Thu Nov 29, 2012, 09:44 PM
TomCADem (6,371 posts)
Conservative activist threatens to steer donors from RNC if GOP raises taxes
Source: The Hill
Brent Bozell, a prominent conservative activist and fundraiser, is threatening to steer donors away from the Republican Party if GOP lawmakers sign a deal to raise taxes. Bozell sent a letter to Republican National Committee (RNC) Chairman Reince Priebus on Wednesday pledging to make it his mission to counsel conservative donors to shun the party if its leaders in Congress agree to raise taxes. Bozell, the chairman of ForAmerica Inc., has been active in conservative political circles for three decades and estimates he has raised hundreds of millions of dollars for “an alphabet soup of conservative causes.” “Reince, it pains me to say this, but if the Republican Party breaks its word to the American people and goes along with President Obama with tax increases, it will have betrayed conservatives for the final time,” Bozell wrote. Read more: http://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/270017-conservative-activist-threatens-to-steer-donors-away-from-rnc Grover Norquist corporate backers and fundraisers are bringing down the hammer to enforce Norquist's tax pledge. There is a reason why Republicans are so willing to hold America's credit rating and taxes for 98 percent of Americans hostage. Their constituents are not the American people, but the corporate SuperPacs that support them.
|
80 replies, 7187 views
| Author | Time | Post | |
| TomCADem | Nov 2012 | OP | |
| W T F | Nov 2012 | #1 | |
| roguevalley | Nov 2012 | #22 | |
| burnsei sensei | Dec 2012 | #68 | |
| kelliekat44 | Nov 2012 | #57 | |
| elleng | Nov 2012 | #2 | |
| pipewrench | Nov 2012 | #3 | |
| hughee99 | Dec 2012 | #61 | |
| Journeyman | Nov 2012 | #4 | |
| PSPS | Nov 2012 | #5 | |
| Squinch | Nov 2012 | #52 | |
| AldoLeopold | Nov 2012 | #6 | |
| gtar100 | Nov 2012 | #7 | |
| Iliyah | Nov 2012 | #8 | |
| chuckstevens | Nov 2012 | #9 | |
| Liberalagogo | Dec 2012 | #62 | |
| Archae | Nov 2012 | #10 | |
| xtraxritical | Nov 2012 | #38 | |
| proud2BlibKansan | Nov 2012 | #11 | |
| wtmusic | Nov 2012 | #12 | |
| HereSince1628 | Nov 2012 | #26 | |
| Bernardo de La Paz | Nov 2012 | #43 | |
| HereSince1628 | Nov 2012 | #44 | |
| Bernardo de La Paz | Nov 2012 | #49 | |
| Aviation Pro | Nov 2012 | #45 | |
| nxylas | Dec 2012 | #79 | |
| cstanleytech | Nov 2012 | #13 | |
| hoboken123 | Nov 2012 | #35 | |
| cstanleytech | Nov 2012 | #58 | |
| AAO | Dec 2012 | #71 | |
| SaveAmerica | Nov 2012 | #14 | |
| Ikonoklast | Nov 2012 | #15 | |
| hifiguy | Nov 2012 | #40 | |
| AlbertCat | Nov 2012 | #16 | |
| kelliekat44 | Nov 2012 | #17 | |
| davidpdx | Dec 2012 | #65 | |
| brush | Nov 2012 | #18 | |
| AAO | Dec 2012 | #72 | |
| brush | Dec 2012 | #73 | |
| The Doctor. | Nov 2012 | #19 | |
| Blandocyte | Nov 2012 | #21 | |
| Squinch | Dec 2012 | #66 | |
| Kennah | Nov 2012 | #20 | |
| SoapBox | Nov 2012 | #23 | |
| drm604 | Nov 2012 | #24 | |
| The Wizard | Nov 2012 | #25 | |
| JHB | Nov 2012 | #27 | |
| Derek in Iowa | Nov 2012 | #42 | |
| tanyev | Nov 2012 | #28 | |
| crim son | Nov 2012 | #29 | |
| Old and In the Way | Nov 2012 | #30 | |
| frylock | Nov 2012 | #31 | |
| Aerows | Nov 2012 | #32 | |
| Third Doctor | Nov 2012 | #33 | |
| RoccoR5955 | Nov 2012 | #34 | |
| heaven05 | Nov 2012 | #36 | |
| NBachers | Nov 2012 | #37 | |
| hifiguy | Nov 2012 | #39 | |
| Derek in Iowa | Nov 2012 | #41 | |
| DocMac | Dec 2012 | #78 | |
| justice1 | Nov 2012 | #46 | |
| ut oh | Nov 2012 | #47 | |
| kenfrequed | Nov 2012 | #48 | |
| They_Live | Nov 2012 | #50 | |
| BeyondGeography | Nov 2012 | #51 | |
| SummerSnow | Nov 2012 | #53 | |
| ItsTheMediaStupid | Nov 2012 | #54 | |
| Fearless | Nov 2012 | #55 | |
| 0rganism | Nov 2012 | #56 | |
| GTurck | Dec 2012 | #59 | |
| Sunlei | Dec 2012 | #60 | |
| cstanleytech | Dec 2012 | #63 | |
| kelliekat44 | Dec 2012 | #64 | |
| bobhuntsman | Dec 2012 | #67 | |
| ElboRuum | Dec 2012 | #69 | |
| dtom67 | Dec 2012 | #70 | |
| AAO | Dec 2012 | #74 | |
| Skittles | Dec 2012 | #75 | |
| Thinkingabout | Dec 2012 | #76 | |
| Skittles | Dec 2012 | #77 | |
| lonestarnot | Dec 2012 | #80 |
Response to TomCADem (Original post)
Thu Nov 29, 2012, 09:55 PM
W T F (535 posts)
1. Uh.. Yeah, like the $350 million Karl Rove gave them was so helpfull.
Response to W T F (Reply #1)
Fri Nov 30, 2012, 02:33 AM
roguevalley (32,811 posts)
22. good on them. may they all fall into the pit.
Response to roguevalley (Reply #22)
Sun Dec 2, 2012, 11:54 AM
burnsei sensei (1,629 posts)
68. +1
|
nt
|
Response to W T F (Reply #1)
Fri Nov 30, 2012, 09:20 PM
kelliekat44 (1,301 posts)
57. GOP=null and void=when your money can't buy what you want and no one is afraid of you, nt
Response to TomCADem (Original post)
Thu Nov 29, 2012, 09:57 PM
pipewrench (194 posts)
3. Corruption at its finest, bought and paid for.
|
TomCADem, great OP
|
Response to pipewrench (Reply #3)
Sat Dec 1, 2012, 11:17 AM
hughee99 (10,122 posts)
61. I don't think "corruption" was the word you were looking for.
|
It's a fundraiser threatening not to raise future funds for a group because of broken promises. This is what interest groups do all the time on BOTH sides of the aisle.
|
Response to TomCADem (Original post)
Thu Nov 29, 2012, 10:00 PM
Journeyman (9,207 posts)
4. Seems like a Win-Win to me. . .
Response to TomCADem (Original post)
Thu Nov 29, 2012, 10:02 PM
PSPS (4,199 posts)
5. And steer them where? Some productive purpose? Your own pocket?
Response to PSPS (Reply #5)
Fri Nov 30, 2012, 07:11 PM
Squinch (3,060 posts)
52. He seems to think dividing the 47% who voted for Romney will magically produce MORE voters next time
|
I bet he thinks cutting taxes on the top 1% creates jobs.
|
Response to TomCADem (Original post)
Thu Nov 29, 2012, 10:03 PM
AldoLeopold (600 posts)
6. Oh look, It's Norquist the Second
|
Norquist Jr. Norquist the Younger. Yet another adept from the depths of Scholomance somewhere in the heart of Rumania.
|
Response to TomCADem (Original post)
Thu Nov 29, 2012, 10:06 PM
gtar100 (2,534 posts)
7. That's okay, Brent. People only like you for your money anyway.
|
The people are on to you, you leech.
|
Response to TomCADem (Original post)
Thu Nov 29, 2012, 10:22 PM
Iliyah (2,360 posts)
8. Bluff, fearmongering, bullying, y'know the finer points of the greedy
|
party of HELL NO.
|
Response to TomCADem (Original post)
Thu Nov 29, 2012, 10:27 PM
chuckstevens (335 posts)
9. Willy Wonka
|
Sarcastically, "No Please, Don't, Stop, Come Back!"
|
Response to TomCADem (Original post)
Thu Nov 29, 2012, 10:28 PM
Archae (26,396 posts)
10. Bozell is a blowhard, liar and hypocrite.
Response to Archae (Reply #10)
Fri Nov 30, 2012, 01:38 PM
xtraxritical (3,019 posts)
38. Just like all the RepubliCONs I know.
|
|
Response to TomCADem (Original post)
Thu Nov 29, 2012, 10:53 PM
proud2BlibKansan (96,386 posts)
11. Go for it, idiot.
|
The rest of us will enjoy watching the show.
|
Response to TomCADem (Original post)
Thu Nov 29, 2012, 11:01 PM
wtmusic (37,766 posts)
12. Ha! Where they gonna go?
|
|
Response to wtmusic (Reply #12)
Fri Nov 30, 2012, 07:20 AM
HereSince1628 (26,670 posts)
26. True, two parties is the stable strategy of our system
|
But, the R's do have an infestation of teaparty types who would love to do more damage and who need money and attention to pull that off.
|
Response to HereSince1628 (Reply #26)
Fri Nov 30, 2012, 04:04 PM
Bernardo de La Paz (7,142 posts)
43. Nope. A duopoly is inherently unstable. Like a stool with two legs.
|
A duopoly is an expression of limited thinking.
A duopoly tends to extreme polarization, like the North / South polarization of the Civil War, and the Bush / Rove 51-49 % strategy. All of the world's most stable democracies have multi-party systems, except one: the USA. Few if any of them have fought a civil war. The United Kingdom (England) fought its last civil war ending in 1651. Reject the tyranny of the duopoly. |
Response to Bernardo de La Paz (Reply #43)
Fri Nov 30, 2012, 05:16 PM
HereSince1628 (26,670 posts)
44. Two poles to a magnet...
|
two sides to a piece of paper or the universe...inside and outside...
I'm not sure you've got it nailed down. |
Response to HereSince1628 (Reply #44)
Fri Nov 30, 2012, 06:11 PM
Bernardo de La Paz (7,142 posts)
49. Binary thinking appeals to people who think they've got it nailed down.
|
The universe is not very binary at all. Magnets (compasses) swing violent from one pole to another when you change conditions (change shielding metal or configurations of nearby magnets).
Dualistic thinking is a trap. Think of the zen aphorism: "No dualities!" It is captured in the koan "Does a dog have buddha nature?" The political universe is not a pair of poles on a single dimension. Nor is it even shades of gray or shades of blue / red / purple on a single dimension. There are many dimensions; two big ones are fiscal policy and social policy. That doesn't even get into corporate governance and states rights and .... |
Response to Bernardo de La Paz (Reply #43)
Fri Nov 30, 2012, 05:30 PM
Aviation Pro (7,665 posts)
45. A stool with two legs....
|
...which perfectly describes most Republicants: a shit on the run.
|
Response to wtmusic (Reply #12)
Mon Dec 3, 2012, 09:06 AM
nxylas (4,697 posts)
79. A breakaway Tea Party, with Sarah as its divinely appointed leader
|
In the bubble, such a party would be assured landslide victories in every election they contested, despite the best efforts of those unpatriotic women, minorities and people with college degrees.
|
Response to TomCADem (Original post)
Thu Nov 29, 2012, 11:09 PM
cstanleytech (5,316 posts)
13. The irony is if the republicans refuse to budge that taxes will automatically raise
|
even for the rich who they are trying to protect so really either way I see this issue as a win for us if properly exploited.
|
Response to cstanleytech (Reply #13)
Fri Nov 30, 2012, 11:57 AM
hoboken123 (251 posts)
35. It's comical, isn't it?
|
Freepers keep talking about calling Obama's bluff and passing nothing.
Sounds like Br'er Rabbit to me. |
Response to hoboken123 (Reply #35)
Fri Nov 30, 2012, 10:24 PM
cstanleytech (5,316 posts)
58. Yup. If they do nothing then everyones taxes raise and Obama and the dems
|
can legitimately blame the republicans for the hike and the dems can then introduce tax cuts for those who earn under say 250000 and if the republicans try to stonewall that then the dems can paint the republicans as really being pro higher taxes except when its someone whos of the 1%.
|
Response to cstanleytech (Reply #58)
Sun Dec 2, 2012, 10:04 PM
AAO (1,506 posts)
71. Soumds almost too good to be true.
|
But i can always dream, right?
|
Response to TomCADem (Original post)
Thu Nov 29, 2012, 11:41 PM
SaveAmerica (4,982 posts)
14. I guess he didn't learn the lesson that $$ doesn't buy votes
|
At least not always.
|
Response to TomCADem (Original post)
Thu Nov 29, 2012, 11:53 PM
Ikonoklast (21,645 posts)
15. Bozell the Clown may not have much to worry about, after the Rove Disaster.
|
Donors might look into throwing their money onto a bonfire for all the good it did them.
At least they could make S'mores over the heat coming off a few hundred million dollars burning brightly. |
Response to Ikonoklast (Reply #15)
Fri Nov 30, 2012, 02:20 PM
hifiguy (13,029 posts)
40. They might as well have used that $350 mil as toilet paper.
|
At least then it would have cleaned up some shit.
|
Response to TomCADem (Original post)
Fri Nov 30, 2012, 12:13 AM
AlbertCat (10,450 posts)
16. breaks its word to the American people
|
You, your ilk, and Grover are NOT the American People... you ass!
Most American People want to raise taxes on those who can afford it. |
Response to TomCADem (Original post)
Fri Nov 30, 2012, 12:41 AM
kelliekat44 (1,301 posts)
17. So, are they going to support a new party? Or a foreign leader?
|
Their money has no real value unless it allows them to wield power over someone or some government. There is nothing else for them to spend it on...so let them ponzi their money among themselves or sit on it. Money, money everywhere and not a drop to spend!
|
Response to kelliekat44 (Reply #17)
Sat Dec 1, 2012, 08:13 PM
davidpdx (8,824 posts)
65. Maybe they can borrow one of the Chinese leaders
|
I mean the Republican Party is already a dictatorship.
|
Response to TomCADem (Original post)
Fri Nov 30, 2012, 12:45 AM
brush (1,049 posts)
18. He's talking about betraying conservatives
|
Last edited Sun Dec 2, 2012, 10:33 PM USA/ET - Edit history (1) Some would say that those conservatives legislators betrayed their swearing in oath by signing Norquist's pledge. You can't served two masters. It's either Norquist or the welfare of the country, which includes raising taxes when necessary for the common weal, i.e., in time of war. Repugs and Bush didn't raise taxes during the Iraq and Afghanistan wars and thus contributed trillions to the deficit, which they are now using talking points ad nauseam to convince low info people that the big fat deficit is the President's fault
|
Response to brush (Reply #18)
Sun Dec 2, 2012, 10:13 PM
AAO (1,506 posts)
72. I'm not sure if it's low-information or low-IQ.
|
But they sure as hell are deficient in something!
|
Response to AAO (Reply #72)
Sun Dec 2, 2012, 10:34 PM
brush (1,049 posts)
73. That too
|
Low IQ and low info kinda go together.
|
Response to TomCADem (Original post)
Fri Nov 30, 2012, 01:34 AM
The Doctor. (17,266 posts)
19. Gotta love a circular firing-squad.
|
Keep the party beholden to greed, watch it fail at the polls. Let it break away from greed watch it fail at fundraising. I guess 'bucket of Crabs' would make a better analogy. |
Response to The Doctor. (Reply #19)
Fri Nov 30, 2012, 02:26 AM
Blandocyte (1,037 posts)
21. DingDingDing!
|
Excellent.
|
Response to The Doctor. (Reply #19)
Sat Dec 1, 2012, 09:42 PM
Squinch (3,060 posts)
66. If they aren't nice to themselves, they're going to hit themselves in the head with a sledgehammer!
|
Last edited Sat Dec 1, 2012, 09:43 PM USA/ET - Edit history (1) Well, OK then!
|
Response to TomCADem (Original post)
Fri Nov 30, 2012, 02:20 AM
Kennah (6,749 posts)
20. GOP2, GOP3, keep it going. The more splintered the merrier.
Response to TomCADem (Original post)
Fri Nov 30, 2012, 02:42 AM
SoapBox (5,828 posts)
23. More of the PukeBagger, thug and bully tactics!
Response to TomCADem (Original post)
Fri Nov 30, 2012, 06:29 AM
drm604 (13,962 posts)
24. It's a bluff and I'm sure the GOP realizes that it's a bluff.
Response to TomCADem (Original post)
Fri Nov 30, 2012, 07:12 AM
The Wizard (7,021 posts)
25. He's irrelevant
|
Other than a handful of radical extremist Republicans, no one cares what he says.
|
Response to TomCADem (Original post)
Fri Nov 30, 2012, 07:55 AM
JHB (17,811 posts)
27. Please procede, Bozo
|
"Active in conservative political circles for three decades" (while never holding an office of his own) means he's spent his entire career needling the insecurites of conservative donors and telling them what they want to hear.
By all means, Brent, go ahead. The prospect of you kneebiting the ideological-zealot beast that your dad and uncle (Bill Buckley) helped inflict on this country will be worth making a special batch of popcorn just to watch. |
Response to TomCADem (Original post)
Fri Nov 30, 2012, 08:11 AM
tanyev (22,106 posts)
28. You go, Brent!
|
Fight the power!
|
Response to TomCADem (Original post)
Fri Nov 30, 2012, 08:46 AM
crim son (26,494 posts)
29. "The American people"
|
are in favor of Obama's tax increases, dipshit. Sigh. When is the Rapture coming? I need a car that actually runs.
|
Response to TomCADem (Original post)
Fri Nov 30, 2012, 08:59 AM
Old and In the Way (36,257 posts)
30. They're screwed, either way.
|
The party of Private Service is running out of electoral tricks to divide this country in a way that makes it possible to serve the interests of their benefactors - the 1%. Obama and the Democrats are holding all of their cards...they best not fold on the Con Game.
|
Response to TomCADem (Original post)
Fri Nov 30, 2012, 11:21 AM
frylock (19,050 posts)
31. take your ball and go home, crybaby
Response to TomCADem (Original post)
Fri Nov 30, 2012, 11:23 AM
Aerows (13,925 posts)
32. To where?
|
Are they going to give it to the DNC instead? I love how all of these dimwits think they can threaten to put money somewhere else.
|
Response to TomCADem (Original post)
Fri Nov 30, 2012, 11:28 AM
Third Doctor (1,025 posts)
33. He's just blowing off steam.
|
If they left the GOP where would they go?
|
Response to TomCADem (Original post)
Fri Nov 30, 2012, 11:48 AM
RoccoR5955 (6,498 posts)
34. Good, I hope he starts a new party
|
And they split the RepubLIEcan vote!
Besides, we need more choices than tweedle dee and tweedle dum. |
Response to TomCADem (Original post)
Fri Nov 30, 2012, 12:45 PM
heaven05 (2,374 posts)
36. breaks it's word to the american people?
|
word to the richest 10%, all the super wealthy and that's all the word was meant for. Damn the repuguglicans!
|
Response to TomCADem (Original post)
Fri Nov 30, 2012, 01:11 PM
NBachers (3,697 posts)
37. Shaking his clenched fist and shouting threats as he circles the bowl with a crapload o' turds
Response to TomCADem (Original post)
Fri Nov 30, 2012, 02:18 PM
hifiguy (13,029 posts)
39. Bwahahaha!
|
Saw the branch off behind you, now that's a great strategy. The derp is strong in these mooks. The Wile E. Coyote is even stronger. Where are they gonna go? To the lobotomized libertarians?
|
Response to TomCADem (Original post)
Fri Nov 30, 2012, 02:32 PM
Derek in Iowa (14 posts)
41. Steer them where?
|
To the Democrats? To the Libertarians? To the Greens? The banksters and the corporate criminals aren't going anywhere, for the same reason the Religious Right isn't going anywhere: there's nowhere for them to go. What WILL happen is that the banksters and the corporate criminals will figure out new, innovative and (they hope) secret ways to exercise control over who get the Repug nomination, and how. If Mittens could have locked in the nomination earlier, he might have won the general election. That is what the corpoids will be looking to do next time.
|
Response to Derek in Iowa (Reply #41)
Mon Dec 3, 2012, 07:25 AM
DocMac (1,271 posts)
78. Welcome to DU. nt
Response to TomCADem (Original post)
Fri Nov 30, 2012, 05:31 PM
justice1 (711 posts)
46. I suspect a grassroots bipartisan group.
|
It will LGBT friendly, drop the Evangelicals and the NRA, etc...at the same time, benefiting billionaires.
|
Response to TomCADem (Original post)
Fri Nov 30, 2012, 05:53 PM
ut oh (252 posts)
47. Please direct your money elsewhere
|
Helps the Dems more!
|
Response to TomCADem (Original post)
Fri Nov 30, 2012, 05:54 PM
kenfrequed (5,277 posts)
48. Yeah
|
I would love it if a bunch of semi-reasonable GOPers would stand up to Grover-monster and say.
"Go ahead and do it Grover. I dare you. Where exactly do you plan to go? What exactly do you plan to do with your tea party morons that have made us entirely unelectable and doomed to trail down a spiral to the dustbin of failed parties? Go ahead and leave so we can actually get something friggin done." Sadly the Republicans that might have said that are gone. |
Response to TomCADem (Original post)
Fri Nov 30, 2012, 06:58 PM
They_Live (814 posts)
50. He should hold his breath until
|
he gets want he wants. I double dog dare him!
|
Response to TomCADem (Original post)
Fri Nov 30, 2012, 06:59 PM
BeyondGeography (21,327 posts)
51. Where they gonna go?
Response to BeyondGeography (Reply #51)
Fri Nov 30, 2012, 07:14 PM
SummerSnow (958 posts)
53. I know ...
|
Irrelevancy is where they are now.All that is left is political oblivion.
|
Response to TomCADem (Original post)
Fri Nov 30, 2012, 07:48 PM
ItsTheMediaStupid (2,800 posts)
54. Legalized bribery - our current campaign finance system
|
Off the fiscal cliff if they don't raise taxes.
We won't fall but three feet. |
Response to TomCADem (Original post)
Fri Nov 30, 2012, 08:24 PM
Fearless (12,404 posts)
55. Ohhh I'm quaking....
|
|
Response to TomCADem (Original post)
Fri Nov 30, 2012, 09:08 PM
0rganism (16,940 posts)
56. here's hoping they wriggle really hard in opposite directions
|
with any luck the GOP can shred itself down to a fraction of its former size and influence by mid-2014
|
Response to TomCADem (Original post)
Sat Dec 1, 2012, 08:24 AM
GTurck (731 posts)
59. Exactly...
|
to whom would he steer that money? This seems a threat without teeth.
As to speaking for the "American" people; the conservatives don't do that and cannot do that since I am a liberal who disagrees with Grover Norquist and his treasonous tax pledge. |
Response to TomCADem (Original post)
Sat Dec 1, 2012, 08:48 AM
Sunlei (2,297 posts)
60. we should tax the hell out of those political charities & political churches.
Response to Sunlei (Reply #60)
Sat Dec 1, 2012, 07:42 PM
cstanleytech (5,316 posts)
63. Well regarding the churches they should just enforce the existing rules is all.
|
In other words the IRS needs to get off its ass and revoke the tax free gift the give churches for staying out of politics if they decide that the churches are unable to remain uninvolved is secular affairs of government.
|
Response to cstanleytech (Reply #63)
Sat Dec 1, 2012, 08:07 PM
kelliekat44 (1,301 posts)
64. If all the tax laws were strictly enforced on the top 50% our deficit would be over. nt
Response to TomCADem (Original post)
Sun Dec 2, 2012, 11:47 AM
bobhuntsman (99 posts)
67. If he starts his own party. . .
|
We'd have to call it the "Bozo Party", wouldn't we???
Or, maybe he could just get the big donors to send all that cash to NewsBusters!! What a douchebag!! |
Response to TomCADem (Original post)
Sun Dec 2, 2012, 01:48 PM
ElboRuum (4,386 posts)
69. Seems to me the GOP has two choices.
|
1. Tell Grover and his cronies to go pound sand, and lose political ground for at least eight years.
2. Go along with Grover and his cronies, and lose political ground until the GOP becomes nothing more a historical curiosity. A vote from a multibillionaire is worth just as much as one from someone who lives from paycheck to paycheck. Once you realize this, you realize that politics is a populist business. |
Response to TomCADem (Original post)
dtom67 This message was self-deleted by its author.
Response to dtom67 (Reply #70)
Sun Dec 2, 2012, 10:45 PM
AAO (1,506 posts)
74. First thought I had - they may be morans.
|
|
Response to TomCADem (Original post)
Sun Dec 2, 2012, 11:38 PM
Thinkingabout (1,790 posts)
76. Lets see, we just had an election and Obama won saying he was going to raise taxes.
|
Let them steer their support somewhere else, GOP does not have the Latino, oriental or the black vote, lost lots of women voters and if the angry because the Democrat candidate is black old white men come back in the Democrat vote, guess who will win. If the poor people voting for the repub candidate because they are against abortion and finally realize the abortion issue is not going to change then the Democrats will be in total control. The likes of Rick OOPS Perry will be back in the Democrat party also..
|
Response to Thinkingabout (Reply #76)
Mon Dec 3, 2012, 03:41 AM
Skittles (86,357 posts)
77. Democrat party?
Response to TomCADem (Original post)
Mon Dec 3, 2012, 10:06 AM
lonestarnot (71,135 posts)
80. So asshat is going to start a new party of corporate welfare league so they can be readily
|
identified. Hmmmf. Go right ahead on there fuckwad.
|

