Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Omaha Steve

(99,505 posts)
Thu Feb 7, 2013, 06:18 PM Feb 2013

Vermont Introduces “Right-to-Work” Kryptonite Law, S.14 the “Fair Share Bill”

Source: We Party Patriots

By Chaz Bolte

With Missouri, Pennsylvania and other states threatening to go the “Right-to-Work” route this year, Vermont stands out as one of the few states setting the opposite example. With what might be described as an “Anti-Right-to-Work” law, Vermont’s Senate Committee on Economic Development voted 5-0 to introduce a “Fair Share Bill” which would require state workers grandfathered out of paying “agency fees” to do so. Those fees go towards costs associated with negotiating and enforcing contracts as well as representation during grievances. They do not, however, go towards political activities.

The bill, S.14, is aimed at ensuring that all those who receive the benefits of union representation pay their fair share into the bargaining process. According to the Vermont Progressive Party,

S.14 as introduced states, “This bill proposes to require payment of agency fees by teachers, school administrators, and municipal employees who are not members of a labor organization recognized as the exclusive bargaining agent. In addition, it would confirm explicitly that agency fees cannot be used for any purpose other than in connection with collective bargaining.”

Legislation sponsor Sen Philip Baruth told Vermont Public Radio, “What this bill seeks to say is that no one will be forced to join a union after this bill goes through the process for good or ill. What it will say is that no one from this point forward would be allowed to avoid paying anything into the system,” he said. “If you enjoy the benefits of your union and collective bargaining you will have to pay a percentage of what a fully paid up member of the union would pay.”

FULL story at link.



Read more: http://wepartypatriots.com/wp/2013/02/07/vermont-introduces-right-to-work-kryptonite-law-s-14-the-fair-share-bill/



About the Author: Chaz Bolte

Chaz Bolte is a native of Pittsburgh, PA where he attended Slippery Rock University. He currently contributes to WePartyPatriots, Addicting Info, Secret Party Room, and Football Nation. You can follow him on Twitter @ChazBolte



15 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Vermont Introduces “Right-to-Work” Kryptonite Law, S.14 the “Fair Share Bill” (Original Post) Omaha Steve Feb 2013 OP
WePartyPatriots. I like that. freshwest Feb 2013 #1
K&R SunSeeker Feb 2013 #2
Whatever is in the water in Vermont Smilo Feb 2013 #3
I know huh.. what a beautiful little Cha Feb 2013 #4
Its called compassion and the republicans would seek to classify it as a class 1 cstanleytech Feb 2013 #5
They probably already have drones Smilo Feb 2013 #6
SNOW! Want some? Auntie Bush Feb 2013 #11
SNOW ?! SNOW??!! I GOT YOUR SNOW!! RIGHT HERE, I GOT YOUR SNOW !!!!!!! King_Klonopin Feb 2013 #13
Nice! a2liberal Feb 2013 #7
Please do! It'a a great state! I'm always proud to say I'm a Vermonter. Auntie Bush Feb 2013 #12
and a Vermont House and Senate with lots of great young and not so cali Feb 2013 #14
YEAH B-ONE Lancer Feb 2013 #8
Which itself attacked the NLR act. What's your point? Squinch Feb 2013 #10
I love it when SoapBox Feb 2013 #9
Our union doesn't make contributions to political candidates or parties. LiberalFighter Feb 2013 #15

cstanleytech

(26,244 posts)
5. Its called compassion and the republicans would seek to classify it as a class 1
Thu Feb 7, 2013, 07:02 PM
Feb 2013

controlled substance if it could be bottled and exported in order to keep it from spreading.

King_Klonopin

(1,306 posts)
13. SNOW ?! SNOW??!! I GOT YOUR SNOW!! RIGHT HERE, I GOT YOUR SNOW !!!!!!!
Fri Feb 8, 2013, 04:54 AM
Feb 2013

Just kidding, auntie.
'bout to get buried down here in Massa-two-shits.

 

cali

(114,904 posts)
14. and a Vermont House and Senate with lots of great young and not so
Fri Feb 8, 2013, 06:43 AM
Feb 2013

young Progressives. Phil Baruth, David Zuckerman, Shap Smith, Peter Galbraith (yes, that Galbraith). Bernie, Pat and Peter are all in their late 60s or early 70s. When they retire, there are lots of good candidates.

SoapBox

(18,791 posts)
9. I love it when
Thu Feb 7, 2013, 07:49 PM
Feb 2013

there is complaining, whining and the like, by people that are getting the BENEFIT of having a union negotiate
a contract...and they don't want to pay dues.

I have a "relative" that works for UPS as a driver...so, they are union. BUT, he has never ever stopped complaining
about unions in general(and his union/dues...he's been a driver for, 20+ years?). What really makes my blood boil is that the "union" has
pulled his ass out of the fire a couple of times over the years (for making deliveries that were wrong or weirdly, were some
kind of money/drug/something set-up/situation) for bizarre situations, that were not his fault.

When reminded of such...he changes the subject to something more important, like bashing Obamacare or stroking Ayn Rand.

LiberalFighter

(50,790 posts)
15. Our union doesn't make contributions to political candidates or parties.
Sun Feb 10, 2013, 11:17 AM
Feb 2013

We do have a pac fund that is funded from voluntary contributions.

The non-union members should pay the dues portion that is associated with bargaining, representation, and training. Training involves attending conferences that are related to doing the job of a grievance handler or bargainer.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Vermont Introduces “Right...