Thu Apr 5, 2012, 11:31 AM
mahatmakanejeeves (3,626 posts)
Half a million Mac computers 'infected with malware'Last edited Thu Apr 5, 2012, 11:52 AM USA/ET - Edit history (6)
Source: BBC News
More than half a million Apple computers have been infected with the Flashback Trojan, according to a Russian anti-virus firm. An investigation by Dr Web suggests that about 600,000 Macs have installed the malware - potentially allowing them to be hijacked and used as a 'botnet'. It says that more than half that number are based in the US. Apple has released a security update, but users who have not installed the patch remain exposed. Read more: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-17623422 Another link: Analysis of a recent Java flaw exploited by the Flashback Trojan reveals that more than 550,000 Macs were affected in the U.S. and abroad, according to anti-virus vendor Doctor Web. I own several Macs, so I'm not gloating. For years, the mantra has been that Macs were immune from the sort of malware, spyware, and whatnot that made owners of computers running Windows pull their hair out. I guess that's changing. That's the price of market share. Can Ubuntu be far behind? At least no one's writing viruses for the Palm OS. I hope. To keep things in perspective, half a million computers is probably how many computers running Windows are infected in an afternoon. Affected Mac owners, as the veteran of attacks by spyware that Spyware Search and Destroy cannot remove, I feel your pain.
|
68 replies, 8966 views
| Author | Time | Post | |
| mahatmakanejeeves | Apr 2012 | OP | |
| Cooley Hurd | Apr 2012 | #1 | |
| mahatmakanejeeves | Apr 2012 | #2 | |
| Cooley Hurd | Apr 2012 | #21 | |
| LiberalArkie | Apr 2012 | #3 | |
| supernova | Apr 2012 | #7 | |
| Auggie | Apr 2012 | #11 | |
| a kennedy | Apr 2012 | #23 | |
| RebelOne | Apr 2012 | #34 | |
| Bozita | Apr 2012 | #35 | |
| RebelOne | Apr 2012 | #47 | |
| sakabatou | Apr 2012 | #44 | |
| OnyxCollie | Apr 2012 | #45 | |
| saras | Apr 2012 | #60 | |
| Art_from_Ark | Apr 2012 | #61 | |
| supernova | Apr 2012 | #4 | |
| TlalocW | Apr 2012 | #5 | |
| RC | Apr 2012 | #8 | |
| xtraxritical | Apr 2012 | #9 | |
| MADem | Apr 2012 | #16 | |
| TroglodyteScholar | Apr 2012 | #36 | |
| onehandle | Apr 2012 | #6 | |
| Vehl | Apr 2012 | #26 | |
| Grassy Knoll | Apr 2012 | #37 | |
| TheManInTheMac | Apr 2012 | #10 | |
| mahatmakanejeeves | Apr 2012 | #13 | |
| Vehl | Apr 2012 | #28 | |
| TheManInTheMac | Apr 2012 | #56 | |
| LanternWaste | Apr 2012 | #48 | |
| TheManInTheMac | Apr 2012 | #57 | |
| DainBramaged | Apr 2012 | #12 | |
| MADem | Apr 2012 | #14 | |
| dharmamarx | Apr 2012 | #15 | |
| d_r | Apr 2012 | #39 | |
| d_r | Apr 2012 | #46 | |
| joshcryer | Apr 2012 | #67 | |
| rdking647 | Apr 2012 | #17 | |
| cbayer | Apr 2012 | #22 | |
| rdking647 | Apr 2012 | #54 | |
| marlakay | Apr 2012 | #68 | |
| Indydem | Apr 2012 | #18 | |
| cbayer | Apr 2012 | #19 | |
| Vehl | Apr 2012 | #20 | |
| Odin2005 | Apr 2012 | #31 | |
| joshcryer | Apr 2012 | #65 | |
| thesquanderer | Apr 2012 | #24 | |
| Vehl | Apr 2012 | #25 | |
| thesquanderer | Apr 2012 | #38 | |
| Vehl | Apr 2012 | #53 | |
| Hissyspit | Apr 2012 | #40 | |
| Vehl | Apr 2012 | #52 | |
| Odin2005 | Apr 2012 | #27 | |
| Vehl | Apr 2012 | #30 | |
| Odin2005 | Apr 2012 | #32 | |
| Vehl | Apr 2012 | #33 | |
| Hissyspit | Apr 2012 | #41 | |
| Marooned | Apr 2012 | #42 | |
| Vehl | Apr 2012 | #51 | |
| Hissyspit | Apr 2012 | #55 | |
| Vehl | Apr 2012 | #50 | |
| Hissyspit | Apr 2012 | #63 | |
| kestrel91316 | Apr 2012 | #29 | |
| denem | Apr 2012 | #43 | |
| d_r | Apr 2012 | #49 | |
| denem | Apr 2012 | #58 | |
| thesquanderer | Apr 2012 | #62 | |
| joshcryer | Apr 2012 | #66 | |
| denem | Apr 2012 | #59 | |
| burrowowl | Apr 2012 | #64 |
Response to mahatmakanejeeves (Original post)
Thu Apr 5, 2012, 11:35 AM
Cooley Hurd (20,724 posts)
1. WebOS (formerly Palm OS) is open-source now, so...
|
...it's possible malware will be forthcoming. I have an HP Touchpad running both WebOS and Android 4.0, and I have Lookout Security loaded for both.
|
Response to Cooley Hurd (Reply #1)
Thu Apr 5, 2012, 11:37 AM
mahatmakanejeeves (3,626 posts)
2. I am so looking forward to that.
|
Last edited Thu Apr 5, 2012, 11:38 AM USA/ET - Edit history (1) I wish I had snagged a couple TouchPads in the fifteen minutes that they were bargain-priced. I own shares of HPQ, and that debacle still nags at me.
|
Response to mahatmakanejeeves (Reply #2)
Thu Apr 5, 2012, 12:32 PM
Cooley Hurd (20,724 posts)
21. It's an incredible tablet - nothing fancy but it runs both OS's like a champ.
|
They're selling for around $250 now for the 32GB model - I highly recommend getting one.
|
Response to mahatmakanejeeves (Original post)
Thu Apr 5, 2012, 11:40 AM
LiberalArkie (1,260 posts)
3. Here is how to check your Mac.. Mine were ok.
|
You can find out whether your machine is affected by opening up the Terminal application and typing:
defaults read /Applications/Safari.app/Contents/Info LSEnvironment If you get the message “The domain/default pair of (/Applications/Safari.app/Contents/Info, LSEnvironment) does not exist”, you must then enter: defaults read ~/.MacOSX/environment DYLD_INSERT_LIBRARIES If you get the message ”The domain/default pair of (/Users/joe/.MacOSX/environment, DYLD_INSERT_LIBRARIES) does not exist”, then your Mac is safe. Basically, the “does not exist” message means you’re clean. If you see anything other than those messages, you can check out F-Secure’s guide to removing the Flashback trojan. http://arstechnica.com/apple/news/2012/04/flashback-trojan-reportedly-controls-half-a-million-macs-and-counting.ars |
Response to LiberalArkie (Reply #3)
Thu Apr 5, 2012, 11:51 AM
supernova (39,143 posts)
7. Thanks for the info
|
my machine is clean.
|
Response to LiberalArkie (Reply #3)
Thu Apr 5, 2012, 12:35 PM
a kennedy (7,039 posts)
23. I'm such a wimp....where is the "Terminal application"
|
thanks.
|
Response to a kennedy (Reply #23)
Thu Apr 5, 2012, 01:12 PM
RebelOne (26,856 posts)
34. I would also like to know where the Terminal application is. n/t
Response to a kennedy (Reply #23)
Thu Apr 5, 2012, 01:16 PM
Bozita (26,949 posts)
35. It's in the Utilities folder.
|
My machine's clean.
|
Response to Bozita (Reply #35)
Thu Apr 5, 2012, 03:27 PM
RebelOne (26,856 posts)
47. Does not work for me.
|
I found the Terminal in the Utilities folder and typed in the application and it just came up as no such file.
|
Response to LiberalArkie (Reply #3)
Thu Apr 5, 2012, 03:08 PM
sakabatou (29,108 posts)
44. I'm clean as well
Response to LiberalArkie (Reply #3)
Thu Apr 5, 2012, 03:21 PM
OnyxCollie (6,574 posts)
45. Thanks.
|
Last edited Thu Apr 5, 2012, 03:22 PM USA/ET - Edit history (1) My laptop's clean.
Will check the desktop when I get home. |
Response to LiberalArkie (Reply #3)
Thu Apr 5, 2012, 08:00 PM
saras (6,670 posts)
60. If you can find it that easy, it's not very sophisticated...
|
...macs have some catching up to do. No stealth rootkits?
|
Response to LiberalArkie (Reply #3)
Thu Apr 5, 2012, 09:27 PM
Art_from_Ark (16,927 posts)
61. Thanks for the information
|
As the Beatles sang in Penny Lane: "It's a clean machine"
|
Response to mahatmakanejeeves (Original post)
Thu Apr 5, 2012, 11:40 AM
supernova (39,143 posts)
4. Macs were never immune
|
by virtue of being Macs. It was just that the relatively small number of us Maccies out here weren't worth hackers' time creating viruses and malware for us.
I say this as someone who has a 2007 MacBook. I think my next laptop I will build with my SO and put Linux on it. |
Response to mahatmakanejeeves (Original post)
Thu Apr 5, 2012, 11:41 AM
TlalocW (8,911 posts)
5. MACS infected with malware
|
Malware's name is... MacOS! Thank you! I'll be here all week.
Just kidding my Mac-loving brethren. ![]() |
Response to TlalocW (Reply #5)
Thu Apr 5, 2012, 11:59 AM
RC (21,640 posts)
8. That graphic is funny.
|
Thanks for sharing.
|
Response to TlalocW (Reply #5)
Thu Apr 5, 2012, 11:59 AM
xtraxritical (3,020 posts)
9. Does anybody think Doctor Web may have a vested interest in malware & viruses?
|
Doctor Web—the Russian anti-virus vendor. I've been using Win 7 on a PC for years now, for security I use Microsoft Security Suite which is free on their website. The software scans everything incoming and occasionally finds a virus which it quarantines and eliminates. It behooves MS to protects their users and they are serious about eliminating viruses attacking their OS. Dr. Web? Not so much.
|
Response to TlalocW (Reply #5)
Thu Apr 5, 2012, 12:24 PM
MADem (86,171 posts)
16. That's a laugh-riot!
|
That commercial never did it for me (the actual one, I mean). I always liked the nerdy guy better--he seemed more sincere-- and thought the MAC guy was a bit smug and unwashed!
The "music box" music was grating, as well! |
Response to TlalocW (Reply #5)
Thu Apr 5, 2012, 01:18 PM
TroglodyteScholar (4,543 posts)
36. Heh heh heh n/t
|
|
Response to mahatmakanejeeves (Original post)
Thu Apr 5, 2012, 11:44 AM
onehandle (35,506 posts)
6. Affects a tiny amount of Macs. How to detect, get rid of it--->
|
Last edited Thu Apr 5, 2012, 11:52 AM USA/ET - Edit history (2) It's a minor threat. You expose yourself more if you use Google products.
Macs update automatically to combat these things. Let your Mac update whenever it asks to. Instructions: http://www.f-secure.com/v-descs/trojan-downloader_osx_flashback_i.shtml |
Response to onehandle (Reply #6)
Thu Apr 5, 2012, 12:46 PM
Vehl (1,902 posts)
26. lol
|
Macs are less secure than Windows and Google products. Its an established fact
Check post#20. |
Response to Vehl (Reply #26)
Thu Apr 5, 2012, 01:29 PM
Grassy Knoll (4,278 posts)
37. Typical Mac Haters Club, LOL...
![]() |
Response to mahatmakanejeeves (Original post)
Thu Apr 5, 2012, 12:01 PM
TheManInTheMac (925 posts)
10. "according to a Russian anti-virus firm."
|
Stopped reading right there.
|
Response to TheManInTheMac (Reply #10)
Thu Apr 5, 2012, 12:05 PM
mahatmakanejeeves (3,626 posts)
13. Yeah, I know what you mean.
|
Last edited Thu Apr 5, 2012, 12:06 PM USA/ET - Edit history (1) .
|
Response to TheManInTheMac (Reply #10)
Thu Apr 5, 2012, 12:51 PM
Vehl (1,902 posts)
28. "Russian"
|
the Russian anti Virus firms are top notch. Where do you think a big Chunk of Virus coders are from? Russia. And most of them work for the Russian mafia-funded rings. Believe me when I say Russians know their stuff.
To Disparage the report cos its Russian, only serves to underscore the typical Mac-user mindset...fatally clueless about most tech issues. No offense meant..but If I were Russian, I would find your comment offensive. |
Response to Vehl (Reply #28)
Thu Apr 5, 2012, 06:45 PM
TheManInTheMac (925 posts)
56. Yes, I know you're right.
|
My concern is always that these online "anti-virus" companies are often responsible for the malware. I'm not clueless. I switched to a Mac when they switched to Unix.
And I certainly didn't mean to denigrate the Russian people or their tech skills. |
Response to TheManInTheMac (Reply #10)
Thu Apr 5, 2012, 03:27 PM
LanternWaste (16,346 posts)
48. I imagine your user name prevented it...
|
I imagine your user name prevented you from reading it...
|
Response to LanternWaste (Reply #48)
Thu Apr 5, 2012, 06:49 PM
TheManInTheMac (925 posts)
57. No. Believe me, I don't worship at the alter of Mac.
|
I am suspicious of anti-virus companies' claims about these things. Before you know it, you're on their webpage, clicking something that says "Scan My Computer (It's FREE!)"
Nope. I don't type my root password in unless I know damn well what I'm installing. |
Response to mahatmakanejeeves (Original post)
Thu Apr 5, 2012, 12:05 PM
DainBramaged (37,897 posts)
12. I wrote about this on DUII last year and not only was I rebuffed, it was basically ignored
|
But what do I know, now that a half a MILLION Macs owned by those who think they are immune to some preety slick minds are part of a botnet sending spam and crap to everyone else.....
|
Response to mahatmakanejeeves (Original post)
Thu Apr 5, 2012, 12:21 PM
MADem (86,171 posts)
14. I thought they were virus and malware - proof, and that's why the inflated price was supposedly
|
"worth it."
I'll stick with my PCs! |
Response to mahatmakanejeeves (Original post)
Thu Apr 5, 2012, 12:21 PM
dharmamarx (46 posts)
15. Linux will remain virus free
|
I don't think Ubuntu or Linux more broadly would run into this kind of problem. Linux operating systems use centralized package management. That means that if you are using Linux, you have no need to run around the internet and download programs from untrusted websites. An Ubuntu user's programs should all be coming from one trusted source (the Debian package maintainers). Proprietary software cannot fully make use of this feature.
|
Response to dharmamarx (Reply #15)
Thu Apr 5, 2012, 01:46 PM
d_r (2,834 posts)
39. I agree that Linux is more secure
Response to d_r (Reply #39)
Thu Apr 5, 2012, 03:23 PM
d_r (2,834 posts)
46. added to say
|
that a part of that reason is the perception that linux users are more tech savvy. If you want to put out a botnet, you want it to be out there long enough to use it. If you are going to bother writing the script you'd want it to work as more than just a proof of concept - you want people to spread it and you want it to last a while. Windows is a target because of the wide user base, mac now because it is low hanging fruit.
|
Response to dharmamarx (Reply #15)
Sat Apr 7, 2012, 02:24 AM
joshcryer (39,764 posts)
67. Android isn't immune to malware.
|
Well, technically it's only .01% of them but it's still millions of phones.
I think my Linux you mean Linux PCs? |
Response to mahatmakanejeeves (Original post)
Thu Apr 5, 2012, 12:26 PM
rdking647 (2,528 posts)
17. i actually installed a mac anti virus program.
|
i know its just a matter of time until viruses become a real threat to macs.
i installed sophos anti virus,a free program a few days ago |
Response to rdking647 (Reply #17)
Thu Apr 5, 2012, 12:32 PM
cbayer (120,014 posts)
22. That's the same one I downloaded.
|
When I got my new computer, I looked around to see what kinds of downloads were recommended and Sophos came up on several lists.
So far I haven't seen it do anything, which I guess is good news.... Right? |
Response to cbayer (Reply #22)
Thu Apr 5, 2012, 05:31 PM
rdking647 (2,528 posts)
54. it actually found a trojan on my computer
|
it was an attachment to en email in my spam folder so it was no problem but the simple fact it found it is good
|
Response to rdking647 (Reply #17)
Sat Apr 7, 2012, 02:55 AM
marlakay (4,213 posts)
68. I downloaded the same one earlier today
|
No virus or worms but after reading what happened I didn't want to take a chance...
|
Response to mahatmakanejeeves (Original post)
Thu Apr 5, 2012, 12:30 PM
Indydem (1,625 posts)
18. This headline should read:
|
"Half a million Mac computers owned by idiots who click 'yes' to bad things."
|
Response to mahatmakanejeeves (Original post)
Thu Apr 5, 2012, 12:31 PM
cbayer (120,014 posts)
19. I just got a new MacBook and, for the first time in my long Mac loving life,
|
downloaded a virus protection program.
While I think there is still a much smaller risk, I think it will grow as Mac slowly but surely picks up market share. |
Response to mahatmakanejeeves (Original post)
Thu Apr 5, 2012, 12:31 PM
Vehl (1,902 posts)
20. Mac OS is Less Secure than Windows! regardless of what iFans might think
|
Last edited Thu Apr 5, 2012, 12:39 PM USA/ET - Edit history (4) Oh how many times have I heard the line "that Macs dont get viruses." from Mac users.
If only they knew that Mac's are as susceptable to viruses as Windows, but were only spared due to the very small marketshare they had. Virus writers wrote for the OS with the largest marketshare, Windows. It has to be noted that the Mac OS is one of the LEAST secure OS's out there, as proven in one hacking contest after another, year after year. Apple's Mac OS X is less secure than Windows
Analysis Exploding the marketing myth IF YOU BELIEVE Apple's marketing then you would think that the expensive fruity machines are more secure than PCs. After all, most of the viruses out there are designed for the PC and Apple users hardly suffer from the problem. But this line of reasoning does not influence corporate IT managers who, were it true, would be trying to stave off hackers by installing shedloads of Apple gear. However that's not the case. Most tell us that even if Apple gear was half the price it's just security by obscurity. A determined hacker who wanted to get into corporate systems would be though it like a knife through butter. Tyler Reguly, a senior security research engineer with Ncircle told the newnewinternet that if you take a look at the two platforms, and the mindsets of the companies behind them, then the Windows PC wins hands down. He said that the Mac ships with more exploitable vulnerabilities already on a system when it is delivered. Further, Eric Johanson, a security researcher pointed out that the Mac OS X has far more published vulnerabilities per user than Windows. more here http://www.theinquirer.net/inquirer/analysis/1590073/apple-mac-os-x-secure-windows and more Researchers: Macs are less secure than Windows PCs http://blogs.computerworld.com/researchers_macs_are_less_secure_than_windows_pcs Pwn2Own Winner: ‘Mac OS X is Less Secure Than Windows’
Charlie Miller's Safari web browser exploit, which won him a new Mac laptop at last week's Pwn2Own competition, once again ignited the discussion about Mac OS X security. In an interview with the Baltimore Sun, Mr. Miller, who uses a MacBook on a daily basis and who used to work at the National Security Agency, said: "Any security expert knows that Mac OS X is less secure than Windows." He continued: "The question is which is SAFER. Because Mac OS X is still relatively rare, it is actually a little safer. But it has nothing to do with it being more secure, but rather, that bad guys are entirely focused on Windows at the moment due to the overwhelming market share Windows has. At this time, I still don't recommend anti-virus for Mac OS X users, because there simply isn't much malware for that platform. However, if Mac OS X market share ever goes up, there will be a landslide of exploits and malware." When asked if Mac users should be worried, he responded: "They should definitely be a little worried." However, there's a perception among many computer users that Mac OS X is inherently secure while Windows isn't, which Mr. Miller said is wrong: "Everything you could do on a Windows machine: turn it into a 'bot,' send spam, perform DDOS , etc. can be done from a compromised Mac. more here http://www.macobserver.com/tmo/article/pwn2own_winner_mac_os_x_is_less_secure_than_windows/ Sadly most Apple owners are happy to buy into the Apple cult and continue parroting the laughable claim that Mac OS is more secure than Windows! its less secure. PS: Furthermore Apple products are the ONLY known consumer electronics products that transmits to anyone within range the unique identifiers of the past three wireless access points the user has logged into. This makes the iPhone and other wifi-enabled Apple devices(like laptops) the LEAST secure amongst comparable products. Check this link Loose-lipped iPhones top the list of smartphones exploited by hacker http://arstechnica.com/apple/news/2012/03/loose-lipped-iphones-top-the-list-of-smartphones-exploited-by-hacker.ars?clicked=related_right As a security professional who gets paid to hack into high-value networks, Mark Wuergler often gets a boost when his targets use smartphones, especially when the device happens to be an iPhone that regularly connects to Wi-Fi networks. That's because the iPhone is the only smartphone he knows of that transmits to anyone within range the unique identifiers of the past three wireless access points the user has logged into. He can then use off-the-shelf hardware to passively retrieve the routers' MAC (media access control) addresses and look them up in databases such as Google Location Services and the Wireless Geographic Logging Engine. By allowing him to pinpoint the precise location of the wireless network, iPhones give him a quick leg-up when performing reconnaissance on prospective marks. .. .. The exposure of MAC addresses extends not only to iPhones, but to all Apple devices with Wi-Fi capabilities, he said. It means that whenever the wireless features are enabled and not connected to a network—for instance, during a brief encounter at a Starbucks—they broadcast the unique identifiers, and it's trivial for anyone nearby to record them. Apple did not respond to our requests for comment for this article. Wanna see what a hacker can get from your Iphone or other Wifi Enabled Apple products? Check this pic out
(right click on image, select view image to view higher resolution version) Everytime I hear an Apple user make the claim that "Mac is more secure than Windows" , i laugh at them...inside. The same way I laugh at evolution/global warming deniers. Both religiously believe in myths with no facts to back them up. |
Response to Vehl (Reply #20)
Thu Apr 5, 2012, 12:53 PM
Odin2005 (48,255 posts)
31. Apple is proof of the power of marketing to brainwash people.
|
They have this shit down to a science. They know exactly how to get people to do what they want. They don't need an overt police state anymore, they just control the vast majority with psychological manipulation.
|
Response to Vehl (Reply #20)
Sat Apr 7, 2012, 02:14 AM
joshcryer (39,764 posts)
65. That iPhone article is slightly misleading, he also has to break into the access points.
|
And that is no easy feat with a proper password and WPA2.
Otherwise, yeah, the iPhone is going to be a target. Just look at all these celebrities whose pictures have been exposed. |
Response to mahatmakanejeeves (Original post)
Thu Apr 5, 2012, 12:39 PM
thesquanderer (1,115 posts)
24. Worth noting: The exploited vulnerability was in Java, not in the MacOS
|
That's the price of allowing "outside" technologies access.
Still, saying that Macs are now as risky as PCs is a ridiculous overstatement. One successful invisible attack versus, what, thousands? |
Response to thesquanderer (Reply #24)
Thu Apr 5, 2012, 12:41 PM
Vehl (1,902 posts)
25. Macs are Less secure than PC's , check my post #20.
|
It's a known fact, albeit not amongst Mac owners.
|
Response to Vehl (Reply #25)
Thu Apr 5, 2012, 01:45 PM
thesquanderer (1,115 posts)
38. except that Mac users more often have to be complicit.
|
Last edited Thu Apr 5, 2012, 03:20 PM USA/ET - Edit history (1) As I understand it, a big difference is that a Windows attack can easily install itself behind the user's back, whereas the Mac will typically put up a box asking the user if it is okay to proceed and prompt him for his password. If you're not sure why you're being prompted, the smart user cancels and exits the page.
The groundbreaking aspect of this particular exploit is that it is, as far as I've seen, the first that can successfully do its dirty work without prompting the user to provide the culprit with system level access. |
Response to thesquanderer (Reply #38)
Thu Apr 5, 2012, 04:01 PM
Vehl (1,902 posts)
53. Not really
|
Last edited Thu Apr 5, 2012, 04:05 PM USA/ET - Edit history (2) Lesser Skilled hackers/Virus coders create viruses/trojans/etc etc which can be caught by built in systemic checking/virus scanners/firewalls, while the good ones do things which we will not be aware till its already too late. In fact the best Viruses/Malware might be in system doing its dirty work for months/years on end without being noticed (say for example if its intent was to monitor whatever you do on your machine and report it back to its creator)
Even windows has a lot of built in checking...like the user Access Control which prompts when a change to anything is about to be made. Power users turn it off because it becomes annoying after a while. But then again pwoer users also know how to keep their machines safe. My college professor for Computer Security class was a NSA veteran of 15 years....he pretty much knew everything there is to know about cryptography/cryptanalysis/Computer security and his comment on the first day of class was this "Security in Obscurity is never real security" This is a fundamental truth in the field of computer security. Before I used to take the class I believed that the most secret Crypto Algorithm must be the most secure one. However history has shown us that Publicly available Crypto Algorithms are much more safer than private/secret ones. If an Algorithm is made public, millions of people can look at it..researchers can research it...improve it..find vulnerabilities. A secret algorithm, however good it might seem to the small group of inventors, would most probably have some loophole/bug/backdoor/exploit that the smaller(relatively) team of inventors overlooked. Thus the most secure/safe algorithms are those which have been exposed to the public..tested and tested again for years. There is no company/country that can find resources to out-think the worldwide collective of academics/researchers/students/hackers/hobbyists. The same applies to Mac's. Till recently Mac's were safer and didn't have viruses because those who wrote Viruses didn't want to write for such an insignificant market share. however nowadays that the Mac OS has a considerable market-share, more and more Viruses will be written for it. Given that the Mac OS is less secure than the Windows OS, they will be affected more. Thus the old adage "security in Obscurity is never real security" applies to Mac users as well. A good first step for Mac users will be to download some Anti Virus Software.And to follow safe browsing practices |
Response to Vehl (Reply #25)
Thu Apr 5, 2012, 01:48 PM
Hissyspit (40,095 posts)
40. I'm a Mac user and I know it.
|
In fact, I am aware of pretty much everything in your post. How is stereotyping Russian security firms more offensive than stereotyping Mac users?
|
Response to Hissyspit (Reply #40)
Thu Apr 5, 2012, 03:47 PM
Vehl (1,902 posts)
52. Read my post again
|
Last edited Thu Apr 5, 2012, 03:48 PM USA/ET - Edit history (1) I explicitly said "most".
However saying stuff like "I stopped reading after I read Russian" sounds very much like stereotyping. PS: Furthermore I'm yet to see Russian companies make fun of their competitors using false advertising...remember the I'm a Mac commercials? |
Response to mahatmakanejeeves (Original post)
Thu Apr 5, 2012, 12:48 PM
Odin2005 (48,255 posts)
27. But, the Mac fanatics are sure that's impossible!
|
|
Response to Odin2005 (Reply #27)
Thu Apr 5, 2012, 12:53 PM
Vehl (1,902 posts)
30. :))
|
Last edited Thu Apr 5, 2012, 12:56 PM USA/ET - Edit history (2) yep!
You know what's one of the best lines I hear from Mac users AFTER one gets through their initial "Macs dont get viruses" firewall? "Well even if they are less secure, they are more "safe" "! After all, no wonder...a recent study found this Apple triggers 'religious' reaction in fans' brains, report says Next time Grandma asks why you're going to the mall on Sunday morning instead of church, tell her you're going to Apple Chapel. For Apple fans, the brand triggers a reaction in the brain that's not unlike that of religious devotees, according to a BBC documentary series that cites neurological research. The neuroscientists ran a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) test on an Apple fanatic and discovered that images of the technology company's gadgets lit up the same parts of the brain as images of a deity do for religious people, the report says. more here http://articles.cnn.com/2011-05-19/tech/apple.religion_1_apple-store-apple-employees-brains?_s=PM:TECH I have relegated these folks to the same cultist group-segment....where they will be at ease with the evolution/global warming deniers. |
Response to Vehl (Reply #30)
Thu Apr 5, 2012, 12:55 PM
Odin2005 (48,255 posts)
32. How long before they treat the late Steve Jobs as a God?
Response to Odin2005 (Reply #32)
Thu Apr 5, 2012, 12:59 PM
Vehl (1,902 posts)
33. They Already are
|
No offense to a recently deceased person...but A person who lived in luxury while his own child (which he claimed it was not his...by lying in the courts that he is unable to father children) and his ex gf lived in welfare for more than a decade worthy of any praise.. and this is not even without getting into the other AH stuff he did. |
Response to Vehl (Reply #33)
Thu Apr 5, 2012, 01:51 PM
Hissyspit (40,095 posts)
41. Yeah!
|
There are no assholes in charge of other tech corporations, just Apple! You are so right.
Good grief... |
Response to Hissyspit (Reply #41)
Thu Apr 5, 2012, 02:31 PM
Marooned (79 posts)
42. He didn't say that
|
He just said Jobs was a major asshole and that's a documented fact. Assholes abound at all companies large and small. Some folks like to pretend Jobs shit didn't stink... the facts say otherwise is all.
|
Response to Marooned (Reply #42)
Thu Apr 5, 2012, 03:44 PM
Vehl (1,902 posts)
51. +100
|
Well said
One does not see millions of customers put the Wall street moguls on a pedestal...and raise them to cult status. However the Apple fans do that and more. |
Response to Marooned (Reply #42)
Thu Apr 5, 2012, 05:57 PM
Hissyspit (40,095 posts)
55. It's about perspective.
|
The lack of it from Apple haters is astounding.
|
Response to Hissyspit (Reply #41)
Thu Apr 5, 2012, 03:41 PM
Vehl (1,902 posts)
50. What marooned said
|
Last edited Thu Apr 5, 2012, 03:41 PM USA/ET - Edit history (1) |
Response to Vehl (Reply #50)
Fri Apr 6, 2012, 01:47 PM
Hissyspit (40,095 posts)
63. Well, I checked and my computer is not infected.
|
As expected.
|
Response to mahatmakanejeeves (Original post)
Thu Apr 5, 2012, 12:52 PM
kestrel91316 (45,434 posts)
29. But, but, Mac users sneeringly tell me that can't happen to Le Sacred Mac.
Response to mahatmakanejeeves (Original post)
Thu Apr 5, 2012, 02:42 PM
denem (7,196 posts)
43. GET A CLUE. This is a JAVA exploit. "BackDoor.Flashback.39" affects OSX and Windows equally.
|
Last edited Thu Apr 5, 2012, 03:12 PM USA/ET - Edit history (2) The Windows removal is:
Reboot Windows in Safe Mode. Use Dr.Web® scanner of free curing utility Dr.Web® CureIT! to scan local drives. The “Cure” action should be applied for all infected files. (or using a anti malware vendor of your choice) Restore registry from the backup copy. The Mac Removal is Select Software Update Apply JAVA update Reboot. |
Response to denem (Reply #43)
Thu Apr 5, 2012, 03:33 PM
d_r (2,834 posts)
49. what is the linux removal?
|
It is funny that Dr. Web is the way to remove on both windows and mac; I wonder if the good Dr. made the little beasty in the first place.
|
Response to d_r (Reply #49)
Thu Apr 5, 2012, 07:21 PM
denem (7,196 posts)
58. I can't see anything yet on the Distro pages.
|
Best just update JAVA I guess. Linux may not be in their sites.
|
Response to denem (Reply #43)
Thu Apr 5, 2012, 09:37 PM
thesquanderer (1,115 posts)
62. More on the vulnerabilities of Java
Response to denem (Reply #43)
Sat Apr 7, 2012, 02:19 AM
joshcryer (39,764 posts)
66. Except, this was patched in Feb. Apple just released their patch 2 days ago.
|
That's why it became a 'thing' on OS X, it had time to propagate. Most Windows users should be safe if they had automatic updates for Java enabled.
|
Response to mahatmakanejeeves (Original post)
Thu Apr 5, 2012, 07:45 PM
denem (7,196 posts)
59. PC & Mac Users - web check to see if you have a Botnet
|
http://botnetchecker.com/ (Recommended by Apple Support)
|
Response to mahatmakanejeeves (Original post)
Fri Apr 6, 2012, 11:38 PM
burrowowl (8,964 posts)



