Thu Feb 28, 2013, 09:16 PM
kpete (38,900 posts)
Drug testing of lawmakers added to Kansas bill
Source: Kansas City Star
Drug testing of lawmakers added to Kansas bill February 28 BY BRENT D. WISTROM Eagle Topeka bureau TOPEKA — State lawmakers may have to take a test to prove they’re not on drugs. That’s because senators tentatively agreed Wednesday to add lawmakers to a bill that requires drug tests of any welfare or unemployment recipient who state officials reasonably suspect is using illegal substances. “What’s good for the goose is good for the gander,” said Wichita Democratic Sen. Oletha Faust-Goudeau, who opposed testing the poor and unemployed but wanted to include lawmakers if the idea were to pass. Lawmakers, however, shot down another proposal that would have required drug tests of businesspeople controlling companies that get economic incentives from the state. Read more: http://www.kansascity.com/2013/02/27/4091117/drug-testing-of-lawmakers-added.html#storylink=cpy#storylink=cpy
|
18 replies, 2239 views
| Author | Time | Post | |
| kpete | Feb 28 | OP | |
| niyad | Feb 28 | #1 | |
| cstanleytech | Feb 28 | #8 | |
| niyad | Feb 28 | #9 | |
| cstanleytech | Feb 28 | #11 | |
| lexx21 | Feb 28 | #2 | |
| and-justice-for-all | Feb 28 | #3 | |
| zbdent | Feb 28 | #5 | |
| another_liberal | Feb 28 | #4 | |
| zbdent | Feb 28 | #6 | |
| another_liberal | Mar 1 | #16 | |
| AlbertCat | Feb 28 | #7 | |
| ellie | Feb 28 | #10 | |
| fantase56 | Feb 28 | #12 | |
| Viva_La_Revolution | Mar 1 | #15 | |
| Proletariatprincess | Feb 28 | #13 | |
| daybranch | Mar 1 | #14 | |
| FiveGoodMen | Mar 1 | #17 | |
| Paul E Ester | Mar 1 | #18 |
Response to kpete (Original post)
Thu Feb 28, 2013, 09:21 PM
niyad (24,196 posts)
1. I have been saying for a long time that every time pols require a drug test for some portion of
|
society, they should be required to be tested as well. before each vote, before each payday--every time they go on some "fact-finding trip" paid for by companies or lobbyists--hell, every time they MEET with company reps or lobbyists.
I like the testing of the businesspeople--what a great idea!! |
Response to niyad (Reply #1)
Thu Feb 28, 2013, 10:10 PM
cstanleytech (5,316 posts)
8. I respectfully disagree with requiring a drug test of politicians.
|
Now a lie detector test to ask them if they have every accepted a bribe or solicited for a "donation" to sway their vote? I could go for that in a heatbeat.
|
Response to cstanleytech (Reply #8)
Thu Feb 28, 2013, 10:13 PM
niyad (24,196 posts)
9. well, except that polygraphs are NOT 100% reliable.
Response to niyad (Reply #9)
Thu Feb 28, 2013, 11:21 PM
cstanleytech (5,316 posts)
11. Nor are drug tests. nt
Response to kpete (Original post)
Thu Feb 28, 2013, 09:23 PM
lexx21 (196 posts)
2. Of course they shot down their big business friends being tested...
|
if they had not, then who would they go to for hookers and blow?
|
Response to kpete (Original post)
Thu Feb 28, 2013, 09:35 PM
and-justice-for-all (14,763 posts)
3. If your taking tax payer funds or services...
|
then you should be tested, especially lawmakers and not just once either.
|
Response to and-justice-for-all (Reply #3)
Thu Feb 28, 2013, 09:56 PM
zbdent (34,523 posts)
5. If you feel that your taxes are so bad that your business can't survive ...
|
maybe the IRS should have a looksee and they might be able to show you how you CAN survive ...
|
Response to kpete (Original post)
Thu Feb 28, 2013, 09:55 PM
another_liberal (1,176 posts)
4. Drug testing of businesspeople?
|
Corporate CEO's will never give up snorting cocaine with their hookers. Never, I tell you, never!
|
Response to another_liberal (Reply #4)
Thu Feb 28, 2013, 09:57 PM
zbdent (34,523 posts)
6. ON their hookers ...
|
of course, hookers and Republican lawmakers are pretty much the same thing ... only the hookers are more respectable ... and probably more honest ... "Oh, you're SOOOOOO good!"
|
Response to zbdent (Reply #6)
Fri Mar 1, 2013, 01:02 PM
another_liberal (1,176 posts)
16. So true!
|
Hookers also are more beneficial to society.
|
Response to kpete (Original post)
Thu Feb 28, 2013, 10:10 PM
AlbertCat (10,450 posts)
7. Is anyone testing for....
|
.... the 3 martini lunch????
|
Response to kpete (Original post)
Thu Feb 28, 2013, 10:31 PM
ellie (5,169 posts)
10. Hahahahahahahahaha
|
<gasp>
Hahahahahahahahaha |
Response to kpete (Original post)
Thu Feb 28, 2013, 11:23 PM
fantase56 (15 posts)
12. as a recovering kansan
|
|
Response to fantase56 (Reply #12)
Fri Mar 1, 2013, 10:42 AM
Viva_La_Revolution (27,078 posts)
15. Welcome to DU, fantase56!
|
Response to kpete (Original post)
Thu Feb 28, 2013, 11:34 PM
Proletariatprincess (718 posts)
13. Nothing is ever what it seems....
|
Drug testing is about, and always has been about, Marijuana/Cannibus. All other substances disappear from the system in a reasonable time, but Cannibus can stay in the system for as long as 30 days.
Drug testing is a class/race based violation of the 4th Amendment: an unreasonable search. It is unlikely that the Lawmakers in Kansas will test positive for any substance unless they use Marijuana. How likely is that? And, can we really trust any test results that come from that source? |
Response to kpete (Original post)
Fri Mar 1, 2013, 01:08 AM
daybranch (391 posts)
14. If not on drugs
|
why are they so lost about what the people need and want? They are about to give up their only valid excuse and if they quit can you imagine them as even less mellow?
|
Response to kpete (Original post)
Fri Mar 1, 2013, 01:07 PM
FiveGoodMen (13,238 posts)
17. Wrong direction
|
STOP testing everyone.
|
Response to FiveGoodMen (Reply #17)
Fri Mar 1, 2013, 01:17 PM
Paul E Ester (952 posts)
18. So often we'll put up with bullshit, if only everyone has to suffer with us. Like you said,
|
enough of the bullshit.
|

