Sat Mar 2, 2013, 12:37 PM
alp227 (20,492 posts)
Scale of sequestration cuts becomes clear as Obama attacks Republicans
Source: The guardian
The scale and reach of the sequestration spending cuts that will hit the US has been laid bare by government officials who warn that the order for the cuts, which was signed by president Barack Obama late Friday, would be "deeply destructive" to the economy and national security. The Office of Management and Budget has compiled an official report on the breakdown of the $85bn cuts package, which was triggered by a failure to reach a broader political consensus on deficit reduction. The document reveals a detailed list of how the cuts will hurt spending at every level of government. It shows that research spending at the Department of Agriculture will be hit by $55m of cuts, while $150m will go from the immigration system at the Department of Homeland Security. ... On Saturday, Obama warned of a "ripple effect" through the American economy that would cost hundreds of thousands of jobs. Obama said the sequestration was "not smart". "The pain will be real," he said in his weekly address. "Many middle-class families will have their lives disrupted in a significant way." ... "It's happening because Republicans in Congress chose this outcome over closing a single wasteful tax loophole that helps reduce the deficit. Just this week, they decided that protecting special-interest tax breaks for the well-off and well-connected is more important than protecting our military and middle-class families from these cuts," Obama said. ... But on Saturday Republicans were still standing firm. In the party's own weekly address, the congresswoman Cathy McMorris Rodgers attacked "out-of-control government spending" and said there was no point in new taxes, as the money would just be wasted. Read more: http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/mar/02/sequestration-cuts-barack-obama-republicans
|
14 replies, 2059 views
| Author | Time | Post | |
| alp227 | Mar 2 | OP | |
| freshwest | Mar 2 | #1 | |
| Andy823 | Mar 2 | #7 | |
| freshwest | Mar 2 | #8 | |
| CJCRANE | Mar 2 | #2 | |
| Andy823 | Mar 2 | #6 | |
| lovuian | Mar 2 | #3 | |
| truthisfreedom | Mar 2 | #4 | |
| djean111 | Mar 2 | #5 | |
| CarmanK | Mar 2 | #9 | |
| kelliekat44 | Mar 2 | #10 | |
| AndyTiedye | Mar 3 | #13 | |
| blkmusclmachine | Mar 2 | #11 | |
| boomerbust | Mar 3 | #12 | |
| AndyTiedye | Mar 3 | #14 |
Response to alp227 (Original post)
Sat Mar 2, 2013, 12:42 PM
freshwest (31,525 posts)
1. I see the Republicans are making use of their judas goat.
|
Last edited Sat Mar 2, 2013, 12:43 PM USA/ET - Edit history (1) How did she vote on the VAWA?
Another waste of money in her eyes, I bet. |
Response to freshwest (Reply #1)
Sat Mar 2, 2013, 03:23 PM
Andy823 (4,701 posts)
7. Yep
|
She seems to like being put out there to make up BS for Boehner and the boys!
She used to be my rep. but when they did the redistricting thing I ended up with Doc Hastings instead and he is worthless as hell! Both are simply mindless drones spewing the right wing talking points instead of actually doing what is good for the people in their districts back home! |
Response to Andy823 (Reply #7)
Sat Mar 2, 2013, 03:36 PM
freshwest (31,525 posts)
8. They're both ruining the dialog in WA state. She's worse than him, though, I'll bet.
Response to alp227 (Original post)
Sat Mar 2, 2013, 12:46 PM
CJCRANE (13,366 posts)
2. But I'm sure Boehner said
|
he was happy to look at closing tax loopholes, a few months ago.
(Or maybe it was Romney, but it seemed like the Repubs were okay with the idea). |
Response to CJCRANE (Reply #2)
Sat Mar 2, 2013, 03:20 PM
Andy823 (4,701 posts)
6. Yes he did
|
But that was then, and it was simply a ploy on his part to try and avoid ending the Bush tax cuts on the supper rich. He knew it wouldn't happen. Now he is doing the old right wing "selective" memory thing where they forget all things they said in the past, at least all the things that the president and the democrats are willing to take him up on.
|
Response to alp227 (Original post)
Sat Mar 2, 2013, 12:49 PM
lovuian (18,384 posts)
3. this will be the Republicans undoing
|
I have no doubt about it
and when you cut the poor...there will be ramifications they will resort to stealing and yet your prisons budgets will be cut its a vicious no win scenario which will show AUSTERE MEASURES make the rich wealthier and the poor poorer I here a death gasp from the Republican party |
Response to alp227 (Original post)
Sat Mar 2, 2013, 01:01 PM
truthisfreedom (17,678 posts)
4. Grover Norquist gave us the idea. And now the repukes are fulfilling it.
|
They're about to shrink their party so much that we can drown it in a bathtub.
|
Response to alp227 (Original post)
Sat Mar 2, 2013, 01:12 PM
djean111 (957 posts)
5. The GOP wanted the cuts.
|
The GOP got exactly what they wanted. No news there.
No chess, no backed into a corner, whatever. My prediction is that people will grumble, but neither party gives a shit. They don't have to give a shit until 2014, when they all will spew the usual lies and everyone will dutifully vote according to the R or D (D = r, really) after the names on the ballots. The cuts will stay, except possibly the defense cuts will be repealed, since those cuts affect corporate money. I would love to be wrong...... |
Response to alp227 (Original post)
Sat Mar 2, 2013, 03:37 PM
CarmanK (648 posts)
9. MD defense industry got 240 workers sent home yesterday as sequester set in.
Response to alp227 (Original post)
Sat Mar 2, 2013, 03:42 PM
kelliekat44 (1,296 posts)
10. The problem is in the framing of the isssue,
|
Allowing them to frame closing tax loopholes as new taxes is a mistake. They should be framed as "uncollected taxes" or "tax breaks" or "unrealized tax revenues" These only benefit large corporations and the wealthy who have been scamming the American consumer for too long!
|
Response to kelliekat44 (Reply #10)
Sun Mar 3, 2013, 09:35 PM
AndyTiedye (22,977 posts)
13. Rapeuglicans Own the Media, So They Get to Do the Framing
|
It really is that simple.
|
Response to alp227 (Original post)
Sat Mar 2, 2013, 05:24 PM
blkmusclmachine (2,875 posts)
11. Bipartisanship. Yay!
|
Last edited Sat Mar 2, 2013, 05:24 PM USA/ET - Edit history (1) |
Response to alp227 (Original post)
Sun Mar 3, 2013, 05:14 AM
boomerbust (2,158 posts)
12. Make no mistake
|
Obama got snookered. AGAIN!!!
|
Response to boomerbust (Reply #12)
Sun Mar 3, 2013, 10:03 PM
AndyTiedye (22,977 posts)
14. It's a Losing Hand No Matter How He Played It
|
He didn't have the votes, he doesn't have the votes now, and he won't have the votes any time in the foreseeable future.
The Rapeuglicans can do this precisely because gerrymandering has made it all but impossible for us to retake the House. That means that they don't care how much pain they cause. They don't have to. Their seats are secure no matter what. The Democrats are in a far weaker position. |

