Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Omaha Steve

(99,580 posts)
Thu Dec 25, 2014, 07:36 AM Dec 2014

Protesters rally for 2nd night after shooting near Ferguson

Source: AP-Excite

By JIM SUHR and JIM SALTER

BERKELEY, Mo. (AP) — Demonstrators took to the streets for a second night after a white police officer in Berkeley, Missouri, killed a black 18-year-old who police said pointed a gun at him.

Dozens of protesters held a vigil late Wednesday at the gas station in the St. Louis suburb where Antonio Martin was shot, and they briefly blocked traffic on Interstate 170 during a march before returning to the station. Berkeley Police Chief Frank McCall told KMOV-TV that six to eight people were arrested.

Later, about 75 people staged a peaceful protest early Christmas morning outside of a nearby church, according to the St. Louis Post-Dispatch. Police in riot gear were present.

The actions were calmer than a night before, when a crowd of about 300 people gathered at the gas station, throwing rocks and bricks in a scene reminiscent of the sometimes-violent protests that followed the death of 18-year-old Michael Brown in nearby Ferguson.

FULL story at link.



A woman walks with police near a gas station in Berkeley, Mo., on Wednesday, Dec. 24, 2014. The mayor of the St. Louis suburb of Berkeley urged calm Wednesday after a white police officer killed black 18-year-old Antonio Martin who police said pointed a gun at him, reigniting tensions that have lingered since the death of Michael Brown in neighboring Ferguson. (AP Photo/St. Louis Post-Dispatch, Robert Cohen)

Read more: http://apnews.excite.com/article/20141225/us--killings_by_police-berkeley-1c5618ede9.html

59 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Protesters rally for 2nd night after shooting near Ferguson (Original Post) Omaha Steve Dec 2014 OP
I drove past the stations on Wed afternoon Sherman A1 Dec 2014 #1
If that was a gun Martin pulled heaven05 Dec 2014 #2
You know I think what these protests will accomplish is doc03 Dec 2014 #3
well they already heaven05 Dec 2014 #4
Martin pulled a gun unless you refuse to believe anything the police say. I saw the video doc03 Dec 2014 #5
Well, while it is still to be proven heaven05 Dec 2014 #17
Rumor. Not true. Travelman Dec 2014 #23
I'll believe it heaven05 Dec 2014 #24
How about you cite the source for this ludicrous rumor that you're spreading? Travelman Dec 2014 #26
thanks for clearing it up heaven05 Dec 2014 #28
I'll take that as your admission that you cannot source your rumor Travelman Dec 2014 #31
Like I could really care about your silly 'proof' and offensive attitude. heaven05 Dec 2014 #34
Darn those pesky facts! Travelman Dec 2014 #58
I saw the video ccarmenfrongillo Dec 2014 #52
When you hear rumors of EMS taking its time in a police-involved shooting, branford Dec 2014 #36
thanks heaven05 Dec 2014 #37
My knowledge of medical emergency services is far inferior to my expertise branford Dec 2014 #38
If you don't want to get shot THECHOSEN1 Dec 2014 #41
IF, that happened, true heaven05 Dec 2014 #43
I don't know how to put other than "those neighborhoods". Every town seems to have areas doc03 Dec 2014 #6
right heaven05 Dec 2014 #15
I agree everyone is not bad in those neighborhoods. Steubenville Ohio has a serious problem here doc03 Dec 2014 #16
well obviously this cop did not share your feeling. nt ellenrr Dec 2014 #7
Neither Camera Was Turned On DallasNE Dec 2014 #20
Thinkprogress Now Has An Article Up DallasNE Dec 2014 #33
Solidarity MrScorpio Dec 2014 #8
Goddamn, but that sign is some seriously sad shit. Thanks for posting -- copied KingCharlemagne Dec 2014 #9
But that's not all. Check this out: MrScorpio Dec 2014 #10
As Randi Rhodes might say, whom are you going to trust, the KingCharlemagne Dec 2014 #11
security cameras straydog Dec 2014 #12
If you've wondered for long, you might have some hypotheses going. Igel Dec 2014 #13
There have been three different angles released so far, there may be more..... George II Dec 2014 #14
I am not an expert but if there is a photo of someone with a gun why can't they zoom in and show jwirr Dec 2014 #19
The only times I've seen that are on Law and Order. Ace Rothstein Dec 2014 #21
I do genealogy and look up census records. They are very small when I pull them up and I have to jwirr Dec 2014 #22
jwirr straydog Dec 2014 #27
Thank you. Too bad. I would assume that many times that would be a useful tool. jwirr Dec 2014 #39
Thanks for sharing your expertise on this... Rhiannon12866 Dec 2014 #57
More video WAS released Travelman Dec 2014 #25
Hope you're right heaven05 Dec 2014 #29
I've always been of the opinion... NaturalHigh Dec 2014 #46
The thing that bothers me most about the details of this shooting mnhtnbb Dec 2014 #18
If he did pull a gun heaven05 Dec 2014 #30
There seems to have been plenty of witnesses around. PersonNumber503602 Dec 2014 #32
and I am waiting for them to speak out also heaven05 Dec 2014 #35
Understandable. The fact the body cam wasn't on also adds to the suspicion PersonNumber503602 Dec 2014 #40
You do realize that body cams will present a limited field of view. Calista241 Dec 2014 #49
That is true, but I don't think that negates their value... PersonNumber503602 Jan 2015 #59
That cop running backwards pretty much says it all to me. cwydro Dec 2014 #50
that is telling heaven05 Dec 2014 #51
How has the story changed? I've only seen one so far. George II Dec 2014 #44
The original report was the cop was on a routine drive by. Then it was changed mnhtnbb Dec 2014 #48
thanks for the article Ramses Dec 2014 #42
Would the protesters prefer that the police officer... NaturalHigh Dec 2014 #45
Actually, sheshe2 Dec 2014 #53
But that's not what happened in this incident. eom. GGJohn Dec 2014 #54
Yes, we continue to hear yor proffessional analysis. sheshe2 Dec 2014 #55
Are you typing on an I-Phone? GGJohn Dec 2014 #56
Sounds like suicide by cop madville Dec 2014 #47

Sherman A1

(38,958 posts)
1. I drove past the stations on Wed afternoon
Thu Dec 25, 2014, 07:42 AM
Dec 2014

The Mobil was secured by the police at the time and across the street at the QT it appeared that repairs were underway from the previous night's damage. Both stations were closed.

 

heaven05

(18,124 posts)
2. If that was a gun Martin pulled
Thu Dec 25, 2014, 09:40 AM
Dec 2014

the officer was within his lawful rights to shoot first, ask questions later. I will always feel that way, no matter the color of the alleged perp or officer.

doc03

(35,325 posts)
3. You know I think what these protests will accomplish is
Thu Dec 25, 2014, 10:09 AM
Dec 2014

police will just take their time responding to a call in these neighborhoods. If I am a cop I sure as hell don't want to
go on a call where someone points a gun at me and I get blamed for murder when I protect myself.

 

heaven05

(18,124 posts)
4. well they already
Thu Dec 25, 2014, 10:16 AM
Dec 2014

take their time responding to calls in "those neighborhoods", but that's another issue. IF martin pulled a gun he brought his death upon himself, IF he didn't and that was a phone then that WILL BE another story indeed. If you are a cop, someone pulling a gun on you goes with the territory. It's the ones that don't have a gun and still die at the hands of police murderers.executioners that is extremely disturbing. If you can't take the heat, stay out the boileroom/kitchen is what I say about joining the police force. I just wish there was a way to screen out racist psychopaths and violent sociopaths in general..

doc03

(35,325 posts)
5. Martin pulled a gun unless you refuse to believe anything the police say. I saw the video
Thu Dec 25, 2014, 10:24 AM
Dec 2014

it sure as hell looked like he pointed a gun, you don' t point a cell phone. There is also a gun on the street. If you believe the police planted the gun
there is no use discussing it unless you have some proof.

 

heaven05

(18,124 posts)
17. Well, while it is still to be proven
Thu Dec 25, 2014, 12:21 PM
Dec 2014

that it was a gun, how is it that he lay there 'bleeding out' for 30 minute BEFORE an ambulance arrived? Small town, shouldn't have happened.

Travelman

(708 posts)
23. Rumor. Not true.
Thu Dec 25, 2014, 03:13 PM
Dec 2014

Every report I've seen said EMS was on the scene within five minutes of when the shots were fired, and they pronounced him at the scene.

This and the "cell phone" rumor are just that: rumor, based in nothing but people's fevered imaginations.

 

heaven05

(18,124 posts)
24. I'll believe it
Thu Dec 25, 2014, 03:16 PM
Dec 2014

when I hear it from a reputable source. Too many agendas and "fevered imaginations" here for my taste. Michael Brown and Trayvon Martin more than confirmed that to me. Thanks anyway.

Travelman

(708 posts)
26. How about you cite the source for this ludicrous rumor that you're spreading?
Thu Dec 25, 2014, 03:34 PM
Dec 2014

Where is your proof that it took 30 minutes for EMS to arrive?


REPUTABLE sources only.



Before you even start: the current tinfoilery is that that gun was planted based upon these pictures from the scene:






Now, the tinfiolery about the gun being planted is complete and total BS because the orange cone is clearly there to mark the location of the gun, but in this case, note that the body has already been covered, less than thirty minutes after the actual shooting.

Ergo, EMS has already been there and pronounced Martin dead at the scene.



Sorry, but your BS rumor is just that: BS rumor.

 

heaven05

(18,124 posts)
28. thanks for clearing it up
Thu Dec 25, 2014, 03:45 PM
Dec 2014

I think. I believe little of what I see, and none of what I read until I can be satisfied, the story is what it is. Take your BS somewhere else. Too many murders/executions lately to just say okay to the authorities story/scenario. I will NEVER do that again. You can swallow the BS, I was fed it too many times over too many years, I said never again, years ago. I do not care about your outrage at my questioning every element of the authorities story and searching out all rumors. Rumors are to be disproved not just thrown out without research . I could care less about your outrage. Period..

Travelman

(708 posts)
31. I'll take that as your admission that you cannot source your rumor
Thu Dec 25, 2014, 04:10 PM
Dec 2014

I have no outrage, at least as far as your silly claims. I just get tired of the conclusion-leaping.

I have said for a very, VERY long time that the police are not your friend. I've personally warned friends of this many times. I genuinely believe that there are a lot of bad, power-mad cops out there who think that they're bad-asses because they have a gun and a badge.

But I'm also very picky about dealing in actual fact. And in this case, it's pretty abundantly clear that Antonio Martin pointed a gun at the cop.



Another uncomfortable fact: there really aren't that many Black men getting killed by police. This year is a record low for people of any stripe to die in police custody, and on average, Black males are only very slightly over-represented in the population of those who have been killed by police. People around here don't want to believe it, because they really want a good reason to be really angry about something, but the reality is that if you (the Royal You) look at the actual cases individually, almost every case of police shootings in the last decade or so were cases that were completely justified, whether the one who died was Black, white, Hispanic, male, female, Asian, or anything else.



I don't swallow any BS. I always research any claim on my own, everything from police shootings to tax policy to whether or not the national speed limit should be 55 MPH (it isn't any more). Rumors from twitter and faceboob are not the basis of how I view facts. Sorry,

 

heaven05

(18,124 posts)
34. Like I could really care about your silly 'proof' and offensive attitude.
Thu Dec 25, 2014, 04:52 PM
Dec 2014

and I don't really care about what you're tired of. You're JUST one more with an opinion based on what you want to see. That's all you are. Period. Another fact, lot's of black men are getting executed by white racist cops these days. Like I said you are JUST one individual spouting off with your own brand of BS. My opinion of your opinion is that you are really full of yourself and your privilege. That's means you are just another showing their true self to the world. And that true self is nobody to me.

 

branford

(4,462 posts)
36. When you hear rumors of EMS taking its time in a police-involved shooting,
Thu Dec 25, 2014, 05:20 PM
Dec 2014

you should always be skeptical, unless its something very unusual and easily explainable like a natural disaster such as a earthquake.

EMS, fire and police work together very closely and often know one another personally. When they hear about a police shooting, they tend to move very fast, if for no other reason than an officer may be or become injured. You can believe the worst of police and their investigative skills after a shooting, but they and their friends and allies will not risk an officer's life so early in the process when most of the facts are unknown and the situation is still chaotic.

In any event, this story has something for everyone. A young black male who was allegedly armed and a police department with new body cameras, but the officer wasn't using his. The security footage is of poor enough quality that preconceived notions can influence what people choose to see. We even have a well known cast of characters like Governor Nixon and the SLPD.

I haven't yet followed the case closely enough to offer any firm opinions, good or bad. However, if the man indeed pointed a gun at the officer in anything approaching a lawful encounter, I cannot imagine any criminal fault on behalf of the officer.

 

heaven05

(18,124 posts)
37. thanks
Thu Dec 25, 2014, 05:31 PM
Dec 2014

I would really like to see/hear/read what you think after and if you look into this latest officer involved shooting incident. Yet the question arises, does not the original call for EMS, since that are such close allies, carry with it a description of who has been shot, officer or alleged perp and that could be a real reason that EMS MIGHT slow down? Just a question. No indictment of EMS. They do always seem neutral.

 

branford

(4,462 posts)
38. My knowledge of medical emergency services is far inferior to my expertise
Thu Dec 25, 2014, 05:48 PM
Dec 2014

concerning the law and police procedure.

However, EMS, like most in the medical field, are very professional and would never discriminate in how their provide care to any victim. It would be unethical and could result in losing not only their employment, but their licenses.

I imagine that the original call to EMS probably indicated that an individual suffered a gunshot wound. I have no idea if the fact that an officer was the shooter was even mentioned, although the information was likely widely available over the radio. However, the emergency call would have been made immediately, while all facts were still unknown and where the situation could change at any time. For instance, remember that there was still a alleged second suspect on the loose and others bystanders around. The fact that the entire area is still somewhat on edge due to the Brown shooting and post-grand jury riots means that police, civilians and even EMS workers are at risk on any shooting call.

Without significant and fairly incontrovertible evidence to the contrary, and regardless of one's feeling about the police generally, I would be cautious of assigning any ill motives or conduct to the EMS response. They routinely treat young minority victims in bad neighborhoods under poor conditions, and their relationship with most communities is certainly not adversarial.

doc03

(35,325 posts)
6. I don't know how to put other than "those neighborhoods". Every town seems to have areas
Thu Dec 25, 2014, 10:31 AM
Dec 2014

were there is a high crime rate. The south side, 33 rd street, east side, west side whatever. I was in St. Petersburg Florida last winter and was told by the bike rental store don't take the bike trail south of Tropicana Field, there had been several muggings and assaults there and one of their rental customers ended up in the hospital. Same goes for here you don't go on 3rd street at night in one town, you don't go to the east side in another.

 

heaven05

(18,124 posts)
15. right
Thu Dec 25, 2014, 11:46 AM
Dec 2014

Last edited Thu Dec 25, 2014, 12:17 PM - Edit history (1)

yet concerning your prior statement. I will wait for witnesses and positive proof that this young man pulled a loaded weapon on a police officer. The video is unclear to me. The mayor of this town is AA and unlike ferguson the police force IS representative of the city's population. Concerning the "bad" parts of town. The reasons for these neighborhoods is usually given as, "oh they are all bad in that part of town", "oh I don't understand why they are all like that in that part of town", and those are a couple of the 'reasons' given for people not to visit the parts of town you mentioned. While I know without a doubt that those parts of town you stated are predominantly minority, the real historical, sociological, economic reasons for these "bad" parts are discounted with the broadbrush stereotyping of the inhabitants of "those areas" as I have read countless times.

I am not saying anything about your character, your intent or racial/political leanings. What I am trying to point out when I take note of words, statements like "those neighborhoods", "those people" is that it is unnecessary to point out when the reality of why they might be that way is totally ignored in favor of the broad brush statements meant to convey a knowledge or feeling about "those neighborhoods" by people NOT forced into that gulag system. There are by and large, many decent, hard working, tax paying, non drug using, non alcoholic, non criminal people in "those neighborhoods" struggling, like many in this country, just to get by..

If minorities weren't steered into the american racial gulags/ghetto system and were more spread out in many communities, as are certain other races, then the instance of crime would be as it is in those "other" communities of non minorities. A statistic not skewed or not worth note.

Yeah, stay out of those areas mentioned, you might run into a "bad" person, just like in certain parts of Florida, Staten Island, ferguson, cincinnatti, clevland and many, many more towns, burgs, neighborhoods, if I am a black person, man, woman or child I might run into a "bad person' intent on killing me because I'm in their area with the wrong color skin..





doc03

(35,325 posts)
16. I agree everyone is not bad in those neighborhoods. Steubenville Ohio has a serious problem here
Thu Dec 25, 2014, 12:07 PM
Dec 2014

the people there have had marches to demonstrate against the bad element. Most all of the arrests
are outsiders from Cleveland, Columbus or Chicago. It seems like for every one of them they put away
two are there the next day to take over.

DallasNE

(7,402 posts)
20. Neither Camera Was Turned On
Thu Dec 25, 2014, 01:59 PM
Dec 2014

Either would have provided conclusive evidence. So why have cameras if you refuse to use them. As it is we are left with a grainy video where it is not possible to tell what was going on. It looks like he raised his arm, at which point the video stops, but I only see one motion. Was he just gesturing with his arm or had he previously pulled out a gun and raised it to point at the officer. The video quality is too poor to determine if he had something in his hand. At this point you have to give the officer the benefit of the doubt but the video is pretty inconclusive due to poor quality and selective editing. Letting the video roll for another 5 seconds might help clear things up as well. Was his arm still up as he flinched/fell from being struck by a gunshot and did something go flying from his hand, for instance.

DallasNE

(7,402 posts)
33. Thinkprogress Now Has An Article Up
Thu Dec 25, 2014, 04:23 PM
Dec 2014

And they are complaining about many of the things I point out here, such as the video cutting off too soon and the question is why use this selective editing. There is a picture of a gun on the ground but the body is nowhere to be found in the picture so how far away is it. Indeed, it is hard to tell if the photo was taken at the scene since there is no landmark for reference meaning it could be stock photo. I'm not making that claim but the poor quality of presentation is a problem because of the claims of raising questions.

http://thinkprogress.org/justice/2014/12/25/3606915/video-footage-from-missouri-shooting-raising-questions/

 

KingCharlemagne

(7,908 posts)
9. Goddamn, but that sign is some seriously sad shit. Thanks for posting -- copied
Thu Dec 25, 2014, 11:09 AM
Dec 2014

and shared to FB and social media.

MrScorpio

(73,630 posts)
10. But that's not all. Check this out:
Thu Dec 25, 2014, 11:16 AM
Dec 2014

If you look at the corner of that building, you'll see that it's ringed with cameras. Here's a better look:



So I'm wondering, why did they only released footage from a camera that's farther away and only rendered an extremely blurry image and was cut off at a crucial moment?

If they actually had clear footage of Martin pointing a "gun" from one of those closer cameras, don't you'd think that we'd have seen it by now?

Hmmm… Very interesting.

 

KingCharlemagne

(7,908 posts)
11. As Randi Rhodes might say, whom are you going to trust, the
Thu Dec 25, 2014, 11:23 AM
Dec 2014

cops or your own lying eyes?

I'm certain that, in the capable hands of Bob McCulloch and his staff of little Eichmanns, justice will be served.

 

straydog

(9 posts)
12. security cameras
Thu Dec 25, 2014, 11:39 AM
Dec 2014

I install security cameras for a living, the two outer most cameras appear to be for the gas pumps, the other two look away from the corner into the parking lot. I would suspect the second camera from the left is the one that produced the video that just catches the edge what happened.

Igel

(35,300 posts)
13. If you've wondered for long, you might have some hypotheses going.
Thu Dec 25, 2014, 11:44 AM
Dec 2014

One possibility could be that not all the cameras were turned on or recording properly at the time.

Then again, the cameras obviously aren't all pointing in the same direction. One appears to be at right angles to another. A third seems to be pointed at nearly 180 degrees to another. The words accompany the image but don't really seem to be related to it. This leads to second possibility--that perhaps there weren't that many cameras which, even if on and recording, could have taped the encounter.

It's always possible that some footage doesn't support the police version--in which you can be pretty sure that a tolerable attorney will get it or determine that it ceased existing.

As for "blurry," that happens at a distance. Not a sufficiently high pixel density on the CCD, perhaps now-obsolete analog recording technology, lossy compression algorithms ...

George II

(67,782 posts)
14. There have been three different angles released so far, there may be more.....
Thu Dec 25, 2014, 11:46 AM
Dec 2014

....the police can't just break into stores and seize the tapes, they have to wait for access.

jwirr

(39,215 posts)
19. I am not an expert but if there is a photo of someone with a gun why can't they zoom in and show
Thu Dec 25, 2014, 01:11 PM
Dec 2014

it clearer? You see this done all the time. If the cameras on the store are like so many other stores they do not have film. Hopefully we will get to see.

Ace Rothstein

(3,160 posts)
21. The only times I've seen that are on Law and Order.
Thu Dec 25, 2014, 02:05 PM
Dec 2014

I don't think it works the same way in the real world. It isn't like they are using HD cameras used for football games.

jwirr

(39,215 posts)
22. I do genealogy and look up census records. They are very small when I pull them up and I have to
Thu Dec 25, 2014, 02:26 PM
Dec 2014

zoom in to read them. If I can do it then I would assume that others can to, especially trained policemen. We also use it to zero in on old photos when we want to see one person in a group. This is not rocket science.

 

straydog

(9 posts)
27. jwirr
Thu Dec 25, 2014, 03:42 PM
Dec 2014

Most security cameras are analog, the more you try to zoom in on the image the more it pixelates. The newer IP cameras allow you to zoom in better IF they are properly set up. Zooming in on a old picture is a lot different than zooming in on a video clip. The stuff you see in the movies is not accurate.

Rhiannon12866

(205,169 posts)
57. Thanks for sharing your expertise on this...
Sun Dec 28, 2014, 09:48 PM
Dec 2014

I learned something today. And welcome to DU, straydog! It's great to have you with us!

 

heaven05

(18,124 posts)
29. Hope you're right
Thu Dec 25, 2014, 03:56 PM
Dec 2014

it's not clear on any of the videos except the one with the officers tripping. No gun seen. I'll wait for the witnesses. You are in too much of a hurry to label people "dumbass" and what ever you're saying in private or FB. Your 'proof" is just PART of the story , not the whole story. I wait for a more reputable source and witnesses on the scene. I'll reserve judgement till then. Too many executions/murders going on by police for me to worry about whether one person on here gets an attitude because people are protesting against murders and executions of unarmed black people, nationwide, by police officers with questionable motives.

NaturalHigh

(12,778 posts)
46. I've always been of the opinion...
Thu Dec 25, 2014, 10:10 PM
Dec 2014

that if you pull a gun on a police officer, nothing good is going to happen.

mnhtnbb

(31,382 posts)
18. The thing that bothers me most about the details of this shooting
Thu Dec 25, 2014, 12:53 PM
Dec 2014

is that the story released by the cops has already changed, along with
their reason for not releasing all the tapes at the same time. Whether
they decided to change the story, doctor the tapes, plant the gun,
who the hell knows?

I also just cannot fathom why a young black man would pull a gun on a cop,
at point blank range, and not expect to get killed. It makes no sense.
He and his friend were not running from the store. They were carrying bags
that look as though they contained purchases. And why the hell didn't the cop
immediately call for back up and get an ambulance when he ran away to hide behind
the gas pumps?

We do know from the tape that there was one witness standing right next to the man
who was killed--and he ran back into the store. I'd like to hear his side of what happened.

 

heaven05

(18,124 posts)
35. and I am waiting for them to speak out also
Thu Dec 25, 2014, 05:02 PM
Dec 2014

there is just no way I will take any authority's word on any scenario, ever again. I'll wait for the complete story after proper investigation by an objective person/organization.

PersonNumber503602

(1,134 posts)
40. Understandable. The fact the body cam wasn't on also adds to the suspicion
Thu Dec 25, 2014, 06:16 PM
Dec 2014

Based on what I've seen, it looks like the cop definitely felt threatened and it does look like a gun was pulled, but ya never know these days. The lack of the body cam being on always raises some red flags and it should for sure be looked into more. Those camera's default state should be on, and when turned off there should be timeout that forces purposeful intervention to keep them off. It's interesting how everyone is so quick to pick and then find evidence to support their side, rather than letting the evidence tell the story. It's even difficult to have a discussion about what's going on without either being labeled a cop hater or an unconditional cop lover.

Calista241

(5,586 posts)
49. You do realize that body cams will present a limited field of view.
Sat Dec 27, 2014, 04:37 PM
Dec 2014

People move and turn their heads in all sorts of directions. Any movement by the officer or the subject will affect the field of view of the camera.

In this case there were 2 subjects, so the officer would most likely be facing some point between them. So, while it's possible a body camera could show what we want it to show, it's just as likely the camera could show nothing conclusive as well.

In any kind of a shootout situation, the cops will certainly try to conceal themselves behind doors, in breezeways, behind numerous other types of objects. The cameras will have almost no utility in such a situation.

PersonNumber503602

(1,134 posts)
59. That is true, but I don't think that negates their value...
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 01:08 PM
Jan 2015

Any video or audio is better than no video or audio.

 

heaven05

(18,124 posts)
51. that is telling
Sat Dec 27, 2014, 07:03 PM
Dec 2014

yet a verbal threat could have been made, I don't know. Video is too inconclusive.. I'll wait on a hopefully proper investigation conclusion. I still just don't trust anything anymore.

mnhtnbb

(31,382 posts)
48. The original report was the cop was on a routine drive by. Then it was changed
Fri Dec 26, 2014, 07:09 AM
Dec 2014

that he was responding to a shoplifting call.

"Police say a Berkeley police officer was on a routine patrol when he noticed two men on the side of the business."

http://fox2now.com/2014/12/24/berkeley-police-officer-involved-in-fatal-shooting/


"We had a policeman responding to a call," he said, noting that the officer had been called to the scene by a report of a young man shoplifting.

http://www.npr.org/blogs/thetwo-way/2014/12/24/372867144/police-kill-young-man-in-st-louis-area-sparking-new-anger

sheshe2

(83,737 posts)
53. Actually,
Sat Dec 27, 2014, 08:21 PM
Dec 2014

I believe the protestors would prefer not to be profiled, assumed guilty and shot while walking and driving and living. Or for that matter just for being black. Deny it if you wish, yet there is an uptick of murder by cop of unarmed black men. That is a fact.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Protesters rally for 2nd ...