HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » Latest Breaking News (Forum) » Reuters: Obama Signs Exec...

Mon Feb 6, 2012, 10:28 AM

Reuters: Obama Signs Exec Order Blocking All Assets Of Iranian Gov't Held In U.S.

Last edited Mon Feb 6, 2012, 12:10 PM USA/ET - Edit history (6)

http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/02/06/us-iran-usa-assets-urgent-idUSTRE81519Q20120206

Obama signs executive order freezing Iran

WASHINGTON | Mon Feb 6, 2012 10:39am EST

(Reuters) - U.S. President Barack Obama signed an executive order on Monday imposing new, stricter sanctions on Iran and its central bank, saying a broader asset freeze was necessary because Iranian banks were concealing transactions.

- snip -

The executive order, described as a further step in the U.S. effort to isolate Iran, prevents any assets deemed to be in U.S. control - including foreign branches of American banks - from being transferred, paid, exported or withdrawn.

https://twitter.com/#!/Reuters/status/166543335635435521

@Reuters: FLASH: Obama signs executive order blocking all assets of the Iranian government, including central bank held in the United States.

https://research.tdwaterhouse.ca/research/public/Markets/NewsArticle/1314-L2E8D66JS-1

8 minutes ago by Thomson Reuters
OBAMA SAYS ADDITIONAL SANCTIONS WERE WARRANTED IN LIGHT OF DECEPTIVE PRACTICES OF IRAN CENTRAL BANK AND OTHER IRANIAN BANKS TO CONCEAL TRANSACTIONS
.

28 replies, 3257 views

Thread informationRemove bookmarkTrash this thread

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 28 replies Author Time Post
Reply Reuters: Obama Signs Exec Order Blocking All Assets Of Iranian Gov't Held In U.S. (Original post)
Hissyspit Feb 2012 OP
xchrom Feb 2012 #1
Historic NY Feb 2012 #2
RKP5637 Feb 2012 #3
FailureToCommunicate Feb 2012 #4
Kolesar Feb 2012 #7
lindysalsagal Feb 2012 #12
DippyDem Feb 2012 #28
woo me with science Feb 2012 #5
DUIC Feb 2012 #6
JDPriestly Feb 2012 #11
kickysnana Feb 2012 #8
The Northerner Feb 2012 #9
MNBrewer Feb 2012 #10
Robb Feb 2012 #13
DUIC Feb 2012 #15
fujiyama Feb 2012 #18
24601 Feb 2012 #14
octothorpe Feb 2012 #20
24601 Feb 2012 #23
octothorpe Feb 2012 #24
kenfrequed Feb 2012 #25
nanabugg Feb 2012 #16
Hotler Feb 2012 #17
Tx4obama Feb 2012 #21
Johnson20 Feb 2012 #26
fujiyama Feb 2012 #19
Art_from_Ark Feb 2012 #22
24601 Feb 2012 #27

Response to Hissyspit (Original post)

Mon Feb 6, 2012, 10:31 AM

1. So there. Nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Hissyspit (Original post)

Mon Feb 6, 2012, 10:39 AM

2. Will that also include the Koch Bros ill gotten gain from its business relationships....

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Historic NY (Reply #2)

Mon Feb 6, 2012, 10:47 AM

3. What a blight on humanity the Koch Bros are ...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Historic NY (Reply #2)

Mon Feb 6, 2012, 10:54 AM

4. Man, those whistleblowers at Koch will need to watch their backs.

Thanks for the link. Disturbing (but not surprising) stuff!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Historic NY (Reply #2)

Mon Feb 6, 2012, 12:43 PM

7. Wow. That's like reading a history book

It took a lot of pages to document the horrors of the Koch brothers.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Historic NY (Reply #2)

Mon Feb 6, 2012, 05:44 PM

12. I read that Romeny holds Iranian stocks......

If that's true, some of his money just dried up. Let's have a bake sale for the poor lad.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Historic NY (Reply #2)

Thu Feb 9, 2012, 07:56 PM

28. No wonder the Kochs are pouring their own money into the SuperPacs! N/T

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Hissyspit (Original post)

Mon Feb 6, 2012, 10:58 AM

5. Here we go.

Predictable as hell.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Hissyspit (Original post)

Mon Feb 6, 2012, 11:06 AM

6. Obama is proving to be better at foreign affairs than any of the Republican Candidates

 

I wonder how Romney will spin this? "Obama is being too soft on Iran because he did not go out and spend the money"?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to DUIC (Reply #6)

Mon Feb 6, 2012, 04:53 PM

11. That is certain. There is no way any Republican can measure

up to Obama on foreign affairs.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Hissyspit (Original post)

Mon Feb 6, 2012, 01:51 PM

8. The one from the 1980's isn't working?

Jesus is coming. Look busy.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Hissyspit (Original post)

Mon Feb 6, 2012, 01:55 PM

9. What happened to extending a hand to Iran?

Last edited Mon Feb 6, 2012, 01:56 PM USA/ET - Edit history (1)

And when have sanctions ever been successful?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to The Northerner (Reply #9)

Mon Feb 6, 2012, 03:25 PM

10. Extending the back of a hand, I guess.

*sigh*

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to The Northerner (Reply #9)

Mon Feb 6, 2012, 05:56 PM

13. South Africa. (nt)

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to The Northerner (Reply #9)

Mon Feb 6, 2012, 06:15 PM

15. The dog sometimes bites the extended hand

 

South African sanctions has changed the course of Africa. Sanctions can work, but require consistency.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to The Northerner (Reply #9)

Mon Feb 6, 2012, 09:17 PM

18. He did when he first came to office

The Iranian government never reciprocated.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Hissyspit (Original post)

Mon Feb 6, 2012, 06:04 PM

14. Boy, Ron Paul is going to be pissed when he finds out - after all, he claims Iran is just as

entitled to nukes as the US. Gotta go with Pres Obama on this one.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to 24601 (Reply #14)

Mon Feb 6, 2012, 10:09 PM

20. While less nukes are always good, I'm not sure I understand why Iran is less entitled to nukes than

any other country.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to octothorpe (Reply #20)

Tue Feb 7, 2012, 10:38 PM

23. Might be their vow to wipe Israel off the map n/t

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to 24601 (Reply #23)

Wed Feb 8, 2012, 12:15 PM

24. Well we should be making sure they don't get erasers then....

No ahem... Here in the US we actually have politicians advocating striking Iran. Israel is doing it too. There are people in the US government talking seriously about attacking Iran. And considering our track record with Iran's neighbors, it's not exactly far fetched. So I'm not following why we're allowed to discuss taking out countries and still have nuclear weapons, but Iran is totally not allowed to.


I'd still rather Iran not have nuclear weapons, but I don't think we hold any moral high ground here. And to be perfectly honest, I can't blame them for wanting to develop nuclear weapons. Put yourself in their shoes.. Although, this is even assuming they truly are developing nuclear weapons. Aren't several groups saying they scraped most of their nuclear weapons programs? I know the US and some others are saying that's not the case, but it's difficult to take them at their word considering the whole Iraq fiasco.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to octothorpe (Reply #24)

Wed Feb 8, 2012, 12:49 PM

25. And don't forget Saudi Arabia

They too have an axe to grind against Iran. Several times Saudi Arabia has been pressuring us to strike Iran militarily. As much as many people want to believe that Israel is the voice we listen to in the region, the Saudi's have a hell of a lot more sway with us due to their control of the largest oil fields in the world.

Really there is almost no military reason to strike Iran. Iran would not be stupid enough to get into a conflict with Israel with nuclear weapons. It would be suicide. A nuclear strike on the US would have similar results.

Iran wants respect and though this is an idiotic way of going about it they are aware that possessing nuclear weaponry puts you in a different place diplomatically.


Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Hissyspit (Original post)

Mon Feb 6, 2012, 06:19 PM

16. This will work more against the GOP stock holders of Iranian assets than Iran. nt

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Hissyspit (Original post)

Mon Feb 6, 2012, 09:15 PM

17. How about signing an executive order seizing the assets .....

Last edited Mon Feb 6, 2012, 09:15 PM USA/ET - Edit history (1)

of the Wall St. banksters. Oh! I forgot. You said they didn't do anything illegal. Never mind.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Hotler (Reply #17)

Tue Feb 7, 2012, 01:50 AM

21. We are in The USA, not Cuba. n/t

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Tx4obama (Reply #21)

Wed Feb 8, 2012, 01:12 PM

26. Or Venezuela. n/t

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Hissyspit (Original post)

Mon Feb 6, 2012, 09:19 PM

19. I see nothing wrong with this

This is what the US should have done to the Saudi Arabian government after 9/11.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to fujiyama (Reply #19)

Tue Feb 7, 2012, 02:36 AM

22. The Saudi Arabian government

You mean, like Crown Prince Abdullah, Dubya's hand-holding and kissing partner?
Or the Saudi royal Family, oilmen after bu$h and Cheney's own hearts?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to fujiyama (Reply #19)

Thu Feb 9, 2012, 07:22 PM

27. You really gotta distinguish the difference between state and non-state actions. The Saudis who

carried out the 9-11 attacks oppose the Saudi government. So we reward the attackers by attacking their enemies? Shit, why not just attack Tibet, after all, they are tied to China?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread