Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

LynneSin

(95,337 posts)
Sat Feb 4, 2012, 08:06 AM Feb 2012

One Town's War on Gay Teens (Welcome to Michelle Bachmann's district)


One Town's War on Gay Teens

In Michele Bachmann's home district, evangelicals have created an extreme anti-gay climate. After a rash of suicides, the kids are fighting back.

Every morning, Brittany Geldert stepped off the bus and bolted through the double doors of Fred Moore Middle School, her nerves already on high alert, bracing for the inevitable.

"Dyke."

Pretending not to hear, Brittany would walk briskly to her locker, past the sixth-, seventh- and eighth-graders who loitered in menacing packs.

"Whore."

Like many 13-year-olds, Brittany knew seventh grade was a living hell. But what she didn't know was that she was caught in the crossfire of a culture war being waged by local evangelicals inspired by their high-profile congressional representative Michele Bachmann, who graduated from Anoka High School and, until recently, was a member of one of the most conservative churches in the area. When Christian activists who considered gays an abomination forced a measure through the school board forbidding the discussion of homosexuality in the district's public schools, kids like Brittany were unknowingly thrust into the heart of a clash that was about to become intertwined with tragedy.

Brittany didn't look like most girls in blue-collar Anoka, Minnesota, a former logging town on the Rum River, a conventional place that takes pride in its annual Halloween parade – it bills itself the "Halloween Capital of the World." Brittany was a low-voiced, stocky girl who dressed in baggy jeans and her dad's Marine Corps sweatshirts. By age 13, she'd been taunted as a "cunt" and "cock muncher" long before such words had made much sense. When she told administrators about the abuse, they were strangely unresponsive, even though bullying was a subject often discussed in school-board meetings. The district maintained a comprehensive five-page anti-bullying policy, and held diversity trainings on racial and gender sensitivity. Yet when it came to Brittany's harassment, school officials usually told her to ignore it, always glossing over the sexually charged insults. Like the time Brittany had complained about being called a "fat dyke": The school's principal, looking pained, had suggested Brittany prepare herself for the next round of teasing with snappy comebacks – "I can lose the weight, but you're stuck with your ugly face" – never acknowledging she had been called a "dyke." As though that part was OK. As though the fact that Brittany was bisexual made her fair game.



Read more: http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/one-towns-war-on-gay-teens-20120202#ixzz1lPjYrx7O


3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
One Town's War on Gay Teens (Welcome to Michelle Bachmann's district) (Original Post) LynneSin Feb 2012 OP
Recommend. From the OP: The policy became unofficially known as "No Homo Promo" Jefferson23 Feb 2012 #1
they got rid of that in 2009 for an even worse policy LynneSin Feb 2012 #2
Much worse, yes...the history behind the present situation needs to be Jefferson23 Feb 2012 #3

Jefferson23

(30,099 posts)
1. Recommend. From the OP: The policy became unofficially known as "No Homo Promo"
Sat Feb 4, 2012, 09:58 AM
Feb 2012

and passed unannounced to parents and unpublished in the policy handbooks; most teachers were told about it by their principals. Teachers say it had a chilling effect and they became concerned about mentioning gays in any context. Discussion of homosexuality gradually disappeared from classes. "If you can't talk about it in any context, which is how teachers interpret district policies, kids internalize that to mean that being gay must be so shameful and wrong," says Anoka High School teacher Mary Jo Merrick-Lockett. "And that has created a climate of fear and repression and harassment."

Snip* Though some members of the Anoka-Hennepin school board had been appalled by "No Homo Promo" since its passage 14 years earlier, it wasn't until 2009 that the board brought the policy up for review, after a student named Alex Merritt filed a complaint with the state Department of Human Rights claiming he'd been gay-bashed by two of his teachers during high school; according to the complaint, the teachers had announced in front of students that Merritt, who is straight, "swings both ways," speculated that he wore women's clothing, and compared him to a Wisconsin man who had sex with a dead deer. The teachers denied the charges, but the school district paid $25,000 to settle the complaint. Soon representatives from the gay-rights group Outfront Minnesota began making inquiries at board meetings. "No Homo Promo" was starting to look like a risky policy.

This is an excellent piece, pass it on.

LynneSin

(95,337 posts)
2. they got rid of that in 2009 for an even worse policy
Sat Feb 4, 2012, 11:42 AM
Feb 2012

it was a 'neutrality' party where teachers were not allowed to show any favoritism positive or negative. It sounds like it should have been a better policy but it made it worse

Jefferson23

(30,099 posts)
3. Much worse, yes...the history behind the present situation needs to be
Sat Feb 4, 2012, 11:58 AM
Feb 2012

exposed..this is a very well done piece. Among other things, it demonstrates
the intentionally orchestrated disregard for preserving human dignity. That a
group of adults come up with a means to ensure a public school system ignores
the rights of those they chose to target needs to be fought..and made as public as possible.

The Republican platform does not include such activity to be promoted, not their
written agenda per se..but this is what they end up with. They should be called
out each time they claim to be the party of family values but I don't see enough
of this to satisfy me.

It is a political party that truly seems to hate people, period.

Thanks for posting the OP.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»One Town's War on Gay Tee...