 139 replies |
Author | Time | Post |
 Tagg Romney: Father wanted to be president ‘less than anyone I’ve met’ (Original post) |
kpete | Dec 2012 | OP |
| brush | Dec 2012 | #1 | |
| Jamaal510 | Dec 2012 | #54 | |
| tblue37 | Dec 2012 | #107 | |
| avaistheone1 | Dec 2012 | #113 | |
| sofa king | Dec 2012 | #127 | |
| surrealAmerican | Dec 2012 | #2 | |
| sulphurdunn | Dec 2012 | #51 | |
| defacto7 | Dec 2012 | #109 | |
| Nay | Dec 2012 | #3 | |
| CountAllVotes | Dec 2012 | #7 | |
| Cracklin Charlie | Dec 2012 | #98 | |
| Siwsan | Dec 2012 | #4 | |
| Moonwalk | Dec 2012 | #33 | |
| djean111 | Dec 2012 | #5 | |
| matt819 | Dec 2012 | #6 | |
| bluemarkers | Dec 2012 | #10 | |
| beac | Dec 2012 | #55 | |
| klook | Dec 2012 | #8 | |
| milestogo | Dec 2012 | #9 | |
| 1StrongBlackMan | Dec 2012 | #11 | |
| MrScorpio | Dec 2012 | #15 | |
| wendylaroux | Dec 2012 | #49 | |
| Live and Learn | Dec 2012 | #50 | |
| BainsBane | Dec 2012 | #63 | |
| wordpix | Dec 2012 | #12 | |
| Squinch | Dec 2012 | #52 | |
| grasswire | Dec 2012 | #66 | |
| Squinch | Dec 2012 | #67 | |
| MrScorpio | Dec 2012 | #13 | |
| Cha | Dec 2012 | #14 | |
| BumRushDaShow | Dec 2012 | #17 | |
| Cha | Dec 2012 | #29 | |
| BumRushDaShow | Dec 2012 | #16 | |
| Cha | Dec 2012 | #32 | |
| alphafemale | Dec 2012 | #18 | |
| bucolic_frolic | Dec 2012 | #19 | |
| No Vested Interest | Dec 2012 | #72 | |
| awoke_in_2003 | Dec 2012 | #20 | |
| Enrique | Dec 2012 | #21 | |
| aandegoons | Dec 2012 | #22 | |
| marble falls | Dec 2012 | #23 | |
| duffyduff | Dec 2012 | #24 | |
| LiberalFighter | Dec 2012 | #25 | |
| Dyedinthewoolliberal | Dec 2012 | #26 | |
| lumberjack_jeff | Dec 2012 | #27 | |
| jerseyjack | Dec 2012 | #28 | |
| SummerSnow | Dec 2012 | #30 | |
| AngryOldDem | Dec 2012 | #31 | |
| Moonwalk | Dec 2012 | #39 | |
| catbyte | Dec 2012 | #34 | |
| jerseyjack | Dec 2012 | #35 | |
| PearliePoo2 | Dec 2012 | #88 | |
| R. Daneel Olivaw | Dec 2012 | #36 | |
| Riley18 | Dec 2012 | #37 | |
| Freddie | Dec 2012 | #65 | |
| Nanjing to Seoul | Dec 2012 | #38 | |
| Theyletmeeatcake2 | Dec 2012 | #138 | |
| Quantess | Dec 2012 | #40 | |
| Ineeda | Dec 2012 | #41 | |
| Hassin Bin Sober | Dec 2012 | #42 | |
| Historic NY | Dec 2012 | #43 | |
| blackdiamond62 | Dec 2012 | #89 | |
| Historic NY | Dec 2012 | #106 | |
| MannyGoldstein | Dec 2012 | #111 | |
| LiberalElite | Dec 2012 | #44 | |
| no_hypocrisy | Dec 2012 | #94 | |
| otohara | Dec 2012 | #45 | |
| onehandle | Dec 2012 | #46 | |
| xfundy | Dec 2012 | #47 | |
| XemaSab | Dec 2012 | #118 | |
| napi21 | Dec 2012 | #48 | |
| AZ Progressive | Dec 2012 | #53 | |
| DollarBillHines | Dec 2012 | #83 | |
| obama2terms | Dec 2012 | #121 | |
| DollarBillHines | Dec 2012 | #129 | |
| arcane1 | Dec 2012 | #56 | |
| A Simple Game | Dec 2012 | #57 | |
| Kahuna | Dec 2012 | #58 | |
| broadcaster75201 | Dec 2012 | #59 | |
| grasswire | Dec 2012 | #60 | |
| LibGranny | Dec 2012 | #61 | |
| Major Nikon | Dec 2012 | #62 | |
| Boomerproud | Dec 2012 | #132 | |
| RZM | Dec 2012 | #64 | |
| judesedit | Dec 2012 | #68 | |
| DallasNE | Dec 2012 | #69 | |
| TeamPooka | Dec 2012 | #70 | |
| Smilo | Dec 2012 | #71 | |
| aint_no_life_nowhere | Dec 2012 | #73 | |
| Myrina | Dec 2012 | #74 | |
| AndyA | Dec 2012 | #75 | |
| JDPriestly | Dec 2012 | #76 | |
| Maeve | Dec 2012 | #81 | |
| Nero No Hero | Dec 2012 | #84 | |
| libdem4life | Dec 2012 | #77 | |
| exboyfil | Dec 2012 | #104 | |
| libdem4life | Dec 2012 | #105 | |
| Politicalboi | Dec 2012 | #78 | |
| The Velveteen Ocelot | Dec 2012 | #79 | |
| onethatcares | Dec 2012 | #80 | |
| ywcachieve | Dec 2012 | #82 | |
| jmowreader | Dec 2012 | #85 | |
| ehrnst | Dec 2012 | #86 | |
| Zoeisright | Dec 2012 | #87 | |
| question everything | Dec 2012 | #90 | |
| FreeBC | Dec 2012 | #91 | |
| tavernier | Dec 2012 | #92 | |
| lin_e65 | Dec 2012 | #93 | |
| brooklynite | Dec 2012 | #95 | |
| Botany | Dec 2012 | #96 | |
| dinger130 | Dec 2012 | #97 | |
| bitchkitty | Dec 2012 | #99 | |
| NoodleyAppendage | Dec 2012 | #100 | |
| Ash_F | Dec 2012 | #101 | |
| Little Star | Dec 2012 | #102 | |
| Drale | Dec 2012 | #103 | |
| politicaljunkie41910 | Dec 2012 | #108 | |
| grasswire | Dec 2012 | #112 | |
| obama2terms | Dec 2012 | #122 | |
| politicaljunkie41910 | Dec 2012 | #134 | |
| obama2terms | Dec 2012 | #135 | |
| libdem4life | Dec 2012 | #133 | |
| MrModerate | Dec 2012 | #110 | |
| oldbanjo | Dec 2012 | #114 | |
| okaawhatever | Dec 2012 | #115 | |
| SemperEadem | Dec 2012 | #116 | |
| Bucky | Dec 2012 | #117 | |
| MissMillie | Dec 2012 | #119 | |
| adigal | Dec 2012 | #120 | |
| obama2terms | Dec 2012 | #123 | |
| KurtNYC | Dec 2012 | #124 | |
| PurityOfEssence | Dec 2012 | #125 | |
| joetubes | Dec 2012 | #126 | |
| hamsterjill | Dec 2012 | #128 | |
| Phx_Dem | Dec 2012 | #130 | |
| applegrove | Dec 2012 | #131 | |
| Bluegene | Dec 2012 | #136 | |
| NoGOPZone | Dec 2012 | #137 | |
| aquart | Dec 2012 | #139 |
Response to brush (Reply #1)
Sun Dec 23, 2012, 01:19 PM
Jamaal510 (3,172 posts)
54. Because Ann secretly threatened to shave off both of Willard's sideburns.
Response to brush (Reply #1)
Sun Dec 23, 2012, 10:22 PM
tblue37 (11,702 posts)
107. He probably let others convince him that he was the prophesied messiah
|
Last edited Sun Dec 23, 2012, 10:33 PM USA/ET - Edit history (3) |
Response to tblue37 (Reply #107)
Mon Dec 24, 2012, 01:55 PM
127. Yeah, or, he could be a sociopath still spinning lies.
Response to kpete (Original post)
Sun Dec 23, 2012, 11:27 AM
2. Very funny.
|
Tagg, I don't think I've ever met anybody stupid enough to believe that.
 |
Response to surrealAmerican (Reply #2)
Sun Dec 23, 2012, 01:06 PM
sulphurdunn (3,502 posts)
51. Tag believes
|
any peasant stupid enough to have voted for his father is also stupid enough to believe that, and he's probably right.
 |
Response to surrealAmerican (Reply #2)
Sun Dec 23, 2012, 11:26 PM
defacto7 (3,346 posts)
109. On the other hand...
Response to kpete (Original post)
Sun Dec 23, 2012, 11:30 AM
3. Really? Really? And that's why he acted so devastated that he lost? He should have been
Response to Nay (Reply #3)
Sun Dec 23, 2012, 11:37 AM
CountAllVotes (11,846 posts)
7. sour orange man thing IMO
|
Orange man's time to go? Yep.
 
|
Response to kpete (Original post)
Sun Dec 23, 2012, 11:32 AM
Siwsan (1,827 posts)
4. All along I've said that Willard wanted the title, but not the job or responsibilities
Response to Siwsan (Reply #4)
Sun Dec 23, 2012, 12:29 PM
33. Oh, I agree, but Tagg there says he didn't want it because he was "shy..."
|
...That translates to: "Dad doesn't like being judged by plebes. He would have hated that part of the job--and really, if he's been made president he would have done something about that. Commoners shouldn't have the right to comment on the acts of a great man like him."
Really, all any of the Romney family wanted was for American to realize that Mitt should be handed the perks and prestige of the Presidency without having to do any of the work, nor have to be in that nasty public spotlight which, after all, is so beneath him 
I'm sure they think we're all going to be sorry, someday soon, that we commoners didn't realize what a great king he would have been. We should have just voted the way they told us to. |
Response to kpete (Original post)
Sun Dec 23, 2012, 11:33 AM
djean111 (953 posts)
5. So - Ann worried about his mental well-being if he won - but encouraged him to run?
Response to kpete (Original post)
Sun Dec 23, 2012, 11:36 AM
matt819 (3,843 posts)
6. Sure. I can see that.
Response to matt819 (Reply #6)
Sun Dec 23, 2012, 01:21 PM
beac (9,340 posts)
55. Not to mention a metric ton of his own money.
Response to kpete (Original post)
Sun Dec 23, 2012, 11:40 AM
klook (4,461 posts)
8. Ah, so that's it.
Response to kpete (Original post)
Sun Dec 23, 2012, 11:42 AM
9. He didn't want to run but God told him he was the man for the job.
Response to kpete (Original post)
Sun Dec 23, 2012, 11:46 AM
11. I'm not going to actually read the article because ...
Response to 1StrongBlackMan (Reply #11)
Sun Dec 23, 2012, 11:52 AM
MrScorpio (55,317 posts)
15. You see it too. nt
Response to 1StrongBlackMan (Reply #11)
Sun Dec 23, 2012, 01:04 PM
Live and Learn (1,470 posts)
50. Now, there is the proper use of the word entitled.
Response to 1StrongBlackMan (Reply #11)
Sun Dec 23, 2012, 01:43 PM
BainsBane (9,559 posts)
63. That's what was so repulsive
Response to kpete (Original post)
Sun Dec 23, 2012, 11:46 AM
12. don't believe a word of it, R$ lost in '08, could have decided not to run '12
Response to wordpix (Reply #12)
Sun Dec 23, 2012, 01:11 PM
Squinch (3,060 posts)
52. The other son, the one named "Burp" is telling the truth: Romney is in hiding, compulsively
Response to kpete (Original post)
Sun Dec 23, 2012, 11:51 AM
MrScorpio (55,317 posts)
13. I myself had a sense that he didn't want run for president
Response to kpete (Original post)
Sun Dec 23, 2012, 11:52 AM
Cha (124,653 posts)
14. Then why did he lie his head off and go so low
Response to Cha (Reply #14)
Sun Dec 23, 2012, 11:55 AM
BumRushDaShow (11,956 posts)
17. And he kept on lying
Response to BumRushDaShow (Reply #17)
Sun Dec 23, 2012, 12:23 PM
Cha (124,653 posts)
29. Repent Romney Repent! And,
Response to kpete (Original post)
Sun Dec 23, 2012, 11:53 AM
BumRushDaShow (11,956 posts)
16. Bullshit
Response to BumRushDaShow (Reply #16)
Sun Dec 23, 2012, 12:27 PM
Cha (124,653 posts)
32. Not one penny.. their campaign even "overbilled reporters" to
Response to kpete (Original post)
Sun Dec 23, 2012, 11:56 AM
alphafemale (13,268 posts)
18. sour grapes much?
Response to kpete (Original post)
Sun Dec 23, 2012, 12:00 PM
19. There may be an element of truth to what he says in this sense
Response to bucolic_frolic (Reply #19)
Sun Dec 23, 2012, 02:29 PM
No Vested Interest (525 posts)
72. Mitt- Have a beer with?
Response to kpete (Original post)
Sun Dec 23, 2012, 12:04 PM
awoke_in_2003 (18,512 posts)
20. In other words...
Response to kpete (Original post)
Sun Dec 23, 2012, 12:06 PM
21. the nation was crying out for Mitt Romney
|
how could he say no?
 |
Response to kpete (Original post)
Sun Dec 23, 2012, 12:10 PM
22. All I can picture is Pee Wee Hurman falling over his bikes handle bars.
Response to kpete (Original post)
Sun Dec 23, 2012, 12:14 PM
23. Sour grapes or bullshit, screw Mitt. He didn't lose, the nation won and so did the President.
|
Last edited Sun Dec 23, 2012, 12:15 PM USA/ET - Edit history (1) |
Response to kpete (Original post)
Sun Dec 23, 2012, 12:15 PM
24. I believe it
|
Last edited Sun Dec 23, 2012, 12:15 PM USA/ET - Edit history (1) |
Response to kpete (Original post)
Sun Dec 23, 2012, 12:16 PM
LiberalFighter (31,082 posts)
25. Tagg gave Meghashyam Mali the reporter a snow job.
Response to kpete (Original post)
Sun Dec 23, 2012, 12:16 PM
Dyedinthewoolliberal (6,463 posts)
26. I'm so glad
|
we've been provided (via the Hill) a glimpse into the uber-wealthy and privleged life of the recent Republican nominee- said no one ever!!!!
|
Response to kpete (Original post)
Sun Dec 23, 2012, 12:17 PM
lumberjack_jeff (24,550 posts)
27. "Fine. I didn't want to win anyway." n/t
Response to kpete (Original post)
Sun Dec 23, 2012, 12:22 PM
jerseyjack (1,361 posts)
28. Shit, I felt the same way about Mitt and his whole family.
Response to kpete (Original post)
Sun Dec 23, 2012, 12:26 PM
31. I always had the sense he was more in love with the concept of being president.
Response to AngryOldDem (Reply #31)
Sun Dec 23, 2012, 12:42 PM
39. Nah. It wouldn't have involved work! You know Mitt had deals with all his backers...
|
...to put certain people in charge and let them run the country while he took vacations at Camp David, flew to Paris on Air Force One, and held soirees at the White House.
No. Mitt was never worried about the "work" he'd have to do as the billions funneled into his campaign came with an agreement that he'd let others do the work (win-win in his mind). What Tagg has got right is that Mittens probably hated the idea that he would have to actually hobnob with the plebes. That the job of President means common folk can scrutinize and judge this great man's every move. Which is fine is one is a commoner president like Obama, but for someone as elite and special as Romney?  No, no, no. It's just not right.
*That* would likely have been the part he didn't like. But maybe he thought he could take care of that, too. Maybe, if he'd won, the agreement included only the right-wing media having access to him; no common folk, no one who might write or say anything outside of praising him. I tell you, we dodged many different bullets in this election. |
Response to kpete (Original post)
Sun Dec 23, 2012, 12:33 PM
catbyte (3,945 posts)
34. I believe he didn't want to RUN. He wanted to BE President. Asshole.
Response to kpete (Original post)
Sun Dec 23, 2012, 12:34 PM
jerseyjack (1,361 posts)
35. Connect this with the Morman prophesy and it makes sense.
Response to jerseyjack (Reply #35)
Sun Dec 23, 2012, 04:49 PM
PearliePoo2 (2,894 posts)
88. This!
|
You nailed it (IMO)
 |
Response to kpete (Original post)
Sun Dec 23, 2012, 12:36 PM
36. How long was he running for president?
Response to kpete (Original post)
Sun Dec 23, 2012, 12:41 PM
37. Yeah he didn't want to run for president because he wanted to be anointed president.
Response to Riley18 (Reply #37)
Sun Dec 23, 2012, 01:45 PM
65. I think his Daddy had a lot to do with it
Response to kpete (Original post)
Sun Dec 23, 2012, 12:41 PM
38. That's good, because I wanted him to be president 'less than anyone I've met' too.
Response to Nanjing to Seoul (Reply #38)
Fri Dec 28, 2012, 02:43 AM
138. Good point!! So did SHmitty boy vote for Obama then....
|
Who really gives a stuff what the spoilt offspring of a spoilt offspring says anyways...maybe another missionary tour of France is on the cards. Maybe it'll be on horseback with Chucky's Bride !
 |
Response to kpete (Original post)
Sun Dec 23, 2012, 12:46 PM
Ineeda (2,932 posts)
41. I guess it's like
|
tripping over your own feet, falling flat on your face, and when you notice that your clumsiness has been witnessed, you jump up and say,
"I meant to do that." |
Response to kpete (Original post)
Sun Dec 23, 2012, 12:49 PM
Hassin Bin Sober (8,619 posts)
42. Sure that's why he spent $50 million of his own money.
Response to kpete (Original post)
Sun Dec 23, 2012, 12:50 PM
Historic NY (19,737 posts)
43. Yeah okay, he has been running since 2008
Response to Historic NY (Reply #43)
Sun Dec 23, 2012, 04:54 PM
89. Since 2006
|
Mittens had been running for POTUS
losing the Republican nomination to McCain in 2008,then licking his "wounds" and running again this year. May be NOW he'll stop running ... |
Response to blackdiamond62 (Reply #89)
Sun Dec 23, 2012, 10:20 PM
Historic NY (19,737 posts)
106. Well he certainly is getting excercise & going no where fast.
|
|
Response to blackdiamond62 (Reply #89)
Sun Dec 23, 2012, 11:49 PM
MannyGoldstein (21,458 posts)
111. Since 2004
Response to kpete (Original post)
Sun Dec 23, 2012, 12:50 PM
LiberalElite (873 posts)
44. So why in the Heck did he run? nt
Response to LiberalElite (Reply #44)
Sun Dec 23, 2012, 07:22 PM
94. Specifically, why did he file papers for his candidacy?
Response to kpete (Original post)
Sun Dec 23, 2012, 12:58 PM
onehandle (35,489 posts)
46. Classic covering for failing. nt
Response to kpete (Original post)
Sun Dec 23, 2012, 12:58 PM
47. Wasn't Taggart the one who wanted to
Response to xfundy (Reply #47)
Mon Dec 24, 2012, 06:59 AM
XemaSab (57,416 posts)
118. *lulz*
|
I had that same thought re: Palin but you phrased it so much more horribly/awesomely.
 |
Response to kpete (Original post)
Sun Dec 23, 2012, 01:01 PM
napi21 (39,482 posts)
48. I don't buy that!
Response to kpete (Original post)
Sun Dec 23, 2012, 01:12 PM
AZ Progressive (398 posts)
53. Lying and Making Big Whoppers Runs In The Family
Response to AZ Progressive (Reply #53)
Sun Dec 23, 2012, 03:55 PM
83. Actually, lying is part of the Mormon cult
Response to DollarBillHines (Reply #83)
Mon Dec 24, 2012, 08:50 AM
121. Just looked that up, wow that's pretty interesting....
Response to kpete (Original post)
Sun Dec 23, 2012, 01:22 PM
arcane1 (19,981 posts)
56. Tagg is only saying that because he never met me
|
|
Response to kpete (Original post)
Sun Dec 23, 2012, 01:26 PM
57. That's not necessary Tagg. We don't need another reason for
Response to kpete (Original post)
Sun Dec 23, 2012, 01:27 PM
Kahuna (26,403 posts)
58. Lying runs in the family. nt
Response to kpete (Original post)
Sun Dec 23, 2012, 01:38 PM
61. Don't believe this for a second! If true, then why
Response to kpete (Original post)
Sun Dec 23, 2012, 01:39 PM
Major Nikon (9,720 posts)
62. He's either monumentally stupid or thinks the public is monumentally gullible
Response to Major Nikon (Reply #62)
Mon Dec 24, 2012, 10:30 PM
132. Well, you answered your own question.
Response to kpete (Original post)
Sun Dec 23, 2012, 01:44 PM
64. Apparently he never met Fred Thompson
|
Last edited Sun Dec 23, 2012, 01:45 PM USA/ET - Edit history (1) |
Response to kpete (Original post)
Sun Dec 23, 2012, 02:07 PM
judesedit (1,190 posts)
68. Rob-me's love of money "trumps" everything
Response to kpete (Original post)
Sun Dec 23, 2012, 02:13 PM
69. What This Shows Is That Tagg Is As Big Of A Liar As Mitt
|
Last edited Sun Dec 23, 2012, 02:27 PM USA/ET - Edit history (1) |
Response to kpete (Original post)
Sun Dec 23, 2012, 02:17 PM
TeamPooka (3,301 posts)
70. good article about Rmoneys loss
Response to kpete (Original post)
Sun Dec 23, 2012, 02:32 PM
aint_no_life_nowhere (18,936 posts)
73. Must have been some doozies in those tax returns:
Response to kpete (Original post)
Sun Dec 23, 2012, 03:07 PM
74. He had no desire to "RUN" ... which means, in typical priviledged frat-boy fashion,
Response to kpete (Original post)
Sun Dec 23, 2012, 03:09 PM
AndyA (16,161 posts)
75. Sure, Tagg, sure.
Response to kpete (Original post)
Sun Dec 23, 2012, 03:12 PM
JDPriestly (37,760 posts)
76. Sour Grapes.
Response to JDPriestly (Reply #76)
Sun Dec 23, 2012, 03:51 PM
Maeve (28,526 posts)
81. My first thought, too.
Response to Maeve (Reply #81)
Sun Dec 23, 2012, 04:01 PM
84. Of course
|
I just wonder if Tagg now wants to punch his father!
|
Response to kpete (Original post)
Sun Dec 23, 2012, 03:17 PM
libdem4life (1,783 posts)
77. Can you imagine the absolute frothing at the mouth of, say, Gingrich, Santorum, et al , WTF?
Response to libdem4life (Reply #77)
Sun Dec 23, 2012, 09:48 PM
exboyfil (3,398 posts)
104. Defeat is one thing
Response to exboyfil (Reply #104)
Sun Dec 23, 2012, 09:59 PM
libdem4life (1,783 posts)
105. Didn't he also come on board fairly late in the campaign? Like when it started not looking so good
Response to kpete (Original post)
Sun Dec 23, 2012, 03:18 PM
78. Yes, Rmoney didn't want that old job anyway
Response to kpete (Original post)
Sun Dec 23, 2012, 03:20 PM
The Velveteen Ocelot (34,730 posts)
79. He wanted to be president "less than anyone I've met."
Response to kpete (Original post)
Sun Dec 23, 2012, 03:55 PM
82. Tagg is trying to save face because his dad got his a$$ handed to him, by President Obama.
Response to kpete (Original post)
Sun Dec 23, 2012, 04:28 PM
ehrnst (2,911 posts)
86. Seven years of campaigning - why?
Response to kpete (Original post)
Sun Dec 23, 2012, 04:43 PM
Zoeisright (7,846 posts)
87. Uh huh. Sure.
Response to kpete (Original post)
Sun Dec 23, 2012, 05:06 PM
question everything (24,769 posts)
90. His wish was granted (nt)
Response to kpete (Original post)
Sun Dec 23, 2012, 06:02 PM
91. Even republicans aren't clueless enought to believe this nonsense
Response to kpete (Original post)
Sun Dec 23, 2012, 06:46 PM
tavernier (627 posts)
92. ... he said with his fists clenched,
Response to kpete (Original post)
Sun Dec 23, 2012, 07:01 PM
93. What about all that money he spent??
Response to kpete (Original post)
Sun Dec 23, 2012, 07:22 PM
brooklynite (12,877 posts)
95. So, a win all around then...
Response to kpete (Original post)
Sun Dec 23, 2012, 07:54 PM
Botany (36,053 posts)
96. No Tagg he ran a shitty campaign and he made his money screwing people.
Response to kpete (Original post)
Sun Dec 23, 2012, 08:49 PM
97. I keep hoping that I won't have to hear
Response to kpete (Original post)
Sun Dec 23, 2012, 09:13 PM
NoodleyAppendage (4,486 posts)
100. Bull and sh*t. Talk about an impression management piece. Nice try Romney clan...no dice.
Response to kpete (Original post)
Sun Dec 23, 2012, 09:15 PM
101. Those grapes are probably sour anyway.
Response to kpete (Original post)
Sun Dec 23, 2012, 09:17 PM
Little Star (11,653 posts)
102. Does Tagg think we were all born yesterday??? What a dummy!
Response to kpete (Original post)
Sun Dec 23, 2012, 10:35 PM
108. They lie about everything. This morning on C-SPAN the two Politico guys who just wrote an E-Book
Response to politicaljunkie41910 (Reply #108)
Mon Dec 24, 2012, 01:58 AM
112. so Ann was a negative for the campaign!!
Response to politicaljunkie41910 (Reply #108)
Mon Dec 24, 2012, 08:55 AM
122. What is that E-book called? I would love to read it
Response to obama2terms (Reply #122)
Tue Dec 25, 2012, 12:05 AM
134. The book is titled, "The End of the Line: Romney vs. Obama"
Response to politicaljunkie41910 (Reply #108)
Mon Dec 24, 2012, 10:49 PM
libdem4life (1,783 posts)
133. Like the cookies from 7-11 ... nice touch. Yeah, they knew all right.
Response to kpete (Original post)
Sun Dec 23, 2012, 11:27 PM
MrModerate (8,048 posts)
110. I'll accept that he had no compelling reason to *be* president . . .
Response to kpete (Original post)
Mon Dec 24, 2012, 05:03 AM
oldbanjo (676 posts)
114. Tag is a lier like his father.
|
Last edited Mon Dec 24, 2012, 05:03 AM USA/ET - Edit history (1) |
Response to kpete (Original post)
Mon Dec 24, 2012, 05:08 AM
115. What a coincidence, I wanted him to be President less than anyone i've met too. n/t
Response to kpete (Original post)
Mon Dec 24, 2012, 06:04 AM
SemperEadem (7,997 posts)
116. Oh, would you and your family just. go. away.
Response to kpete (Original post)
Mon Dec 24, 2012, 06:27 AM
Bucky (41,536 posts)
117. You didn't break up with me; I broke up with you.
Response to kpete (Original post)
Mon Dec 24, 2012, 07:51 AM
119. Apparently there were a lot of people
Response to kpete (Original post)
Mon Dec 24, 2012, 12:37 PM
125. Tiresome fratboy blather: if he'd REALLY wanted it, he would've won
Response to kpete (Original post)
Mon Dec 24, 2012, 03:51 PM
hamsterjill (4,305 posts)
128. Oh, baloney!
Response to kpete (Original post)
Mon Dec 24, 2012, 06:11 PM
130. That's good because we wanted him "less than anyone."
Response to kpete (Original post)
Mon Dec 24, 2012, 06:58 PM
applegrove (58,436 posts)
131. Good riddance to that family. Sour
|
Last edited Mon Dec 24, 2012, 06:59 PM USA/ET - Edit history (1) |
Response to kpete (Original post)
Fri Dec 28, 2012, 04:45 AM
aquart (67,538 posts)
139. So everyone in a gated community wants to be president?
