Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

alp227

(32,006 posts)
Thu Apr 12, 2012, 01:10 PM Apr 2012

Iran's nuclear programme: legal debate stirs over basis for US or Israeli attack

Source: The Guardian

Amid the sabre-rattling and bluster over Iran, a furious if little-noticed debate is boiling over the legal basis for a US or Israeli attack on Tehran's nuclear programme.

The threat of a military strike hangs over this weekend's talks in Istanbul between the major powers and Iran.

The Israeli leadership says an attack will come within months, not years, if the present diplomatic push fails. The US Congress is not far behind, with the Republican leadership pledging to pass an authorisation for the use of "overwhelming military force" if there are signs Iran is developing a nuclear weapon.

Barack Obama is more cautious, but says the "military option" remains on the table if sanctions fail to persuade Tehran to give up its enriched uranium.

Read more: http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/apr/12/iran-military-attack-legal-debate

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Iran's nuclear programme: legal debate stirs over basis for US or Israeli attack (Original Post) alp227 Apr 2012 OP
The Real Nuclear Outlaws polly7 Apr 2012 #1
RepubliCONs always create sham enemys around and election. xtraxritical Apr 2012 #3
Related story, also from Guardian RitchieRich Apr 2012 #2
If you wanted to discuss both sides of this nuclear issue... Comrade Grumpy Apr 2012 #5
Right on bahrbearian Apr 2012 #6
They'll just make some shit up to justify what they want to do. Comrade Grumpy Apr 2012 #4

polly7

(20,582 posts)
1. The Real Nuclear Outlaws
Thu Apr 12, 2012, 01:19 PM
Apr 2012

Last edited Thu Apr 12, 2012, 06:39 PM - Edit history (1)

The Real Nuclear Outlaws
How the US and Israel are Shredding the NPT
By Carl Boggs

Wednesday, April 11, 2012

http://www.zcommunications.org/the-real-nuclear-outlaws-by-carl-boggs

While United States and Israeli leaders, duly assisted by a warmongering media, ramp up war talk against Iran, two troublesome pieces of information are ritually ignored. First, even American intelligence reports conclude that Iran is not close to building a nuclear-weapons program. Second, it is the U.S. and Israel – not Iran – that stand in flagrant violation of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT). The real nuclear outlaws are located in Washington and Tel Aviv rather than in Tehran.

The consensus of 17 U.S. agencies, as reported by National Intelligence Estimates of 2007 and 2011, finds that Iran has not enriched uranium above 20 percent purity, far short of the nearly 90 percent essential to weapons development. Further, no viable nuclear delivery system or command structure has been uncovered. High-powered U.S. surveillance and espionage operations, many inside Iran, have revealed nothing beyond (an entirely legal) civilian energy program. Recent International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) investigations, the latest in November 2011 and February 2012, cite “continuing enrichment processes” but nothing beyond the 20 percent level. The IAEA merely states what should be obvious – that some Iranian sites “could be” used for a weapons program at some point in the future.



The NPT called on all parties to fight proliferation while allowing for peaceful atomic development under international monitoring. Article I stated that nuclear powers agree not to assist non-nuclear countries in their nuclear programs, while Article IV affirmed the right of all NPT members to develop nuclear energy and Article VI obliged nuclear states to begin dismantling nukes in “good faith”. At present nine countries have nuclear arsenals with the strong likelihood others will follow, as an increasing number of states have adequate research, facilities, materials, and reactors for processing uranium at high levels. Several countries, aside from Iran, now have the technology and resources to achieve nuclear-weapons status within the next decades, including Japan, Brazil, Australia, Argentina, Turkey, and South Africa. All of these states, as NPT members, are fully entitled to nuclear sources of energy – though so far only Iran has been singled out for international scrutiny and targeted with economic sanctions and military threats.

As for Article I, the U.S. (along with France) offered substantial aid and protection to the hyper-secret Israeli nuclear-weapons program going back to the 1950s. Israel has never wanted anything to do with the NPT, fearful of any meddling into its accumulation of between 200 and 400 warheads, thinly concealed behind a façade of “ambiguity”. Aside from nukes, Tel Aviv reportedly owns an abundant stockpile of chemical and biological weapons while again refusing to join the relevant global conventions.




 

xtraxritical

(3,576 posts)
3. RepubliCONs always create sham enemys around and election.
Thu Apr 12, 2012, 01:46 PM
Apr 2012

VOTE A STRAIGHT DEMOCRATIC BALLOT and restore congress to sanity.

RitchieRich

(292 posts)
2. Related story, also from Guardian
Thu Apr 12, 2012, 01:31 PM
Apr 2012

"...
Iran will help any nation or group that confronts the "cancer" Israel, the Islamic republic's supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, has said.
...
Khamenei affirmed that Iran had assisted militant groups like the Lebanese Hezbollah and the Palestinian Hamas – a well-known policy, but one that Iranian leaders rarely acknowledge explicitly.
..."
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/feb/03/khamenei-iran-help-confront-israel?INTCMP=ILCNETTXT3487

(not trying to be argumentative, I just like to discuss both sides of everything)

 

Comrade Grumpy

(13,184 posts)
5. If you wanted to discuss both sides of this nuclear issue...
Thu Apr 12, 2012, 03:08 PM
Apr 2012

...you might want to talk about Israeli's 100-200 nuclear weapons and why that's okay, but the notion that Iran might be able to make a nuclear weapon opens them to military attack by Israel or the US.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Iran's nuclear programme:...