Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

alp227

(32,018 posts)
Sat Dec 17, 2011, 12:02 AM Dec 2011

Ohio Civil Rights Commission to revisit 'white only' pool case

The Ohio Civil Rights Commission in Columbus will revisit next month a case it has already determined probably represents unlawful interference with housing rights on the basis of race.

The case was brought by Michael Gunn, a white man who had unrestricted access to the pool area for himself and his guests during the nearly two years he lived in a duplex in Cincinnati, he told CNN in a telephone interview.

Gunn said he and his girlfriend, who is also white, lived upstairs; their 31-year-old landlord lived downstairs. "It's a very nice neighborhood, racially mixed," said Gunn, a software engineer.

But it turned not-so-nice last Memorial Day, when he invited his 10-year-old biracial daughter to visit and swim in the pool, he said.

"Complainant states that the owner, Jamie Hein, accused his daughter of making the pool 'cloudy' because she used chemicals in her hair," the commission said in its summary. "Days later, the owner posted a sign on the gate to the pool which read, 'Public Swimming Pool, White Only.'"

full: http://www.cnn.com/2011/12/16/us/ohio-white-only/index.html

Wow. Just read that last quote from the commission report again. How many brain cells do you have to lack to make such a stupid statement? Hair chemicals making the pool cloudy and then using that as excuse to post a whites only sign?

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Ohio Civil Rights Commission to revisit 'white only' pool case (Original Post) alp227 Dec 2011 OP
The sign should read "No hair products in pool. Wash hair first, please, thanks!" truthisfreedom Dec 2011 #1
There is a nice indoor pool in my town that asks everyone to shower before entering the pool. ZombieHorde Dec 2011 #3
Your sign would have solved any problem Frances Dec 2011 #4
Thr federal fair housing act doesn't marybourg Dec 2011 #2
It would be informative if someone asked Ron Paul for his opinion on this. Boston_Chemist Dec 2011 #5

ZombieHorde

(29,047 posts)
3. There is a nice indoor pool in my town that asks everyone to shower before entering the pool.
Sat Dec 17, 2011, 03:51 AM
Dec 2011

You have to walk through the shower rooms to enter the pool area.

marybourg

(12,620 posts)
2. Thr federal fair housing act doesn't
Sat Dec 17, 2011, 12:11 AM
Dec 2011

Apply to 2-family houses where the owner occupies 1 of the units . Probably the Ohio statute is the same.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Ohio Civil Rights Commiss...