Mon Dec 10, 2012, 01:27 PM
trailmonkee (2,595 posts)
Judge finds NC ‘Choose Life’ plates unconstitutional
Source: fox
RALEIGH, N.C. – A federal judge has ruled it is unconstitutional for North Carolina to issue pro-life license plates unless the state offers similar plates supporting abortion rights. U.S. District Court Judge James C. Fox ruled on Friday that North Carolina cannot produce or distribute the “Choose Life” plate. Judge Fox concluded, “The State’s offering of a Choose Life license plate in the absence of a pro-choice plate constitutes viewpoint discrimination in violation of the First Amendment.” The American Civil Liberties Union of North Carolina Legal Foundation had filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina in Sept. 2011 on behalf of North Carolinians seeking a specialty license plate that supports a woman’s right to reproductive freedom. “This is a great victory for the free speech rights of all North Carolinians, regardless of their point of view on reproductive freedom,” said Chris Brook, legal director of the ACLU-NCLF. Brook said the government cannot create an avenue to express one side of a political issue while denying an equal opportunity to citizens with an opposing view. Read more: http://myfox8.com/2012/12/10/judge-finds-nc-choose-life-plates-unconstitutional/
|
79 replies, 8220 views
| Author | Time | Post | |
| trailmonkee | Dec 2012 | OP | |
| cstanleytech | Dec 2012 | #1 | |
| Hissyspit | Dec 2012 | #2 | |
| calimary | Dec 2012 | #35 | |
| hodger | Dec 2012 | #65 | |
| BlancheSplanchnik | Dec 2012 | #66 | |
| pitbullgirl1965 | Dec 2012 | #67 | |
| calimary | Dec 2012 | #79 | |
| LeftofObama | Dec 2012 | #3 | |
| katmondoo | Dec 2012 | #4 | |
| Ligyron | Dec 2012 | #9 | |
| LiberalFighter | Dec 2012 | #28 | |
| Hissyspit | Dec 2012 | #33 | |
| mwooldri | Dec 2012 | #43 | |
| Hissyspit | Dec 2012 | #47 | |
| calimary | Dec 2012 | #37 | |
| grandpamike1 | Dec 2012 | #32 | |
| csziggy | Dec 2012 | #36 | |
| lupinella | Dec 2012 | #58 | |
| lark | Dec 2012 | #74 | |
| get the red out | Dec 2012 | #5 | |
| eaglesfanintn | Dec 2012 | #21 | |
| calimary | Dec 2012 | #39 | |
| ObaMania | Dec 2012 | #63 | |
| Nay | Dec 2012 | #70 | |
| UpInArms | Dec 2012 | #6 | |
| Tempest | Dec 2012 | #7 | |
| Orrex | Dec 2012 | #8 | |
| Towlie | Dec 2012 | #19 | |
| Orrex | Dec 2012 | #25 | |
| peacebird | Dec 2012 | #14 | |
| Baitball Blogger | Dec 2012 | #10 | |
| RKP5637 | Dec 2012 | #11 | |
| Myrina | Dec 2012 | #12 | |
| obamanut2012 | Dec 2012 | #20 | |
| Myrina | Dec 2012 | #23 | |
| enlightenment | Dec 2012 | #27 | |
| LiberalFighter | Dec 2012 | #29 | |
| 47of74 | Dec 2012 | #45 | |
| avebury | Dec 2012 | #31 | |
| hamsterjill | Dec 2012 | #72 | |
| brooklynite | Dec 2012 | #13 | |
| struggle4progress | Dec 2012 | #15 | |
| ancianita | Dec 2012 | #16 | |
| okaawhatever | Dec 2012 | #17 | |
| calimary | Dec 2012 | #38 | |
| femrap | Dec 2012 | #18 | |
| Towlie | Dec 2012 | #22 | |
| HockeyMom | Dec 2012 | #24 | |
| 47of74 | Dec 2012 | #34 | |
| HockeyMom | Dec 2012 | #46 | |
| Tunkamerica | Dec 2012 | #61 | |
| IdaBriggs | Dec 2012 | #69 | |
| HockeyMom | Dec 2012 | #77 | |
| Whovian | Dec 2012 | #26 | |
| JoeyT | Dec 2012 | #60 | |
| progressoid | Dec 2012 | #30 | |
| Gore1FL | Dec 2012 | #40 | |
| Cha | Dec 2012 | #41 | |
| John2 | Dec 2012 | #42 | |
| duhneece | Dec 2012 | #44 | |
| trayfoot | Dec 2012 | #48 | |
| Danascot | Dec 2012 | #49 | |
| NCarolinawoman | Dec 2012 | #53 | |
| jdadd | Dec 2012 | #50 | |
| ReRe | Dec 2012 | #51 | |
| patrice | Dec 2012 | #52 | |
| JohnnyRingo | Dec 2012 | #54 | |
| MissMillie | Dec 2012 | #68 | |
| Patiod | Dec 2012 | #76 | |
| Beartracks | Dec 2012 | #55 | |
| trailmonkee | Dec 2012 | #59 | |
| jmowreader | Dec 2012 | #56 | |
| lupinella | Dec 2012 | #57 | |
| Tabasco_Dave | Dec 2012 | #62 | |
| merrily | Dec 2012 | #64 | |
| Politicub | Dec 2012 | #71 | |
| forestpath | Dec 2012 | #73 | |
| randomtagger | Dec 2012 | #75 | |
| TForbster | Dec 2012 | #78 |
Response to trailmonkee (Original post)
Mon Dec 10, 2012, 01:30 PM
cstanleytech (5,292 posts)
1. A good call by the judge imo. nt
Response to trailmonkee (Original post)
Mon Dec 10, 2012, 01:33 PM
Hissyspit (40,031 posts)
2. Good. I hate those fucking things.
|
Last edited Mon Dec 10, 2012, 01:34 PM USA/ET - Edit history (1) Like this is that hard to understand:
"Brook said the government cannot create an avenue to express one side of a political issue while denying an equal opportunity to citizens with an opposing view." |
Response to Hissyspit (Reply #2)
Mon Dec 10, 2012, 04:22 PM
calimary (30,556 posts)
35. I hate those things, too. STOP PREACHING TO ME, ASSHOLES!!!!
|
And quit trying to change my mind. A woman's right to have the last word over what happens to HER body - the ULTIMATE right of sovereignty - is NON-NEGOTIABLE. It is an ABSOLUTE. Just as any man would insist - for issues involving his own body.
|
Response to calimary (Reply #35)
Tue Dec 11, 2012, 06:55 AM
hodger (8 posts)
65. You are so correct here
|
and the argument should begin and end with this absolute!
|
Response to calimary (Reply #35)
Tue Dec 11, 2012, 08:34 AM
BlancheSplanchnik (7,705 posts)
66. I love how you phrased it...that is the real heart of the whole issue.
|
The right to own our own bodies and be THE decision maker concerning it--in present, real time, as a present full person-- is the prime sovereign right.
Other people should not have the right to project "rights" onto a future possibility. Oh I'm just rambling.... You captured the point perfectly. |
Response to calimary (Reply #35)
Tue Dec 11, 2012, 08:44 AM
pitbullgirl1965 (92 posts)
67. Men are people, women are women
|
That is the problem. We are seen as property with no right to control our bodies. Forcing women to be incubators, while doctors need permission to harvest organs from DEAD people? Outrageous.
|
Response to pitbullgirl1965 (Reply #67)
Tue Dec 11, 2012, 04:10 PM
calimary (30,556 posts)
79. Welcome to DU, pitbullgirl1965 and hodger!
|
Last edited Tue Dec 11, 2012, 04:10 PM USA/ET - Edit history (1) Good to have both of you here!
I can't take credit for the idea of "sovereignty over one's own body." That came from an African-American guest on one of the MSNBC shows. I apologize for not remembering his name at the moment. I thought that just absolutely NAILED it in the plainest terms imaginable. I did think of something else, though. I'm a regular viewer of lots of these shows. Primarily those on MSNBC. Sometimes we see CNN also. And I notice the constant references to the issues most pressing to the Black demographic. To the Latino demographic. The youth demographic. The elder demographic. The gay demographic. They usually get around to mentioning women toward the bottom of that list - when they should really mention the female demographic FIRST! How come? Women are roughly 51% of the population. That means there are legions of Black women, Latinas, young women, elderly women (AND HOW!!!), and gay women. Femaleness transcends ALL those other demographic groups. EVERY LAST ONE OF THEM. And it seems to me that when you address women's issues, you cover ALL the bases - in ALL the demographic groups. When I hear the chattering class talking about - "oh, immigration! THAT'S the key for the Latino vote!" "Oh, voter suppression/racism - THAT pissed of the Blacks." "Young people! Student loans! YEAOWWW!" "Seniors! Medicare! And Social Security - YIKES!!!!" Do they not get that women ACROSS THE BOARD have the same concerns, and are under constant CONservative assault - no matter what color, age, or sexual preference they are? WOMEN. Women's issues transcend ALL. One of the chief concerns for women, if not THE chief concern, is health care coverage. It affects their job mobility and other workplace choices. It affects what they have to pay at the pharmacy and the doctor's office or emergency room. It affects their families - their kids, maybe an older parent they're now taking care of. These assholes fought our access to affordable health care, contraceptives, jobs, pay equity, retirement benefits. Many of them are fighting the idea of our physical safety, since they said no to the Violence Against Women Act. Their grandfathers, fathers, and uncles even fought against our having the very right to vote! Women have always been the slave class - the property class - the lesser half - the least among "equals." Tiresome. DAMN tiresome. Because most of these arguments were settled LONG AGO. And these bastards keep bringing 'em back, hoping to roll back the clock. We have a lot of work to do. We need you guys. |
Response to trailmonkee (Original post)
Mon Dec 10, 2012, 01:35 PM
LeftofObama (2,426 posts)
3. K & R!
|
Great News!
|
Response to trailmonkee (Original post)
Mon Dec 10, 2012, 01:37 PM
katmondoo (1,798 posts)
4. We need a Florida Judge to rule the same
|
I have a vanity tag that says Choice in Polish. No one here can read Polish. I didn't say what it meant to the license bureau
|
Response to katmondoo (Reply #4)
Mon Dec 10, 2012, 01:57 PM
Ligyron (169 posts)
9. ain't that the truth
|
I wonder if this ruling will affect that possibility. It's a US court, not circuit or state but I'm not sure how this works legally-speaking in other states. |
Response to Ligyron (Reply #9)
Mon Dec 10, 2012, 03:45 PM
LiberalFighter (31,073 posts)
28. Whichever states are in the same district now have to follow it.
Response to Ligyron (Reply #9)
Mon Dec 10, 2012, 04:18 PM
Hissyspit (40,031 posts)
33. Vanity plates are not the same. The message you choose for a license plate number is YOUR choice
|
Last edited Mon Dec 10, 2012, 04:21 PM USA/ET - Edit history (2) as an individual citizen.
These are an official STATE design, with no alternate "pro-choice" state design:
It was clearly un-Constitutional when passed by the state legislature. Any bone-head could see that. They just didn't care. http://www.lifenews.com/2011/06/08/north-carolina-house-approves-choose-life-license-plates/ |
Response to Hissyspit (Reply #33)
Mon Dec 10, 2012, 06:17 PM
mwooldri (5,985 posts)
43. I'd like that design as a "Kids First" plate...
|
It's more colourful than the one we have now. But come to think of it, I think the present one is just fine. Easier for people to read and it uses the standard NC plate design.
IMO all NC special plates should look like the standard issue plate. It would help law enforcement officers (especially outside of NC) from recognizing a North Carolina registered vehicle. The vast majority of specialized plates do look like standard issue plates, save for the logo and the suffix at the end. It's only more recently the more colourful designs have come out, save for the NASCAR specials. I might make an exception for NASCAR since I think it's the state sport (if not official it should be!). At least NC doesn't allow mistakes like Virginia...
Or do we?
Well, we make up for it with this one: ![]() |
Response to mwooldri (Reply #43)
Mon Dec 10, 2012, 07:37 PM
Hissyspit (40,031 posts)
47. "Eat the kids first"
|
Last edited Mon Dec 10, 2012, 07:39 PM USA/ET - Edit history (1) Hee.
"Eat shit." Double hee. I'm pretty sure I saw the "Bushlies" plate at some point driving around here. |
Response to Ligyron (Reply #9)
Mon Dec 10, 2012, 04:28 PM
calimary (30,556 posts)
37. Welcome to DU, Ligyron!
|
No idea - I'm sure they'll take it all the way up if they feel they need to. But I'm glad this stupid one-sidedness has been at least temporarily stopped.
Glad you're here! We need you! Stay vigilant! Obviously these assholes won't give up OR go away. So we have to stay awake and stay aware - and ready to head off whatever shit they try to pull. |
Response to katmondoo (Reply #4)
Mon Dec 10, 2012, 04:04 PM
grandpamike1 (52 posts)
32. No they
|
should issue euthanasia plates for the population in Florida, or Happy Trip to LaBrea plates.
|
Response to grandpamike1 (Reply #32)
Mon Dec 10, 2012, 04:28 PM
csziggy (14,195 posts)
36. What do you mean?
|
Euthanasia for Floridians?
Or did you intend |
Response to katmondoo (Reply #4)
Tue Dec 11, 2012, 12:42 PM
lark (2,096 posts)
74. I thought that our "wonderful" FL judges did review this
|
and found it legal?
|
Response to trailmonkee (Original post)
Mon Dec 10, 2012, 01:38 PM
get the red out (7,286 posts)
5. We need the same in Kentucky
|
I get so sick of those things.
|
Response to get the red out (Reply #5)
Mon Dec 10, 2012, 03:05 PM
eaglesfanintn (82 posts)
21. And in Tennessee
Response to eaglesfanintn (Reply #21)
Mon Dec 10, 2012, 04:34 PM
calimary (30,556 posts)
39. Welcome to DU, eaglesfanintn!
|
Glad you're with us! Probably will have to assert this in ALL the states, considering how relentless this enemy is.
|
Response to eaglesfanintn (Reply #21)
Tue Dec 11, 2012, 05:27 AM
ObaMania (2,052 posts)
63. AND in Virginia
|
Not gonna happen though.
|
Response to eaglesfanintn (Reply #21)
Tue Dec 11, 2012, 11:06 AM
Nay (5,687 posts)
70. Would love to see it in VA, but the stupid is strong here.
|
Last edited Tue Dec 11, 2012, 11:08 AM USA/ET - Edit history (1) |
Response to trailmonkee (Original post)
Mon Dec 10, 2012, 01:40 PM
UpInArms (42,640 posts)
6. love me that judge!
|
Just when you think the world is irretrievably broken - along comes someone who makes a difference.
|
Response to trailmonkee (Original post)
Mon Dec 10, 2012, 01:49 PM
Tempest (14,028 posts)
7. Another Faux misleading headline
|
The judge didn't rule the plates unconstitutional.
He ruled the plates unconstitutional without a legal option for the pro-choice vehicle owners. |
Response to Tempest (Reply #7)
Mon Dec 10, 2012, 01:57 PM
Orrex (36,402 posts)
8. I don't find it misleading
|
Last edited Mon Dec 10, 2012, 03:32 PM USA/ET - Edit history (1) The "Choose Life" plates are unconstitutional if an alternative plate is not available.
That alternative plate is not available. Therefore the "Choose Life" plates are unconstitutional. Seems to me that the headline is correct as written. It doesn't tell the whole story perhaps, but thankfully there's a longer article attached to the headline. |
Response to Orrex (Reply #8)
Mon Dec 10, 2012, 03:02 PM
Towlie (1,691 posts)
19. Huh? "The 'Choose Life' plates are unconstitutional if an alternative plate is available."
|
I think you need to proofread.
|
Response to Towlie (Reply #19)
Mon Dec 10, 2012, 03:32 PM
Orrex (36,402 posts)
25. No I don't. You need to read my mind.
|
Er. I mean...
Anyway, the point stands, once I correct the typo. |
Response to Tempest (Reply #7)
Mon Dec 10, 2012, 02:41 PM
peacebird (7,504 posts)
14. the legislature 6x refused to authorize a plate option was ProChoice
|
"However, officials say the legislature repeatedly refused to authorize a plate that supported the countervailing position in favor of reproductive freedom.
Six amendments were proposed in the legislature to authorize an additional new plate that stated either, “Trust Women. Respect Choice,” or simply “Respect Choice.” The legislature rejected all six amendments." |
Response to trailmonkee (Original post)
Mon Dec 10, 2012, 02:05 PM
Baitball Blogger (11,242 posts)
10. Very promising.
Response to trailmonkee (Original post)
Mon Dec 10, 2012, 02:24 PM
RKP5637 (25,586 posts)
11. Excellent!!! n/t
Response to trailmonkee (Original post)
Mon Dec 10, 2012, 02:30 PM
Myrina (8,913 posts)
12. Why can't license plates just be license plates?
|
I mean, really? You can cover the rest of your damn car in bumper stickers if you need to make a statement.
|
Response to Myrina (Reply #12)
Mon Dec 10, 2012, 03:03 PM
obamanut2012 (9,971 posts)
20. I have Blue Ridge Parkway NC plates
|
The money goes to conservation efforts there. Same for the coastal plates. I don't know how that works for the university and college plates, and the rest of them.
I never put any stickers at all on my car. Ever. I can't afford new tires or a paint job. |
Response to obamanut2012 (Reply #20)
Mon Dec 10, 2012, 03:18 PM
Myrina (8,913 posts)
23. I get that, but ....
|
... here in Indiana we have all kinds of 'specialty cause' plates (conserv and lib) - and the money supposedly goes to those orgs but, knowing Indiana government, I'd be surprised if it really did.
I guess I'd rather have plates be plates and if I want to donate to an org, I'll do that and/or have my cruiser wear a bumper sticker. |
Response to Myrina (Reply #23)
Mon Dec 10, 2012, 03:38 PM
enlightenment (6,224 posts)
27. I agree.
|
Just plain plates - the State and the number.
|
Response to Myrina (Reply #23)
Mon Dec 10, 2012, 03:46 PM
LiberalFighter (31,073 posts)
29. Too many specialty plates!!
Response to obamanut2012 (Reply #20)
Mon Dec 10, 2012, 06:38 PM
47of74 (6,654 posts)
45. The university I went to is in the process of getting its own speciality plate
|
When it becomes available I'm seriously considering getting one.
|
Response to Myrina (Reply #12)
Mon Dec 10, 2012, 03:59 PM
avebury (2,929 posts)
31. Because specialty plates are a source of revenue. You have to pay more money
|
in addition to what you pay for a regular plate.
|
Response to Myrina (Reply #12)
Tue Dec 11, 2012, 11:45 AM
hamsterjill (4,292 posts)
72. Thank you. I feel exactly the same way.
|
I think all of the license plates in a particular state should look the same. That would make it easier for the license plate to do what it is meant to do - identify the vehicle.
The rest of your car is yours to do with as you see fit. Hell, stick a thousand bumper stickers on it if you want to. Knock yourself out! But the license plate and inspection sticker should be uniform IMHO. |
Response to trailmonkee (Original post)
Mon Dec 10, 2012, 02:37 PM
brooklynite (12,818 posts)
13. Choice...what an ironic word to use by the Pro-Life movement.
Response to trailmonkee (Original post)
Mon Dec 10, 2012, 02:41 PM
struggle4progress (71,465 posts)
15. link to pdf ruling:
|
http://dig.abclocal.go.com/wtvd/docs/NC_Choose_Life_Ruling_121012.pdf
hattip: Judge rules NC 'Choose Life' plate unconstitutional http://abclocal.go.com/wtvd/story?section=news/local&id=8914763 |
Response to trailmonkee (Original post)
Mon Dec 10, 2012, 02:44 PM
ancianita (1,032 posts)
16. Nice.
Response to trailmonkee (Original post)
Mon Dec 10, 2012, 02:50 PM
okaawhatever (477 posts)
17. And in N Carolina no less! Jesse Helms is rolling over in his grave LOL n/t
Response to okaawhatever (Reply #17)
Mon Dec 10, 2012, 04:29 PM
calimary (30,556 posts)
38. Welcome to DU, okaawhatever!
|
Glad you're here. Maybe his rotted carcass will spin itself silly.
|
Response to trailmonkee (Original post)
Mon Dec 10, 2012, 02:57 PM
femrap (13,418 posts)
18. Can we do
|
this in OH as well? Please!
Otherwise I want one 'Yes on Assisted Suicide.' But then I hate pain and have very little patience. |
Response to trailmonkee (Original post)
Mon Dec 10, 2012, 03:06 PM
Towlie (1,691 posts)
22. Maybe they'll take the fight to Florida now.
|
http://www.flhsmv.gov/dmv/specialtytags/
I see a "Choose Life", but nothing supporting a woman's right to choose. |
Response to trailmonkee (Original post)
Mon Dec 10, 2012, 03:25 PM
HockeyMom (10,699 posts)
24. "Pro Choice Family of 6" sticker in Florida
|
A family at the school where I used to work had this sticker. EVERYONE appalled them on this. These MORONS seem to think that if you have given birth, no matter how many times, you are ANTI CHOICE and believe everyone MUST choose the same? Until they can understand this, they are DOOMED to lose.
|
Response to HockeyMom (Reply #24)
Mon Dec 10, 2012, 04:21 PM
47of74 (6,654 posts)
34. Applauded?
|
You had appalled in your post. Another case of autocorrect strikes again?
|
Response to 47of74 (Reply #34)
Mon Dec 10, 2012, 06:45 PM
HockeyMom (10,699 posts)
46. My spelling or my VIEWS
|
you don't like?
|
Response to HockeyMom (Reply #46)
Tue Dec 11, 2012, 04:01 AM
Tunkamerica (4,353 posts)
61. maybe just the word choice.
|
it doesn't make sense
|
Response to HockeyMom (Reply #46)
Tue Dec 11, 2012, 10:06 AM
IdaBriggs (6,209 posts)
69. Confused - Everyone "appalled" them on this.
|
I am sorry, but I don't understand - did everyone "applaud" them, or was everyone "appalled by" them?
No hostility - just genuine confusion, and now I want to know! |
Response to IdaBriggs (Reply #69)
Tue Dec 11, 2012, 01:54 PM
HockeyMom (10,699 posts)
77. Applaud
|
As the Mom told everyone, we CHOSE to have 4 kids. We don't believe in FORCING anyone else to have 4, 10, 1, etc., kids if they themselves don't want to.
|
Response to trailmonkee (Original post)
Mon Dec 10, 2012, 03:36 PM
Whovian (2,866 posts)
26. Good news, now we need to visit this in AL. n/t
Response to Whovian (Reply #26)
Tue Dec 11, 2012, 12:03 AM
JoeyT (4,549 posts)
60. Ugh.
I kept the "Stars Fall On Alabama" one, stupid as that fucking slogan is, because I didn't want the religious one. |
Response to trailmonkee (Original post)
Mon Dec 10, 2012, 03:48 PM
progressoid (27,282 posts)
30. Rec.
Response to trailmonkee (Original post)
Mon Dec 10, 2012, 05:00 PM
Gore1FL (11,664 posts)
40. I always found these plates funny
|
As they specifically had the word "Choose" in them.
|
Response to trailmonkee (Original post)
Mon Dec 10, 2012, 05:08 PM
Cha (124,435 posts)
41. Ye-AH! Get their "religion" out of my
|
Government.
|
Response to trailmonkee (Original post)
Mon Dec 10, 2012, 05:18 PM
John2 (1,714 posts)
42. This will be a long four years.
|
Last edited Mon Dec 10, 2012, 05:19 PM USA/ET - Edit history (1) Because I don't think this will be the last time the Republican Elect-Governor and Republican Legislature will get sued in North Carolina. They will do more crazy things before they come up for re-election.
|
Response to trailmonkee (Original post)
Mon Dec 10, 2012, 06:30 PM
duhneece (1,693 posts)
44. Yay!!! I love this ruling nt
Response to trailmonkee (Original post)
Mon Dec 10, 2012, 07:39 PM
trayfoot (1,560 posts)
48. Good Decision!!!!!!
Response to trailmonkee (Original post)
Mon Dec 10, 2012, 09:49 PM
Danascot (1,920 posts)
49. Judge Fox
|
heh
|
Response to Danascot (Reply #49)
Mon Dec 10, 2012, 10:23 PM
NCarolinawoman (2,058 posts)
53. Hmmm. Judge Fox was nominated to his position by Ronald Reagan.
|
But then again, he attended the University of North Carolina in Chapel Hill, a bastion of liberalism.
|
Response to trailmonkee (Original post)
Mon Dec 10, 2012, 09:49 PM
jdadd (1,105 posts)
50. Ohio has these also.....
![]() |
Response to trailmonkee (Original post)
Mon Dec 10, 2012, 10:02 PM
ReRe (2,851 posts)
51. Wow! A Federal Judge in NC with a head on his shoulders?
|
....amazing! Wonders never cease!! Ohhh... source is FOX? Oops! I bet you they are all over their namesake Judge James C. Fox about his decision in this First Amendment case.
Well, all I can say for Judge Cox is WAY TO GO! |
Response to trailmonkee (Original post)
Mon Dec 10, 2012, 10:04 PM
patrice (47,311 posts)
52. KICK from a Pro-Child/Pro-Woman/Pro-Family Pro-Choicer
|
Last edited Mon Dec 10, 2012, 10:07 PM USA/ET - Edit history (1) |
Response to trailmonkee (Original post)
Mon Dec 10, 2012, 10:35 PM
JohnnyRingo (9,327 posts)
54. Under "choose life", the plate should read....
|
Last edited Mon Dec 10, 2012, 10:39 PM USA/ET - Edit history (3) "support the death penalty".
I've never met a "pro-lifer" who didn't argue vehemently for liberal use of the electric chair. Most even go so far as to complain the killing is too humane for their liking. On edit: If they want this license plate, there should be a requirement that the driver has to have at least one adopted child. |
Response to JohnnyRingo (Reply #54)
Tue Dec 11, 2012, 08:52 AM
MissMillie (27,091 posts)
68. Anti-choice Catholics
|
don't usually support the death penalty, at least that's my experience.
|
Response to MissMillie (Reply #68)
Tue Dec 11, 2012, 01:16 PM
Patiod (11,511 posts)
76. In my (large extended) Catholic family they do
|
I challenged my Super "Pro-life" cousin on this, and he said "that's different - I'm talking about innocent life." When I reminded him that the pope is very strongly anti-death penalty, he said the pope didn't understand out culture.
So: Sex -> listen to the pope! Death penalty -> don't listen to the pope! Our Fox-watching former pastor, who was a friend of my Dad's, also strongly supports the death penalty, in spite of the Vatican's views on the subject. Fox>Vatican. Even my more politically moderate Catholic friends are pro death penalty. The only Catholics I know who are against it are old-timey 60s liberals who are still hanging in there with the church. |
Response to trailmonkee (Original post)
Mon Dec 10, 2012, 11:14 PM
Beartracks (3,159 posts)
55. Love your sig image: "Keep Christ in Christians" n/t
Response to Beartracks (Reply #55)
Tue Dec 11, 2012, 12:03 AM
trailmonkee (2,595 posts)
59. thanks...
|
I am proud to say that one came out of my tiny brain the other day...the keep Christ in Christmas stuff drives me bonkers...
|
Response to trailmonkee (Original post)
Mon Dec 10, 2012, 11:25 PM
jmowreader (23,913 posts)
56. I predict...
|
that by the end of the week the fundamentalists will design a Pro-Choice plate. By the end of the month they'll have the 25,000 signatures they need to get the plate approved, which the NC General Assembly will do on an emergency basis.
If the choices are to aid and abet the enemy, or to quit cramming their religion down people's throats, they'll be some aiding-and-abetting mother fuckers. |
Response to trailmonkee (Original post)
Mon Dec 10, 2012, 11:36 PM
lupinella (176 posts)
57. K&R n/t
Response to trailmonkee (Original post)
Tue Dec 11, 2012, 05:06 AM
Tabasco_Dave (1,155 posts)
62. I always think of this when i hear choose life
|
Last edited Tue Dec 11, 2012, 05:31 AM USA/ET - Edit history (1) Hey i grew up in the 80's! |
Response to trailmonkee (Original post)
Tue Dec 11, 2012, 05:52 AM
merrily (964 posts)
64. Does offering plates with both views solve the problem, though?
Response to trailmonkee (Original post)
Tue Dec 11, 2012, 11:39 AM
Politicub (5,842 posts)
71. Nice. Good ruling for fairness.
|
Last edited Tue Dec 11, 2012, 11:40 AM USA/ET - Edit history (1) Are these the same stupid choose life plates that are written in crayon? Seriously.
We have them in Georgia, but not sure if its the same design from state to state. The site in Georgia shows little kids holding anti abortion signs. It reminds me of the countries that hide weapons at hospitals, schools and homes so the military dictatorship leaders stay out of the spotlight. |
Response to trailmonkee (Original post)
Tue Dec 11, 2012, 12:22 PM
forestpath (2,052 posts)
73. Nobody on the planet is more pro-choice than I am, but I don't think either
|
sentiment, or ANY political sentiment, belongs on a license plate.
If you want to express your opinion, get a bumper sticker. |
Response to trailmonkee (Original post)
Tue Dec 11, 2012, 12:47 PM
randomtagger (125 posts)
75. yeah
|
I wouldn't have a problem if they also sold plates with pro-choice slogans.
|
Response to trailmonkee (Original post)
Tue Dec 11, 2012, 02:01 PM
TForbster (26 posts)
78. Keep Separation Of Church And State



