The Senate Drone Report of 2019
By Tom Engelhardt
Source: TomDispatch.com
December 19, 2014
It was December 6, 2019, three years into a sagging Clinton presidency and a bitterly divided Congress. That day, the 500-page executive summary of the Senate Intelligence Committees long fought-over, much-delayed, heavily redacted report on the secret CIA drone wars and other American air campaigns in the 18-year-long war on terror was finally released. That day, committee chairman Ron Wyden (D-OR) took to the Senate floor, amid the warnings of his Republican colleagues that its release might
inflame Americas enemies leading to violence across the Greater Middle East, and
said:
Over the past couple of weeks, I have gone through a great deal of introspection about whether to delay the release of this report to a later time. We are clearly in a period of turmoil and instability in many parts of the world. Unfortunately, thats going to continue for the foreseeable future, whether this report is released or not. There may never be the right time to release it. The instability we see today will not be resolved in months or years. But this report is too important to shelve indefinitely. The simple fact is that the drone and air campaigns we have launched and pursued these last 18 years have proven to be a stain on our values and on our history.
Though it was a Friday afternoon, normally a dead zone for media attention, the response was instant and stunning. As had happened five years earlier with the committees similarly fought-over report on torture, it became a 24/7 media event. The revelations from the report poured out to a stunned nation. There were the CIAs own figures on the
hundreds of
children in the backlands of Pakistan and Yemen killed by drone strikes against terrorists and militants. There were the
double-tap strikes in which drones returned after initial attacks to go after rescuers of those buried in rubble or to take out the funerals of those previously slain. There were the CIAs own statistics on the stunning numbers of unknown villagers killed for every significant and known figure targeted and finally taken out (
1,147 dead in Pakistan for 41 men specifically targeted). There were the unexpected internal Agency discussions of the imprecision of the robotic weapons always publicly hailed as surgically precise (and also of the weakness of much of the intelligence that led them to their targets). There was the joking and commonplace use of dehumanizing language (
bug splat for those killed) by the teams directing the drones. There were the
signature strikes, or the targeting of groups of young men of military age about whom nothing specifically was known, and of course there was the raging argument that ensued in the media over the effectiveness of it all (including various emails from CIA officials admitting that drone campaigns in Pakistan, Afghanistan, and Yemen had proven to be mechanisms not so much for destroying terrorists as for creating new ones).
Full article:
https://zcomm.org/znetarticle/the-senate-drone-report-of-2019/