Mon Apr 16, 2012, 02:24 PM
Judi Lynn (78,135 posts)
Argentina to nationalise Spain oil company
Source: Associated Press
Argentina to nationalise Spain oil company April 17, 2012 - 3:44AM Argentine President Cristina Fernandez has proposed a bill to nationalise the YPF oil company that is controlled by Spain's Repsol, moving ahead with the plan despite fierce opposition from Madrid. Fernandez said in an address to the country that the measure sent to congress on Monday is aimed at recovering the nation's sovereignty over its hydrocarbon resources. She said the shares being expropriated will be split between the national and provincial governments. The president complained that Argentina last year had to spend more than $US3 billion ($A2.91 billion) to important gas and petroleum. Spanish officials have already protested the plan, saying Argentina risks becoming "an international pariah" if it takes control of Repsol's YPF subsidiary. Read more: http://news.theage.com.au/breaking-news-world/argentina-to-nationalise-spain-oil-company-20120417-1x465.html
|
30 replies, 3105 views
| Author | Time | Post | |
| Judi Lynn | Apr 2012 | OP | |
| banned from Kos | Apr 2012 | #1 | |
| bongbong | Apr 2012 | #2 | |
| bemildred | Apr 2012 | #5 | |
| banned from Kos | Apr 2012 | #6 | |
| bemildred | Apr 2012 | #9 | |
| bemildred | Apr 2012 | #10 | |
| Warren Stupidity | Apr 2012 | #12 | |
| 4th law of robotics | Apr 2012 | #3 | |
| bemildred | Apr 2012 | #4 | |
| newfie11 | Apr 2012 | #7 | |
| Cleita | Apr 2012 | #18 | |
| newfie11 | Apr 2012 | #19 | |
| Angleae | Apr 2012 | #20 | |
| Cleita | Apr 2012 | #21 | |
| 4th law of robotics | Apr 2012 | #24 | |
| Lars77 | Apr 2012 | #28 | |
| Cleita | Apr 2012 | #30 | |
| dipsydoodle | Apr 2012 | #8 | |
| Warren Stupidity | Apr 2012 | #11 | |
| ProgressiveProfessor | Apr 2012 | #13 | |
| Warren Stupidity | Apr 2012 | #14 | |
| ProgressiveProfessor | Apr 2012 | #15 | |
| Warren Stupidity | Apr 2012 | #16 | |
| Arctic Dave | Apr 2012 | #17 | |
| NuttyFluffers | Apr 2012 | #22 | |
| Snake Alchemist | Apr 2012 | #23 | |
| Becka2515 | Apr 2012 | #25 | |
| 4th law of robotics | Apr 2012 | #27 | |
| Lars77 | Apr 2012 | #29 | |
| Judi Lynn | Apr 2012 | #26 |
Response to Judi Lynn (Original post)
Mon Apr 16, 2012, 02:33 PM
banned from Kos (4,017 posts)
1. This is illegal under the US Consitution
|
before someone says we should do it.
|
Response to banned from Kos (Reply #1)
Mon Apr 16, 2012, 02:34 PM
bongbong (5,436 posts)
2. Illegal under the Constitution?
|
That isn't a hindrance to the plans of the 1%. Not in the slightest.
|
Response to banned from Kos (Reply #1)
Mon Apr 16, 2012, 02:50 PM
bemildred (67,682 posts)
5. It is completely legal and has been done many times already.
|
What is illegal under the Constitution is taking without "due process" and "just compensation". YPF Repsol will most likely get something.
|
Response to bemildred (Reply #5)
Mon Apr 16, 2012, 03:00 PM
banned from Kos (4,017 posts)
6. yeah - the Fifth Amendment says "just compensation" on takings
|
Usually South American countries don't provide such.
That is OK with me though. If you're in Peru take your property back from them. |
Response to banned from Kos (Reply #6)
Mon Apr 16, 2012, 03:11 PM
bemildred (67,682 posts)
9. Yeah, actually they do.
|
Not necessarily as much as the current owners might like, but they generally got it themselves by use of force in the first place, so ...
|
Response to banned from Kos (Reply #6)
Mon Apr 16, 2012, 03:16 PM
bemildred (67,682 posts)
10. When you hear them whining about "international pariah" that is a tell
|
that they have nothing better, like the law, on their side.
|
Response to banned from Kos (Reply #6)
Mon Apr 16, 2012, 03:29 PM
Warren Stupidity (32,336 posts)
12. Usually they do, although just as usually there is a dispute over what the valuation is.
|
Last edited Mon Apr 16, 2012, 03:29 PM USA/ET - Edit history (1) But if you have evidence that Latin American countries frequently nationalize businesses without compensation, please do provide it.
Just so I have it straight, your original assertion was that nationalization was illegal under our constitution. You then back tracked to a lesser assertion that taking without compensation was illegal (and we can all agree that is true,) and added a new assertion that Latin American nations nationalize without compensation "usually", where usually means to me "more often than not". |
Response to Judi Lynn (Original post)
Mon Apr 16, 2012, 02:41 PM
4th law of robotics (6,801 posts)
3. I'm guessing they did the math
|
and figured they would gain more from this action then they will lose in the inevitable retaliation.
|
Response to Judi Lynn (Original post)
Mon Apr 16, 2012, 02:44 PM
bemildred (67,682 posts)
4. Long overdue. nt
Response to Judi Lynn (Original post)
Mon Apr 16, 2012, 03:01 PM
newfie11 (3,559 posts)
7. Go Argentina!!!!
|
|
Response to newfie11 (Reply #7)
Mon Apr 16, 2012, 05:04 PM
Cleita (64,656 posts)
18. Now it's time for us to nationalize BP and any other foreign oil companies operating here.
|
As a matter-of-fact we should nationalize them all and keep the profits for the citizens of the US.
|
Response to Cleita (Reply #18)
Mon Apr 16, 2012, 11:16 PM
Angleae (2,086 posts)
20. Which would cost how many trillions of dollars?
|
The 4th & 5th amendment specifically disallow just siezing any property without just compensation or due process.
|
Response to Angleae (Reply #20)
Mon Apr 16, 2012, 11:19 PM
Cleita (64,656 posts)
21. Like the trillions we are spending on criminal wars to enable these guys
|
to make their blood money profits?
|
Response to Angleae (Reply #20)
Tue Apr 17, 2012, 10:38 AM
4th law of robotics (6,801 posts)
24. Not to mention those foreign companies would put pressure
|
on their countries to retaliate in some way. As I suspect Argentina will find.
It could be that they do little business with Spain so this won't hurt them much (not saying that is the case, I really don't know). But the US and Britain? Yeah that's not really a trade war we want to start. |
Response to Cleita (Reply #18)
Wed Apr 18, 2012, 12:15 PM
Lars77 (3,032 posts)
28. Or just make them pay tax
Response to Lars77 (Reply #28)
Wed Apr 18, 2012, 02:23 PM
Cleita (64,656 posts)
30. In another life I would agree, but I have moved to the left on this.
|
Foreign owned companies have been successfully nationalized in other countries. The American copper mine that my dad worked in for forty-four years in Chile was nationalized shortly after he retired. It was a big improvement for the lives of the Chileans who worked there and the profits go to social programs in the country.
|
Response to Judi Lynn (Original post)
Mon Apr 16, 2012, 03:07 PM
dipsydoodle (33,116 posts)
8. Bloombergs article on the subject
|
leaves doubt as to whether Argentina expects to pay for the 51% they will nationalise.
|
Response to Judi Lynn (Original post)
Mon Apr 16, 2012, 03:20 PM
Warren Stupidity (32,336 posts)
11. She's a dictator!
Response to Warren Stupidity (Reply #11)
Mon Apr 16, 2012, 03:49 PM
ProgressiveProfessor (22,144 posts)
13. Yet another shiny object to distract the Argentine populace
|
not unlike the Falklands.
The current government must think there are some real problems at home |
Response to ProgressiveProfessor (Reply #13)
Mon Apr 16, 2012, 04:15 PM
Warren Stupidity (32,336 posts)
14. Actually it really isn't like the Falklands much at all,
|
except of course for the heavy handed neocolonial attitude of the first world powers. There appears to be an underlying, pun intended, motive here: a shit ton of shale oil and gas that will become quite valuable as oil prices continue to rise. Argentina thinks perhaps most of that value ought to go to the Argentinian people, the usual suspects from the global financial elites have other ideas. I know where I stand.
|
Response to Warren Stupidity (Reply #14)
Mon Apr 16, 2012, 04:28 PM
ProgressiveProfessor (22,144 posts)
15. We are assuming different motivations
|
Normally I side with the home countries as long as fair compensation is paid. It is not clear if some compensation will be paid or not, but normally that is what happens.
However, I am not so sure about their thinking. With the current government doing the Falklands dance to distract the people again, I wonder if anything major they do has the same intent. Should the current government fall and a new one arise that also supports nationalization and does not appear to be trying to distract the populace, I would be quite supportive |
Response to ProgressiveProfessor (Reply #15)
Mon Apr 16, 2012, 04:32 PM
Warren Stupidity (32,336 posts)
16. If you google the news on this, buried under the diatribes
|
is the discussion of the potential future value of oil resources in Argentina. The truth leaks out if you look hard enough for it. Besides, when every major media outlet is speaking with one voice on a subject like this, I'm generally confident that the opposing viewpoint, the one not being discussed, is the one with merit.
|
Response to Judi Lynn (Original post)
Mon Apr 16, 2012, 05:00 PM
Arctic Dave (12,643 posts)
17. Long overdue.
|
This should the pie holes of repugs up here saying we aren't competitive with the rest of the world.
|
Response to Judi Lynn (Original post)
Tue Apr 17, 2012, 08:01 AM
NuttyFluffers (6,479 posts)
22. good.
|
|
Response to Judi Lynn (Original post)
Tue Apr 17, 2012, 08:04 AM
Snake Alchemist (3,318 posts)
23. Next, reclaim the Falklands. nt
Response to Snake Alchemist (Reply #23)
Tue Apr 17, 2012, 11:43 AM
Becka2515 (58 posts)
25. Are you kidding?
|
The vast majority of the people who live on the Falkland Islands want to keep it the way it is. Argentina has no claim real or imagined.
|
Response to Snake Alchemist (Reply #23)
Wed Apr 18, 2012, 12:11 PM
4th law of robotics (6,801 posts)
27. For what purpose?
Response to Snake Alchemist (Reply #23)
Wed Apr 18, 2012, 12:19 PM
Lars77 (3,032 posts)
29. Argentina / Spain never had settlements there
|
I know it looks odd that England should have sovereignty over it, but Argentina has no business taking it.
|
Response to Judi Lynn (Original post)
Tue Apr 17, 2012, 03:42 PM
Judi Lynn (78,135 posts)
26. Argentina's defiance on YPF strikes chord at home
|
Argentina's defiance on YPF strikes chord at home
Tue Apr 17, 2012 3:07pm EDT By Helen Popper and Hilary Burke BUENOS AIRES, April 17 (Reuters) - Argentina's drive to seize control of leading energy company YPF from Spain's Repsol may have outraged European trade partners and foreign investors, but many ordinary citizens hailed it as virtually heroic. The move by combative President Cristina Fernandez appealed to Argentines who are critical about the vagaries of global finance and the controversial privatizations of the 1990s - a decade remembered for rampant corruption and factory closures in Latin America's No. 3 economy. Fernandez loyalists pasted "Thank You Cristina" posters on government buildings in the capital Buenos Aires and supporters of the expropriation drive praised the president's boldness. "It's about recovering what's ours," said Julio Olaz, a passerby in downtown Buenos Aires. "We need to get together and make sure Argentina belongs to Argentina and not to foreigners." The takeover move could help Fernandez regain the political initiative after a series of unpopular policy moves and a corruption probe involving her vice president that have eroded her approval ratings since her landslide re-election in October last year. More: http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/04/17/argentina-ypf-idUSL2E8FGG5620120417?rpc=401 |

