Mon Feb 6, 2012, 10:28 AM
Hissyspit (40,089 posts)
Reuters: Obama Signs Exec Order Blocking All Assets Of Iranian Gov't Held In U.S.Last edited Mon Feb 6, 2012, 12:10 PM USA/ET - Edit history (6)
http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/02/06/us-iran-usa-assets-urgent-idUSTRE81519Q20120206
Obama signs executive order freezing Iran WASHINGTON | Mon Feb 6, 2012 10:39am EST (Reuters) - U.S. President Barack Obama signed an executive order on Monday imposing new, stricter sanctions on Iran and its central bank, saying a broader asset freeze was necessary because Iranian banks were concealing transactions. - snip - The executive order, described as a further step in the U.S. effort to isolate Iran, prevents any assets deemed to be in U.S. control - including foreign branches of American banks - from being transferred, paid, exported or withdrawn. https://twitter.com/#!/Reuters/status/166543335635435521 @Reuters: FLASH: Obama signs executive order blocking all assets of the Iranian government, including central bank held in the United States. https://research.tdwaterhouse.ca/research/public/Markets/NewsArticle/1314-L2E8D66JS-1 8 minutes ago by Thomson Reuters OBAMA SAYS ADDITIONAL SANCTIONS WERE WARRANTED IN LIGHT OF DECEPTIVE PRACTICES OF IRAN CENTRAL BANK AND OTHER IRANIAN BANKS TO CONCEAL TRANSACTIONS .
|
28 replies, 3257 views
| Author | Time | Post | |
| Hissyspit | Feb 2012 | OP | |
| xchrom | Feb 2012 | #1 | |
| Historic NY | Feb 2012 | #2 | |
| RKP5637 | Feb 2012 | #3 | |
| FailureToCommunicate | Feb 2012 | #4 | |
| Kolesar | Feb 2012 | #7 | |
| lindysalsagal | Feb 2012 | #12 | |
| DippyDem | Feb 2012 | #28 | |
| woo me with science | Feb 2012 | #5 | |
| DUIC | Feb 2012 | #6 | |
| JDPriestly | Feb 2012 | #11 | |
| kickysnana | Feb 2012 | #8 | |
| The Northerner | Feb 2012 | #9 | |
| MNBrewer | Feb 2012 | #10 | |
| Robb | Feb 2012 | #13 | |
| DUIC | Feb 2012 | #15 | |
| fujiyama | Feb 2012 | #18 | |
| 24601 | Feb 2012 | #14 | |
| octothorpe | Feb 2012 | #20 | |
| 24601 | Feb 2012 | #23 | |
| octothorpe | Feb 2012 | #24 | |
| kenfrequed | Feb 2012 | #25 | |
| nanabugg | Feb 2012 | #16 | |
| Hotler | Feb 2012 | #17 | |
| Tx4obama | Feb 2012 | #21 | |
| Johnson20 | Feb 2012 | #26 | |
| fujiyama | Feb 2012 | #19 | |
| Art_from_Ark | Feb 2012 | #22 | |
| 24601 | Feb 2012 | #27 |
Response to Hissyspit (Original post)
Mon Feb 6, 2012, 10:31 AM
xchrom (90,675 posts)
1. So there. Nt
Response to Hissyspit (Original post)
Mon Feb 6, 2012, 10:39 AM
Historic NY (19,748 posts)
2. Will that also include the Koch Bros ill gotten gain from its business relationships....
Response to Historic NY (Reply #2)
Mon Feb 6, 2012, 10:47 AM
RKP5637 (25,626 posts)
3. What a blight on humanity the Koch Bros are ...
Response to Historic NY (Reply #2)
Mon Feb 6, 2012, 10:54 AM
FailureToCommunicate (4,399 posts)
4. Man, those whistleblowers at Koch will need to watch their backs.
|
Thanks for the link. Disturbing (but not surprising) stuff!
|
Response to Historic NY (Reply #2)
Mon Feb 6, 2012, 12:43 PM
Kolesar (29,334 posts)
7. Wow. That's like reading a history book
|
It took a lot of pages to document the horrors of the Koch brothers.
|
Response to Historic NY (Reply #2)
Mon Feb 6, 2012, 05:44 PM
lindysalsagal (1,805 posts)
12. I read that Romeny holds Iranian stocks......
|
If that's true, some of his money just dried up. Let's have a bake sale for the poor lad.
|
Response to Historic NY (Reply #2)
Thu Feb 9, 2012, 07:56 PM
DippyDem (420 posts)
28. No wonder the Kochs are pouring their own money into the SuperPacs! N/T
Response to Hissyspit (Original post)
Mon Feb 6, 2012, 10:58 AM
woo me with science (19,693 posts)
5. Here we go.
|
Predictable as hell.
|
Response to Hissyspit (Original post)
Mon Feb 6, 2012, 11:06 AM
DUIC (167 posts)
6. Obama is proving to be better at foreign affairs than any of the Republican Candidates
|
I wonder how Romney will spin this? "Obama is being too soft on Iran because he did not go out and spend the money"?
|
Response to DUIC (Reply #6)
Mon Feb 6, 2012, 04:53 PM
JDPriestly (37,764 posts)
11. That is certain. There is no way any Republican can measure
|
up to Obama on foreign affairs.
|
Response to Hissyspit (Original post)
Mon Feb 6, 2012, 01:51 PM
kickysnana (3,176 posts)
8. The one from the 1980's isn't working?
|
Jesus is coming. Look busy.
|
Response to Hissyspit (Original post)
Mon Feb 6, 2012, 01:55 PM
The Northerner (5,040 posts)
9. What happened to extending a hand to Iran?
|
Last edited Mon Feb 6, 2012, 01:56 PM USA/ET - Edit history (1) And when have sanctions ever been successful?
|
Response to The Northerner (Reply #9)
Mon Feb 6, 2012, 03:25 PM
MNBrewer (5,715 posts)
10. Extending the back of a hand, I guess.
|
*sigh*
|
Response to The Northerner (Reply #9)
Mon Feb 6, 2012, 05:56 PM
Robb (38,354 posts)
13. South Africa. (nt)
Response to The Northerner (Reply #9)
Mon Feb 6, 2012, 06:15 PM
DUIC (167 posts)
15. The dog sometimes bites the extended hand
|
South African sanctions has changed the course of Africa. Sanctions can work, but require consistency.
|
Response to The Northerner (Reply #9)
Mon Feb 6, 2012, 09:17 PM
fujiyama (14,609 posts)
18. He did when he first came to office
|
The Iranian government never reciprocated.
|
Response to Hissyspit (Original post)
Mon Feb 6, 2012, 06:04 PM
24601 (2,494 posts)
14. Boy, Ron Paul is going to be pissed when he finds out - after all, he claims Iran is just as
|
entitled to nukes as the US. Gotta go with Pres Obama on this one.
|
Response to 24601 (Reply #14)
Mon Feb 6, 2012, 10:09 PM
octothorpe (962 posts)
20. While less nukes are always good, I'm not sure I understand why Iran is less entitled to nukes than
|
any other country.
|
Response to octothorpe (Reply #20)
Tue Feb 7, 2012, 10:38 PM
24601 (2,494 posts)
23. Might be their vow to wipe Israel off the map n/t
Response to 24601 (Reply #23)
Wed Feb 8, 2012, 12:15 PM
octothorpe (962 posts)
24. Well we should be making sure they don't get erasers then....
|
No ahem... Here in the US we actually have politicians advocating striking Iran. Israel is doing it too. There are people in the US government talking seriously about attacking Iran. And considering our track record with Iran's neighbors, it's not exactly far fetched. So I'm not following why we're allowed to discuss taking out countries and still have nuclear weapons, but Iran is totally not allowed to.
I'd still rather Iran not have nuclear weapons, but I don't think we hold any moral high ground here. And to be perfectly honest, I can't blame them for wanting to develop nuclear weapons. Put yourself in their shoes.. Although, this is even assuming they truly are developing nuclear weapons. Aren't several groups saying they scraped most of their nuclear weapons programs? I know the US and some others are saying that's not the case, but it's difficult to take them at their word considering the whole Iraq fiasco. |
Response to octothorpe (Reply #24)
Wed Feb 8, 2012, 12:49 PM
kenfrequed (5,277 posts)
25. And don't forget Saudi Arabia
|
They too have an axe to grind against Iran. Several times Saudi Arabia has been pressuring us to strike Iran militarily. As much as many people want to believe that Israel is the voice we listen to in the region, the Saudi's have a hell of a lot more sway with us due to their control of the largest oil fields in the world.
Really there is almost no military reason to strike Iran. Iran would not be stupid enough to get into a conflict with Israel with nuclear weapons. It would be suicide. A nuclear strike on the US would have similar results. Iran wants respect and though this is an idiotic way of going about it they are aware that possessing nuclear weaponry puts you in a different place diplomatically. |
Response to Hissyspit (Original post)
Mon Feb 6, 2012, 06:19 PM
nanabugg (2,198 posts)
16. This will work more against the GOP stock holders of Iranian assets than Iran. nt
Response to Hissyspit (Original post)
Mon Feb 6, 2012, 09:15 PM
Hotler (3,675 posts)
17. How about signing an executive order seizing the assets .....
|
Last edited Mon Feb 6, 2012, 09:15 PM USA/ET - Edit history (1) of the Wall St. banksters. Oh! I forgot. You said they didn't do anything illegal. Never mind.
|
Response to Hotler (Reply #17)
Tue Feb 7, 2012, 01:50 AM
Tx4obama (29,015 posts)
21. We are in The USA, not Cuba. n/t
Response to Tx4obama (Reply #21)
Wed Feb 8, 2012, 01:12 PM
Johnson20 (315 posts)
26. Or Venezuela. n/t
Response to Hissyspit (Original post)
Mon Feb 6, 2012, 09:19 PM
fujiyama (14,609 posts)
19. I see nothing wrong with this
|
This is what the US should have done to the Saudi Arabian government after 9/11.
|
Response to fujiyama (Reply #19)
Tue Feb 7, 2012, 02:36 AM
Art_from_Ark (16,927 posts)
22. The Saudi Arabian government
|
You mean, like Crown Prince Abdullah, Dubya's hand-holding and kissing partner?
Or the Saudi royal Family, oilmen after bu$h and Cheney's own hearts? |
Response to fujiyama (Reply #19)
Thu Feb 9, 2012, 07:22 PM
24601 (2,494 posts)
27. You really gotta distinguish the difference between state and non-state actions. The Saudis who
|
carried out the 9-11 attacks oppose the Saudi government. So we reward the attackers by attacking their enemies? Shit, why not just attack Tibet, after all, they are tied to China?
|

