HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » Latest Breaking News (Forum) » Federal judge rules surve...
Introducing Discussionist: A new forum by the creators of DU

Fri Mar 15, 2013, 09:51 PM

Federal judge rules surveillance provisions unconstitutional

This discussion thread was locked as off-topic by Tx4obama (a host of the Latest Breaking News forum).

Source: Yahoo




By Bernard Vaughan | Reuters – 1 hr 31 mins ago



By Bernard Vaughan
NEW YORK (Reuters) - A federal judge has ruled unconstitutional national security provisions that permit federal investigators to access customer information from some companies without court approval.
The provisions "suffer from significant constitutional infirmities," and violate the First Amendment and separation of powers, Judge Susan Illston of the District Court for the Northern District of California wrote in an order on Thursday.
The judge's decision stems from a "National Security Letter" that the Federal Bureau of Investigation issued to an unnamed telecommunications company, according to the Electronic Frontier Foundation.
The National Security Letter provision of the Patriot Act expanded the FBI's authority to demand personal customer records from Internet service providers, financial institutions and credit companies without prior court approval, according to the American Civil Liberties Union.
The letter to the telecommunications company sought "subscriber information" from the company, and warned that the letter's disclosure could result "in a danger to the United States," among other ramifications, according to the decision.

--snip--



Read more: http://news.yahoo.com/federal-judge-rules-surveillance-provisions-unconstitutional-001457869--finance.html 



This is a very big deal.

2 replies, 586 views

Cannot reply in locked threads

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 2 replies Author Time Post
Reply Federal judge rules surveillance provisions unconstitutional (Original post)
formercia Mar 2013 OP
Mnemosyne Mar 2013 #1
Tx4obama Mar 2013 #2

Response to formercia (Original post)

Fri Mar 15, 2013, 09:54 PM

1. Friday late good news dump? Very big deal, I agree! nt

Cannot reply in locked threads

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to formercia (Original post)

Fri Mar 15, 2013, 09:57 PM

2. Locking, sorry. LBN Dupe. Please continue discussion on LBN link below

Cannot reply in locked threads

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink