Mon Mar 12, 2012, 06:25 PM
Judi Lynn (77,618 posts)
Cheney deems Canada too dangerous for visit
Source: Associated Press
Cheney deems Canada too dangerous for visit Associated Press | Posted: Monday, March 12, 2012 4:26 pm Former U.S. Vice President Dick Cheney canceled a Canadian speaking appearance because of security concerns sparked by demonstrations during a visit he made to Vancouver last fall. Cheney was scheduled to talk about his experiences in office and the current American political situation at the Metro Toronto Convention Centre on April 24. But Ryan Ruppert of Spectre Live Corp. said on Monday that Cheney and his daughter Elizabeth had begged off through their agent. "After speaking with their security advisers, they changed their mind on coming to the event," Ruppert said. He said they had "decided it was better for their personal safety they stay out of Canada." Read more: http://www.stltoday.com/news/world/cheney-deems-canada-too-dangerous-for-visit/article_1b6503aa-9298-5019-8861-5dd4715a4322.html#ixzz1owaixcUS
|
99 replies, 11297 views
| Author | Time | Post | |
| Judi Lynn | Mar 2012 | OP | |
| annabanana | Mar 2012 | #1 | |
| Justice wanted | Mar 2012 | #3 | |
| csziggy | Mar 2012 | #79 | |
| Justice wanted | Mar 2012 | #80 | |
| dixiegrrrrl | Mar 2012 | #89 | |
| 24601 | Mar 2012 | #98 | |
| freshwest | Mar 2012 | #8 | |
| RoccoR5955 | Mar 2012 | #35 | |
| freshwest | Mar 2012 | #37 | |
| cstanleytech | Mar 2012 | #23 | |
| Frustratedlady | Mar 2012 | #2 | |
| Angry Dragon | Mar 2012 | #4 | |
| lark | Mar 2012 | #88 | |
| Devil_Fish | Mar 2012 | #91 | |
| sakabatou | Mar 2012 | #5 | |
| pangaia | Mar 2012 | #28 | |
| Aerows | Mar 2012 | #62 | |
| RC | Mar 2012 | #73 | |
| russspeakeasy | Mar 2012 | #6 | |
| Sanity Claws | Mar 2012 | #7 | |
| dmr | Mar 2012 | #18 | |
| Major Nikon | Mar 2012 | #22 | |
| dmr | Mar 2012 | #24 | |
| chervilant | Mar 2012 | #74 | |
| yardwork | Mar 2012 | #34 | |
| MsPithy | Mar 2012 | #39 | |
| 90-percent | Mar 2012 | #54 | |
| DeSwiss | Mar 2012 | #77 | |
| KamaAina | Mar 2012 | #9 | |
| polly7 | Mar 2012 | #11 | |
| pitohui | Mar 2012 | #51 | |
| Selatius | Mar 2012 | #95 | |
| WhoIsNumberNone | Mar 2012 | #10 | |
| DCBob | Mar 2012 | #12 | |
| Faygo Kid | Mar 2012 | #13 | |
| donco | Mar 2012 | #14 | |
| JEB | Mar 2012 | #15 | |
| Nostradammit | Mar 2012 | #16 | |
| Amonester | Mar 2012 | #17 | |
| Julian Englis | Mar 2012 | #19 | |
| Gregorian | Mar 2012 | #20 | |
| ThomThom | Mar 2012 | #31 | |
| DonCoquixote | Mar 2012 | #21 | |
| BlueDemKev | Mar 2012 | #55 | |
| DonCoquixote | Mar 2012 | #63 | |
| Solly Mack | Mar 2012 | #25 | |
| baldguy | Mar 2012 | #47 | |
| GliderGuider | Mar 2012 | #26 | |
| JBoy | Mar 2012 | #27 | |
| stevedeshazer | Mar 2012 | #29 | |
| grasswire | Mar 2012 | #46 | |
| stevedeshazer | Mar 2012 | #48 | |
| Bucky | Mar 2012 | #30 | |
| mother earth | Mar 2012 | #32 | |
| trusty elf | Mar 2012 | #33 | |
| mikeSchmuckabee | Mar 2012 | #36 | |
| thelordofhell | Mar 2012 | #38 | |
| lastlib | Mar 2012 | #69 | |
| Deep13 | Mar 2012 | #40 | |
| PuffedMica | Mar 2012 | #41 | |
| LynneSin | Mar 2012 | #42 | |
| FailureToCommunicate | Mar 2012 | #43 | |
| Doc Holliday | Mar 2012 | #44 | |
| Ilsa | Mar 2012 | #45 | |
| pitohui | Mar 2012 | #49 | |
| Canuckistanian | Mar 2012 | #50 | |
| pbrower2a | Mar 2012 | #93 | |
| Canuckistanian | Mar 2012 | #99 | |
| chrisa | Mar 2012 | #52 | |
| BlueDemKev | Mar 2012 | #53 | |
| NICO9000 | Mar 2012 | #56 | |
| JJW | Mar 2012 | #57 | |
| GiveMeFreedom | Mar 2012 | #58 | |
| 90-percent | Mar 2012 | #59 | |
| Politicalboi | Mar 2012 | #61 | |
| Canuckistanian | Mar 2012 | #65 | |
| safrthjt | Mar 2012 | #60 | |
| MrMickeysMom | Mar 2012 | #64 | |
| broadway515 | Mar 2012 | #66 | |
| NBachers | Mar 2012 | #67 | |
| TrogL | Mar 2012 | #68 | |
| excuse not to write | Mar 2012 | #70 | |
| Vidar | Mar 2012 | #71 | |
| young_at_heart | Mar 2012 | #72 | |
| Jamaal510 | Mar 2012 | #75 | |
| eepatt | Mar 2012 | #76 | |
| RogueTrooper | Mar 2012 | #78 | |
| tclambert | Mar 2012 | #81 | |
| stubtoe | Mar 2012 | #84 | |
| lunatica | Mar 2012 | #82 | |
| samsingh | Mar 2012 | #83 | |
| AverageJoe90 | Mar 2012 | #85 | |
| freefall | Mar 2012 | #86 | |
| edbermac | Mar 2012 | #87 | |
| The Wizard | Mar 2012 | #90 | |
| Hotler | Mar 2012 | #92 | |
| Monk06 | Mar 2012 | #94 | |
| yellowcanine | Mar 2012 | #96 | |
| tabasco | Mar 2012 | #97 |
Response to Judi Lynn (Original post)
Mon Mar 12, 2012, 06:29 PM
annabanana (45,582 posts)
1. Is the big dick liable for arrest for war crimes in Canada as they
|
SHOULD BE in every country in the world?
|
Response to annabanana (Reply #1)
Mon Mar 12, 2012, 06:32 PM
Justice wanted (2,657 posts)
3. Beat me too it! Remember a few days ago the thread talking about how U.S. is proscuting 2 Irish
|
gentleman for crimes in America WITHOUT them even setting foot in America?
Maybe some countries should do that against the Bush Administration. |
Response to Justice wanted (Reply #3)
Tue Mar 13, 2012, 06:09 AM
csziggy (14,206 posts)
79. Id Spain still prosecuting their case against Bush administration members?
|
The Bush Six to Be Indicted
Apr 13, 2009 4:34 PM EDT Spanish prosecutors will seek criminal charges against Alberto Gonzales and five high-ranking Bush administration officials for sanctioning torture at Guantánamo. Spanish prosecutors have decided to press forward with a criminal investigation targeting former U.S. Attorney General Alberto Gonzales and five top associates over their role in the torture of five Spanish citizens held at Guantánamo, several reliable sources close to the investigation have told The Daily Beast. Their decision is expected to be announced on Tuesday before the Spanish central criminal court, the Audencia Nacional, in Madrid. But the decision is likely to raise concerns with the human-rights community on other points: They will seek to have the case referred to a different judge. Both Washington and Madrid appear determined not to allow the pending criminal investigation to get in the way of improved relations. The six defendants—in addition to Gonzales, Federal Appeals Court Judge and former Assistant Attorney General Jay Bybee, University of California law professor and former Deputy Assistant Attorney General John Yoo, former Defense Department general counsel and current Chevron lawyer William J. Haynes II, Vice President Cheney’s former chief of staff David Addington, and former Undersecretary of Defense Douglas J. Feith—are accused of having given the green light to the torture and mistreatment of prisoners held in U.S. detention in “the war on terror.” The case arises in the context of a pending proceeding before the court involving terrorism charges against five Spaniards formerly held at Guantánamo. A group of human-rights lawyers originally filed a criminal complaint asking the court to look at the possibility of charges against the six American lawyers. Baltasar Garzón Real, the investigating judge, accepted the complaint and referred it to Spanish prosecutors for a view as to whether they would accept the case and press it forward. “The evidence provided was more than sufficient to justify a more comprehensive investigation,” one of the lawyers associated with the prosecution stated. More: http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2009/04/13/the-bush-six-to-be-indicted.html Will Bush's Torture Memo Team Face Justice in Spain?
Nancy Goldstein on January 12, 2011 - 11:33 AM ET There may yet be justice for the victims of the post-9/11 US torture program. Just not in the United States. Here, our previous president is enjoying terrific sales for a memoir where he boasts about having authorized waterboarding. The current administration's commitment to "moving past" the illegalities incurred on its predecessor's watch is so hardcore that the Department of Justice decided late last year against prosecuting anyone from the CIA for destroying ninety-two videotapes that showed the torture of prisoners detained as suspected terrorists. Which leaves Attorney General Eric Holder more time to subpoena Twitter records and figure out how to criminalize Julian Assange and WikiLeaks for promoting government transparency. But perhaps there will be justice in Spain. This past Friday, the Center for Constitutional Rights filed papers urging Judge Eloy Velasco to do what the United States will not: prosecute the "Bush Six," the group of senior Bush-era government lawyers led by then–Attorney General Alberto Gonzalez, for violating international law by creating a legal framework that aided and abetted the torture of suspected terrorists. (Full disclosure: I've done consulting work for CCR.) More: http://www.thenation.com/blog/157654/will-bushs-torture-memo-team-face-justice-spain CCR Announces Bush Indictment for Convention Against Torture Signatory States
No Immunity for Former Presidents Under Law Contact: press@ccrjustice.org February 7, 2011, Geneva and New York – Today, two torture victims were to have filed criminal complaints, with more than 2,500-pages of supporting material, in Geneva against former U.S. President George W. Bush, who was due to speak at an event there on 12 February. Swiss law requires the presence of the torturer on Swiss soil before a preliminary investigation can be opened. When Bush cancelled his trip to avoid prosecution, the human rights groups who prepared the complaints made it public and announced that the Bush Torture Indictment would be waiting wherever he travels next. The Indictment serves as the basis on which to prepare country-specific, plaintiff-specific indictments, with additional evidence and updated information. According to international law experts at the New York-based Center for Constitutional Rights (CCR) and the Berlin-based European Center for Constitutional and Human Rights (ECCHR), former presidents do not enjoy special immunity under the Convention Against Torture (CAT). “Waterboarding is torture, and Bush has admitted, without any sign of remorse, that he approved its use,” said Katherine Gallagher, Senior Staff Attorney at CCR and Vice President of the International Federation for Human Rights (FIDH). “The reach of the Convention Against Torture is wide – this case is prepared and will be waiting for him wherever he travels next. Torturers – even if they are former presidents of the United States – must be held to account and prosecuted. Impunity for Bush must end.” More: http://ccrjustice.org/newsroom/press-releases/human-rights-groups-announce-bush-indictment-convention-against-torture-sign Published on Sunday, January 15, 2012 by Common Dreams
Spanish Judge Reopens Guantánamo Torture Probe - Common Dreams staff Just days after the 10th anniversary of the Guantánamo, the notorious prison remains in the news. On Thursday, Witness Against Torture led 40 people who were arrested protesting outside of Obama's White House protesting Guantánamo and indefinite detention. Now a Spanish judge has re-launched an investigation into the alleged torture of detainees held at the U.S. detention center. Not much more: http://www.commondreams.org/headline/2012/01/15-2 |
Response to csziggy (Reply #79)
Tue Mar 13, 2012, 06:47 AM
Justice wanted (2,657 posts)
80. thanks for the info.
Response to csziggy (Reply #79)
Tue Mar 13, 2012, 03:45 PM
dixiegrrrrl (30,831 posts)
89. Just as we thought, way back when.
|
History records what eventually happens when those in power ignore the rule of law for too long.
|
Response to csziggy (Reply #79)
Wed Mar 14, 2012, 10:46 PM
24601 (2,490 posts)
98. Not that I put any stock in this - but what does it fortell for former President Obama and
|
former Attorney General Holder in the future?
If the precedent is set for an persecuting an Attorney for giving an opinion - what of the Attorney that defends a murderer who kills again? As for Cheney, Vice Presidents are not in the Chain of Command and are not Deputy Commanders in Chief. They give no orders outside their immediate White House and Senate staffs. The approval to kill a US person(Alawki) went from the President to the Secretary of Defense and/or CIA directly without passing through the Vice President. |
Response to annabanana (Reply #1)
Mon Mar 12, 2012, 06:39 PM
freshwest (31,480 posts)
8. I thought he was. Brattlesboro, VT had a similiar plan.
Response to freshwest (Reply #8)
Mon Mar 12, 2012, 08:18 PM
RoccoR5955 (6,492 posts)
35. They still do...
|
Ever wonder why, in 8 years, neither he, nor Dumbya set foot in Vwemont?
|
Response to RoccoR5955 (Reply #35)
Mon Mar 12, 2012, 08:22 PM
freshwest (31,480 posts)
37. Not really... But you know Darth is big on those undisclosed locations...
|
Usually overseas with his oil sheik pals so he can be closer to his major backers, I guess. And away from the pesky proles.
|
Response to annabanana (Reply #1)
Mon Mar 12, 2012, 07:16 PM
cstanleytech (5,311 posts)
23. It wouldnt surprise me in the least if thats why he canceled it.
Response to Judi Lynn (Original post)
Mon Mar 12, 2012, 06:31 PM
Frustratedlady (8,915 posts)
2. Don't I remember correctly that the fav Pug saying has been...
|
"Man up!" Wasn't Elizabeth one of those who kept making fun of Democratic men...they should man up? How about poppa?
I hope their reputation in Canada and many other countries keeps them from speaking out. We know their rhetoric is all lies and poisonous statements. |
Response to Judi Lynn (Original post)
Mon Mar 12, 2012, 06:32 PM
Angry Dragon (24,073 posts)
4. Cheney can send people to countries with guns
|
but he is afraid to go to a peaceful country
such a brave man |
Response to Angry Dragon (Reply #4)
Tue Mar 13, 2012, 03:06 PM
lark (2,101 posts)
88. Fucking chicken-hawk
|
Loves to send other's to die for his causes, but never risks anything himself. I wish the vomitting smilie was still around, since that's what I feel like when I think of him and shrub.
|
Response to Judi Lynn (Original post)
Mon Mar 12, 2012, 06:34 PM
sakabatou (29,081 posts)
5. Huh... I visited Quebec years ago and had no problems.
Response to sakabatou (Reply #5)
Mon Mar 12, 2012, 07:53 PM
pangaia (1,066 posts)
28. Why goodness..
|
I wan in Toronto just last weekend...
|
Response to sakabatou (Reply #5)
Mon Mar 12, 2012, 10:31 PM
Aerows (13,857 posts)
62. I've been to Canada, too
|
I didn't have any problems either. I guess that's because I'm not a war criminal.
|
Response to Aerows (Reply #62)
Tue Mar 13, 2012, 01:11 AM
RC (21,634 posts)
73. Make that three.
|
I've been to Ottawa. And even wondered around after dark in the down town area. Never a problem.
Use to date a Canadian who live in Winnipeg. I find Canadians much friendlier than us USA'ens. Better educated too. |
Response to Judi Lynn (Original post)
Mon Mar 12, 2012, 06:35 PM
russspeakeasy (5,734 posts)
6. Coward in the first degree.
|
|
Response to Judi Lynn (Original post)
Mon Mar 12, 2012, 06:36 PM
Sanity Claws (13,410 posts)
7. Paranoid fear
|
He is long-time alcoholic and alcohol has a known link to psychosis and fear. He tried to infect the rest of the country with his delusional fear and succeeded to an extent.
|
Response to Sanity Claws (Reply #7)
Mon Mar 12, 2012, 06:55 PM
dmr (25,775 posts)
18. Cheney a long-time alcoholic? I've never heard that.
|
Do you have a link for that? Thanks
|
Response to dmr (Reply #18)
Mon Mar 12, 2012, 07:16 PM
Major Nikon (9,708 posts)
22. He was arrested twice for DUI that we know about.
|
Smokinggun.com used to have the records, but a quick search no longer turns them up.
One arrest would be a strong indicator of alcoholism. Two or more should remove most doubts. I've never heard of him ever receiving treatment for it, although this is certainly not outside the realm of possibility. |
Response to Major Nikon (Reply #22)
Mon Mar 12, 2012, 07:18 PM
dmr (25,775 posts)
24. I knew about the DUIs
|
Thanks.
|
Response to Major Nikon (Reply #22)
Tue Mar 13, 2012, 02:01 AM
chervilant (4,016 posts)
74. hmm...
|
Wasn't he drunk when he shot that poor old man in the face?
|
Response to dmr (Reply #18)
Mon Mar 12, 2012, 08:15 PM
yardwork (37,074 posts)
34. Reports say that Cheney was drinking the day he shot Harry Whittington in the face.
|
There were conflicting reports from the people there. Read down the wiki entry. Reading between the lines, I'd say that Cheney was smashed. No way to prove this of course.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dick_Cheney_hunting_incident |
Response to yardwork (Reply #34)
Mon Mar 12, 2012, 08:32 PM
MsPithy (565 posts)
39. If he was not drinking when he shot a guy in the face,
|
he would have demanded a breathalyzer immediately, just to silence his critics.
|
Response to yardwork (Reply #34)
Mon Mar 12, 2012, 09:32 PM
90-percent (4,603 posts)
54. Reading between the lines
|
Dastardly Dick was shooting between the eyes when he sprayed his hunting buddy with shot.
Drinking and shooting. I guess Dick considers that safer than drinking and driving, anyway. At least the episode gave Dick something else to cover up. -90% Jimmy |
Response to yardwork (Reply #34)
Tue Mar 13, 2012, 04:08 AM
DeSwiss (17,213 posts)
77. ''Hunting'' incident?
This is what it was: Dick and about nine other overfed white guys sitting in a comfy luxury blind with their manly shotguns, waiting for the Westmoreland guy stationed behind them on a hill to release clusters of stunned, fat, tame game birds from a net. Then they shoot them.
Lots and lots of them. And then they slap each other on the back. And they grunt and say nice shot as the birds drop like flies as dogs race back and forth hauling dead or dying birds into huge piles. Whee what fun. More than 400 birds were killed in one lackadaisical afternoon. Dick himself blasted the living crap out of 70 birds, all by himself. That's right, 70. Plus an unknown number of mallard ducks. Then they had them all plucked and vacuum packed and sent back home to show off to the staff. Dick was driven back to the airport in a Humvee. Are we not all impressed? Are we not all sitting here saying, wow, that Dick Cheney guy, he of the massive alleged Halliburton corruption scandals, he is one studly dude, slaughtering a small mountain of docile, stupefied birds that had no chance of escape. What a guy. Read more: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/g/a/2004/01/23/notes012304.DTL&ao=all K&R ![]() |
Response to Judi Lynn (Original post)
Mon Mar 12, 2012, 06:39 PM
KamaAina (45,243 posts)
9. Is Darth even admissible into Canada?
|
With his four, count 'em, four DUIs?
|
Response to KamaAina (Reply #9)
Mon Mar 12, 2012, 06:45 PM
polly7 (7,784 posts)
11. I had no idea he was a serial drunken driver.
|
http://www.1800duilaws.com/article/travel_to_canada.asp
I found this with a quick google search: "Who Can’t Enter Canada. To begin, in Canada a DUI is a felony and therefore an excludable offense under the Immigration Act. A DUI is an indictable offense in Canada that may be punished by imprisonment for up to a 5 year term.¹ Anyone with a conviction in the United States that is treated as a felony or indictable offense in Canada is excludable from Canada, but even if the offense is not a felony or indictable offense in Canada, Customs and Immigration Officers have ultimate authority to permit and deny entry to Canada.²" .................. "Overcoming Exclusion from Canada. There are several ways individuals can overcome criminal inadmissibility, but the short answer you must give your client is that there is no short and easy way to do it.º These include: Deemed rehabilitation at a Canadian port of entry; Streamlined rehabilitation at a Canadian port of entry; Approval of rehabilitation through a Canadian Consulate in the United States; and A Temporary Resident Permit through a Canadian Consulate in the United States 1. Deemed Rehabilitation. Persons are eligible to apply for deemed rehabilitation at a port of entry if the following are true: There was only one conviction in total; At least ten years have elapsed since all of the sentences for the conviction were completed (payment of all fees, jail time completed, restitution paid, etc); The conviction would not be considered serious criminality in Canada (most felony convictions in the United States are equivalent to serious criminality in Canada); and The conviction did not involve any serious property damage, physical harm to any person, or any type of weapon." Seems like the creep can get in. |
Response to KamaAina (Reply #9)
Mon Mar 12, 2012, 09:18 PM
pitohui (20,494 posts)
51. yes there's a form you buy, you're admissable if you buy your way in
|
Last edited Mon Mar 12, 2012, 09:19 PM USA/ET - Edit history (1) it isn't even very expensive to a rich guy like cheney, i'm thinking someone told me it's about $300? so it only keeps out the middle class drunks not the rich ones but anyway it's a special visa for DUIs and other minor criminals
|
Response to KamaAina (Reply #9)
Wed Mar 14, 2012, 07:48 AM
Selatius (20,440 posts)
95. I always considered him Emperor Cheney. Bush was the Darth Vader approximate in my mind.
|
Since, as most of us here surmised, Cheney was the one with the real power in the Bush White House. GWB was a very willing tool in his plans. He, unlike Chaney, never had the capacity for grandiose plans.
|
Response to Judi Lynn (Original post)
Mon Mar 12, 2012, 06:45 PM
WhoIsNumberNone (4,510 posts)
10. Yeah- Cheney wouldn't be safe at all if he had to go to prison...
Response to Judi Lynn (Original post)
Mon Mar 12, 2012, 06:45 PM
DCBob (14,773 posts)
12. LOL!! Those crazy dangerous Canadians.
|
coward.
|
Response to Judi Lynn (Original post)
Mon Mar 12, 2012, 06:49 PM
Faygo Kid (20,215 posts)
13. Surprising for a brave Vietnam vet . . . oh wait
|
Forgot about those five deferments but willingness to send OTHER FOLKS' CHILDREN to their deaths.
|
Response to Judi Lynn (Original post)
Mon Mar 12, 2012, 06:49 PM
donco (1,075 posts)
14. SIGH one more
|
deferment to add to his resume.
|
Response to Judi Lynn (Original post)
Mon Mar 12, 2012, 06:50 PM
JEB (608 posts)
15. I thought
|
Freedom was on the march...just not into Canada I guess. Chickenhawk afraid of prosecution. Not too big on "personal responsibility".
|
Response to Judi Lynn (Original post)
Mon Mar 12, 2012, 06:52 PM
Nostradammit (2,920 posts)
16. "Spectre Live Corp."
|
I never knew that ghouls like Cheney had their own booking agency.
|
Response to Judi Lynn (Original post)
Mon Mar 12, 2012, 06:52 PM
Amonester (10,185 posts)
17. Most (anti-harper) Canadians don't understand why cheneyouR$elf
|
is "still" safe in the U.S. ... ("International Law"-legally speaking)...
|
Response to Judi Lynn (Original post)
Mon Mar 12, 2012, 07:04 PM
Julian Englis (231 posts)
19. Of course it is too dangerous for Cheney
|
Last edited Mon Mar 12, 2012, 07:09 PM USA/ET - Edit history (1) Despite the best efforts of the Canadian right, Canada still is a democracy with a functioning opposition. With any luck, the US soon will be less safe for Cheney.
|
Response to Judi Lynn (Original post)
Mon Mar 12, 2012, 07:11 PM
Gregorian (19,610 posts)
20. You can run, but you can't hide.
|
I hope there's a heaven. I can see that man standing at the gates terrified about his personal safety in that other place.
|
Response to Gregorian (Reply #20)
Mon Mar 12, 2012, 08:00 PM
ThomThom (1,390 posts)
31. Cheney at the gates that is laughable
|
if there is a hell he will be there
personally I don't believe in heaven or hell arrest the war criminal |
Response to Judi Lynn (Original post)
Mon Mar 12, 2012, 07:14 PM
DonCoquixote (5,630 posts)
21. I know Canada has no death penalty
|
But if he dares show up there, would ye kindly consider making an exception? He deserves to hang more than Louis Riel ever did.
|
Response to DonCoquixote (Reply #21)
Mon Mar 12, 2012, 09:32 PM
BlueDemKev (2,590 posts)
55. But they do have National Health Insurance & Gun Control
|
...what does it say about America?
|
Response to BlueDemKev (Reply #55)
Mon Mar 12, 2012, 10:53 PM
DonCoquixote (5,630 posts)
63. That their government is less corrupt
|
Though Harper is working on changing that rapidly.
|
Response to Judi Lynn (Original post)
Mon Mar 12, 2012, 07:42 PM
Solly Mack (49,509 posts)
25. Yeah, well. War criminals should live in fear.
|
At the very (very, very) least.
Living in fear is not an acceptable alternative to their incarceration, however. |
Response to Judi Lynn (Original post)
Mon Mar 12, 2012, 07:52 PM
GliderGuider (15,156 posts)
26. Protesters are keeping Canada safe from the one man occupation team, Dick "The Dick" Cheney. nt
Response to Judi Lynn (Original post)
Mon Mar 12, 2012, 07:53 PM
JBoy (7,463 posts)
27. He wouldn't be able to talk accurately about his experience without admitting war crimes.
Response to Judi Lynn (Original post)
Mon Mar 12, 2012, 07:55 PM
stevedeshazer (21,653 posts)
29. The he'd better stay away from Portland and Seattle, too.
|
We gave him a nice welcome last time he was here in Portland.
It's pretty much unanimous in the Pacific Northwet that Dick Cheney is a dick. I wish he'd get arrested. |
Response to stevedeshazer (Reply #29)
Mon Mar 12, 2012, 09:10 PM
grasswire (36,696 posts)
46. Steve, what are those hats on the protesters?
|
Do you know?
|
Response to grasswire (Reply #46)
Mon Mar 12, 2012, 09:15 PM
stevedeshazer (21,653 posts)
48. Nope. Wish I did.- n/t
Response to Judi Lynn (Original post)
Mon Mar 12, 2012, 07:56 PM
Bucky (41,528 posts)
30. Free speech is dangerous. Freedom of assembly is terrorism.
|
Hiding under your bed is patriotism.
|
Response to Judi Lynn (Original post)
Mon Mar 12, 2012, 08:08 PM
mother earth (3,264 posts)
32. He should stay home always, if Canada's not safe, it should speak volumes to him.
Response to Judi Lynn (Original post)
Mon Mar 12, 2012, 08:10 PM
trusty elf (2,879 posts)
33. .........
![]() |
Response to Judi Lynn (Original post)
Mon Mar 12, 2012, 08:22 PM
mikeSchmuckabee (349 posts)
36. Their gain is our loss.
Response to Judi Lynn (Original post)
Mon Mar 12, 2012, 08:29 PM
thelordofhell (3,809 posts)
38. Isn't he dead yet?
|
Did the bastard get a new heart or something? I thought he had only 6 months to live a year and a half ago?
|
Response to thelordofhell (Reply #38)
Mon Mar 12, 2012, 11:47 PM
lastlib (3,787 posts)
69. I think they put new batteries in the sumbitch. I sure wish they'd over-volt
|
and really give him a charge that would get his heart a-racin'.....Burnout!!
|
Response to Judi Lynn (Original post)
Mon Mar 12, 2012, 08:32 PM
Deep13 (37,259 posts)
40. Is there no safe place in this world for a war criminal besides the USA? nt
Response to Judi Lynn (Original post)
Mon Mar 12, 2012, 08:33 PM
PuffedMica (795 posts)
41. Cheney would be in danger of extradition to the Hague
Response to Judi Lynn (Original post)
Mon Mar 12, 2012, 08:36 PM
LynneSin (89,793 posts)
42. Canada is a beautiful, wonderful and safe country to visit.....
|
as long as you aren't a known war criminal.
|
Response to Judi Lynn (Original post)
Mon Mar 12, 2012, 08:37 PM
FailureToCommunicate (4,399 posts)
43. Dear Dick, Stay OUT of Canada...come to beautiful Marlboro, VT in the good ol USA...
Response to Judi Lynn (Original post)
Mon Mar 12, 2012, 08:42 PM
Doc Holliday (593 posts)
44. See?
|
The Canadians are our friends.
|
Response to Judi Lynn (Original post)
Mon Mar 12, 2012, 08:46 PM
Ilsa (31,683 posts)
45. LOL! That piece of dog excrement
|
has become too paranoid to travel. I hope he and Liz stay in their hidey-holes until his ticker gives out and her teeth fall out.
|
Response to Judi Lynn (Original post)
Mon Mar 12, 2012, 09:17 PM
pitohui (20,494 posts)
49. that's pretty chickenshit
|
if you're too chicken shit to visit canada, what country CAN you visit?
|
Response to Judi Lynn (Original post)
Mon Mar 12, 2012, 09:17 PM
Canuckistanian (42,197 posts)
50. Yeah, right
|
Toronto is no more dangerous than Portland, Maine.
Dick "Dick" Cheney is more afraid of protesters reminding him of his own war crimes. And Canada being a member of the International Criminal Court must make him sweat. All in all a "Profile in Cowardice". |
Response to Canuckistanian (Reply #50)
Wed Mar 14, 2012, 01:01 AM
pbrower2a (125 posts)
93. But would he be arrested?
|
Remember -- war crimes. He has no immunity anymore.
|
Response to pbrower2a (Reply #93)
Wed Mar 14, 2012, 11:17 PM
Canuckistanian (42,197 posts)
99. No. Not with our government at the moment.
|
Harper is trying to ingratiate himself with the American right. He doesn't seem to realize that the former Bush administration is in any way wrong. Even though Americans have rejected them by a large margin.
|
Response to Judi Lynn (Original post)
Mon Mar 12, 2012, 09:29 PM
chrisa (3,365 posts)
52. "The Jackal" must be living in Canada now.
Response to Judi Lynn (Original post)
Mon Mar 12, 2012, 09:31 PM
BlueDemKev (2,590 posts)
53. That's what happens when you act like a "Dick"....
|
....you make enemies even among the friendliest people. So much that you can't set foot outside your own house.
It's absolutely sickening to know that Ted Kennedy is gone while Dick Cheney is still around. Is there any justice in this world? |
Response to Judi Lynn (Original post)
Mon Mar 12, 2012, 09:36 PM
NICO9000 (970 posts)
56. For him it might be
|
God would I love to see him in an orange jumpsuit. Too bad it will never, ever happen.
|
Response to Judi Lynn (Original post)
Mon Mar 12, 2012, 09:42 PM
JJW (1,416 posts)
57. Not safe?
|
Perhaps they will be invaded for their tar sands, uh I mean freedom?
|
Response to Judi Lynn (Original post)
Mon Mar 12, 2012, 09:47 PM
GiveMeFreedom (921 posts)
58. Jebus,
|
This fucker is still alive? He's getting so senile he's beating war drums to go north of the border? What a fucking piece of crap he is!!
![]() |
Response to Judi Lynn (Original post)
Mon Mar 12, 2012, 09:55 PM
90-percent (4,603 posts)
59. Richard Clarke is getting his wish
|
These people are no longer allowed in polite society. I hope Dick enjoys his leper colony like forced isolation. A prisoner in his own country. Couldn't happen to a nicer guy!
-90% jimmy |
Response to 90-percent (Reply #59)
Mon Mar 12, 2012, 10:26 PM
Politicalboi (9,485 posts)
61. It's too bad
|
He ain't broke on top of that in his own country.
|
Response to 90-percent (Reply #59)
Mon Mar 12, 2012, 11:23 PM
Canuckistanian (42,197 posts)
65. Very, very true
|
We don't put up with assholes like Cheney in Canada. And we'll call them on their bullshit every time.
|
Response to Judi Lynn (Original post)
Mon Mar 12, 2012, 10:08 PM
safrthjt (4 posts)
60. Spam deleted by Morning Dew (MIR Team)
Response to Judi Lynn (Original post)
Mon Mar 12, 2012, 11:03 PM
MrMickeysMom (10,683 posts)
64. Quick, let's get a rain barrel for Niagra Falls...
|
Hey, DICK... Wanna go for a RIDE?
|
Response to Judi Lynn (Original post)
Mon Mar 12, 2012, 11:38 PM
broadway515 (1 post)
66. Chief Chickenhawk
|
It seems the Chief of Chickenhawks strikes again...
Big Dick always has more important priorities when his own personal safety is at stake... |
Response to Judi Lynn (Original post)
Mon Mar 12, 2012, 11:40 PM
NBachers (3,697 posts)
67. "Run Chicken Run" Link Wray
Response to Judi Lynn (Original post)
Mon Mar 12, 2012, 11:47 PM
TrogL (31,276 posts)
68. AH Ha ha har har heeeer ROFL stop it I can't take it
|
I can just bloody imagine. I'd have flown down for sure.
|
Response to Judi Lynn (Original post)
Tue Mar 13, 2012, 12:49 AM
excuse not to write (147 posts)
70. Four Words:
|
R. C. M. P.
What a fucking yellowbelly! |
Response to Judi Lynn (Original post)
Tue Mar 13, 2012, 01:02 AM
Vidar (18,335 posts)
71. The clean air would probably kill him.
Response to Judi Lynn (Original post)
Tue Mar 13, 2012, 01:11 AM
young_at_heart (3,311 posts)
72. How many former VP's have been unable to visit Canada?
|
I believe this is unprecedented!
|
Response to Judi Lynn (Original post)
Tue Mar 13, 2012, 03:30 AM
Jamaal510 (3,164 posts)
75. As rich as The Dick is, I still would hate to be him now.
|
I don't get how he can sleep at night, knowing that many consider him a war criminal, and he is among the most hated people in the world.
|
Response to Judi Lynn (Original post)
Tue Mar 13, 2012, 03:41 AM
eepatt (10 posts)
76. Frustration!
|
It is frustrating that we cannot prosecute The Cheney(His first name is "The" although we usually see him referred to by his middle name.) and his war criminal buddies in this country. However, as much as I hate to stand in long lines, I'm gonna piss on his grave.
|
Response to Judi Lynn (Original post)
Tue Mar 13, 2012, 06:08 AM
RogueTrooper (4,337 posts)
78. Brave, Brave Sir Robin
|
Conservatives, their just not very brave
|
Response to Judi Lynn (Original post)
Tue Mar 13, 2012, 06:48 AM
tclambert (5,536 posts)
81. How bad a person must you be for CANADIANS to violently hate you?
|
You've got to be pretty nasty for them even to speak rudely to you.
|
Response to tclambert (Reply #81)
Tue Mar 13, 2012, 12:11 PM
stubtoe (1,854 posts)
84. Excellent point!
Response to Judi Lynn (Original post)
Tue Mar 13, 2012, 07:50 AM
lunatica (28,852 posts)
82. Oh those lucky Canadians!!
|
I wish Cheney would deem the US too dangerous to live in! Why does Canada always get the breaks?!
|
Response to Judi Lynn (Original post)
Tue Mar 13, 2012, 10:32 AM
samsingh (10,344 posts)
83. cheney is an asshole
Response to Judi Lynn (Original post)
Tue Mar 13, 2012, 12:45 PM
AverageJoe90 (5,357 posts)
85. Even Albertans wouldn't like this asshole much........nt
Response to Judi Lynn (Original post)
Tue Mar 13, 2012, 12:47 PM
freefall (662 posts)
86. This is wonderful news
|
It does one's heart good to know that this excuse for a human has been thwarted in any way.
|
Response to Judi Lynn (Original post)
Tue Mar 13, 2012, 02:23 PM
edbermac (11,147 posts)
87. "With all their hockey hullabaloo and that bitch Anne Murray too!"
|
BLAME CANADA!!
|
Response to Judi Lynn (Original post)
Tue Mar 13, 2012, 05:50 PM
The Wizard (7,018 posts)
90. I guess Canada
|
prosecutes war crimes.
|
Response to Judi Lynn (Original post)
Tue Mar 13, 2012, 08:59 PM
Hotler (3,674 posts)
92. Dick and Liz can go fuck themselves. Just remember,
|
Cheney said the the tax cuts were their due and that the Iraqi war would pay for it's self and deficits didn't matter. Rot in hell you fucking shit stain.
|
Response to Judi Lynn (Original post)
Wed Mar 14, 2012, 01:26 AM
Monk06 (5,606 posts)
94. Thanks Dick you just made Canada safer by not showing up. It's a wonder he found enough Canadians
|
interested enough to listen to him in a crummy airport hotel conference room. Multi Level Marketing sleaze balls can do better than that. |
Response to Judi Lynn (Original post)
Wed Mar 14, 2012, 09:26 PM
yellowcanine (24,444 posts)
96. Must suck to be Cheney. Legacy is war criminal, crooked businessman and incompetent hunter who shot
|
his friend in the face. Not to mention that he could drop dead at any moment as his wife tries to kill him with rich food so that she can get his money and use it to snag a younger healthier version.
|
Response to Judi Lynn (Original post)
Wed Mar 14, 2012, 09:51 PM
tabasco (18,296 posts)
97. Just like Vietnam!
|
Really liked watching people die on TV, though!
|




