HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » Latest Breaking News (Forum) » Mass. poll: Scott Brown f...

Thu Dec 20, 2012, 01:14 PM

Mass. poll: Scott Brown for John Kerry's seat

Source: Politico

Outgoing Sen. Scott Brown might not be out of Washington for long.

The Massachusetts Republican would be in a strong position to win a special election to fill the seat of Sen. John Kerry if the latter is appointed secretary of state, according to a WBUR/MassInc. poll released Thursday.

Forty-seven percent of registered voters would vote for Brown compared with 39 percent who would vote for a generic Democrat. Against many of the most talked-about Democratic candidates, Brown holds big leads. He tops Rep. Michael Capuano, 47 percent to 28 percent; has a 48 percent to 30 percent lead over Rep. Ed Markey; and holds a whopping 51 percent to 24 percent lead over Rep. Stephen Lynch. And his lead over former Rep. Marty Meehan is 49 percent to 30 percent.

The four House members suffer from low name recognition. A majority of Bay State voters either donít know of or donít have an opinion of Meehan, Capuano, Markey and Lynch. Brown is viewed favorably by 58 percent of voters, and only 28 percent view him unfavorably, the poll found.




Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2012/12/mass-poll-scott-brown-for-john-kerry-seat-85352.html?hp=r3

111 replies, 11899 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 111 replies Author Time Post
Reply Mass. poll: Scott Brown for John Kerry's seat (Original post)
dlwickham Dec 2012 OP
Mass Dec 2012 #1
JDPriestly Dec 2012 #48
wisteria Dec 2012 #60
Bucky Dec 2012 #86
Cha Dec 2012 #91
MADem Dec 2012 #103
Smarmie Doofus Dec 2012 #107
yodermon Dec 2012 #2
LynneSin Dec 2012 #3
Dawson Leery Dec 2012 #4
blm Dec 2012 #10
thesquanderer Dec 2012 #16
Little Star Dec 2012 #17
quakerboy Dec 2012 #40
LynneSin Dec 2012 #45
Mass Dec 2012 #51
wisteria Dec 2012 #61
banned from Kos Dec 2012 #5
chelsea0011 Dec 2012 #6
DonViejo Dec 2012 #31
karynnj Dec 2012 #47
DonViejo Dec 2012 #52
karynnj Dec 2012 #106
chelsea0011 Dec 2012 #76
DonViejo Dec 2012 #77
chelsea0011 Dec 2012 #78
DonViejo Dec 2012 #79
chelsea0011 Dec 2012 #100
meegbear Dec 2012 #7
Fearless Dec 2012 #11
Little Star Dec 2012 #15
JDPriestly Dec 2012 #49
Little Star Dec 2012 #58
JDPriestly Dec 2012 #71
Cha Dec 2012 #90
hughee99 Dec 2012 #97
Is That All There Is Dec 2012 #24
demwing Dec 2012 #27
Is That All There Is Dec 2012 #34
Lordquinton Dec 2012 #57
demwing Dec 2012 #73
Cha Dec 2012 #92
davidpdx Dec 2012 #108
iandhr Dec 2012 #8
demwing Dec 2012 #50
Arugula Latte Dec 2012 #9
sasha031 Dec 2012 #12
MBS Dec 2012 #74
Bucky Dec 2012 #87
Cha Dec 2012 #93
blm Dec 2012 #13
MessiahRp Dec 2012 #21
BlueCaliDem Dec 2012 #25
GoCubsGo Dec 2012 #104
BlueCaliDem Dec 2012 #110
GoCubsGo Dec 2012 #111
Little Star Dec 2012 #14
Is That All There Is Dec 2012 #20
BlueCaliDem Dec 2012 #26
LineLineLineLineReply ?
Is That All There Is Dec 2012 #29
BlueCaliDem Dec 2012 #98
grantcart Dec 2012 #102
blm Dec 2012 #32
MannyGoldstein Dec 2012 #18
Rider3 Dec 2012 #19
and-justice-for-all Dec 2012 #22
treestar Dec 2012 #23
hedda_foil Dec 2012 #28
BigDemVoter Dec 2012 #30
railsback Dec 2012 #33
Tarheel_Dem Dec 2012 #37
Arkana Dec 2012 #82
Tarheel_Dem Dec 2012 #85
McCamy Taylor Dec 2012 #35
blm Dec 2012 #41
Cha Dec 2012 #94
Arkana Dec 2012 #83
Turbineguy Dec 2012 #36
graywarrior Dec 2012 #38
Cha Dec 2012 #95
cyclezealot Dec 2012 #39
blm Dec 2012 #42
cyclezealot Dec 2012 #56
blm Dec 2012 #65
Arkana Dec 2012 #84
heaven05 Dec 2012 #43
valerief Dec 2012 #44
MiniMe Dec 2012 #46
Doctor_J Dec 2012 #53
Joey Liberal Dec 2012 #54
politicasista Dec 2012 #64
The Stranger Dec 2012 #80
Flatpicker Dec 2012 #55
wisteria Dec 2012 #62
Flatpicker Dec 2012 #63
wisteria Dec 2012 #59
RoverSuswade Dec 2012 #66
hrmjustin Dec 2012 #67
RoverSuswade Dec 2012 #68
hrmjustin Dec 2012 #69
cstanleytech Dec 2012 #70
SunSeeker Dec 2012 #72
GoCubsGo Dec 2012 #105
foo_bar Dec 2012 #75
Arkana Dec 2012 #81
cosmicone Dec 2012 #88
Cha Dec 2012 #89
Cha Dec 2012 #96
davidpdx Dec 2012 #109
NHDEMFORLIFE Dec 2012 #99
ann--- Dec 2012 #101

Response to dlwickham (Original post)

Thu Dec 20, 2012, 01:17 PM

1. Or not. The media love to push the poll showing Brown up.

But they do not like so much to talk about the one showing Deval Patrick up and Vicky Kennedy very close, when nobody is even running.

http://www.sys-con.com/node/2492085

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Mass (Reply #1)

Thu Dec 20, 2012, 04:38 PM

48. Kerry accepting the post of Secretary of State -- pure egotism.

We need him in the Senate.

Let Kerry help get someone ready to win the election against Scott Brown and take his seat.

Then when polls show that person would win, then Kerry can leave the Senate.

It would be utterly wrong, utterly unpatriotic for Kerry to leave the Senate to become Secretary of State. We need him in the Senate.

He is a good man. He would make a great Secretary of State, but that is not where we need him. We need him in the Senate.

Please, Please, Please, Senator Kerry, you have already sacrificed a lot for you country. Once more, please, please. Your presence in the Senate makes more of a difference than your presence would make on the diplomatic circuit or in the State Department.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to JDPriestly (Reply #48)

Thu Dec 20, 2012, 07:43 PM

60. Oh stop pleading, Brown will not win again in Mass, n/t

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to JDPriestly (Reply #48)

Fri Dec 21, 2012, 01:17 PM

86. When we quit trusting the voters to get what they want or to deserve what they get...

...we quit being democrats (small "d") and thus quit honoring what it means to be Democrats (big "D").

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to JDPriestly (Reply #48)

Fri Dec 21, 2012, 08:03 PM

91. Imv, It has absolutely nothing to do with "egotism" and

everything to do with what an excellent SOS, John Kerry would be.

The next Senate race in Mass should generate interest across our Nation.. I sent money to Elizabeth who was behind Brown in the polls and I'll do it again for whomever. I do not want to see Scott Brown's racist ass in there again.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to JDPriestly (Reply #48)

Mon Dec 24, 2012, 06:42 PM

103. If he gets the formal offer, he's taking it.

I am bummed, I hope the national party folks get behind the Dem and push HARD. We'll need star power and money in a hurry--and I'd take a Senator Affleck (D) over any Republican...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to JDPriestly (Reply #48)

Mon Dec 24, 2012, 07:53 PM

107. +1. It's like handing them a senate seat. n/t

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to dlwickham (Original post)

Thu Dec 20, 2012, 01:18 PM

2. proceeding to plan n/t

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to dlwickham (Original post)

Thu Dec 20, 2012, 01:18 PM

3. I call bullshit to this poll

A named person is ALWAYS going to poll better than a generic name.

A year ago Brown was polling strong against the democratic generic name. How did Brown do last election?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to LynneSin (Reply #3)

Thu Dec 20, 2012, 01:19 PM

4. +1

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to LynneSin (Reply #3)

Thu Dec 20, 2012, 01:29 PM

10. Plus, the Dem nominee would have Kerry's political team in Mass at their service.

Big difference.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to LynneSin (Reply #3)

Thu Dec 20, 2012, 01:36 PM

16. Not necessarily

re: "A named person is ALWAYS going to poll better than a generic name. "

A generic--who has no negatives--can poll very well against a known name. And also compared to actual people who have either some negatives or little name recognition.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to LynneSin (Reply #3)

Thu Dec 20, 2012, 01:36 PM

17. I call truth on this poll.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to LynneSin (Reply #3)

Thu Dec 20, 2012, 03:24 PM

40. He also beat named people

by nearly 20 points.

And he did remarkably well last election, considering he was a republican running in a blue state after selling out most anything important that people might have cared about. He got far better numbers in his attempt to be reelected than any republican presidential candidate in mass in recent history.

In fact, he got around 46% of the vote. Which is not far off of what they are polling him at in these polls. So people who voted for him before say they will vote for him again given the opportunity.

Will the people who voted against him bother to show up in a non-presidential election? It didn't work out so well for Mass the last time around.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to quakerboy (Reply #40)

Thu Dec 20, 2012, 04:12 PM

45. But that was the same thing with his polling before the Dem nomination

THere were 2 zillion polls done before MA democratic voters had picked their nominees that showed Brown would be Warren. Warren was NOT the nominee just one of several options to choose from.

When it's a '1 to many' choice the 1 will always come out the winner because the many end up getting diluted. When we finally have the 2 main candidates named then I'll pay attention to the polls.

And provided that the democrats do NOT get another Martha Coakley on the ticket I think we can still beat the guy. Brown was an absolute douchebag with his racist attacks on Warren's heritage. The only reason it was as close as it was is because Warren association with the consumer advocate groups there to protect average folks against the banks. Alot of big money came into that race specifically to defeat her because of that issue.

My 2 cents is if a strong candidate is on the ticket that Brown will lose with an even bigger margin. Kerry will see to it that his seat is replaced by a democrat. He wouldn't take the SoS position otherwise.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to quakerboy (Reply #40)

Thu Dec 20, 2012, 04:46 PM

51. Yes, last time nobody believed he could win. This time we know.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to LynneSin (Reply #3)

Thu Dec 20, 2012, 07:45 PM

61. +1 n/t

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to dlwickham (Original post)

Thu Dec 20, 2012, 01:21 PM

5. Martha Coakley was a generic Democrat

 

pretty much so anyway.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to dlwickham (Original post)

Thu Dec 20, 2012, 01:21 PM

6. Lynch is a moderate/conservative Dem and would probably beat him.

No one outside his district knows him. This poll is BS.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to chelsea0011 (Reply #6)

Thu Dec 20, 2012, 02:18 PM

31. Disagree...

Lynch is pro-life; that won't fly in Massachusetts.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to DonViejo (Reply #31)

Thu Dec 20, 2012, 04:23 PM

47. So is Scott Brown, co sponsor of the Blunt amendment nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to karynnj (Reply #47)

Thu Dec 20, 2012, 05:01 PM

52. In the last election Brown claimed to be pro-choice and

outright rejected the endorsement of the National Right to Life Committee.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to DonViejo (Reply #52)

Mon Dec 24, 2012, 07:12 PM

106. However, did people believe him?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to DonViejo (Reply #31)

Fri Dec 21, 2012, 09:27 AM

76. If that were true Ray Flynn would have never become Mayor of Boston

and Moakley would have never become Representative and Romney would have never become Governor and Ed King would have never become Governor, and on and on. MA has had many pro life Catholics elected. Granted many are like the VP Biden type but they can and will get elected.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to chelsea0011 (Reply #76)

Fri Dec 21, 2012, 10:41 AM

77. Two problems with using Ray Flynn as an example...

Last edited Fri Dec 21, 2012, 12:12 PM - Edit history (1)

he ran against Mel King (an alleged "black-radical") and Flynn promised to do nothing to interfere with or change existing law on abortion, to include not blocking Boston City Hospital from performing abortions. While Flynn served several terms as Mayor, he was defeated in his bid for Congress.

Moakley represented a heavily conservative Roman Catholic district (pretty much the same district Lynch is from and represents).

Ed King defeated Mike Dukakis owing to Democratic/liberal anger with Dukakis, his perceived arrogance and aloofness, but also, King ran as pro-life at a time when abortion was a very hot button issue in MA (late 70's/early 1980's). Dukakis came back four years later and defeated King.

We're also talking about the Massachusetts of 30+ years ago, when conservative Dems were a big but waning influence in the MA Democratic Party. I believe John Silber's campaign was the last hurrah for conservative MA Democrats. Republican Bill Weld was elected, attributing his narrow victory to his pro-choice position AND the gay community (Silber ran promising to undo an out of court settlement between Dukakis and the gay community over the issue of gay foster parents).

You may also recall Cardinal Medeiros interfering in the elections of Barney Frank and Jim Shannon, urging people to vote against them because of their pro-choice positions. Shannon and Frank won huge victories and the Church never again involved itself in elections to the extent Medeiros involved it in those two elections.

BTW, I was the Administrative Aide to a MA State Senator while King was Governor, leaving the position to work in Mayor Flynn's office,

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to DonViejo (Reply #77)

Fri Dec 21, 2012, 11:42 AM

78. Regardless of the reasons why, they were all elected. And I would not

refer to Mel King as a black radical.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to chelsea0011 (Reply #78)

Fri Dec 21, 2012, 12:10 PM

79. I don't refer to Mel as a "black radical"...

Last edited Fri Dec 21, 2012, 02:34 PM - Edit history (1)

that's why it was (and is in this comment) in quotation marks. You seem to be aware of Boston politics, thus you know that is how Mel was portrayed by portions of the media (columnists from the Boston Herald and yackers on WRKO for example. Mel has been a good friend to me and was a strong supporter during a particularly painful time. It was my partner's and mine home then Governor Mike Dukakis ordered the removal of two foster children from. However, your point is a good one and I will edit my previous comment to read alleged black radical.

On edit:

I couldn't recall the year Mel ran for Mayor of Boston so I went over to Wikipedia to see if there was a listing. Guess what? This is how they describe him;

In 1983, when incumbent Kevin White's withdrawal from contention after 16 years in office made the race wide open, Mel King went from obscure radical to serious contender for Mayor of Boston. Despite Boston's historical scars of racism, Mel King's grassroots activism culminated in political momentum that nearly defeated the favorite, Raymond Flynn. Aside from securing the African American vote, King would have needed 30% of the white vote, which was almost accomplished. Flynn, an Irish-Catholic with roots in the gritty "Southie"(South Boston) area, would take the election despite a landmark showing by King. Even with the defeat, the election and national attention was a historical turning point in the participation of African Americans in politics and urban policy.


The entire entry for Mel is under dispute, apparently someone believes the piece reads too much like a PR piece.

So, you think it's unimportant why a person is elected? Does your standard apply to President Obama as well?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to DonViejo (Reply #79)

Mon Dec 24, 2012, 06:23 PM

100. Thanks for the clarification. Mel was from my neighborhood,

and good guy. I got a kick out of the Wikipedia comment about King. I would hardly consider Mel obscure. I hardly think it is unimportant about how people get elected and apologize if my comments make it seem that way. I do believe that a pro life candidate can win in state wide election in MA. Brown won even though he claims pro choice which he most certainly is not. I don't think a pro life Catholic candidate like Lynch will hurt him statewide. I think he will gather votes between the cities and take a lot of Brown's support in those areas away from him.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to dlwickham (Original post)

Thu Dec 20, 2012, 01:24 PM

7. Those are well known Dems in the state, BUT ...

there are three names not there that could have a big impact:

1. Vicky Kennedy - People are pushing Teddy's widow (again) to run for Senate.

2. Edward Kennedy Jr.

3. Ben Affleck

This could become interesting.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to meegbear (Reply #7)

Thu Dec 20, 2012, 01:30 PM

11. Any of which with a properly run campaign

Would mop the floor with Brown.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Fearless (Reply #11)

Thu Dec 20, 2012, 01:35 PM

15. Ben Affleck would have a good shot. MA loves Ben....

As a matter of fact I think he is the only person who's name has been thrown around who stands a real good chance.

Now if only he'd be willing to run.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Little Star (Reply #15)

Thu Dec 20, 2012, 04:40 PM

49. Ben Affleck is the only one with the positive image and name to get elected.

The Kennedy name means a lot, but Ben Affleck is the only one who could get elected.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to JDPriestly (Reply #49)

Thu Dec 20, 2012, 07:25 PM

58. That's the way I see it too. But...

Tonight on the local evening news (can't remember the station) they said that Ted Kennedy's son, Ted Jr. was a possibility.
Now, because of name recognition, I might buy that one. Though he has no political background.

For the past few years I've been living in Norfolk County but spent most of my life in Worcester County, still have big family there.

From this neck of Mass, both Norfolk Co & Worcester Co, even Dems find Brown likable and consider him either independent or at least moderate. At least that's what I hear every time his name comes up.

Do you live in MA?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Little Star (Reply #58)

Fri Dec 21, 2012, 01:46 AM

71. No. I don't live in Ma.

I just think Kerry should stay in the Senate. Ted Kennedy, Jr. needs to serve in the House first.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Little Star (Reply #15)

Fri Dec 21, 2012, 07:47 PM

90. I love Ben.. :)

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Little Star (Reply #15)

Sat Dec 22, 2012, 01:42 PM

97. I'm not sure... he wasn't very good a playing a "wicked smaht guy" in Paycheck

and essentially killed off the Jack Ryan character in "The Sum of all Fears". Most of his best acting work has been playing some kind of lovable fuck-up (though I haven't seen Argo yet). I'm not sure how convincing he'd be when giving speeches as "Your Next Senator".

And of course as a Freshman senator, he'd have to watch out for guys like this...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to meegbear (Reply #7)

Thu Dec 20, 2012, 01:55 PM

24. My Head hurts

 

Vikki Kennedy- I did not know that political aptitude could be sexually transmitted. What the Fuck has she ever done, besides throw your next in line off her property.
EKjr- Silver Spoon Drunk (AKA 1%er), see above. No thanks.
Ben Affleck- See Ronald Regan. Confusing his acting smart as really being smart. Not what the country needs.

How about a true open race of ideas and merit. Excluding nobody because of lack of name recognition. Demand better of the party. There were some very good Dems in the primary that got roled by the Political establisment in Warrens coronation. They never got a say in our supposed open democracy.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Is That All There Is (Reply #24)

Thu Dec 20, 2012, 02:04 PM

27. Take some Ibuprofen

Afflek may or may not be Senate ready, but he's no Reagan. Are actors now Persona Non Grata in Washington, just because of St. Ronnie? What a shame...

Afflek is a progressive, popular in his state, quite thoughtful, speaks well, and is prettier than Brown

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to demwing (Reply #27)

Thu Dec 20, 2012, 02:24 PM

34. Oxy works better

 

I will pick some up at the free clinic on my way home. How about we listen to all the canidates and not fall in love with someone based on name, looks and percieved info. No they let in Sonnie Bono and Cooter as well. St Ronnie? boy you have got me pegged wrong. His movies are popular, but the blue collar folks (you know the ones he likes to act like in his movies) do not much like people from Cambridge.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to demwing (Reply #27)

Thu Dec 20, 2012, 06:37 PM

57. Actors shouldn't run for office

Unless they are republican

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Lordquinton (Reply #57)

Fri Dec 21, 2012, 08:22 AM

73. "We the people..."

Except you actors. No room for your type in our perfect union.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to demwing (Reply #27)

Fri Dec 21, 2012, 08:09 PM

92. No, they are not.. in my book. That's broad brushing. Al Franken

was a comedian.

I really can't see Ben being interested in being a Senator with his young family but ya never know.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to meegbear (Reply #7)

Tue Dec 25, 2012, 06:19 AM

108. Except two of those three are now out

Vicki Kennedy would be an excellent place holder for the six or so months it would take to have the special election, but not as a permanent replacement.

It looks to me like the A list is now gone.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to dlwickham (Original post)


Response to iandhr (Reply #8)

Thu Dec 20, 2012, 04:43 PM

50. Yes, its a damned shame they passed that awful legislation!

wait...that never happened...? Oh...

(never mind)

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to dlwickham (Original post)

Thu Dec 20, 2012, 01:25 PM

9. FFS

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to dlwickham (Original post)

Thu Dec 20, 2012, 01:30 PM

12. Brown is damaged goods

if he's viewed favorably by 58%, how is it he lost to Warren 53-47.
It's also come out that he has received $$$1000's from the NRA both in 2010 & 2012.
Not exactly something that MA voters care for.

What I don't understand, is why people aren't talking about Ed Markey, he's got more than an outstanding record.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to sasha031 (Reply #12)

Fri Dec 21, 2012, 08:29 AM

74. " " " " n/t

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to sasha031 (Reply #12)

Fri Dec 21, 2012, 01:18 PM

87. But you gotta admit, *sexy* damaged goods.

Yowza!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to sasha031 (Reply #12)

Fri Dec 21, 2012, 08:18 PM

93. Brown got the highest rating from NRA and benefitted from

the most campaign funds and bonus points.. he was Endorsed by the Hypocrisy of Michael Bloomberg.

"BLOOMBERG BACKS SCOTT BROWN, THE NRA'S CANDIDATE, AGAINST ELIZABETH WARREN"

http://www.capitalnewyork.com/article/politics/2012/07/6292816/bloomberg-backs-scott-brown-nras-candidate-against-elizabeth-warren

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to dlwickham (Original post)

Thu Dec 20, 2012, 01:31 PM

13. RW Politico - they also pushed the idea that Brown was unbeatable for 2012, too.

Last edited Thu Dec 20, 2012, 02:21 PM - Edit history (1)

.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to blm (Reply #13)

Thu Dec 20, 2012, 01:47 PM

21. Exactly before everyone starts their predictable hand wringing

and then their predictable John Kerry attacks, let's remember the source of this shit: Politico.

Give Brown a challenger with a face and people won't be so apt to pick him over generic unknown.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to blm (Reply #13)

Thu Dec 20, 2012, 01:55 PM

25. Yep. And then a never-ran-for-office-before Democrat beat him

54% to 46% - eight friggin points!

Politico luvs them sum Republicans, tho, so that's why I take a pound of salt every time they report something.

On the other hand, I would be more open to polls conducted by the PPP since they were the third most accurate pollsters in last election (Nate Silver was No. 1, I believe. Don't know who No. 2 is, though).

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to BlueCaliDem (Reply #25)

Mon Dec 24, 2012, 07:05 PM

104. She was down by 17 points when she was nominated, too.

And, she had low name recognition, too. Just like all the Dems in the OP's poll. All this hand-wringing and teeth-gnashing is getting kind of tiresome.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to GoCubsGo (Reply #104)

Wed Dec 26, 2012, 12:36 PM

110. I agree with you 100%.

Some people just can't wait to light that match and set it to their hair.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to BlueCaliDem (Reply #110)

Wed Dec 26, 2012, 12:46 PM

111. LOL!!!

You ain't kidding!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to dlwickham (Original post)

Thu Dec 20, 2012, 01:31 PM

14. My feet are on the ground here in MA & I don't doubt this poll for a second....

People here like Brown as a person and they believe he is more of a Independent than a Republican.

That's simply just the way it is here.

It would take someone like Ben Affleck running to ease my mind on this horrible turn of events.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Little Star (Reply #14)

Thu Dec 20, 2012, 01:45 PM

20. No we don't

 

Like Affleck here in Ma. Maybe his movies(some). You are again confusing an actor as smart person. Most of them are parrotts that can read lines really good. Someone like him to ease your mind, how about a True Blue Collar man who understands the REAL Ma. Former Iron Worker, REAL Southie boy worked his way up from nothing Steven Lynch. Stop with all the Social Dem frauds and elect real persons of the people.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Is That All There Is (Reply #20)

Thu Dec 20, 2012, 02:01 PM

26. Stating that Affleck is just another actor but not a smart person

means you've totally forgotten the hugely successful, Good Will Hunting.

Good Will Hunting was both a critical and financial success. It grossed over US $225 million during its theatrical run, more than twenty-two times its $10 million budget. It was nominated for nine Academy Awards, winning two: Best Supporting Actor for Williams and Best Original Screenplay for Affleck and Damon.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Good_Will_Hunting


Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to BlueCaliDem (Reply #26)

Thu Dec 20, 2012, 02:14 PM

29. ?

 

So that is your litmus test for smarts, money and awards by like minded droids. Then MeL Gibson is a genius according to that standard. Clint Eastwood is equal to old Albert E-MC2.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Is That All There Is (Reply #29)

Sun Dec 23, 2012, 12:14 AM

98. You're forgetting that when Good Will Hunting was written

Affleck was a very young man. He was only 25-years-old. Neither Gibson nor Eastwood were anywhere near that successful or creative at that very young age.

Writing an incredible award-winning script like Good Will Hunting, producing the movie, and securing an A-list entertainer like Robin Williams at the tender age of 25 shows just how smart the guy is. Ask yourself, could YOU have done it at that age or even twice it? Don't think so.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Is That All There Is (Reply #20)

Mon Dec 24, 2012, 06:35 PM

102. Affleck has a wide set of interests outside of acting that include substantial public policy


activities, not the least of which is his work on the conflict in Congo.

He is a much more substantial person than Brown. Politics and public interest is not a hobby for him.

Affleck's mother was a civil rights freedom rider. He is as authentic a MA home grown boy who was raised by a single mother and made something good for himself.

You don't seem to be very well informed about Affleck's history or politics in any way.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Little Star (Reply #14)

Thu Dec 20, 2012, 02:23 PM

32. The Dem would have Kerry's experienced political team in Mass. This fearfulness is absurd, imo.

.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to dlwickham (Original post)

Thu Dec 20, 2012, 01:41 PM

18. I'm also from MA, and I think that Brown would be toast

Americans, particularly Bay Staters, are growing ever more tired of abject liars who shill for the 1%.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to dlwickham (Original post)

Thu Dec 20, 2012, 01:42 PM

19. NO F'ING WAY

I do not want that guy representing me or my state at all.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to dlwickham (Original post)

Thu Dec 20, 2012, 01:49 PM

22. Fuck that.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to dlwickham (Original post)

Thu Dec 20, 2012, 01:51 PM

23. He was ahead of Elizabeth Warren in the polls too early on

And this would constitute a very early poll. The generic Democrat - reminds me of the generic Republican who was supposed to be able to beat Obama.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to dlwickham (Original post)

Thu Dec 20, 2012, 02:07 PM

28. On Andrea Greenspan show, they were floating Ted Kennedy Jr.

He recently said he'd probably run for office at some point.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to dlwickham (Original post)

Thu Dec 20, 2012, 02:16 PM

30. Just what I was fucking afraid of. . .

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to dlwickham (Original post)

Thu Dec 20, 2012, 02:23 PM

33. I have a hard time believing Massachusetts is that 'effed up in the head.

 

Seriously?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to railsback (Reply #33)

Thu Dec 20, 2012, 02:42 PM

37. Not to disparage MA, but they did it before. A hot guy, in pink hotpants, obviously has some appeal

I hope to the heavens this guy isn't allowed near the Senate EVER again. Many of us voiced this concern prior to this selection. We remember how we got Scott Brown and Jan Brewer in the first place.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Tarheel_Dem (Reply #37)

Fri Dec 21, 2012, 01:03 PM

82. You guys from other states don't understand how he sold himself.

He didn't play the "Hello, I'm Teabagger McFuckinangry" game, because he and his staff knew that those Republicans don't win elections in Massachusetts.

What he did was play the game purely on character. "Hi, I'm a nice guy. I wear a barn coat and I drive a truck. I'm just a regular Joe, like you."

Normally this shit doesn't work either, but it wasn't helped by Martha Coakley's flat refusal to run anything resembling a campaign, her sneering jokes about him standing in front of Fenway Park shaking hands, and her calling Curt Schilling a Yankees fan (Bostonians take their baseball seriously.)

Add to this about 8 kabillion Tea Party shock troopers, scads of Tea Party money, and a Republican team that DESPERATELY wanted to stick it to the Democrats by stealing Ted Kennedy's seat, and you have a recipe for complete and total disaster.

Scott's on his own this time. He may have the money, but he's a known quantity--and the Tea Party's diminished power coupled with their complete hatred of him will hold many if not all of them back. And Democrats have been preparing for this eventuality ever since it was announced that Kerry might possibly be the new SoS after Hillary. The MA Democratic Party is ready, and so is the 54% that cast their ballots for Elizabeth Warren. We are NOT going to let it happen again.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink