Tue Dec 25, 2012, 11:40 AM
DonViejo (4,453 posts)
U.N. To Reconsider Arms Trade Treaty Blocked By NRA Conspiracy TheoriesLast edited Tue Dec 25, 2012, 11:41 AM USA/ET - Edit history (1)
Source: ThinkProgress
The United Nations voted late Christmas Eve to once again take up a global arms trade treaty in March. The treaty would regulate global weapons exports and have no effect on domestic gun laws. Still, the US failed to ratify it in July, mainly due to conspiracy theories advanced by conservatives, former presidential candidate Mitt Romney, and the National Rifle Association that suggested the U.N. would revoke American gun rights. Member states will try to negotiate an agreement at a conference from March 18-28. But American resistance to the treaty has little basis in fact. NRA CEO Wayne LaPierre claimed in July that the U.N. was infringing on Americans’ right to bear arms and refused to support any treaty involving civilian gun ownership. Far from touching Second Amendment rights, the treaty seeks to control the $60 billion illicit weapons trade that has helped along some of the worst human rights violations in history, and continues to kill hundreds of thousands of people every year. The Associated Press explains: Many countries, including the United States, control arms exports but there has never been an international treaty regulating the estimated $60 billion global arms trade. For more than a decade, activists and some governments have been pushing for international rules to try to keep illicit weapons out of the hands of terrorists, insurgent fighters and organized crime.
The treaty also specifically acknowledges that domestic constitutional protections for arms owners would be unchanged. Read more: http://thinkprogress.org/justice/2012/12/25/1376111/un-will-re-attempt-arms-trade-treaty-after-blocked-by-nra-conspiracy-theories/
|
6 replies, 1627 views
Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
| Author | Time | Post | |
| DonViejo | Dec 2012 | OP | |
| patrice | Dec 2012 | #1 | |
| DonViejo | Dec 2012 | #4 | |
| brewens | Dec 2012 | #2 | |
| eggplant | Dec 2012 | #3 | |
| onehandle | Dec 2012 | #5 | |
| Kolesar | Dec 2012 | #6 |
Response to DonViejo (Original post)
Tue Dec 25, 2012, 11:53 AM
patrice (47,281 posts)
1. Thank Goodness! & Merry Christmas, Don Viejo!!
|
|
Response to patrice (Reply #1)
Tue Dec 25, 2012, 12:01 PM
DonViejo (4,453 posts)
4. Thanks Patrice. And Merry Christmas to you too! nt
Response to DonViejo (Original post)
Tue Dec 25, 2012, 11:56 AM
brewens (3,003 posts)
2. "Domestic constitutional protections for arms owners would be unchanged." That there's code fer,
|
"they gunna git yer guns!" Ya think I just fell of a turnip truck?
|
Response to DonViejo (Original post)
Tue Dec 25, 2012, 12:01 PM
eggplant (972 posts)
3. Well, when you are the PR agency for the arms manufacturers...
|
...of course you oppose stopping illicit trade of arms.
Follow the money. |
Response to DonViejo (Original post)
Tue Dec 25, 2012, 01:33 PM
onehandle (35,369 posts)
5. NRA = Homeland Al Qaeda. nt
Response to DonViejo (Original post)
Wed Dec 26, 2012, 07:39 AM
Kolesar (29,305 posts)

