Thu Jan 10, 2013, 01:56 PM
DonViejo (4,568 posts)
Santorum takes up fight against Hagel nomination
Source: AP
BY BY DONNA CASSATA, ASSOCIATED PRESS WASHINGTON (AP) — Former Republican presidential candidate Rick Santorum is launching an effort to defeat the nomination of Chuck Hagel to head the Defense Department. Santorum is a former Senate colleague of Hagel’s and a fellow Republican. He says in a statement that Hagel’s, quote, “anti-Israel, pro-Iran mindset” makes him unqualified for the Pentagon job. President Barack Obama nominated Hagel on Monday, but he has faced strong opposition from Senate Republicans. Santorum recently led a successful fight to defeat a U.N. treaty on the disabled, convincing several Senate Republicans to oppose ratification. Supporters of Hagel’s nomination are also lobbying on his behalf. Former Secretary of State Colin Powell will appear on NBC’s “Meet the Press” on Sunday to argue for the nominee -30- Read more: http://www.salon.com/2013/01/10/santorum_takes_up_fight_against_hagel_nomination/
|
15 replies, 1338 views
| Author | Time | Post | |
| DonViejo | Jan 2013 | OP | |
| WI_DEM | Jan 2013 | #1 | |
| truebrit71 | Jan 2013 | #3 | |
| julian09 | Jan 2013 | #7 | |
| yellowcanine | Jan 2013 | #2 | |
| blm | Jan 2013 | #4 | |
| JEB | Jan 2013 | #5 | |
| Dollface | Jan 2013 | #9 | |
| JEB | Jan 2013 | #10 | |
| Jeff In Milwaukee | Jan 2013 | #6 | |
| sinkingfeeling | Jan 2013 | #8 | |
| underpants | Jan 2013 | #15 | |
| KamaAina | Jan 2013 | #11 | |
| FreeBC | Jan 2013 | #12 | |
| frylock | Jan 2013 | #13 | |
| GreenTea | Jan 2013 | #14 |
Response to DonViejo (Original post)
Thu Jan 10, 2013, 01:58 PM
WI_DEM (32,522 posts)
1. Santorum is definitely running again in '16
Response to WI_DEM (Reply #1)
Thu Jan 10, 2013, 01:59 PM
truebrit71 (16,912 posts)
3. Oh I do hope so!!!
|
Should be tons of fun!!!
|
Response to WI_DEM (Reply #1)
Thu Jan 10, 2013, 02:51 PM
julian09 (1,435 posts)
7. The Repigs will have their "A TEAM " running in 2016 and Santorum need not apply
|
He pushed Rmoney so far right, Mitt couldn't get back to middle.
|
Response to DonViejo (Original post)
Thu Jan 10, 2013, 01:59 PM
yellowcanine (24,444 posts)
2. “anti-Israel, pro-Iran mindset” You really are a small little man, Rick.
|
That is all.
|
Response to DonViejo (Original post)
Thu Jan 10, 2013, 02:03 PM
blm (89,658 posts)
4. Santorum is siding with neo-cons who can't stand real conservatives. Yes, he IS that dumb.
|
Real conservatives are an endangered species in the GOP since the NWO interventionist neo-cons took control.
|
Response to DonViejo (Original post)
Thu Jan 10, 2013, 02:20 PM
JEB (612 posts)
5. If Santorum is against it,
|
Last edited Thu Jan 10, 2013, 02:25 PM USA/ET - Edit history (3) I'm for it. Conversely, if Santorum is for something, then I'm against it. Seems to be a law of Nature. Actully thought that Hagel was a Repuke prick SOB until Santorum raised his nasty little pinhead.
|
Response to JEB (Reply #5)
Thu Jan 10, 2013, 03:09 PM
Dollface (1,440 posts)
9. Hagel is a Repuke prick SOB but he broke from the neo-cons and they are still pissed.
|
Apparently he refuses to shut-up when he disagrees with the party so the right-wingers also think he is a prick. That makes me laugh and gesture in their general direction.
|
Response to Dollface (Reply #9)
Thu Jan 10, 2013, 03:46 PM
JEB (612 posts)
10. Read somewhere
|
that Hagel might be open to Defense cuts and since he is a R it might have a chance. Probably why the neo-cons have their panties in such a twist.
|
Response to DonViejo (Original post)
Thu Jan 10, 2013, 02:32 PM
Jeff In Milwaukee (12,512 posts)
6. He's no longer in the Senate right?
|
I didn't miss anything? As in, who gives a shit what Rick Santorum thinks?
|
Response to DonViejo (Original post)
Thu Jan 10, 2013, 02:55 PM
sinkingfeeling (27,856 posts)
8. Why does Santorum get any more attention on this subject than my janitor?
Response to sinkingfeeling (Reply #8)
Sun Jan 13, 2013, 09:43 AM
underpants (105,621 posts)
15. LOL great question - looks like all the pro-Iraq war neo-cons are actually piping up about this
|
The campaign now being waged against Mr. Hagel’s nomination as secretary of defense is in some ways a relitigation of that decade-old dispute. It is also a dramatic return to the public stage by the neoconservatives whose worldview remains a powerful undercurrent in the Republican Party and in the national debate about the United States’ relationship with Israel and the Middle East.
“This is the neocons’ worst nightmare because you’ve got a combat soldier, successful businessman and senator who actually thinks there may be other ways to resolve some questions other than force,” said Richard L. Armitage, who broke with the more hawkish members of the Bush team during the Iraq war when he was a deputy to Secretary of State Colin L. Powell. William Kristol, the editor of The Weekly Standard, who championed the Iraq invasion and is leading the opposition to Mr. Hagel’s nomination, says the former senator and his supporters are suffering from “neoconservative derangement syndrome.” “I’d much prefer a secretary of defense who was a more mainstream internationalist — not a guy obsessed by how the United States uses its power and would always err on the side of not intervening,” he added. Of Mr. Hagel and his allies, Mr. Kristol said, “They sort of think we should have just gone away.” http://www.nytimes.com/2013/01/13/us/old-foes-lead-charge-against-chuck-hagel.html?pagewanted=2&_r=0&hp |
Response to DonViejo (Original post)
Thu Jan 10, 2013, 05:10 PM
KamaAina (45,246 posts)
11. "One of the greatest minds of the 13th century"
|
as described by the Philadelphia Inquirer.
|
Response to DonViejo (Original post)
Thu Jan 10, 2013, 06:01 PM
FreeBC (365 posts)
12. Santorum is an out of work asshole, no different than Fred Phelps or Orly Taitz
Response to DonViejo (Original post)
Thu Jan 10, 2013, 08:01 PM
GreenTea (5,149 posts)
14. There is no way the republicans can do jack shit - They can't stop any Obama nominee....
|
Last edited Thu Jan 10, 2013, 08:37 PM USA/ET - Edit history (1) The Democrats have 55 senators voting in the democratic caucus -
The Democrats only need fifty senators to approval any Obama nominee - And the vice- President's vote (if needed) would make 51 votes which is good enough for approval for any Obama nominee! So fuck-off republicans - You are helpless!! |

