Mon Feb 25, 2013, 09:48 PM
alp227 (29,700 posts)
Sotomayor chides prosecutor for ‘racially charged’ question
Source: Washington Post
Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor accused a Texas federal prosecutor Monday of tapping into a “deep and sorry vein of racial prejudice” in his questioning of a black man facing a drug charge.
The justices did not accept Bongani Charles Calhoun’s request that the court review his conviction, but Sotomayor appended a scathing statement to make sure that the court’s denial was not be seen as a signal of “tolerance of a federal prosecutor’s racially charged remark.”
Sotomayor did not name Assistant U.S. Attorney Sam L. Ponder in her statement, but she denounced his questioning of Calhoun, who maintained in court that he did not know that the friends with whom he was traveling were planning a drug deal.
Ponder had asked Calhoun: “You’ve got African Americans, you’ve got Hispanics, you’ve got a bag full of money. Does that tell you — a light bulb doesn’t go off in your head and say, ‘This is a drug deal?’ ”
Read more: http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/sotomayor-chides-prosecutor-for-racially-charged-question/2013/02/25/23e4a836-7f8d-11e2-b99e-6baf4ebe42df_story.html
11 replies, 3222 views
Sotomayor chides prosecutor for ‘racially charged’ question (Original post)
|Xipe Totec||Feb 2013||#2|
|Xipe Totec||Feb 2013||#9|
Response to Xipe Totec (Reply #2)
Tue Feb 26, 2013, 12:09 AM
1KansasDem (251 posts)
4. When the supremes refuse to take up a case
I didn't believe we ever know what the vote is.
Refusing to take the case had nothing to do with the incendiary questioning of the witness.
It was basically a statute of limitations issue.
Response to Xipe Totec (Reply #9)
Tue Feb 26, 2013, 08:13 AM
msanthrope (36,264 posts)
10. You have no frackin' clue what she said in conference. And you have no idea how rare a cert denial
statement is. Your inference--based on no facts at all, is revolting.
Response to blueclown (Reply #1)
Tue Feb 26, 2013, 12:58 AM
msanthrope (36,264 posts)
5. It's a statement on a cert denial, pretty rare. As I noted on this thread,
the prosecutor did more than make one statement--and the DOJ should have done a better job on this.
Response to msanthrope (Reply #5)
Tue Feb 26, 2013, 01:50 AM
joshcryer (58,001 posts)
8. Thanks msanthrope.
Good to have a lawyer amongst us.
I hate law. Helped my mom edit her essays in real estate law and criminal law. Really fascinating stuff but it's not terribly interesting to me (fascinating when reading, but if I wasn't helping my mom edit her essays for school, I wouldn't have cared much about it, still I learned a lot). She can't do Word very well but she's one sharp lady.
edit: she actually has a signed letter from Sotomayor congratulating her on her success in criminal law, because she did a paper and sent it to Sotomayor and apparently Sotomayor read it. One of her proudest possessions.