Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kpete

(71,984 posts)
Thu Dec 5, 2013, 02:01 PM Dec 2013

Obama Executive Order: Federal Government Must Triple Renewable Energy In 7 Years

Source: Think Progress


...............................

Obama now seems to be making good on those statements. On Thursday, the administration released an executive order http://assets.nationaljournal.com/pdf/131205_EOenergymanagement.pdf directing the federal government to triple its use of renewable energy by 2020, which would bring the government’s renewable energy usage to 20 percent. The order will apply to all federal agencies, including the military.

The Associated Press, which obtained a copy of the executive order before it was published, noted that the federal government itself occupies approximately 500,000 buildings and operates 600,000 vehicles, and purchases more than $500 billion per year in goods and services. The order does not disclose the cost of the transition, but says the goal will be reached “to the extent economically feasible and technically practicable.”
The top priority for federal agencies is installing agency-funded renewable energy on-site at federal facilities, and retaining renewable energy certificates, or RECs. An REC is a certificate that represents the environmental value of one megawatt-hour of electricity. In buying a REC, the government essentially pays a little bit of money in order to claim and keep track of the clean benefit of the electricity produced.

Obama has pledged to address climate change during his second term, and in a June speech detailed a three-tier plan for the administration. That plan would cut carbon pollution in America, lead international efforts to cut global emissions, and prepare the U.S. for the costly impacts of climate change. President Obama framed the action as a moral obligation to do what we can for “the world we leave our children.”

“This is the global threat of our time,” Obama said in June. “And for the sake of future generations, our generation must move toward a global compact to confront a changing climate before it is too late. That is our job. That is our task. We have to get to work.”

Read more: http://thinkprogress.org/climate/2013/12/05/3024081/obama-order-federal-government-triple-renewable-energy-2020-2/

19 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Obama Executive Order: Federal Government Must Triple Renewable Energy In 7 Years (Original Post) kpete Dec 2013 OP
Damn Nanny State! nt onehandle Dec 2013 #1
What! Not 100%???? riqster Dec 2013 #2
Off to greatest. nt awoke_in_2003 Dec 2013 #3
Great move. northoftheborder Dec 2013 #4
If it mostly comes from bioethanol, I won't be impressed. Orsino Dec 2013 #5
I hate to say it mcp37 Dec 2013 #7
Well, don't hate to say it. Seems valid. Orsino Dec 2013 #8
I agree. mcp37 Dec 2013 #10
Obama has been strong on wind and solar. kristopher Dec 2013 #12
KnR Hekate Dec 2013 #6
That'll only happen if we hold onto the White House groundloop Dec 2013 #9
Hope it becomes a reality. nt 2naSalit Dec 2013 #11
conflicting signals this week contrarian22 Dec 2013 #13
Can he sign an executive order that might do some good in, say, a year? Doctor_J Dec 2013 #14
Meanwhile on the other side of the aisle kknackjr Dec 2013 #15
A small beginning Coyotl Dec 2013 #16
Countries like Germany and Denmark get, what, 25-30% of their power from non-fossil-fuel sources? nomorenomore08 Dec 2013 #17
Obama also snuck a carbon tax increase into a microwave oven document back in June. It will okaawhatever Dec 2013 #18
This message was self-deleted by its author 24601 Dec 2013 #19

riqster

(13,986 posts)
2. What! Not 100%????
Thu Dec 5, 2013, 02:14 PM
Dec 2013

That damned corporate whore DLC Third Way sellout, olive-garden-eating, pit-bull-porn-watching Obama, he's useless!!!! I'm SERIES!!!!



(yes, )

Orsino

(37,428 posts)
5. If it mostly comes from bioethanol, I won't be impressed.
Thu Dec 5, 2013, 02:23 PM
Dec 2013

Now, carbon-neutral? That would be something.

mcp37

(27 posts)
7. I hate to say it
Thu Dec 5, 2013, 02:44 PM
Dec 2013

but we've got a whole nation to tow behind us. Baby steps are sometimes the only way to go. I get it, I walk to work 2.5 miles one way and back again every day but not everyone can do that. I can take the bus but I & my girlfriend choose to walk unless the weather is bad. Then we take the bus. Not everyone has that option. What Pres. Obama is doing is setting the best example he can. Change doesn't happen over night. We have to show how it can work through doing it. I think that is what we are seeing here. I would love to see us move to trains and pubic transit and foot traffic friendly areas but that is going to take time. Action is the best way to show the value of your actions. WE as the convinced have to show everyone else the value in what we do by doing it.

Orsino

(37,428 posts)
8. Well, don't hate to say it. Seems valid.
Thu Dec 5, 2013, 02:50 PM
Dec 2013

I think we're long past too-little-too-late measures, but when specifics are revealed, perhaps we'll see significant action in the works.

mcp37

(27 posts)
10. I agree.
Thu Dec 5, 2013, 03:26 PM
Dec 2013

We just have top get the general population to go along with us. That takes us showing the relevancy of our position by show it benefits!

kristopher

(29,798 posts)
12. Obama has been strong on wind and solar.
Thu Dec 5, 2013, 03:58 PM
Dec 2013

On Nov.15th they announced a reduction in the ethanol mandate for 2014 from the scheduled 18 billion gal to 15 billion gal.

I'm all in for renewables and follow the policies pretty tightly. Given the circumstances he's had to work with, I've been extremely pleased with the actions the Pres has taken. He has done everything I can think of within the exclusive authority of the Executive Branch to promote clean energy,

groundloop

(11,518 posts)
9. That'll only happen if we hold onto the White House
Thu Dec 5, 2013, 02:55 PM
Dec 2013

Otherwise the use of renewable energy will be eliminated in January of 2017 and we'll be back to square 1 (again).

contrarian22

(16 posts)
13. conflicting signals this week
Thu Dec 5, 2013, 04:47 PM
Dec 2013

WH wants more renewable energy and fines them for creating it. Remember parks and recs department fined Duke energy several millions for bird deaths from it windmills?

 

Doctor_J

(36,392 posts)
14. Can he sign an executive order that might do some good in, say, a year?
Thu Dec 5, 2013, 11:01 PM
Dec 2013

Stuff like this sounds good but is silly and pretty meaningless.

kknackjr

(11 posts)
15. Meanwhile on the other side of the aisle
Sat Dec 7, 2013, 06:18 PM
Dec 2013

Climate change denial is still status quo. We are lucky to be getting 8 years worth of damage control with Obama but in 2016 it's back to the nailbiting game to see what climate change denier and anti-environmentalist corporate puppet is competing to run our nation. Always be looking and thinking ahead!

nomorenomore08

(13,324 posts)
17. Countries like Germany and Denmark get, what, 25-30% of their power from non-fossil-fuel sources?
Sat Dec 7, 2013, 07:32 PM
Dec 2013

And if there weren't so many backward idiots gumming up the works, I'm sure we could do the same here.

okaawhatever

(9,461 posts)
18. Obama also snuck a carbon tax increase into a microwave oven document back in June. It will
Sat Dec 7, 2013, 08:16 PM
Dec 2013

affect several things. Fox news jumped all over it, but few other news sources mentioned it. I think he knows making a big deal out of anything that will hurt big oil only brings serious political backlash. It will have an impact on how the Keystone pipeline is judged by making the cost to the environment in dollars much higher now.

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-06-12/tougher-regulations-seen-from-obama-change-in-carbon-cost.html

Response to kpete (Original post)

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Obama Executive Order: Fe...