Thu Jan 10, 2013, 09:51 PM
DonViejo (4,523 posts)
Bachmann still hasn’t paid presidential campaign staffers
Source: Salon
Five Iowa staffers say they've waited 375 days for payment, but refuse to sign the gag order the campaign demands BY ALEX SEITZ-WALD Over a year after she dropped out, Republican Rep. Michele Bachmann has refused to pay five staffers from her failed presidential bid, according to a former top campaign official. Peter Waldron, her controversial former national field coordinator, told Salon the dispute started when former Iowa straw poll staffers refused to sign a nondisclosure agreement that would bar them from discussing any “unethical, immoral, or criminal activity” they witnessed on the campaign with police or reporters. Waldron said the staffers are owed a mere $5,000, and that Bachmann has more than $2 million in her campaign account, but has refused to pay unless the staffers sign the agreement. Negotiations over payment with Bachmann Finance Chairman James Pollack eventually broke down and Waldron decided to go public with the news, posting a press release on Christian Newswire this evening. A Bachmann spokesperson did not immediately respond to a request for comment, but we will update when they do. “I feel a moral obligation to see that my Christian brothers and sisters are paid for worked performed in good faith. I’ve continually communicated by telephone and email with Mr. Pollack for 1 year but he broke every promise made to me to pay the staff. I appealed to Dr. Bachmann for help. I appealed to Representative Bachmann’s Chief of Staff Robert Boland to intercede with Mrs. Bachmann on behalf of her loyal Iowa staff — all of whom are married, all have children,” Waldron said in the press release. “It is sobering to think that a Christian member of Congress would betray her testimony to the Lord and the public by withholding earned wages from deserving staff,” Waldron added. -snip- Read more: http://www.salon.com/2013/01/11/bachmann_still_hasnt_paid_her_presidential_campaign_staff/
|
38 replies, 4354 views
| Author | Time | Post | |
| DonViejo | Jan 2013 | OP | |
| Omaha Steve | Jan 2013 | #1 | |
| kardonb | Jan 2013 | #11 | |
| Bjorn Against | Jan 2013 | #2 | |
| Gore1FL | Jan 2013 | #3 | |
| Volaris | Jan 2013 | #25 | |
| SummerSnow | Jan 2013 | #4 | |
| Ken Burch | Jan 2013 | #5 | |
| Angry Dragon | Jan 2013 | #9 | |
| Ken Burch | Jan 2013 | #12 | |
| sellitman | Jan 2013 | #6 | |
| alittlelark | Jan 2013 | #7 | |
| Ken Burch | Jan 2013 | #13 | |
| alittlelark | Jan 2013 | #33 | |
| Angry Dragon | Jan 2013 | #8 | |
| hughee99 | Jan 2013 | #16 | |
| eggplant | Jan 2013 | #10 | |
| Crowman1979 | Jan 2013 | #22 | |
| UnrepentantLiberal | Jan 2013 | #14 | |
| rocktivity | Jan 2013 | #17 | |
| littlemissmartypants | Jan 2013 | #15 | |
| sakabatou | Jan 2013 | #23 | |
| rocktivity | Jan 2013 | #18 | |
| LiberalFighter | Jan 2013 | #21 | |
| Tabasco_Dave | Jan 2013 | #34 | |
| Rob H. | Jan 2013 | #35 | |
| Gman | Jan 2013 | #19 | |
| olegramps | Jan 2013 | #20 | |
| samsingh | Jan 2013 | #24 | |
| JNelson6563 | Jan 2013 | #26 | |
| SwankyXomb | Jan 2013 | #31 | |
| lexw | Jan 2013 | #27 | |
| klyon | Jan 2013 | #28 | |
| Hubert Flottz | Jan 2013 | #29 | |
| Blue Owl | Jan 2013 | #30 | |
| Third Doctor | Jan 2013 | #32 | |
| Rob H. | Jan 2013 | #36 | |
| dorkulon | Jan 2013 | #37 | |
| NYtoBush-Drop Dead | Jan 2013 | #38 |
Response to DonViejo (Original post)
Thu Jan 10, 2013, 09:59 PM
Omaha Steve (35,826 posts)
1. I hope they call Wage & Hour
|
I'm sure they would get a lot more $ going public with any of this activity they did see. |
Response to Omaha Steve (Reply #1)
Thu Jan 10, 2013, 11:49 PM
kardonb (327 posts)
11. staff
|
typical republicon , spend money they don't have, and cheat hard working people .
|
Response to DonViejo (Original post)
Thu Jan 10, 2013, 10:02 PM
Bjorn Against (8,216 posts)
2. Yet she still has more money than nearly any other member of Congress
|
She outspent her opponent in the last election several times over, she has plenty of cash and could easily pay her workers wages. Isn't it a crime to withhold wages?
It is VERY revealing that Bachmann is so insistent on them signing an agreement promising not to discuss criminal activity in the campaign. If there was no criminal activity why would this waiver be so important to her? I hope the FBI is paying attention, I sense a big scandal. |
Response to DonViejo (Original post)
Thu Jan 10, 2013, 10:12 PM
Gore1FL (11,666 posts)
3. Maybe she was paying them on commission. n/t
Response to Gore1FL (Reply #3)
Fri Jan 11, 2013, 02:40 PM
Volaris (1,583 posts)
25. It sounds more like, she would be paying them for OMISSION.
Response to DonViejo (Original post)
Thu Jan 10, 2013, 10:21 PM
SummerSnow (936 posts)
4. She said you get paid if I win...and they said of course you'll win.LOL
|
Last edited Thu Jan 10, 2013, 10:22 PM USA/ET - Edit history (1) |
Response to DonViejo (Original post)
Thu Jan 10, 2013, 10:31 PM
Ken Burch (31,228 posts)
5. Bachmann was only in the race for a few months...
|
Last edited Fri Jan 11, 2013, 12:24 AM USA/ET - Edit history (1) ...did she even have TIME to do anything she wouldn't want disclosed?
|
Response to Ken Burch (Reply #5)
Thu Jan 10, 2013, 11:11 PM
Angry Dragon (24,073 posts)
9. June 2011 to January 2012
|
Last edited Thu Jan 10, 2013, 11:12 PM USA/ET - Edit history (1) |
Response to Angry Dragon (Reply #9)
Fri Jan 11, 2013, 12:25 AM
Ken Burch (31,228 posts)
12. ok. corrected. Still, she was out before any real voting happened.
|
Hard to believe she could even HAVE anything to hide.
|
Response to DonViejo (Original post)
Thu Jan 10, 2013, 10:48 PM
sellitman (9,305 posts)
6. I love the smell of scandal in the morning.
|
|
Response to DonViejo (Original post)
Thu Jan 10, 2013, 10:52 PM
alittlelark (14,800 posts)
7. Both sides espouse 'Christian morals'.
|
Perhaps they should call on Jesus to come sort it out?
|
Response to alittlelark (Reply #7)
Fri Jan 11, 2013, 12:26 AM
Ken Burch (31,228 posts)
13. That could be the new afternoon hit: "Messiah Court". n/t.
Response to Ken Burch (Reply #13)
Sat Jan 12, 2013, 01:22 AM
alittlelark (14,800 posts)
33. It could be the new 'Reality' TV hit !
|
Move over Judge Judy, the Big Dog's comin' in!
|
Response to DonViejo (Original post)
Thu Jan 10, 2013, 11:05 PM
Angry Dragon (24,073 posts)
8. “unethical, immoral, or criminal activity”
|
I think that is an illegal non-disclosure
Marcus must have gone off again Bachmann should be sent to prison for non payment of earned wages |
Response to Angry Dragon (Reply #8)
Fri Jan 11, 2013, 01:10 AM
hughee99 (10,106 posts)
16. They probably would be okay with "unethical and immoral"
|
but I think you're right, I don't think you can sign an NDA to protect criminal activity.
|
Response to DonViejo (Original post)
Thu Jan 10, 2013, 11:14 PM
eggplant (974 posts)
10. Larry Flynt should offer to pay the debt in exchange for anything they care to tell him. n/t
Response to eggplant (Reply #10)
Fri Jan 11, 2013, 12:54 PM
Crowman1979 (3,086 posts)
22. She probably masturbated in front of a Jesus painting while Marcus was having fun with the guys.
|
Remember when she said that we should get HOT for Jesus?
|
Response to DonViejo (Original post)
Fri Jan 11, 2013, 12:29 AM
UnrepentantLiberal (11,700 posts)
14. What's that story about giving a snake a ride across the river?
Response to UnrepentantLiberal (Reply #14)
Fri Jan 11, 2013, 01:33 AM
rocktivity (36,625 posts)
17. A scorpion asked a frog to take him across a pond
|
Last edited Fri Jan 11, 2013, 11:38 PM USA/ET - Edit history (2) The frog said, "No! You'll sting me, and I'll drown." The scorpion said, "If I did that, we'd BOTH drown."
The frog couldn't argue with that, so he let the scorpion jump on his back. He starts swimming across the pond, and the scorpion stings him! The frog gasped with his last dying breath, "Why? Why did you sting me when you knew it would kill you, too?" The scorpion says with HIS last dying breath, "Because it is my nature." rocktivity |
Response to DonViejo (Original post)
Fri Jan 11, 2013, 12:52 AM
littlemissmartypants (2,999 posts)
15. Oh Jesus. n/t
Response to littlemissmartypants (Reply #15)
Fri Jan 11, 2013, 02:21 PM
sakabatou (29,073 posts)
23. I just noticed your signature...
Response to DonViejo (Original post)
Fri Jan 11, 2013, 01:41 AM
rocktivity (36,625 posts)
18. They can't tell the police about illegal things they've witnessed?
|
Last edited Sat Jan 12, 2013, 05:04 PM USA/ET - Edit history (2) How can that in itself possibly be legal?
rocktivity |
Response to rocktivity (Reply #18)
Fri Jan 11, 2013, 11:09 AM
LiberalFighter (31,079 posts)
21. It should be illegal to have that in a contract.
Response to LiberalFighter (Reply #21)
Sat Jan 12, 2013, 04:45 AM
Tabasco_Dave (1,155 posts)
34. I think it is.
|
|
Response to rocktivity (Reply #18)
Sat Jan 12, 2013, 02:35 PM
Rob H. (4,190 posts)
35. That sounds almost like formalizing a criminal conspiracy
|
Is there such a thing? (Seriously, I'm curious.) As far as I know, failure to report a crime can be a crime in itself. If any criminal activities were to come to light, it almost sounds as if they were dumb enough to put it in writing that they were willing to be accessories to them.
|
Response to DonViejo (Original post)
Fri Jan 11, 2013, 08:35 AM
Gman (21,168 posts)
19. Nice attack angle.. a RW nut invoking the Christianity of another RW nut.
|
what's a RW nut to do?
|
Response to DonViejo (Original post)
Fri Jan 11, 2013, 10:47 AM
olegramps (3,926 posts)
20. Sounds like they deserve each other. A marriage made in hell.
Response to DonViejo (Original post)
Fri Jan 11, 2013, 02:35 PM
samsingh (10,339 posts)
24. this woman is scary, dense, a leech
Response to DonViejo (Original post)
Fri Jan 11, 2013, 03:09 PM
JNelson6563 (24,767 posts)
26. Staffers should send her a note...
|
"Dear Congresswoman,
Please disregard our previous requests for owed wages for our work on your Presidential campaign. Since we are now collaborating on a tell-all book and we've gotten some very high offers (with a generous advance in each), we've decided we can do without the money you owe us. Enjoy and God bless! Regards, Names" |
Response to DonViejo (Original post)
Fri Jan 11, 2013, 03:13 PM
lexw (804 posts)
27. The same attitude as that a$$ who won the nomination. What a stack of creeps—Creepublicans.
Response to DonViejo (Original post)
Fri Jan 11, 2013, 03:28 PM
klyon (1,634 posts)
28. She should have had them sign first then they would know what they were in for.
|
If they refuse to sign (I would) than no work. It is a little late now.
What is she hiding? Hopefully someone will speak up. |
Response to DonViejo (Original post)
Fri Jan 11, 2013, 04:17 PM
Hubert Flottz (36,720 posts)
29. "Christian member of Congress" (CINO)
|
The repug misleaders are "Christian" In Name only and the repugs do that self naming to get votes from suckers.
|
Response to DonViejo (Original post)
Fri Jan 11, 2013, 04:29 PM
Blue Owl (8,503 posts)
30. The one area in which she is "outstanding"
|
n/t
|
Response to DonViejo (Original post)
Fri Jan 11, 2013, 05:50 PM
Third Doctor (1,025 posts)
32. They should sue.
Response to DonViejo (Original post)
Sat Jan 12, 2013, 02:43 PM
Rob H. (4,190 posts)
36. Romney also left a lot of his campaign workers stranded
|
all over the US when his campaign cancelled all their credit cards right after his concession speech. Since they were willing to backstab and abandon the people who were on their sides and trying to help them win, just imagine what would've happened to the country if either of those self-centered assholes had actually won!
|
Response to DonViejo (Original post)
Sun Jan 13, 2013, 11:45 AM
dorkulon (4,990 posts)
37. Ah, Christians. So much more ethical than the rest of us garbage.
|
At least they're always implying that. Never seen any actual evidence of it, though.
|
Response to DonViejo (Original post)
Sun Jan 13, 2013, 07:09 PM
NYtoBush-Drop Dead (236 posts)
38. she is such a good christian...
|
NOT.
|

