HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » Latest Breaking News (Forum) » NSA Analysts Intentionall...

Fri Aug 23, 2013, 01:25 PM

 

NSA Analysts Intentionally Abused Spying Powers Multiple Times

Source: Bloomberg.com

August 23, 2013

Some National Security Agency analysts deliberately ignored restrictions on their authority to spy on Americans multiple times in the past decade, contradicting Obama administration officials’ and lawmakers’ statements that no willful violations occurred.

“Over the past decade, very rare instances of willful violations of NSA’s authorities have been found,” the NSA said in a statement to Bloomberg News. “NSA takes very seriously allegations of misconduct, and cooperates fully with any investigations -- responding as appropriate. NSA has zero tolerance for willful violations of the agency’s authorities.”

The incidents, chronicled in a new report by the NSA’s inspector general, provide more evidence that U.S. agencies sometimes have violated legal and administrative restrictions on domestic spying, and may add to the pressure to bolster laws that govern intelligence activities.

The inspector general documented an average of one case per year over 10 years of intentionally inappropriate actions by people with access to the NSA’s vast electronic surveillance systems, according to an official familiar with the findings. The incidents were minor, the official said, speaking on the condition of anonymity to discuss classified intelligence.

Read more: http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-08-23/nsa-analysts-intentionally-abused-spying-powers-multiple-times.html

11 replies, 1365 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 11 replies Author Time Post
Reply NSA Analysts Intentionally Abused Spying Powers Multiple Times (Original post)
David Krout Aug 2013 OP
AnotherMcIntosh Aug 2013 #1
David Krout Aug 2013 #2
GoneFishin Aug 2013 #3
Ocelot Aug 2013 #8
uhnope Aug 2013 #5
Helen Borg Aug 2013 #6
uhnope Aug 2013 #4
paleotn Aug 2013 #9
uhnope Aug 2013 #10
ChairmanAgnostic Aug 2013 #7
PSPS Aug 2013 #11

Response to David Krout (Original post)

Fri Aug 23, 2013, 01:35 PM

1. But only "one case per year" = bullshit.

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to AnotherMcIntosh (Reply #1)

Fri Aug 23, 2013, 01:38 PM

2. Let's remember, NSA itself can't be the judge of what's "intentional" or not

 

These cases would have to be declassified in order for the public or judges to determine themselves whether the NSA is whitewashing the number of intentional cases or not.

The thing is that we were told by NSA defenders that no intentional incidents occurred. Now it's "10." What's next?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to David Krout (Reply #2)

Fri Aug 23, 2013, 01:54 PM

3. Ditto. One case per year = Bullshit.

With such a huge number of contractors, where there is one abuser there are many more.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to David Krout (Reply #2)

Fri Aug 23, 2013, 04:48 PM

8. They're pulling the numbers out of their NSAsses

 

Booz Allen have already said they "can't" monitor the internet activities of their own employees. Meaning they don't want to because then they'll have to acknowledge said employees' wrongdoing. I don't believe anything they say.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to AnotherMcIntosh (Reply #1)

Fri Aug 23, 2013, 03:54 PM

5. Why? If it doesn't come from Snowden/GG, it can't be true?

I call that BS

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to AnotherMcIntosh (Reply #1)

Fri Aug 23, 2013, 04:27 PM

6. It's one case a year until...

documents proving it's one thousand or more time come out. Then they'll revise the figure accordingly.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to David Krout (Original post)

Fri Aug 23, 2013, 03:54 PM

4. more proof that the NSA panic is overblown.

Only ten instances in ten years. The NSA is responding to the public debate. That these intentional abuses were found in their own audits and reported to news agencies is a good sign. It's a positive step in progressive efforts to monitor the NSA

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to uhnope (Reply #4)

Fri Aug 23, 2013, 06:31 PM

9. Do you honestly believe that?

"Ok, Ok, NSA personnel / contractors broke the LAW oh....I don't know....10 times in the last 10 years. And we caught them ourselves, of course. Satisfied?! Now go on about your petty, little lives. Move along. Nothing to see here. Trust us."

One thing I've learned in nearly 50 years of life is if it can be done, it will be done and if it's profitable or advantageous in any way, despite the risk, it will be done a multitude of times.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to paleotn (Reply #9)

Fri Aug 23, 2013, 06:44 PM

10. Yes, I believe the process is underway and oversight is happening.

Your message seems quite angry, and anger is bad for observation.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to David Krout (Original post)

Fri Aug 23, 2013, 04:29 PM

7. 10 . . . 9 . . . 8 . . .

waiting for the NSA apologists to weigh in seven seconds.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to David Krout (Original post)

Fri Aug 23, 2013, 10:49 PM

11. "The least untruthful answer."

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread