HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » Latest Breaking News (Forum) » State Suspends Handgun Ca...
Introducing Discussionist: A new forum by the creators of DU

Fri Jan 11, 2013, 05:20 PM

State Suspends Handgun Carry Permit Of Tactical Response CEO

Source: TPM

The state of Tennessee has suspended the concealed handgun carry permit of James Yeager, CEO of Tactical Response, who recently said he would "start killing people" should President Obama take executive action on gun control.

State officials explained they revoked the permit because of Yeager's "material likelihood of risk of harm to the public," according to a local TV station. Tactical Response is a Tennessee-based company that specializes in firearms and tactical training.

"The number one priority for our department is to ensure the public's safety," wrote Commissioner Bill Gibbons. "Mr. Yeager's comments were irresponsible, dangerous, and deserved our immediate attention. Due to our concern, as well as that of law enforcement, his handgun permit was suspended immediately. We have notified Mr. Yeager about the suspension today via e-mail. He will receive an official notification of his suspension through the mail."

Yeager released a second video Thursday in which he refused to back down from most his statements.

-snip-

Read more: http://livewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/entry/state-suspends-handgun-carry-permit-of-tactical-response

86 replies, 10435 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 86 replies Author Time Post
Reply State Suspends Handgun Carry Permit Of Tactical Response CEO (Original post)
highplainsdem Jan 2013 OP
Comrade_McKenzie Jan 2013 #1
Wernothelpless Jan 2013 #13
upaloopa Jan 2013 #2
Laurian Jan 2013 #3
johnnyrocket Jan 2013 #4
Luft Jan 2013 #79
Trajan Jan 2013 #5
marions ghost Jan 2013 #6
Kolesar Jan 2013 #7
marions ghost Jan 2013 #18
pasto76 Jan 2013 #31
marions ghost Jan 2013 #36
Tempest Jan 2013 #51
marions ghost Jan 2013 #55
Tempest Jan 2013 #56
Luft Jan 2013 #81
ancianita Jan 2013 #9
SharonAnn Jan 2013 #10
Wernothelpless Jan 2013 #16
DeschutesRiver Jan 2013 #21
Tempest Jan 2013 #52
DeschutesRiver Jan 2013 #68
Grantuspeace Jan 2013 #25
PSPS Jan 2013 #40
Tempest Jan 2013 #53
damnedifIknow Jan 2013 #8
Laurian Jan 2013 #12
Kingofalldems Jan 2013 #11
LeftInTX Jan 2013 #14
Tempest Jan 2013 #54
jody Jan 2013 #15
Laurian Jan 2013 #20
jody Jan 2013 #22
Laurian Jan 2013 #26
jody Jan 2013 #28
Laurian Jan 2013 #39
jody Jan 2013 #42
LanternWaste Jan 2013 #59
graegoyle Jan 2013 #65
2ndAmForComputers Jan 2013 #70
Luft Jan 2013 #82
Kingofalldems Jan 2013 #27
jody Jan 2013 #30
Kingofalldems Jan 2013 #33
jody Jan 2013 #34
Trajan Jan 2013 #45
jody Jan 2013 #46
Trajan Jan 2013 #49
2naSalit Jan 2013 #62
tabasco Jan 2013 #38
Luft Jan 2013 #83
Lone_Star_Dem Jan 2013 #47
jody Jan 2013 #48
Lone_Star_Dem Jan 2013 #57
frylock Jan 2013 #61
Electric Monk Jan 2013 #74
frylock Jan 2013 #75
2naSalit Jan 2013 #63
jody Jan 2013 #64
2ndAmForComputers Jan 2013 #66
2naSalit Jan 2013 #67
Luft Jan 2013 #84
hrmjustin Jan 2013 #85
jobycom Jan 2013 #17
Laurian Jan 2013 #19
marble falls Jan 2013 #23
Enrique Jan 2013 #24
Kaleva Jan 2013 #29
RKP5637 Jan 2013 #32
jody Jan 2013 #37
frylock Jan 2013 #76
PatrynXX Jan 2013 #35
samsingh Jan 2013 #41
Dems to Win Jan 2013 #43
freshwest Jan 2013 #78
CJCRANE Jan 2013 #80
Ilsa Jan 2013 #44
Tempest Jan 2013 #50
SoapBox Jan 2013 #58
Kablooie Jan 2013 #72
DumbBassRepublicans Jan 2013 #60
Zoeisright Jan 2013 #69
Kablooie Jan 2013 #71
thucythucy Jan 2013 #73
onehandle Jan 2013 #77
Earth_First Jan 2013 #86

Response to highplainsdem (Original post)

Fri Jan 11, 2013, 05:22 PM

1. If I were a governor, I'd create a task force to monitor social networks for similar threats...

 

And start suspending like crazy.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Comrade_McKenzie (Reply #1)

Fri Jan 11, 2013, 05:34 PM

13. I'm sure they are ...

Have you been over to the Tea Party page on FB? ... there MUST be someone monitoring those lunatics ... they are OUT there ...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to highplainsdem (Original post)

Fri Jan 11, 2013, 05:24 PM

2. Well they castrated him I guess.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to highplainsdem (Original post)

Fri Jan 11, 2013, 05:24 PM

3. Thank God! His army will have to manage with a toothless tiger.

What an asshole.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to highplainsdem (Original post)

Fri Jan 11, 2013, 05:26 PM

4. Wow, just wow. This guy probably needs to be arrested. At least monitored.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to johnnyrocket (Reply #4)

Sat Jan 12, 2013, 07:27 PM

79. Definitely he should be arrested

The man threatened to start killing people. I don't see why he isn't already in jail. If he doesn't get arrested and he does kill someone there will be hell to pay.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to highplainsdem (Original post)

Fri Jan 11, 2013, 05:26 PM

5. Oh hell yes !

Time for a little trip to the woodshed, asshole ...

He should learn that he cannot violate the law by threatening his fellow citizens with homicidal violence ...

This nutcase is exposed ... Good!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to highplainsdem (Original post)

Fri Jan 11, 2013, 05:27 PM

6. Is that going to stop him?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to marions ghost (Reply #6)

Fri Jan 11, 2013, 05:30 PM

7. What do you mean?

Please be explicit.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Kolesar (Reply #7)

Fri Jan 11, 2013, 05:46 PM

18. What do I mean?

I mean he sounds like a cold dead hands kinda guy. In other words, insane.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to marions ghost (Reply #18)

Fri Jan 11, 2013, 06:04 PM

31. since he has been all over the interwebs, when he is caught with a concealed handgun, big trouble

firearm law violations will end his stupid company

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to pasto76 (Reply #31)

Fri Jan 11, 2013, 06:15 PM

36. As I understand it he can still carry unconcealed handguns?

AND any other guns?

Weak, weak -- response to obvious open threats to kill. But the thing that's most disturbing is that this video INCITES others who are even more unstable...probably his intention.

Hard to believe this is all they can do to him. These gun nuts really do rule America.



Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to marions ghost (Reply #36)

Fri Jan 11, 2013, 06:53 PM

51. Permit required for open carry in Tennessee

His permit was revoked.

He carries one in public in the open, he goes to jail.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Tempest (Reply #51)

Fri Jan 11, 2013, 07:09 PM

55. The OP said Concealed Carry

was revoked. So this applies to open carry as well? Well...really the point could be moot if he (or some admirer acting on his behalf) wants to commit Murder Without Permit.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to marions ghost (Reply #55)

Fri Jan 11, 2013, 07:11 PM

56. One permit for both is my reading of the law. n/t

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Tempest (Reply #56)

Sat Jan 12, 2013, 07:43 PM

81. Right or Privilege?

If something is a right how can it require a permit? Doesn't having the government, State or Federal, tell the people "you can do this if we give you permission" reduce a right to a privilege? Has this law been challenged in the U. S. Supreme Court?

That being said this nut job seriously threated to kill people. He should be arrested and all of his guns confiscated.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to marions ghost (Reply #6)

Fri Jan 11, 2013, 05:32 PM

9. It might slow him down. He knows he lucky he wasn't arrested by DHS. He knows he's being monitored.

Good enough for now.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to marions ghost (Reply #6)

Fri Jan 11, 2013, 05:33 PM

10. He still has the guns, doesn't he? Just not the Concealed Carry permit.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to SharonAnn (Reply #10)

Fri Jan 11, 2013, 05:38 PM

16. This means Yeager gets pulled over in his vehicle every time he leaves his house ...

The governor and local police in Tennessee are NOT going to allow this fool to drive ONE block with a weapon in his car and now that he's lost his permit the ONLY thing he can carry is a deer rifle mounted in the back window of his truck ... just like Grandaddy ... he won't last a week before they have to apprehend him .... this guy is a 72 hour hold away from a mental hospital ... boing! ...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to SharonAnn (Reply #10)

Fri Jan 11, 2013, 05:52 PM

21. Revoking the CCW didn't affect his gun ownership. And he may still be able to transport firearms

so long as they are unloaded and in a case, which is common in many states.

But I haven't seen the TN statute on this to know for certain.

I think that he is also restricted from carrying in the open if his handgun permit has been revoked.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to DeschutesRiver (Reply #21)

Fri Jan 11, 2013, 06:55 PM

52. You are correct on open carry in TN. I just read the law.

The one permit covers both and since it was revoked, he would be in violation of the law.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Tempest (Reply #52)

Fri Jan 11, 2013, 08:28 PM

68. Thx for the confirmation; dialup wretched here tonight; impossible to research anything. nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to SharonAnn (Reply #10)

Fri Jan 11, 2013, 05:57 PM

25. You know he still has his guns.

Unfortunately this is all they can probably do to him for now. And that just illustrates the need for regulation.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Grantuspeace (Reply #25)

Fri Jan 11, 2013, 06:18 PM

40. Correct. He should have his guns confiscated before his promised killing spree instead of after it.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to PSPS (Reply #40)

Fri Jan 11, 2013, 06:56 PM

53. +1

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to highplainsdem (Original post)

Fri Jan 11, 2013, 05:30 PM

8. Seriously

That's a guy who needs to be watched carefully.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to damnedifIknow (Reply #8)

Fri Jan 11, 2013, 05:34 PM

12. And anyone who is associated with him. I don't know

if his "army" comments were just bravado or not, but he may well have a cohort of like thinking dumb asses.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to highplainsdem (Original post)

Fri Jan 11, 2013, 05:34 PM

11. Confiscate his guns immediately

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to highplainsdem (Original post)

Fri Jan 11, 2013, 05:36 PM

14. Oh, the irony

He was complaining about the Feds, but the state of Tennessee took his permit away.



Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to LeftInTX (Reply #14)

Fri Jan 11, 2013, 06:57 PM

54. I'll bet you $10,000 he blames Obama. n/t

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to highplainsdem (Original post)


Response to jody (Reply #15)

Fri Jan 11, 2013, 05:49 PM

20. You think this unhinged freak should be allowed to carry concealed weapons?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Laurian (Reply #20)

Fri Jan 11, 2013, 05:53 PM

22. I said "Agree" which you overlooked. nt

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to jody (Reply #22)

Fri Jan 11, 2013, 05:57 PM

26. I did see your agreement, but was puzzled by the rest of your comment. n/t

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Laurian (Reply #26)

Fri Jan 11, 2013, 05:59 PM

28. RKBA is just one of our civil rights and I suggested denying all of them. nt

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to jody (Reply #28)

Fri Jan 11, 2013, 06:17 PM

39. If you think his permit should not have been revoked, why

not just say so instead of speaking in some kind of code with an implied message.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Laurian (Reply #39)

Fri Jan 11, 2013, 06:20 PM

42. See #15. Do you know what "Agree" means? nt

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to jody (Reply #42)

Fri Jan 11, 2013, 07:18 PM

59. In the language of Petulance, 'Agree' means...

" Do you know what "Agree" means? "

I've inferred that in the language of Petulance, 'Agree' means, "I've failed completely to make my clever point, and am now backtracking so as deny looking like a greater fool"

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to LanternWaste (Reply #59)

Fri Jan 11, 2013, 08:09 PM

65. In this, instance I think you have misunderstood something.

The poster seems to support the revocation of the permits and suggests even more restrictions of his rights; that post needs no decoding.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to jody (Reply #22)

Fri Jan 11, 2013, 08:46 PM

70. Do you think we were all born yesterday? YOU. ARE. DEFENDING. JAMES. YEAGER.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Laurian (Reply #20)

Sat Jan 12, 2013, 08:06 PM

82. I'm hoping his statement was misunderstood.

I'm hoping by "remove all other civil rights to make the point" he means that the man should be arrested, convicted and jailed which would remove all his other rights and make a point. But I have to agree that he came off sounding a bit like a troll.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to jody (Reply #15)

Fri Jan 11, 2013, 05:59 PM

27. That cannot be done. Looks like sarcasm.

Puzzling.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Kingofalldems (Reply #27)

Fri Jan 11, 2013, 06:04 PM

30. Good question. I don't know of any legal way to deny just one of a person's civil rights. Do you? nt

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to jody (Reply #30)

Fri Jan 11, 2013, 06:08 PM

33. You brought it up.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Kingofalldems (Reply #33)

Fri Jan 11, 2013, 06:11 PM

34. Then remove all his civil rights? nt

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to jody (Reply #34)

Fri Jan 11, 2013, 06:33 PM

45. You presented this ridiculous dichotomy

1) "Agree" he should lose his concealed carry rights

then ...

2) ALL civil rights should be denied ?

C'mon ... admit your. cynical little ploy .... absolute non sequitur ..... red herring ... completely fallacious.

Your intent is to disrupt this forum, and I really do wish you would simply admit this to yourself and the rest of us. Stop your little lie and find some honesty in your soul ...

If you had a scintilla of integrity, you would immediately remove yourself from this forum, and never return.

Fat chance of that, though ... eh?

Yeah .... Fat chance ....

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Trajan (Reply #45)

Fri Jan 11, 2013, 06:37 PM

46. Trajan you really are good for laughs. RKBA is a civil right. If it's removed then a logical

 

question is why not remove all civil rights?

That was the point of my suggestion "remove all other civil rights".

I'm so sorry that you were not able to understand that.

Thanks for trying anyway.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to jody (Reply #46)

Fri Jan 11, 2013, 06:48 PM

49. Oh .... I understood completely ....

Last edited Sat Jan 12, 2013, 12:17 AM - Edit history (1)

Your intent is clear: cast the sincerely and correctly applied loss of the right to carry a concealed weapon as a 'bad thing', and poison the well by demanding ALL civil rights then be denied .....

There is no obvious rationale for this line of argument, except to purposely toss a monkey wrench into the issue ....

Your intent is to disrupt the discussion, plain and simple ....

I see Pave and d_s were finally shown the door ... there are still a few of you left, eh?

How long, Jody? .... How long will it take?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Trajan (Reply #49)

Fri Jan 11, 2013, 07:55 PM

62. Pretzel logic...

This individual used it in another thread earlier... makes no sense, keeps demanding answers to rhetorical questions that make little or no sense.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to jody (Reply #30)

Fri Jan 11, 2013, 06:16 PM

38. Really?

That's not a hard thing to do. I can't imagine why a reasonably intelligent person could not comprehend a method to prohibit a person to carry a concealed weapon, while at the same time allowing them - for example - to vote or enjoy freedom of association.

Of course, "reasonably intelligent" is stipulated.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to jody (Reply #30)

Sat Jan 12, 2013, 08:11 PM

83. Due process

When a person is arrested and jailed they lose there right of liberty. It requires (or at least it is suppose to require) due process.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to jody (Reply #15)

Fri Jan 11, 2013, 06:39 PM

47. Are you're saying you believe concealed carry is a civil right under the second amendment?

Which should not be regulated by the states, or subject to review? That it's somehow protected beyond ramifications?

Since in the US a person can lose one or more of their civil liberties and still retain others as a consequence to their actions, that still makes no sense to me.

What exactly are you saying, and which other specific rights are you thinking they should lose?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Lone_Star_Dem (Reply #47)

Fri Jan 11, 2013, 06:46 PM

48. RKBA is a civil right. That's all I said. nt

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to jody (Reply #48)

Fri Jan 11, 2013, 07:15 PM

57. No, you also said to remove all his other civil rights.

Which promted me to ask if you believed his right to carry a handgun should not be regulated by the states, be subject to review, and if it was somehow protected beyond ramifications no matter what his actions?

I also pointed out that one can lose some of their civil liberties in the United States as a consequence of their actions, and still retain others. Which made what you said all the more confusing to me.

The laws are how our civil liberties are applied to our everyday lives. Not adhering to the law has consequences, which in this case cost him his right to publicly carry his handgun.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to jody (Reply #15)

Fri Jan 11, 2013, 07:50 PM

61. herp derp?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to frylock (Reply #61)

Sat Jan 12, 2013, 12:11 AM

74. With anchovies and extra cheese :)

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Electric Monk (Reply #74)

Sat Jan 12, 2013, 12:17 AM

75. wow. that fools been here longer than me..

guess he really really liked guns. well, he's in a better place now.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to jody (Reply #15)

Fri Jan 11, 2013, 07:59 PM

63. With rights come responsibilities

It would appear that this individual has forfeited his "right" to conceal/carry by his choice to eschew his responsibilities that accompany said "right".

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to 2naSalit (Reply #63)

Fri Jan 11, 2013, 08:01 PM

64. Agree but why not remove all his civil rights. nt

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to jody (Reply #64)

Fri Jan 11, 2013, 08:15 PM

66. Hi there.

Have you recovered from that bad, bad, bad, BAD day you had some nine weeks ago?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to jody (Reply #64)

Fri Jan 11, 2013, 08:17 PM

67. Perhaps it's because that's the one he seems to not

give a rat's ass about at the moment. And perhaps there will be other rights he will choose to forfeit, though it seems he already has, so I suspect that some others will be at stake in the very near future. Instant gratification doesn't always work in legal issues that may bring others into harm's way while trying to enforce the law.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to jody (Reply #64)

Sat Jan 12, 2013, 08:16 PM

84. Because that would require putting him to death

Jody, after reading your posts I have to believe you are trolling.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Luft (Reply #84)

Sat Jan 12, 2013, 10:07 PM

85. Jody has been removed from DU.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to highplainsdem (Original post)

Fri Jan 11, 2013, 05:46 PM

17. Now they can pick him up in two weeks for an unlicensed concealed weapon...

Since he hardly seems like the type to stop carrying just because the law tells him to.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to jobycom (Reply #17)


Response to highplainsdem (Original post)

Fri Jan 11, 2013, 05:56 PM

23. Highly appropriate. As will be the follow up visit from ATF to determine the legality of his arsenal

and his free mental evaluation for anger management and impulse control.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to highplainsdem (Original post)

Fri Jan 11, 2013, 05:57 PM

24. i'd like to see a local news show visit him and ask him for comment

be sure to have the cameras rolling

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to highplainsdem (Original post)

Fri Jan 11, 2013, 06:01 PM

29. kicked

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to highplainsdem (Original post)

Fri Jan 11, 2013, 06:07 PM

32. Fortunately, he decided to advertise his intentions. He's a hazard. One would hope

he's under surveillance. Watching the videos he sure doesn't seem very well wrapped.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to RKP5637 (Reply #32)

Fri Jan 11, 2013, 06:15 PM

37. "under surveillance" Don't worry, Poindexter's Total Information Awareness office didn't go

 

away. it's tracking every post, email, phone call, and movement of those on both the fringe of the Right & Left.


Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to jody (Reply #37)

Sat Jan 12, 2013, 01:28 AM

76. grave dance..

too soon?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to highplainsdem (Original post)

Fri Jan 11, 2013, 06:13 PM

35. Tennesse is rather red

So the guy obviously had to be rather dumb to put that statement out. Old coworker of me did something just about as dumb but he's in jail and this nut isn't. and maybe for a good reason but he never meant to kill anyone. This guy however.......

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to highplainsdem (Original post)

Fri Jan 11, 2013, 06:18 PM

41. kick

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to highplainsdem (Original post)

Fri Jan 11, 2013, 06:23 PM

43. In Tennesse? Call your police, demand they boycott Tactical Response

Put this treasonous outfit out of business.

It is a MYTH that the 2nd amendment exists to facilitate treason. It was written to facilitate defense against sedition and rebellion, as in the Whiskey Rebellion, when the militia was called out to put down armed resistance.

These folks plotting treason, and there are a lot of them, need to be treated as the traitors that they are.

Surely we can start with getting them out of government contracting.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Dems to Win (Reply #43)

Sat Jan 12, 2013, 11:46 AM

78. Good post.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Dems to Win (Reply #43)

Sat Jan 12, 2013, 07:35 PM

80. It's right there in the words...

"A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed."

The militia is to be "well regulated" and help provide security for the "state". It is not meant to be used against the state.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to highplainsdem (Original post)

Fri Jan 11, 2013, 06:25 PM

44. Maybe we'll get lucky and Yeager

will pull a concealed weapon on someone and they'll do the same and shoot him. The world will be a better place.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to highplainsdem (Original post)

Fri Jan 11, 2013, 06:51 PM

50. Words have consequences. Especially excessively violent ones like this guy spouted. n/t

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to highplainsdem (Original post)

Fri Jan 11, 2013, 07:16 PM

58. Good...this guy is unhinged.

Now, pick him up for mental observation, in a nice cozy cell.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to SoapBox (Reply #58)

Fri Jan 11, 2013, 09:35 PM

72. But I'm sure he's not alone. Fox News spews the seeds of instability on millions every day.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to highplainsdem (Original post)

Fri Jan 11, 2013, 07:23 PM

60. CUCKOO...!!!!!!!!!

Does an assault weapon make you MENTAL, or..............
Does a MENTAL case need, an assault weapon..??!!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to highplainsdem (Original post)

Fri Jan 11, 2013, 08:37 PM

69. Hopefully he'll have some kind of breakdown now.

And be institutionalized.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to highplainsdem (Original post)

Fri Jan 11, 2013, 09:21 PM

71. Thank Fox News and the radio right. They convinced this idiot that Obama is Dr. Evil.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to highplainsdem (Original post)

Fri Jan 11, 2013, 10:14 PM

73. Can you imagine being this guy's neighbor?

That sound you hear is property values in his neighborhood being flushed down the toilet.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to highplainsdem (Original post)

Sat Jan 12, 2013, 09:15 AM

77. Ha Ha!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to highplainsdem (Original post)

Sat Jan 12, 2013, 10:33 PM

86. Honestly, they need to take this a step further...

Revoke the training credentials to any individual or organization which used Tactical Response as a training facility.

Let it be known that this sort of behavior will not be tolerated.

Don't like my opinion on this; you should hear my ideas on gun control...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread