Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Omaha Steve

(99,573 posts)
Fri Nov 30, 2012, 12:36 AM Nov 2012

Hostess wins OK to give execs up to $1.75 million in bonuses

Source: LA Times

By Tiffany Hsu

Hostess Brands Inc., in the midst of winding down its business, won approval Thursday from a federal bankruptcy judge to give as much as $1.75 million in bonuses to its executives.

The money is intended as an incentive for 19 top-level managers to remain with the Twinkies and Ding Dongs maker to oversee its liquidation.

The payouts will be granted only if managers "achieve a set of specific tasks and goals within a specified time frame that are designed to speed and lower the cost of the wind-down," Hostess spokesman Lance Ignon said.

The maximum bonus amount, Ignon said, represents 0.07% of Hostess' revenue and 0.17% of the value of its assets and is below the average for bonuses in comparable bankruptcy cases. Hostess Chief Executive Greg Rayburn would be not be eligible for a bonus, Ignon said.

FULL story at link.



Read more: http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-hostess-20121130,0,1027676.story

20 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Hostess wins OK to give execs up to $1.75 million in bonuses (Original Post) Omaha Steve Nov 2012 OP
Well thats BS. nt cstanleytech Nov 2012 #1
Heartwarming. Kablooie Nov 2012 #2
Of course. nt OnyxCollie Nov 2012 #3
Profits over people, The American Way! nc4bo Nov 2012 #4
The bonus should be paid out in Twinkies and Ding-Dongs. Gormy Cuss Nov 2012 #5
My thoughts, exactly... nt DollarBillHines Nov 2012 #13
At eBay prices mahatmakanejeeves Nov 2012 #18
That's just ridiculous. n/t Agschmid Nov 2012 #6
Sickening. SoapBox Nov 2012 #7
We're in this pretty fckng deep. This is messed up. lexw Nov 2012 #8
Holy injustice. abelenkpe Nov 2012 #9
Start within and appoint judges that care about the consumers, workers, laborers Iliyah Nov 2012 #10
Sickening! luv_mykatz Nov 2012 #11
Bonuses for what? Running the company into the ground? AtheistCrusader Nov 2012 #12
Son of a BITCH. HughBeaumont Nov 2012 #14
The bonus should be davidpdx Nov 2012 #15
The executives are so incompetent, so bad that they put the corporation into bankruptcy fasttense Nov 2012 #16
It should be awarded in twinkies and fucking ding-dongs via dump-truck those fucks. lonestarnot Nov 2012 #17
Our system is certainly SCREWED UP!!!!!!!! onecent Nov 2012 #19
They fucking failed at their jobs, so they Baitball Blogger Nov 2012 #20

Gormy Cuss

(30,884 posts)
5. The bonus should be paid out in Twinkies and Ding-Dongs.
Fri Nov 30, 2012, 12:47 AM
Nov 2012

If the top-level managers had been doing their jobs the company wouldn't be in liquidation.

abelenkpe

(9,933 posts)
9. Holy injustice.
Fri Nov 30, 2012, 01:00 AM
Nov 2012

Typical.

Should have told the failure CEOS to piss off and look for work elsewhere and set that money aside to give the the workers who are being screwed out of a job and pension.

Iliyah

(25,111 posts)
10. Start within and appoint judges that care about the consumers, workers, laborers
Fri Nov 30, 2012, 01:27 AM
Nov 2012

Its a slow process but the people must take back the justice system.

AtheistCrusader

(33,982 posts)
12. Bonuses for what? Running the company into the ground?
Fri Nov 30, 2012, 03:09 AM
Nov 2012

One way or another, the leadership of the company is to blame. For not adapting to the market, for not adapting to consumer tastes or food quality priorities, for not expanding into new areas, you fucking name it. For failing to negotiate wages/benefits. For failing to compete against other companies.

No matter how you slice it, the company died on their watch, by their hand.


The only possible explanation for a bonus in that situation, is to reward an executioner for skeletonizing and breaking up the company into profitable little pieces to liquidate.

HughBeaumont

(24,461 posts)
14. Son of a BITCH.
Fri Nov 30, 2012, 07:23 AM
Nov 2012

Are you KIDDING ME ON THIS??? REALLY????

You diaper bastards shouldn't be getting "incentive bonuses", you should be SKINNED.

What the fuck is an "incentive bonus" anyway? "Oh, my millions and giant house and stacked ...cars don't inspire me enough . . . I need more "incentive"".

Plutocracy. And America, THAT'S what will be biting you in the ass. Not the "have too littles". Not the elderly. Not students. Not those who you think are "commies". Not (insert boogeyman du jour here). THIS is your "class warfare" and YOU'RE LOSING IT. End of story.

davidpdx

(22,000 posts)
15. The bonus should be
Fri Nov 30, 2012, 08:05 AM
Nov 2012

to shove their fat asses in one of those huge vats with a blender while it is going on high speed.

 

fasttense

(17,301 posts)
16. The executives are so incompetent, so bad that they put the corporation into bankruptcy
Fri Nov 30, 2012, 09:14 AM
Nov 2012

And the Bankruptcy judge approves giving them bonuses in the millions. Talk about corruption.

I don't know who is more immoral and evil, the executives for playing out this scheme to get millions from harvesting Hostess and destroying worker's jobs, or the judge who lets them do it.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Hostess wins OK to give e...