Hostess wins OK to give execs up to $1.75 million in bonuses
Source: LA Times
By Tiffany Hsu
Hostess Brands Inc., in the midst of winding down its business, won approval Thursday from a federal bankruptcy judge to give as much as $1.75 million in bonuses to its executives.
The money is intended as an incentive for 19 top-level managers to remain with the Twinkies and Ding Dongs maker to oversee its liquidation.
The payouts will be granted only if managers "achieve a set of specific tasks and goals within a specified time frame that are designed to speed and lower the cost of the wind-down," Hostess spokesman Lance Ignon said.
The maximum bonus amount, Ignon said, represents 0.07% of Hostess' revenue and 0.17% of the value of its assets and is below the average for bonuses in comparable bankruptcy cases. Hostess Chief Executive Greg Rayburn would be not be eligible for a bonus, Ignon said.
FULL story at link.
Read more: http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-hostess-20121130,0,1027676.story
cstanleytech
(26,280 posts)Kablooie
(18,625 posts)All the way to heartburn.
OnyxCollie
(9,958 posts)nc4bo
(17,651 posts)I hope they all choke on their unearned rewards.
Gormy Cuss
(30,884 posts)If the top-level managers had been doing their jobs the company wouldn't be in liquidation.
DollarBillHines
(1,922 posts)mahatmakanejeeves
(57,378 posts).
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)SoapBox
(18,791 posts)Creeps and Crooks.
How the hell do we stop them?
lexw
(804 posts)abelenkpe
(9,933 posts)Typical.
Should have told the failure CEOS to piss off and look for work elsewhere and set that money aside to give the the workers who are being screwed out of a job and pension.
Iliyah
(25,111 posts)Its a slow process but the people must take back the justice system.
luv_mykatz
(441 posts)AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)One way or another, the leadership of the company is to blame. For not adapting to the market, for not adapting to consumer tastes or food quality priorities, for not expanding into new areas, you fucking name it. For failing to negotiate wages/benefits. For failing to compete against other companies.
No matter how you slice it, the company died on their watch, by their hand.
The only possible explanation for a bonus in that situation, is to reward an executioner for skeletonizing and breaking up the company into profitable little pieces to liquidate.
HughBeaumont
(24,461 posts)Are you KIDDING ME ON THIS??? REALLY????
You diaper bastards shouldn't be getting "incentive bonuses", you should be SKINNED.
What the fuck is an "incentive bonus" anyway? "Oh, my millions and giant house and stacked ...cars don't inspire me enough . . . I need more "incentive"".
Plutocracy. And America, THAT'S what will be biting you in the ass. Not the "have too littles". Not the elderly. Not students. Not those who you think are "commies". Not (insert boogeyman du jour here). THIS is your "class warfare" and YOU'RE LOSING IT. End of story.
davidpdx
(22,000 posts)to shove their fat asses in one of those huge vats with a blender while it is going on high speed.
fasttense
(17,301 posts)And the Bankruptcy judge approves giving them bonuses in the millions. Talk about corruption.
I don't know who is more immoral and evil, the executives for playing out this scheme to get millions from harvesting Hostess and destroying worker's jobs, or the judge who lets them do it.
lonestarnot
(77,097 posts)onecent
(6,096 posts)Baitball Blogger
(46,698 posts)get a nice cushion.
Capitalism.