Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Omaha Steve

(99,488 posts)
Tue Jan 27, 2015, 03:09 PM Jan 2015

White House Drone Crash Is Tied to Drinking by Intelligence Worker

Source: NY Times

By MICHAEL S. SCHMIDT and MICHAEL D. SHEAR

WASHINGTON — A man who says he operated a drone that crashed on the White House grounds early Monday is an employee of the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency, according to law enforcement officials. He told Secret Service investigators that he had been drinking at an apartment nearby before he lost control of the craft, the officials said.

The man told investigators that he went to bed despite fearing that the drone had flown over the White House. After friends told him about news reports on the drone Monday morning, he contacted the authorities.

The drone, which was about two feet in diameter and weighed about two pounds, belonged to a friend, the man said.

A spokesman for the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency, which is based at Fort Belvoir, Va., declined to comment.

FULL story at link.



The drone that landed on the White House's South Lawn. Credit U.S. Secret Service

Read more: http://www.nytimes.com/2015/01/28/us/white-house-drone.html?_r=0

53 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
White House Drone Crash Is Tied to Drinking by Intelligence Worker (Original Post) Omaha Steve Jan 2015 OP
DUI KamaAina Jan 2015 #1
MADD Enrique Jan 2015 #4
If something stupid happens at 3 a.m. bigworld Jan 2015 #2
Yeah...just wandering around outside the White House..with toy drone KoKo Jan 2015 #30
Cool story bro. tridim Jan 2015 #3
Hahah no, that dude is SO fired. AtheistCrusader Jan 2015 #5
LOL former9thward Jan 2015 #25
We shall see. AtheistCrusader Jan 2015 #31
How absolutely ridiculous. lark Jan 2015 #6
why, what is the big deal? snooper2 Jan 2015 #14
Friends don't let friends drone drunk. n/t PoliticAverse Jan 2015 #7
They need little number locks on the control consoles. Jackpine Radical Jan 2015 #9
What "control console"? jmowreader Jan 2015 #11
I understood it to be a toy drone, but I don't really Jackpine Radical Jan 2015 #12
This is what the transmitter looks like jmowreader Jan 2015 #19
Wow--It's amazing Jackpine Radical Jan 2015 #24
Always pick a designated droner jberryhill Jan 2015 #8
Why should we care what the drunken droner does for a living? Lionel Mandrake Jan 2015 #10
Well, he was an "Intelligence Worker" William Seger Jan 2015 #13
But it does make you wonder what he was doing Jackpine Radical Jan 2015 #15
It's a DJI Phantom quadracopter Nitram Jan 2015 #16
At 3 am there's not enough light to fly the vehicle ladjf Jan 2015 #17
The SS said there was no camera on the drone. former9thward Jan 2015 #26
Well, with no camera or lights I don't see how it would have been possible ladjf Jan 2015 #32
The drone belonged to a friend. former9thward Jan 2015 #36
Yet, the craft did actually plop down on the White House lawn. ladjf Jan 2015 #38
Ever been to the White House? former9thward Jan 2015 #40
I didn't think it was a big deal or a threat. ladjf Jan 2015 #42
Lots of people fly quadcopters at night William Seger Jan 2015 #34
Looking at this in a positive light riverbendviewgal Jan 2015 #18
They SHOULD have the security already jmowreader Jan 2015 #20
The Phantom is about the same size and speed as a seagull Xithras Jan 2015 #46
They may already have it. FLPanhandle Jan 2015 #33
NGA statement on White House drone incident kentauros Jan 2015 #21
Was his name "Sterling"? FrodosPet Jan 2015 #22
Dangerzone! nt Codeine Jan 2015 #37
So, an employee of a spy agency Kelvin Mace Jan 2015 #23
Yeah, when you put it that way . . . It really makes you wonder, doesn't it? NBachers Jan 2015 #29
"Dude, Where's My Drone?" based on a true story.... GreatGazoo Jan 2015 #27
How many drones must a man pass out on underpants Jan 2015 #28
"Are you drunk or something?" Ykcutnek Jan 2015 #35
Out of all places News Breaker Jan 2015 #39
Stupid as it was, it does not appear to be unlawful. CTyankee Jan 2015 #41
It most definitely is against the law to fly any unauthorized aircraft in the vicinity ladjf Jan 2015 #43
But isn't it just a toy? CTyankee Jan 2015 #44
Occording to an article I read last week, model airplane clubs in the area had to shut down their ladjf Jan 2015 #45
Thanks for the info. Were they shut down because of recent attempts to get into CTyankee Jan 2015 #47
No, the shutdowns were simply due to new FAA regulations about aircraft of any type. ladjf Jan 2015 #48
Wow. That guy should have known that, drunk or not drunk. CTyankee Jan 2015 #49
"Sir, I need you to step out of your Mom's basement." Kennah Jan 2015 #50
So, it's a bit like Turbineguy Jan 2015 #51
If you mean "drunk, stupid, and out of control", then yeah ... JustABozoOnThisBus Jan 2015 #52
At least he called when finally aware of what he had done. Cha Jan 2015 #53

KoKo

(84,711 posts)
30. Yeah...just wandering around outside the White House..with toy drone
Tue Jan 27, 2015, 09:01 PM
Jan 2015

in a drunken stupor. I think the Fed Guidelines about working 24/7 might have something to do with that....but, then, what we don't know about this is probably revealed much later.

tridim

(45,358 posts)
3. Cool story bro.
Tue Jan 27, 2015, 03:17 PM
Jan 2015

CYA is so easy these days, just say you are drunk or stupid and everything will be okay.

jmowreader

(50,528 posts)
11. What "control console"?
Tue Jan 27, 2015, 03:55 PM
Jan 2015

That's one of those little model-airplane drones they sell at places like Walmart and Best Buy, not a government-style drone. The smallest drone the government uses is the RQ-11 Raven, which is a fixed-wing aircraft that looks like a moderate-size model airplane. (Actually, I think it IS a moderate-size model airplane.)

Jackpine Radical

(45,274 posts)
12. I understood it to be a toy drone, but I don't really
Tue Jan 27, 2015, 04:22 PM
Jan 2015

know anything much about them. Don't you have some sort of little hand-held control console (or iPhone app or something) that you use to control it?

jmowreader

(50,528 posts)
19. This is what the transmitter looks like
Tue Jan 27, 2015, 05:45 PM
Jan 2015


"Console" is really overstating the case here. It's more like what you'd use to drive a radio-controlled car or something. And there are some drones that use an iPhone to control them.



This is what a Predator's control console looks like...



This is an Army Shadow UAV console...

When you say "console" all the Military Intelligence stuff comes back and I start thinking in terms of "you need a box truck to haul it and two hours to emplace it."

Jackpine Radical

(45,274 posts)
24. Wow--It's amazing
Tue Jan 27, 2015, 07:33 PM
Jan 2015

how one snarky remark can launch a whole off-topic debate on the exact meaning of a word like "console."

I'll probly have to take a snack break now to console myself over having been sucked in here.

Lionel Mandrake

(4,076 posts)
10. Why should we care what the drunken droner does for a living?
Tue Jan 27, 2015, 03:51 PM
Jan 2015

His job has nothing to do with his droning accident.

Nitram

(22,755 posts)
16. It's a DJI Phantom quadracopter
Tue Jan 27, 2015, 05:01 PM
Jan 2015

Capable of carrying a Go-Pro video camera. Pretty sophisticated, as it uses GPS to hover even in a wind, or return automatically if the link to the controller is lost. However, an environment with steel reinforced buildings can interfere with the radio-control and GPS signals.

ladjf

(17,320 posts)
17. At 3 am there's not enough light to fly the vehicle
Tue Jan 27, 2015, 05:38 PM
Jan 2015

simply by watching it. Many such helicopters now have forward viewing on board video cameras which can be used for navigation.
However, it would a very skilled operator to fly that copter around town in the dark while using the on board camera.

He might have launched it and then lost control. But, the fact that it crashed on the White House lawn, leads me to believe that the owner was attempting to buzz the White House and then bring the copter back to the launch area.

ladjf

(17,320 posts)
32. Well, with no camera or lights I don't see how it would have been possible
Tue Jan 27, 2015, 10:25 PM
Jan 2015

to navigate to the White House. However, some drones have GPS navigation and autopilots. Conceivably, an autopilot program could guided the copter to the White House and even back to the origin if the batteries held out. But, that scenario isn't very likely.
If the craft was equipped with gps and autopilot, the Feds have not mentioned it.


former9thward

(31,925 posts)
36. The drone belonged to a friend.
Wed Jan 28, 2015, 01:28 AM
Jan 2015

I think the guy was just drinking and screwing around and one thing led to another.

ladjf

(17,320 posts)
38. Yet, the craft did actually plop down on the White House lawn.
Wed Jan 28, 2015, 11:02 AM
Jan 2015

That doesn't seem like a coincidence to me.

former9thward

(31,925 posts)
40. Ever been to the White House?
Wed Jan 28, 2015, 12:27 PM
Jan 2015

It has a very big "lawn". But yes, he could have been trying to get close. So what? Not the end of the world and no threat to anyone.

ladjf

(17,320 posts)
42. I didn't think it was a big deal or a threat.
Wed Jan 28, 2015, 02:14 PM
Jan 2015

I was just having some fun speculating about how it happened.

However, the versatility of the multiple rotor helicopters is impressive. Controlling their use might be more difficult than most people
might think.

William Seger

(10,775 posts)
34. Lots of people fly quadcopters at night
Tue Jan 27, 2015, 11:05 PM
Jan 2015

They have bright LED lights, with different colors front and back so you can see the orientation. If there's at least enough light to make out where the trees and buildings are and you keep line-of-sight, it's not any harder than flying in daylight. If you get confused about the orientation, however, night or day, it's easy to lose control of these things. This guy apparently borrowed the quadcopter from a friend, so that's a good possibility if he didn't have much experience and had been drinking.

riverbendviewgal

(4,252 posts)
18. Looking at this in a positive light
Tue Jan 27, 2015, 05:44 PM
Jan 2015

Now it is known there is a weakness in the security of the White House. THis issue will be addressed and hopefully there will be work on making the White House more secure .

jmowreader

(50,528 posts)
20. They SHOULD have the security already
Tue Jan 27, 2015, 05:47 PM
Jan 2015

Assuming the White House has a radar system to surveil the skies around it, adding a couple of 12-gauge shotguns to blow these creepy things out of the sky would solve the problem in a hurry.

Xithras

(16,191 posts)
46. The Phantom is about the same size and speed as a seagull
Wed Jan 28, 2015, 02:40 PM
Jan 2015

On radar, they're nearly indistinguishable from the birds that fly over Washington DC. Any radar over DC would have to be tuned to filter out echoes from the thousands of gulls, geese, hawks, and countless other species of birds in the air over the city at any given moment. Small drones like the DJI Phantom would be lost in the noise.

The only way to definitively identify a quadcopter is by eye.

FLPanhandle

(7,107 posts)
33. They may already have it.
Tue Jan 27, 2015, 10:28 PM
Jan 2015

My drone goes out of control and will crash if all signals are lost.

The Secret Service may have a signal jammer already installed and that's why the drone crashed.

kentauros

(29,414 posts)
21. NGA statement on White House drone incident
Tue Jan 27, 2015, 06:01 PM
Jan 2015
NGA statement on White House drone incident

January 27, 2015

SPRINGFIELD, Va. — An employee with the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency was questioned yesterday by the Secret Service as the operator of the drone involved in Monday’s incident at the White House.

The employee self-reported the incident Monday. The employee was off duty and is not involved in work related to drones or unmanned aerial vehicles in any capacity at NGA.

Even though the employee was using a personal item while off duty, the agency takes the incident very seriously and remains committed to promoting public trust and transparency.

The Secret Service is currently investigating the incident.

Media Contact:
National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency
Don Kerr
Chief of Media
Phone: (571) 557-2299
Email: [email protected]


OUR MISSION

NGA provides timely, relevant, and accurate geospatial intelligence in support of national security.

https://www.nga.mil/About/History/Pages/default.aspx


Since someone asked upthread about what kind of agency this could be while having "intelligence" in it's name

CTyankee

(63,883 posts)
41. Stupid as it was, it does not appear to be unlawful.
Wed Jan 28, 2015, 02:13 PM
Jan 2015

"Drunken misadventure" is what it was.

It looks like the WH security stopped it because it could have been weaponized. It's a bit embarrassing all the way around.

ladjf

(17,320 posts)
43. It most definitely is against the law to fly any unauthorized aircraft in the vicinity
Wed Jan 28, 2015, 02:19 PM
Jan 2015

of Washington. Further, the Feds might want to make an example in this case.

ladjf

(17,320 posts)
45. Occording to an article I read last week, model airplane clubs in the area had to shut down their
Wed Jan 28, 2015, 02:40 PM
Jan 2015

launch sites that were within 20 miles of the center of Washington, DC.


CTyankee

(63,883 posts)
47. Thanks for the info. Were they shut down because of recent attempts to get into
Wed Jan 28, 2015, 02:45 PM
Jan 2015

the WH? Or were they always forbidden to fly their model planes within 20 miles of the center of Washington? If they were allowed before recent incidents, then that suggests they weren't envisioned as threats, only toys.

ladjf

(17,320 posts)
48. No, the shutdowns were simply due to new FAA regulations about aircraft of any type.
Wed Jan 28, 2015, 02:56 PM
Jan 2015

A number of new sweeping proposals about model aircraft are being considered by the FAA. If you are interested, their are numerous articles on the INTERNET about this subject.

What has the government worried is the versatility of the model helicopters. Not only can they operated on all axes, they are easily programmable to operated on automatic, that means they can readily be programmed to fly a pre-determined flight plan with no pilot involved and at a cost of under $600 dollars. The current commercial models are too small to carry much weight, but up-sized models could be easy to produced.

With high quality small TV cameras they are very capable reconnaissance craft. They are , in fact, already being widely used for that purpose.

JustABozoOnThisBus

(23,315 posts)
52. If you mean "drunk, stupid, and out of control", then yeah ...
Thu Jan 29, 2015, 06:07 AM
Jan 2015

... but I don't think intelligence-worker-drone-boy had a Cheney making his decisions.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»White House Drone Crash I...