Thu Jan 26, 2012, 10:04 PM
EarlG (12,534 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
Romney is the aggressor in final Florida debate
JACKSONVILLE, Fla. (AP) — An aggressive Mitt Romney repeatedly challenged Republican presidential rival Newt Gingrich in a fast-paced campaign debate Thursday night, ridiculing the former House speaker's call to build costly projects in key primary states and to colonize the moon.
Romney vehemently denied Gingrich's own accusation that he anti-immigrant — more so than any other candidate. And, as charges flew back and forth, Gingrich rebutted any suggestion that he couldn't rein in surging federal spending. "You don't just have to be cheap everywhere. You can actually have priorities to get things done," Gingrich declared, saying that as speaker of the House he had helped balance the budget while doubling spending on the National Institutes of health. The debate was the second in four days in the run-up to next Tuesday's Florida primary. Opinion polls make the race a close one — slight advantage Romney — with two other contenders, former Sen. Rick Santorum of Pennsylvania and Texas Rep. Ron Paul far behind. http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5jfKwAFOcZHbgbGvnn_qsyyu4VgOQ?docId=e572ce821c0a4406bd2f492e5276bed5
|
9 replies, 1487 views
| Author | Time | Post | |
| EarlG | Jan 26 | OP | |
| ChairmanAgnostic | Jan 26 | #1 | |
| gateley | Jan 26 | #2 | |
| Lint Head | Jan 26 | #3 | |
| groundloop | Jan 26 | #4 | |
| Ikonoklast | Jan 26 | #5 | |
| wordpix | Jan 27 | #6 | |
| wordpix | Jan 27 | #7 | |
| d_r | Jan 27 | #8 | |
| 6000eliot | Jan 27 | #9 |
Response to EarlG (Original post)
Thu Jan 26, 2012, 10:06 PM
ChairmanAgnostic (22,582 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
1. clearly he ate his wheaties.
|
But dammmmm. Those were some bad, stupid, pointless, and ridiculous questions.
|
Response to EarlG (Original post)
Thu Jan 26, 2012, 10:08 PM
gateley (56,233 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
2. Maybe he got a dose of self confidence since he was ahead of Gingrich (poll wise)
|
going into the debate.
|
Response to EarlG (Original post)
Thu Jan 26, 2012, 10:42 PM
Lint Head (7,804 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
3. I think Willard saved up.
Response to EarlG (Original post)
Thu Jan 26, 2012, 11:04 PM
groundloop (1,434 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
4. New debate coach
|
Just saw on Ed that Mittens has a new debate coach.
|
Response to EarlG (Original post)
Thu Jan 26, 2012, 11:26 PM
Ikonoklast (16,235 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
5. Willard caught Newt flat-footed with his investment remark rebuttal.
|
Newt didn't even know that he owned Freddy and Fannie investments in his mutual fund holdings.
Newt was thrown off for the rest of the night by that; he must be really stupid bringing that up about Rmoney owning those investments in his blind trust, thinking that he was on safe ground. It shows that Newt either didn't know, or he didn't do his prep, or that he didn't think Rmoney does opposition research. |
Response to EarlG (Original post)
Fri Jan 27, 2012, 12:02 AM
wordpix (9,979 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
6. Rmoney failed to list a Swiss bank acct he's parked money in??? Shocked I say!
|
|
Response to EarlG (Original post)
Fri Jan 27, 2012, 12:10 AM
wordpix (9,979 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
7. I find it ironic they're sparring over each other's ads, considering Citizens United
|
Repukes wanted unlimited cash flowing into their associates' coffers to benefit them, the candidates, with their "unassociated" ads and campaigns. And now these PACs are sinking each others' repug ships.
|
Response to EarlG (Original post)
Fri Jan 27, 2012, 08:07 PM
d_r (1,523 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
8. "Gingrich's own accusation that he anti-immigrant "
|
why are there so many typos anymore?
|
Response to EarlG (Original post)
Fri Jan 27, 2012, 08:43 PM
6000eliot (3,860 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
9. Didn't he just do the exact same thing to Newt that Newt did to the mod
|
in the SC debate? It seemed like almost the exact same words to me. It was certainly the same tone of fake indignation.
|
