Ohio Civil Rights Commission to revisit 'white only' pool case
The Ohio Civil Rights Commission in Columbus will revisit next month a case it has already determined probably represents unlawful interference with housing rights on the basis of race.
The case was brought by Michael Gunn, a white man who had unrestricted access to the pool area for himself and his guests during the nearly two years he lived in a duplex in Cincinnati, he told CNN in a telephone interview.
Gunn said he and his girlfriend, who is also white, lived upstairs; their 31-year-old landlord lived downstairs. "It's a very nice neighborhood, racially mixed," said Gunn, a software engineer.
But it turned not-so-nice last Memorial Day, when he invited his 10-year-old biracial daughter to visit and swim in the pool, he said.
"Complainant states that the owner, Jamie Hein, accused his daughter of making the pool 'cloudy' because she used chemicals in her hair," the commission said in its summary. "Days later, the owner posted a sign on the gate to the pool which read, 'Public Swimming Pool, White Only.'"
full: http://www.cnn.com/2011/12/16/us/ohio-white-only/index.html
Wow. Just read that last quote from the commission report again. How many brain cells do you have to lack to make such a stupid statement? Hair chemicals making the pool cloudy and then using that as excuse to post a whites only sign?
truthisfreedom
(23,145 posts)Christ.
ZombieHorde
(29,047 posts)You have to walk through the shower rooms to enter the pool area.
Frances
(8,545 posts)without being overtly racist
marybourg
(12,620 posts)Apply to 2-family houses where the owner occupies 1 of the units . Probably the Ohio statute is the same.
Boston_Chemist
(256 posts)Seriously, it would.