HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » Latest Breaking News (Forum) » U.S. to pursue 'non-letha...

Sun Mar 25, 2012, 09:03 AM

U.S. to pursue 'non-lethal' aid for Syrian rebels

Source: Associated Press

SEOUL, South Korea (AP) – Seeking to stem the violence in Syria, the U.S. and other key allies are considering providing Syrian rebels with communications help, medical aid and other "non-lethal" assistance.

President Obama discussed the potential aid options Sunday in a lengthy private meeting with Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan. Both leaders are in Seoul, South Korea for a nuclear security summit.

Turkey has been a key U.S. partner in international efforts to quell violence in neighboring Syria and push President Bashar Assad to leave power. The United Nations estimates 8,000 people — many civilian protesters — have been killed in year-long clashes between forces loyal to Assad and opposition fighters.

Ben Rhodes, the White House deputy national security adviser for strategic communication, said Sunday that communications assistance could be critical to the opposition's efforts.

-snip-


Read more: http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/story/2012-03-25/syria-us-aid/53764796/1

8 replies, 1523 views

Thread informationRemove bookmarkTrash this thread

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 8 replies Author Time Post
Reply U.S. to pursue 'non-lethal' aid for Syrian rebels (Original post)
Eugene Mar 2012 OP
no_hypocrisy Mar 2012 #1
leveymg Mar 2012 #2
dipsydoodle Mar 2012 #3
Deep13 Mar 2012 #4
freefall Mar 2012 #5
Fool Count Mar 2012 #6
David__77 Mar 2012 #7
cqo_000 Mar 2012 #8

Response to Eugene (Original post)

Sun Mar 25, 2012, 09:06 AM

1. Isn't that how we got started in Libya?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to no_hypocrisy (Reply #1)

Sun Mar 25, 2012, 09:33 AM

2. It's how we got started in Iraq - '98 McCain-Lieberman Iraq Liberation Act funded opposition group

Last edited Sun Mar 25, 2012, 09:38 AM USA/ET - Edit history (1)

that was the channel for false WMD intelligence and other disinformation that was used to justify the invasion a few years later.

We've learned nothing. The same powerful neocons are still in control of the White House and Senate. We're going to do it again, and even DU now has its own cheerleaders for war and disinformation brigade. Roll the drums, saddle up, we're going to war!

Clinton Signs Iraq Liberation Act
Iraq News, SUNDAY, NOVEMBER 1, 1998
By Laurie Mylroie
http://www.fas.org/news/iraq/1998/11/01/981101-in.htm

The central focus of Iraq News is the tension between the considerable, proscribed WMD capabilities that Iraq is holding on to and its increasing stridency that it has complied with UNSCR 687 and it is time to lift sanctions. If you wish to receive Iraq News by email, a service which includes full-text of news reports not archived here, send your request to Laurie Mylroie .

I. CLINTON SIGNS IRAQ LIBERATION ACT, WHITE HOUSE STATEMENT, OCT 31
II. '99 APPROPRIATIONS BILL, IRAQ OPPOSITION, SIGNED BY CLINTON OCT 21
III. INC WELCOMES IRAQ LIBERATION ACT, PRESS STATEMENT, OCT 31

Today is the 89th day without weapons inspections in Iraq and the first
day without UNSCOM monitoring.

"Iraq News" is preparing an issue on Iraq's decision to suspend UNSCOM
monitoring. Meanwhile, this issue deals with the developments
regarding the policy promoted by Congress to deal with the Iraqi threat,
namely to overthrow Saddam.

On Oct 30, Radio Free Iraq began broadcasting. In an Oct 30 press
statement, David Newton, head of RFI, explained "that in addition to
local news about Iraq, programs will focus on democracy, free speech and
human rights. 'Under the dictatorship of President Saddam Hussein,
people in Iraq never a chance to hear about these issues,' said Newton,
a former US ambassador to Iraq. He says broadcasts to Iraq will
eventually expand to six hours a day, airing in the Arabic as well as
Kurdish languages." Transcripts and RealAudio of the broadcasts will be
available at http://www.rferl.org

Yesterday, Clinton signed into law HR 4655, the "Iraq Liberation Act
of 1998." In a presidential statement, issued by the White House,
Clinton said, "This Act makes clear that it is the sense of the Congress
that the United States should support those elements of the Iraqi
opposition that advocate a very different future for Iraq than the
bitter reality of internal repression and external aggression that the
current regime in Baghdad now offers. . . . On October 21, 1998, I
signed into law the Omnibus Consolidated and Emergency Supplemental
Appropriations Act, 1999, which made $8 million available for assistance
to the Iraqi democratic opposition. . . My Administration, as required
by that statue, has also begun to implement a program to compile
information regarding allegations of genocide, crimes against humanity,
and war crimes by Iraq's current leaders as a step towards bringing to
justice those directly responsible for such acts."
Indeed, Sec 590 of the omnibus appropriations bill stated that "not
less than $8,000,000 shall be made available for assistance to the Iraqi
democratic opposition. Of this amount, not less than $3,000,000 should
be made available as a grant for the Iraq National Congress. The
conferees also direct the Administration to provide not less than
$3,000,000 as a grant to the Iraqi Campaign to Indict Iraqi War
Criminals to be used to compile information to support the indictment of
Iraqi officials for war crimes. The conferees direct the Administration
to provide not less than $2,000,000 for the conduct of activities by the
Iraqi democratic opposition inside Iraq."
The president of the INC's Executive Council welcomed Clinton's
signature of the Iraq Liberation Act, in an Oct 31 statement that began
by condemning Saddam's suspension of UNSCOM monitoring, while hailing
the president's signing of the legislation and thanking the US Congress.
The statement concluded, "Saddam is the problem and he cannot be part of
any solution in Iraq. Therefore, President Clinton's action today is
the most appropriate response to Saddam. Let him know that Iraqis will
rise up to liberate themselves from his totalitarian dictatorship and
that the US is ready to help their democratic forces with arms to do so.
Only then will the trail of tragedy in Iraq end. Only then will Iraq be
free of weapons of mass destruction."

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Eugene (Original post)

Sun Mar 25, 2012, 10:29 AM

3. Guns dont kill people : people kill people

so it follows that guns are non lethal. Be interesting to see what Russia supplies the government with.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Eugene (Original post)

Sun Mar 25, 2012, 01:11 PM

4. Nonlethal aid? Like what, a case of body bags? nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Eugene (Original post)

Sun Mar 25, 2012, 02:40 PM

5. So now it's all right to support al-Qaeda?

"Apart from fears that groups identifying with al-Qaeda are operating on the fringes of the insurgency, Western wariness of siding openly with the rebels has mounted after rights groups accused them last week of carrying out human rights abuses."

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/syria/9165813/Barack-Obamas-personal-pledge-to-aid-Syria-rebels.html (March 25, 2012)

"Apparently in an effort to get out in front of the issue, the Obama administration has conceded al-Qaeda’s involvement in the Syrian rebellion. Last month, Director of National Intelligence James Clapper warned that al-Qaeda had “infiltrated” the opposition to Bashar Assad."

http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/292904/al-qaeda-rebel-syria-john-rosenthal (March 8, 2012)

"Secretary of State Hillary Clinton on Sunday warned against the United States arming rebels in Syria because such a move could inadvertently lead to support for Al-Qaeda and Hamas."

http://news.yahoo.com/clinton-arming-syria-rebels-could-help-al-qaeda-204813946.html (February 26, 2012)

Guess it must now be OK to provide material support to terrorist groups.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Eugene (Original post)

Sun Mar 25, 2012, 05:02 PM

6. A possible form of "non-lethal" aid -

 

to send them guns and bullets and to ask that they only aimed for Syrian soldiers' extremities.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Eugene (Original post)

Sun Mar 25, 2012, 09:01 PM

7. So Obama wants to send US tax dollars to the enemies of the USA.

Last edited Sun Mar 25, 2012, 09:01 PM USA/ET - Edit history (1)

I cannot see how else this could possibly be interpreted. The Islamic radicals pursuing terrorism in Syria are the same exact ones (in many cases, literally!) as those that killed and maimed so many US soldiers in Iraq.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Eugene (Original post)

Tue Mar 27, 2012, 02:03 AM

8. Syrian rebels are engaged in "ethnic cleansing" of Christians

http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/world_now/2012/03/church-fears-ethnic-cleansing-of-christians-in-homs-syria.html

helping the opposition overthrow the Government could in turn give rise to a mass slaughter of religious minorities.I hope the U.S. and it's allies think really hard about the potential consequences of what they are proposing to do.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread