HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » Latest Breaking News (Forum) » Autopsy Scheduled for Pai...

Sun Apr 8, 2012, 10:08 PM

Autopsy Scheduled for Painter Thomas Kinkade

Source: Reuters

Autopsy scheduled for painter Thomas Kinkade

Sun Apr 8, 2012 9:35pm EDT

LOS ANGELES (Reuters) - A California coroner is due to conduct an autopsy of Thomas Kinkade on Monday, three days after the famed American painter died unexpectedly, the Los Angeles Times reported on Sunday.

Kinkade, whose luminescent, homespun scenes captivated millions even as critics scoffed, died alone at his home in Los Gatos in northern California of apparently natural causes, according to family spokesman David Satterfield. Kinkade was 54.

The Santa Clara County coroner will perform the autopsy. Officials have offered no further details on the case.

Kinkade claimed to be America's most collected living artist, his prints hanging in the homes of an estimated 10 million Americans. He was a Christian who often depicted scenes from the Bible, and his work expressed a wholesome idealism.

Read more: http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSBRE83801M20120409?irpc=932

71 replies, 15200 views

Thread informationRemove bookmarkTrash this thread

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 71 replies Author Time Post
Reply Autopsy Scheduled for Painter Thomas Kinkade (Original post)
Hissyspit Apr 2012 OP
tularetom Apr 2012 #1
Hissyspit Apr 2012 #3
jberryhill Apr 2012 #4
AlbertCat Apr 2012 #5
kpete Apr 2012 #6
AlbertCat Apr 2012 #7
XemaSab Apr 2012 #9
ashling Apr 2012 #19
AlbertCat Apr 2012 #54
ashling Apr 2012 #56
Ken Burch Apr 2012 #21
Ian David Apr 2012 #34
rrneck Apr 2012 #41
grantcart Apr 2012 #47
pansypoo53219 Apr 2012 #26
AlbertCat Apr 2012 #50
XemaSab Apr 2012 #12
Mz Pip Apr 2012 #13
Brother Buzz Apr 2012 #14
Ken Burch Apr 2012 #23
Tom Ripley Apr 2012 #27
mopinko Apr 2012 #36
AlbertCat Apr 2012 #51
Brickbat Apr 2012 #39
Ken Burch Apr 2012 #22
mopinko Apr 2012 #59
mopinko Apr 2012 #35
colorado_ufo Apr 2012 #60
Spider Jerusalem Apr 2012 #38
Scairp Apr 2012 #65
lester94111 Apr 2012 #2
Cracklin Charlie Apr 2012 #8
rusty fender Apr 2012 #64
NoodleyAppendage Apr 2012 #10
kwassa Apr 2012 #11
LineLineReply !
Hissyspit Apr 2012 #15
aquart Apr 2012 #16
dixiegrrrrl Apr 2012 #42
Auggie Apr 2012 #30
marions ghost Apr 2012 #66
Tom Ripley Apr 2012 #17
PatrynXX Apr 2012 #18
EFerrari Apr 2012 #24
Hissyspit Apr 2012 #25
muriel_volestrangler Apr 2012 #28
dixiegrrrrl Apr 2012 #44
lunatica Apr 2012 #29
Auggie Apr 2012 #31
Inuca Apr 2012 #32
cosmicone Apr 2012 #49
rrneck Apr 2012 #43
Hissyspit Apr 2012 #45
rrneck Apr 2012 #46
Scairp Apr 2012 #67
rrneck Apr 2012 #70
Beacool Apr 2012 #55
emilyg Apr 2012 #20
Ian David Apr 2012 #33
AlbertCat Apr 2012 #52
Ian David Apr 2012 #53
Mz Pip Apr 2012 #68
Liberal Veteran Apr 2012 #37
Evasporque Apr 2012 #40
AlbertCat Apr 2012 #48
Evasporque Apr 2012 #57
Hissyspit Apr 2012 #62
Evasporque Apr 2012 #71
tawadi Apr 2012 #58
jmowreader Apr 2012 #61
leveymg Apr 2012 #63
marions ghost Apr 2012 #69

Response to Hissyspit (Original post)

Sun Apr 8, 2012, 10:18 PM

1. "wholesome idealism" my ass

The guy was a hypocrite, a control freak, a scam artist and an alcoholic, not necessarily in that order.

He made a fortune selling his sentimentalized crap to naive cretins and conned his business associates out of millions of dollars.

The article mentions the $860k settlement won by two gallery owners who were defrauded by Kinkade, but it says nothing about the fact that the award was increased to $2.8 million by the court. It also omitted some details about curious episodes of odd personal behavior such as the time he took a leak in a Las Vegas elevator to the shock of a carful of patrons.

Not meaning to speak ill of the recently deceased, but there are dozens of skeletons in Mr Kinkade's closet, very few of which will be divulged by the media reportng of his demise.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to tularetom (Reply #1)

Sun Apr 8, 2012, 10:37 PM

3. Yes, I'm hating these write-ups.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to tularetom (Reply #1)

Sun Apr 8, 2012, 10:48 PM

4. Oh come on...

Who hasn't taken a leak in a Vegas elevator?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to tularetom (Reply #1)

Sun Apr 8, 2012, 10:49 PM

5. "wholesome idealism" my ass

Last edited Mon Apr 9, 2012, 01:06 PM USA/ET - Edit history (3)

"Painter of light" my ass.

I mean, you don't have to be an art nerd to think of many more "real" artists who are more "painter of light" material.

Off the top of my pointed head, I bet can come up with 5 in 30 seconds...

Vermeer
Monet
Hopper (not Harper)
de la Tour
Turner

Let's see if I can find examples...

Vermeer
Monet
Hopper (not Harper)
de la Tour
Turner

Anyway.... self promotion and consumerism do not make one a "real" artist.

Well, I hope he didn't suffer....


BTW.... it's "Hopper" as in Edward Hopper.... not Harper.... as was pointed out to me. Thank you... I have no idea where "Harper" came from since I had to do a search to find a good painting! But all my art education comes from doing research for set and costume design, so y'see, I'm no expert. Still, I do know who Edward Hopper was.

No really!

And STILL could come up with 5 painters of light in 30 seconds (if not exact)

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to AlbertCat (Reply #5)

Sun Apr 8, 2012, 10:52 PM

6. Renoir


Landscape on the Coast, near Menton 1883
Pierre-Auguste Renoir

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kpete (Reply #6)

Sun Apr 8, 2012, 11:06 PM

7. Then there's this!

Last edited Mon Apr 9, 2012, 01:08 PM USA/ET - Edit history (1)




Too soon?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to AlbertCat (Reply #7)

Sun Apr 8, 2012, 11:24 PM

9. Never!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to AlbertCat (Reply #7)

Mon Apr 9, 2012, 01:56 AM

19. Is the autopsy really

going to be performed by 15th century disgusted Dutch artists?


Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ashling (Reply #19)

Mon Apr 9, 2012, 02:18 PM

54. going to be performed by 15th century disgusted Dutch artists?

Well, they're 17th century....

But regardless of the century, artists of all stripes will learn nothing from it.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to AlbertCat (Reply #54)

Mon Apr 9, 2012, 02:43 PM

56. That's what I meant

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to AlbertCat (Reply #7)

Mon Apr 9, 2012, 02:29 AM

21. Wow...TMZ got the autopsy pictures already?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to AlbertCat (Reply #7)

Mon Apr 9, 2012, 08:23 AM

34. LOL!!! n/t

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to AlbertCat (Reply #7)

Mon Apr 9, 2012, 11:25 AM

41. Perfect! nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to AlbertCat (Reply #7)

Mon Apr 9, 2012, 12:44 PM

47. Oddlly I find this picture both "wholesome" and "idealistic".

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kpete (Reply #6)

Mon Apr 9, 2012, 03:40 AM

26. ACK1 NOOOO!!! monet is the IMPRESSIONISISM krapcaid!

frothy sugary. at least his later stuff.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to pansypoo53219 (Reply #26)

Mon Apr 9, 2012, 01:15 PM

50. monet is the IMPRESSIONISISM krapcaid!

I wholeheartedly disagree!

But that's beside the point. All those views of the Houses of Parliament, and Notre Dame.... painter of light!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to AlbertCat (Reply #5)

Sun Apr 8, 2012, 11:27 PM

12. Apart from Goya, how many painters of darkness have there been?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to XemaSab (Reply #12)

Sun Apr 8, 2012, 11:41 PM

13. Edvard Munch

Last edited Sun Apr 8, 2012, 11:45 PM USA/ET - Edit history (1)

The Scream come to mind.

Kind of how I felt looking at Thomas Kincaid paintings.

http://www.flickr.com/photos/visionshare/5973897005/

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to XemaSab (Reply #12)

Sun Apr 8, 2012, 11:49 PM

14. Hieronymus Bosch?


Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Brother Buzz (Reply #14)

Mon Apr 9, 2012, 02:32 AM

23. Is that one titled "The Lawrence Welk Orchestra in Hell"? n/t.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to XemaSab (Reply #12)

Mon Apr 9, 2012, 05:04 AM

27. Ad Reinhardt, Frank Stella

Yeah, I'm a wise guy

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to XemaSab (Reply #12)

Mon Apr 9, 2012, 08:31 AM

36. leon golub.



sue coe



ed paschke

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to mopinko (Reply #36)

Mon Apr 9, 2012, 01:39 PM

51. leon golub.

Golub has some very interesting images. I like these...








And his technique is not unlike Egon Schiele:





I must check him out some more.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to XemaSab (Reply #12)

Mon Apr 9, 2012, 10:56 AM

39. Francis Bacon.

Last edited Mon Apr 9, 2012, 10:58 AM USA/ET - Edit history (4)


Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to AlbertCat (Reply #5)

Mon Apr 9, 2012, 02:31 AM

22. But only Thomas Kinkade was a painter of Jesus-lovin' gay-hatin', tax-cut-wantin' GOP light!

Last edited Mon Apr 9, 2012, 03:32 PM USA/ET - Edit history (1)

See the difference?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Ken Burch (Reply #22)

Mon Apr 9, 2012, 03:21 PM

59. yeah, that does make it all add up, doesn't it?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to AlbertCat (Reply #5)

Mon Apr 9, 2012, 08:24 AM

35. uh, light was the whole fucking point of the impressionist movement.

only about a century late for that claim.
and what a smarmy waste of paint.


at least i outlived the fucker.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to AlbertCat (Reply #5)

Mon Apr 9, 2012, 04:42 PM

60. Just got back from the Monet exhibit at the Bellagio in Vegas -

A wonderful experience.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to tularetom (Reply #1)

Mon Apr 9, 2012, 09:31 AM

38. There's a lot to be critical of Kinkade about...

but I really don't think that his alcoholism is something that's fair game, honestly. Addiction is a disease, not a moral failing.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to tularetom (Reply #1)

Tue Apr 10, 2012, 06:57 PM

65. Big time deadbeat

Last edited Tue Apr 10, 2012, 08:10 PM USA/ET - Edit history (1)

Some years ago my husband was telling me how much Kincade's company owed his in back pay. I can't say what company or the services they provided but suffice it to say it was necessary and I believe his company is just one of many who had to take Kincade to court. And why would they need to do a post on someone who died of natural causes? Don't they usually just do a view, draw fluids and that's it? Seems like a waste of resources.

And how the hell exactly do you spell his name? I've seen it spelled three different ways. Oh, I just remembered, I don't care.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Hissyspit (Original post)

Sun Apr 8, 2012, 10:22 PM

2. Isn't there enough coverage of this hack already?

<eom?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Hissyspit (Original post)

Sun Apr 8, 2012, 11:19 PM

8. Caravaggio

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Cracklin Charlie (Reply #8)

Tue Apr 10, 2012, 11:32 AM

64. I was going to post his name as painter of light and dark

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Hissyspit (Original post)

Sun Apr 8, 2012, 11:24 PM

10. Tasteless fools and their money are easily parted...by Kinkade. n/t

J

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Hissyspit (Original post)

Sun Apr 8, 2012, 11:25 PM

11. Autopsy reveals Kincade died from schlock.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kwassa (Reply #11)

Sun Apr 8, 2012, 11:58 PM

15. !

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kwassa (Reply #11)

Mon Apr 9, 2012, 12:02 AM

16. How does one nominate a DUzy?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink



Response to kwassa (Reply #11)

Mon Apr 9, 2012, 08:01 AM

30. +1

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kwassa (Reply #11)

Tue Apr 10, 2012, 07:45 PM

66. good one...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Hissyspit (Original post)

Mon Apr 9, 2012, 12:12 AM

17. That's the closest he will ever come to Francis Bacon

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Hissyspit (Original post)

Mon Apr 9, 2012, 12:26 AM

18. must say disappointed in the hate in this thread

like saying Ken Burns isn't a historian. the fact your arguing if it's art or not reaffirms it's art. So all your doing is making Thomas the better Artist ....

Prefer other modern art. But his light was always best.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to PatrynXX (Reply #18)

Mon Apr 9, 2012, 02:37 AM

24. Light as seen from Pluto.

lol

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to PatrynXX (Reply #18)

Mon Apr 9, 2012, 02:37 AM

25. Nonsense.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to PatrynXX (Reply #18)

Mon Apr 9, 2012, 06:06 AM

28. Not having seen many of his before his death

Last edited Mon Apr 9, 2012, 07:54 AM USA/ET - Edit history (1)

(since he's not talked about in Britain), I have to say his approach to 'light' seemed to be 'whatever time of day, every window in every house must have a light in it'. Which makes some of them look a bit surreal, since the light in the window has to look stronger than daylight. It also doesn't give an impression of reality, in which some lights are on, and others aren't. But I can't work out if there's a 'message' behind this expression.

Maybe there are paintings of his without houses? They might be better.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to muriel_volestrangler (Reply #28)

Mon Apr 9, 2012, 11:34 AM

44. He also had flowers, shrubs and trees from3 seasons

blooming madly at the same time in some of his pics.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to PatrynXX (Reply #18)

Mon Apr 9, 2012, 07:20 AM

29. When you paint light it's supposed to capture what real light does

Kincaid painted variations on something that was floating around in his head and which have nothing to do with physical reality, or the laws of Nature. Artists try to capture the fleeting moments of what real earthly light does or they deliberately defy what real life shows. Kincaid not only made it all up but he also brought a cotton candy saccharin element to his invented pastoralesque scenes. It's that element of saccharin that turns art critics and artists off, because it shows a strong element of dishonesty which smacks of cynicism. It's formulaic and commercial. In the world of literature it can be compared to the formula writing of the modern romance novel compared to what is considered outstanding literature which mirrors the true messiness of real life.

Maybe in your mind his light was always best, but what are you comparing it to? Real life or some other artists version of what he or she thinks light should be doing instead of what it really does?

Nobody set out to hate his art.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to PatrynXX (Reply #18)

Mon Apr 9, 2012, 08:07 AM

31. As a painter, Kinkade was a fraud. His work was kitsch.

Last edited Mon Apr 9, 2012, 08:09 AM USA/ET - Edit history (1)

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Auggie (Reply #31)

Mon Apr 9, 2012, 08:13 AM

32. Agree

I don't know anything about his life, but his paintings define kitch.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Auggie (Reply #31)

Mon Apr 9, 2012, 01:11 PM

49. +1000000 n/t

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to PatrynXX (Reply #18)

Mon Apr 9, 2012, 11:32 AM

43. It's art.

But it's bad art. It might work formally or even be interesting technecally, but it was designed to feed off the viewer and our culture.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to rrneck (Reply #43)

Mon Apr 9, 2012, 12:34 PM

45. Speaking as a painting instructor

it's bad technically, too.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Hissyspit (Reply #45)

Mon Apr 9, 2012, 12:40 PM

46. I have to admit I've never seen one in person.

I will gratefully defer to your evaluation.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to rrneck (Reply #43)

Tue Apr 10, 2012, 08:15 PM

67. Such bad art

I have no idea what so many saw in his crap, and enough to pay money for it too. One born every minute they say.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Scairp (Reply #67)

Tue Apr 10, 2012, 08:37 PM

70. Tell people what they want to hear

and they'll line up across the street to get it.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to PatrynXX (Reply #18)

Mon Apr 9, 2012, 02:19 PM

55. I don't get the hate either.

He wasn't my cup of tea, but I don't understand why people are being nasty about his death. His stuff was quite popular and made him rich, so someone must have been buying his work.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Hissyspit (Original post)

Mon Apr 9, 2012, 02:06 AM

20. RIP.

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Hissyspit (Original post)

Mon Apr 9, 2012, 08:21 AM

33. I hope we find out he was murdered by Jon McNaughton. n/t

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Ian David (Reply #33)

Mon Apr 9, 2012, 01:47 PM

52. LOL!

Last edited Mon Apr 9, 2012, 01:48 PM USA/ET - Edit history (2)

I need to paint a bad painting of McNaughton holding a burning Kinkcade and pointing to it.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to AlbertCat (Reply #52)

Mon Apr 9, 2012, 02:00 PM

53. Do that! That would be funny! n/t

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to AlbertCat (Reply #52)

Tue Apr 10, 2012, 08:20 PM

68. Jesus has to be in there

mayby crying.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Hissyspit (Original post)

Mon Apr 9, 2012, 09:28 AM

37. So much for my guess that he would rise again on Sunday.

It seemed only fitting that he would die on Good Friday and rise on Easter to pay for our kitschy sins of hanging pictures of impossibly narrow roads leading to impossibly lit and impossibly idealized charming cottages in our homes.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Hissyspit (Original post)

Mon Apr 9, 2012, 11:14 AM

40. He died of a saccharin overdose....

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Evasporque (Reply #40)

Mon Apr 9, 2012, 01:01 PM

48. God... I hope they don't have hurricanes there!

That cottage is doomed... from even just a Nor'easter!

And the perspective of the steps....

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to AlbertCat (Reply #48)

Mon Apr 9, 2012, 02:52 PM

57. But those are soft fluffy waves...

The light house looks really wrong....the whole thing looks really wrong...

But you know...it is what it is...I knew a guy in Art school that only painted ram's heads....

for four years....rams heads....

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Evasporque (Reply #57)

Mon Apr 9, 2012, 09:31 PM

62. It's a pastiche of painting clichés

sewn together like some kind of Frankenstein monster.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Hissyspit (Reply #62)

Wed Apr 11, 2012, 09:25 AM

71. Percy Fraunckenstine says....

Last edited Wed Apr 11, 2012, 09:26 AM USA/ET - Edit history (1)



"I find the form reminiscent of a British Romantic having been tied with velvet straps and drug through a Rococo garden by unicorned chariot and a host of cherubs."

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Evasporque (Reply #40)

Mon Apr 9, 2012, 03:02 PM

58. This one does look misproportioned

Damn, now even I cannot appreciate his paintings as much. I still like the snow scenes.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Hissyspit (Original post)

Mon Apr 9, 2012, 09:15 PM

61. There's no need for an autopsy. I know what the cause of death was

Ol' Tom decided to paint A Major Work on Good Friday in honor of Our Fallen Savior. Jesus didn't like the painting and smited him.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Hissyspit (Original post)

Tue Apr 10, 2012, 10:35 AM

63. Gotta hand it to him. The man knew his audience and their taste>

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Hissyspit (Original post)

Tue Apr 10, 2012, 08:27 PM

69. People are apparently buying Kinkades right now but you can't buy an original:

"Interesting side note on the Studio Proof. When the first Thomas Kinkade Gallery was started it was located in Carmel CA, an exclusive community near Pebble Beach. Carmel had by laws that required an art gallery to only sell originals. Thom wanted to keep his originals for himself. So they came up with the Studio Proof and dubbed it a "Semi-Original" because Thom did some hand highlighting on them. This allowed them to start the first Thomas Kinkade Signature Gallery.

And now the most exclusive edition outside of the original of course. The M/E - Masters Edition. Today a Masters Edition is limited to one piece per size per image. In years past there were sometimes more produced, but always a small quantity. A Masters Edition is a piece that Thom entirely repaints just for you. And because there is only one per size of the current releases, it makes it the most collectable. A Masters runs anywhere from $8,000 to $54,000.00 depending on the size. Very exclusive piece, very few around.

Originals have not been sold since 1997. Clearing Storms was the last original sold, all the rest have gone into Thom's museum."

http://reviews.ebay.com/Former-Kinkade-Gallery-Owner-Answers-Edition-Questions?ugid=10000000004415859

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread