Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Eugene

(61,872 posts)
Mon Mar 26, 2012, 11:11 AM Mar 2012

Supreme court refuses tobacco firm appeal in smoker case

Source: Reuters

By James Vicini

WASHINGTON | Mon Mar 26, 2012 10:32am EDT

(Reuters) - The Supreme Court said on Monday it will not hear an appeal by R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co in a Florida case in which it was ordered to pay $28.3 million to a woman whose husband died of lung cancer after decades of smoking its cigarettes.

The justices refused an appeal by the Reynolds American Inc unit, which argued that its constitutional due process rights had been violated and that the issue could affect thousands of pending cases in Florida against tobacco companies.

In 2009, a state trial court in Pensacola, Florida, ordered Reynolds to pay more than $3.3 million in compensatory damages and $25 million in punitive damages to Mathilde Martin.

Her husband, Benny Martin, died in 1995 of lung cancer that she blamed on his long-time smoking of Reynolds' Lucky Strike cigarettes.

[font size=1]-snip-[/font]


Read more: http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/03/26/us-tobacco-court-florida-idUSBRE82P0NR20120326

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Supreme court refuses tobacco firm appeal in smoker case (Original Post) Eugene Mar 2012 OP
That's surprising to me Cirque du So-What Mar 2012 #1
Me too. Smilo Mar 2012 #2
IMO, big oil, finance, pharma and other companies dotymed Mar 2012 #4
good point. n/t BlancheSplanchnik Mar 2012 #5
Good. Line up and destroy big tobacco. onehandle Mar 2012 #3
The other shoe just dropped. DeSwiss Mar 2012 #6
Pay up, R.J. Reynolds gratuitous Mar 2012 #7

dotymed

(5,610 posts)
4. IMO, big oil, finance, pharma and other companies
Mon Mar 26, 2012, 12:25 PM
Mar 2012

have replaced tobacco as large political contributors. That is the only reason that this ruling was upheld.

 

DeSwiss

(27,137 posts)
6. The other shoe just dropped.
Mon Mar 26, 2012, 02:56 PM
Mar 2012


And I'm simply astonished that this court in particular was the one who refused an appeal from these rich tobacco guys.

- The wonders will never cease......

K&R

gratuitous

(82,849 posts)
7. Pay up, R.J. Reynolds
Mon Mar 26, 2012, 03:52 PM
Mar 2012

You had your day in court, and failed. Let's see, $28 million is about two days' profits. I'm sure R.J. Reynolds will really miss the money. Almost as much as Mathilde misses Benny.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Supreme court refuses tob...