Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
Wed Nov 14, 2012, 11:51 PM Nov 2012

"OPERATION MOUNTAIN HIGH" YIELDS MULTIPLE DRUG ARRESTS FOR POT GROWING ON PUBLIC LANDS

Source: East County Magazine




November 14, 2012 (San Diego)-- Today U.S. State Attorney Laura Duffy called a press conference to announce the arrest of six out of 10 suspects wanted by federal authorities in relation to running illegal marijuana farms on state and federal lands in the East County and Riverside County.

"Drug agents on routine aerial surveillance happened to spot and remove a marijuana farm in Julian in the summer of 2010," said Duffy, explaining how the operation started. after the “Chariot Canyon Grow” operation.

What was unusual about this raid, according to Duffy, is that "In this case agents found more than plants and farmers. They found cell phones."

This intelligence cache allowed officers in the Narcotics Task Force to start to put together how the Sotelo Organization worked.

The distribution of marijuana ranged all the way to Northern California, Idaho and Utah. There were also contacts in Mexico; the investigation continues on the Mexican side of the Border. When asked about possible links to cartels, Duffy said that there were no links found, but the investigation is continuing.




Read more: http://www.eastcountymagazine.org/node/11726



By the way this is the largest, per officials, drug growing and distribution network.

If you are in public lands anywhere in the US and come across a grove, get away and contact law enforcement.
47 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
"OPERATION MOUNTAIN HIGH" YIELDS MULTIPLE DRUG ARRESTS FOR POT GROWING ON PUBLIC LANDS (Original Post) nadinbrzezinski Nov 2012 OP
hmm, if we could grow it at home that would not be needed. dumb feds nt msongs Nov 2012 #1
Oh it gets better than just that. nadinbrzezinski Nov 2012 #2
Exactly. Legalization, not decriminalization of personal use. WheelWalker Nov 2012 #16
I wonder if that's actually the way they were found Major Nikon Nov 2012 #3
Yup, in aerial reconassaince. nadinbrzezinski Nov 2012 #5
Living MJ plants emit a characteristic heat signature. Lasher Nov 2012 #20
Oh and trivia, the photo... nadinbrzezinski Nov 2012 #10
I was a search and rescue spotter in BC for a couple of missions in the '80s OnlinePoker Nov 2012 #21
Good. Not a fan of the drug wars, but growing drugs on public lands is harmful CreekDog Nov 2012 #4
Point made by local BLM director. nadinbrzezinski Nov 2012 #6
thanks for pointing that out CreekDog Nov 2012 #13
Why not blame those who continue the drug war? Fumesucker Nov 2012 #9
I am all for legalizing at least weed nadinbrzezinski Nov 2012 #11
Because harming public lands is wrong, whether you do it by poaching, growing drugs... CreekDog Nov 2012 #12
By the way, those are *my* lands TOO, you don't get to decide that my lands don't get protection CreekDog Nov 2012 #14
The lands wouldn't *need* "protection" from illicit grows if it wasn't for the drug war. Fumesucker Nov 2012 #17
Actually this OP isa local news story nadinbrzezinski Nov 2012 #18
Oh, they do it, too. sofa king Nov 2012 #35
Boooooooo. Like they have nothing better to do. MrSlayer Nov 2012 #7
Actually these guys are not the peaceful kind. nadinbrzezinski Nov 2012 #8
The violence is caused by prohibition, not cultivation. Warren Stupidity Nov 2012 #22
No. Violence is caused by people. Not regulations. randome Nov 2012 #24
Prohibition creates the structural conditions that make violence a useful option. Comrade Grumpy Nov 2012 #30
I disagree. Violence is never an answer when talking about growing a harmless plant. randome Nov 2012 #33
I am not arguing for prohibition nadinbrzezinski Nov 2012 #28
Why do you keep saying that? Floyd_Gondolli Nov 2012 #41
You could always trash the thread nadinbrzezinski Nov 2012 #42
Answer the question Floyd_Gondolli Nov 2012 #43
You can trash the thread nadinbrzezinski Nov 2012 #44
Except it's not a fact, it's your opinion Floyd_Gondolli Nov 2012 #45
Yup, sure, you can take it to the editor nadinbrzezinski Nov 2012 #46
Nice job Floyd_Gondolli Nov 2012 #47
growing drugs on public lands is HARMFUL CreekDog Nov 2012 #15
So end prohibition. No more illegal cultivation on public lands. Warren Stupidity Nov 2012 #23
that will not end illegal cultivation on public lands CreekDog Nov 2012 #31
no they are the same issue. Warren Stupidity Nov 2012 #34
so you are okay with destruction of public lands while you wait for prohibition to end? CreekDog Nov 2012 #36
It's simple. People don't have any choice but to worship the weed. They MUST get high. randome Nov 2012 #37
where did I say that? Warren Stupidity Nov 2012 #39
because you were arguing with me and i never discounted prohibition in the long term CreekDog Nov 2012 #40
Face it! The inevitable outcome of the war on MJ has been known for a long time. Bozita Nov 2012 #19
You know what is funny of this post nadinbrzezinski Nov 2012 #26
Want lots of cheap and great pot? Let them grow it in the midwest farm belt AngryAmish Nov 2012 #25
But until it does nadinbrzezinski Nov 2012 #27
No doubt my friend AngryAmish Nov 2012 #29
and in the meantime? get it OFF public lands --it is dangerous, harmful, polluting and a menace CreekDog Nov 2012 #32
I used to say, why not just move bitchkitty Nov 2012 #38
 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
2. Oh it gets better than just that.
Wed Nov 14, 2012, 11:56 PM
Nov 2012

My gut tells me welcome to the war on drugs Mexican style in the US....Santa Muerte is not something to trifle with. In Mexico followers have ahem, put bodies in vats of acid and decapitated others.

I asked, got the predicted answer...other local newsies were shocked, not the Mexican media.

WheelWalker

(8,955 posts)
16. Exactly. Legalization, not decriminalization of personal use.
Thu Nov 15, 2012, 12:16 AM
Nov 2012

Decriminalizing personal use does nothing to eliminate the vast waste of resources directed at suppressing the trade in cannabis. Decriminalized users still have to break the law to obtain the herb, and associate with those who on many other levels are likely not law abiding citizens. Legalize and break the back of the illegal market, and redirect law enforcement resources to the suppression of corporate criminals. Legalize and promote the homegrown solution. That is my view as well.

Major Nikon

(36,827 posts)
3. I wonder if that's actually the way they were found
Wed Nov 14, 2012, 11:58 PM
Nov 2012

I've seen spectral analysis technology that allows large areas to be surveyed for pot by filtering aerial or satellite photography for the specific color of pot (or most anything else).

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
5. Yup, in aerial reconassaince.
Thu Nov 15, 2012, 12:00 AM
Nov 2012

You are right...it's not just a chopper flying by. This s the back country I regularly cover fires at. The canopy is thick in locations described.

Lasher

(27,566 posts)
20. Living MJ plants emit a characteristic heat signature.
Thu Nov 15, 2012, 04:17 AM
Nov 2012

This is how the plants are often detected from helicopters that are equipped to recognize this heat. I think a flyover from such an aircraft is the most likely scenario.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
10. Oh and trivia, the photo...
Thu Nov 15, 2012, 12:07 AM
Nov 2012

After I got there I learned that cameras are allowed on press day with press credentials.

That is my cell phone, highly cropped.

Nothing to write home about, but good enough in a pinch.

:-;

OnlinePoker

(5,719 posts)
21. I was a search and rescue spotter in BC for a couple of missions in the '80s
Thu Nov 15, 2012, 05:16 AM
Nov 2012

We actually picked out the plantations easily just from the colour difference of the pot compared to the pine and spruce they were planted around. On the coast, it helped that the growers put up white plastic tarps to keep the torrential rains from washing their grow away. You see that, it's a pretty sure bet what you've got.

CreekDog

(46,192 posts)
4. Good. Not a fan of the drug wars, but growing drugs on public lands is harmful
Wed Nov 14, 2012, 11:59 PM
Nov 2012

they dont' belong there and they are becoming a danger to the habitats themselves and often those who protect the drugs are endangering the visitors and staff that use the public lands properly.

CreekDog

(46,192 posts)
13. thanks for pointing that out
Thu Nov 15, 2012, 12:13 AM
Nov 2012

even if one is against the drug war and in favor of legalization, destruction of public lands through illegal (as in trespassing or misappropriation) is wrong and harmful.

Fumesucker

(45,851 posts)
9. Why not blame those who continue the drug war?
Thu Nov 15, 2012, 12:05 AM
Nov 2012

You don't see illicit corn farmers setting up hidden grows on public land.

The politicians have known all along that the drug war is a vicious and harmful lie.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
11. I am all for legalizing at least weed
Thu Nov 15, 2012, 12:11 AM
Nov 2012

Can't wait for it to be rescheduled quite honestly, but they are dong a lot of damage, and these guys in particular are not precisely nice folks.

My belief is that it will take a month or two, like with prohibition, for shit like this to collapse while legal operations take over. But until then, there is real damage being done, and I know some of these areas, there is also some danger of a nice wild fire.

Many reasons why I can't wait for rescheduling.

CreekDog

(46,192 posts)
12. Because harming public lands is wrong, whether you do it by poaching, growing drugs...
Thu Nov 15, 2012, 12:11 AM
Nov 2012

or any other ways that harm public lands.

you want to apologize to them? go ahead.

i think most drugs should be legalized, but even if they are, anyone who grows drugs, uses pesticides in our national or state parks should have his ass thrown in jail for a long, long time.

this is environmental destruction, pollution and often violence towards those who legitimately use these lands.

these are scum.

you grow a little pot in your house, i don't have an issue with that. you grow drugs on public lands, cut back native vegetation, hire armed people to keep the public out of the drug fields you've planted on *their* lands, that's low and illegal. bye bye from me and no sympathy.

CreekDog

(46,192 posts)
14. By the way, those are *my* lands TOO, you don't get to decide that my lands don't get protection
Thu Nov 15, 2012, 12:14 AM
Nov 2012

from this crap that is polluting them, causing them to be dangerous places for visitors and by destroying native habitat that is for legal users and visitors who use the lands in keeping with the reasons they are protected as well as in a way that will allow future generations to use them.

Fumesucker

(45,851 posts)
17. The lands wouldn't *need* "protection" from illicit grows if it wasn't for the drug war.
Thu Nov 15, 2012, 12:52 AM
Nov 2012

Be angry at those who are actually the root of the problem, the politicians who continue the drug war against the vast amount of evidence that it's counterproductive, leading to exactly the sort of thing this OP is about.

America is so fucked up in head about this subject, it's all but impossible to talk rationally about it.





 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
18. Actually this OP isa local news story
Thu Nov 15, 2012, 01:01 AM
Nov 2012

I covered.

And some of us can talk rationally. Yes, it needs to be legalized...rescheduling will com first...at the same time we can also recognize the issues with this.

Oh and for god sakes I had an AK round kill a radiator and another go through and though my ambulance. So I think I can talk with some personal authority about this.

sofa king

(10,857 posts)
35. Oh, they do it, too.
Thu Nov 15, 2012, 03:52 PM
Nov 2012

Farmers and ranchers, I recall, are among the worst offenders according to the BLM. They routinely violate buffer zones, pull down fences, kill off game along the border, move borders, let dogs and cats run loose, pollute, and otherwise encroach on protected land everywhere that private land abuts public land.

But really only marijuana growers have an incentive to go deep into public land, disturb the environment there, set booby traps, and ward off people who wish to use the land as it is intended. So your essential point is spot-on.

 

Warren Stupidity

(48,181 posts)
22. The violence is caused by prohibition, not cultivation.
Thu Nov 15, 2012, 08:08 AM
Nov 2012

Every harm mentioned in this thread is a direct consequence of prohibition. The drug war is an insane policy that harms society and enriches gangsters on both sides of the law.

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
24. No. Violence is caused by people. Not regulations.
Thu Nov 15, 2012, 08:52 AM
Nov 2012

I understand your point but the responsibility for violence lies with those initiating it.

 

Comrade Grumpy

(13,184 posts)
30. Prohibition creates the structural conditions that make violence a useful option.
Thu Nov 15, 2012, 01:12 PM
Nov 2012

It is a mistake to consider violence nothing more than personal pathology.

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
33. I disagree. Violence is never an answer when talking about growing a harmless plant.
Thu Nov 15, 2012, 02:05 PM
Nov 2012

Someone's desire to 'have fun' or 'get high' should NEVER be an excuse to harm someone. The fact that violence is considered an appropriate response by many when growing marijuana is proof that people cannot rationally approach the subject.

If the government outlawed just about anything else -say, college ruled paper- most people would go on about their lives without it. But when it's marijuana, we're all supposed to jump up and down and scream, "Authoritarians!"

The reason marijuana is not legal now is because most people really don't care about it. And once the government outlawed it, those people still shrugged and said, "Who cares?"

Now when it comes to decriminalization, I think we can all agree on that.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
28. I am not arguing for prohibition
Thu Nov 15, 2012, 12:35 PM
Nov 2012

I am just stating a fact. This is a fact, these guys are not peaceful growers...

I have also stated in this thread repeteadly that I am for full legalization.

Fun fact, lets assume the Feds tell California " go ahead, carry on." I still will not be able, legally, to buy or posses it. I don't have a prescription.

 

Floyd_Gondolli

(1,277 posts)
41. Why do you keep saying that?
Thu Nov 15, 2012, 08:49 PM
Nov 2012

Nobody thinks Mexican drug cartels are made up of "nice" people. Even a child would grasp that concept. Your belief that people need to be reminded of this - incessantly - is weird and nonsensical.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
42. You could always trash the thread
Thu Nov 15, 2012, 08:50 PM
Nov 2012

Or put me on ignore if you really object to this. It is that simple you know.

 

Floyd_Gondolli

(1,277 posts)
43. Answer the question
Thu Nov 15, 2012, 08:59 PM
Nov 2012

In what world do people believe Mexican drug cartels are made up of "nice" people?

I know a lot of liberals and conservatives and middle of the road folks. None of them would, in any scenario, say Mexican drug cartels have any redeeming qualities at all.

And yet you feel the need to state that over and over again as if you are privy to some inside information that lends you extra credibility.

We get it. They're bad.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
44. You can trash the thread
Thu Nov 15, 2012, 09:11 PM
Nov 2012

I was answering to the other poster. If you have a problem with that statement of fact, that is truly your problem, not mine.

 

Floyd_Gondolli

(1,277 posts)
45. Except it's not a fact, it's your opinion
Thu Nov 15, 2012, 09:18 PM
Nov 2012

And a rather ludicrous opinion.

And by the way, people who are arrested are not defendants until they enter a plea.

Until then they are simply "arrested" or "arrested on complaints of...".

This can be found in any AP Style book.

 

Floyd_Gondolli

(1,277 posts)
47. Nice job
Thu Nov 15, 2012, 09:27 PM
Nov 2012

Your bizarre take on the issue is challenged and you punt.

Someone points out that your knowledge of basic concepts in journalism is lacking and you refer him to your editor.

It doesn't seem like you take a lot of pride in your work.

And I pity any editor that has to read your copy with that shitty attitude. It must be excruciating to go down into your rabbit hole on a regular basis.

CreekDog

(46,192 posts)
15. growing drugs on public lands is HARMFUL
Thu Nov 15, 2012, 12:16 AM
Nov 2012

if you want to allow them to harm our wildlife, habitats and endanger hikers and visitors through their chemicals, through their environmental destruction and through their booby traps. that's not OK.

CreekDog

(46,192 posts)
31. that will not end illegal cultivation on public lands
Thu Nov 15, 2012, 01:59 PM
Nov 2012

these are two different issues.

why are smart people like you unable to understand this?

 

Warren Stupidity

(48,181 posts)
34. no they are the same issue.
Thu Nov 15, 2012, 03:51 PM
Nov 2012

You tell me how many hops farmers are illegally cultivating on federal lands. Why aren't they? Oh that's right, it is legal to grow hops.

CreekDog

(46,192 posts)
36. so you are okay with destruction of public lands while you wait for prohibition to end?
Thu Nov 15, 2012, 03:56 PM
Nov 2012

if you are okay with environmental destruction of our public lands, then you aren't an environmentalist.

which is sad, for a long time, i thought you were.

what is also sad is that you cannot seem to hold in your brain two simultaneous ideas:

1) you can be against the drug war
2) you can also be against cultivation of any kind on public lands, especially one's that introduce harmful pesticides (this one does) and remove native habitat (this one does!)

you can hold those two ideas simultaneously!

except, perhaps, you are so limited intellectually that you don't think one can believe those two things at the same time.

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
37. It's simple. People don't have any choice but to worship the weed. They MUST get high.
Thu Nov 15, 2012, 04:11 PM
Nov 2012

So it's really everyone else's fault that they are growing crops on federal land.

 

Warren Stupidity

(48,181 posts)
39. where did I say that?
Thu Nov 15, 2012, 04:38 PM
Nov 2012

I'll try again: if you wish to actually end these sorts of activities, end prohibition. If instead you just like to feel good about punishing "bad guys", why then carry on with the failed idiotic prohibitionist nightmare.

CreekDog

(46,192 posts)
40. because you were arguing with me and i never discounted prohibition in the long term
Thu Nov 15, 2012, 08:14 PM
Nov 2012

i only argued that this needed to be dealt with in the short term, regardless of whether prohibition stays or goes.

Bozita

(26,955 posts)
19. Face it! The inevitable outcome of the war on MJ has been known for a long time.
Thu Nov 15, 2012, 03:21 AM
Nov 2012

The sooner, the better.

But the for-profit prison corporations and the state and local police departments who rely on the drug forfeiture laws want to delay it forever.

You can compare a for-profit prison corporation to a hotel operation. Higher occupancy means greater profits. An empty cell hurts the bottom line. Is it any wonder these folks lobby like hell against any change in the laws?

And the financially-strapped local cops?

The drug forfeiture laws allow these folks the opportunity for bigtime financial bonanzas on drug busts involving MJ. I found myself caught behind a cop car at a stop light. On the back bumper was a statement saying that that particular cop car was purchased with drug forfeiture funds.

Infuckingsanity!

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
26. You know what is funny of this post
Thu Nov 15, 2012, 12:10 PM
Nov 2012

Locally we have been following the travails of ASA and the local clinics certified by the Sheriffs led by a republican who is no fan. Completely separate, the rads on those same legal growth organizations under California state law, were done by the Feds, led by a dem. it is hysterics. I know.

Moreover, that OP is n actual story in an actual paper from a press release in the morning at the Federal Building. And the people arrested are not nice.

 

AngryAmish

(25,704 posts)
25. Want lots of cheap and great pot? Let them grow it in the midwest farm belt
Thu Nov 15, 2012, 10:17 AM
Nov 2012

Drive from Chicago to St. Louis. Millions of acres of flat, well irrigated land. I bet pot will fetch a higher price than say soybeans. There is an upper bound on how much people will smoke.

Crimony this war on MJ is stupid.

If it could be grown legally, then this crap will not happen.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
27. But until it does
Thu Nov 15, 2012, 12:31 PM
Nov 2012

I am serious as a heart attack, you come across one of these in public lands back away and call 911. It's not the plant, it's the guards with shotguns, rifles and traps.

The story has the facts of the case, some taken from the presser, some from the press packet. This is a just the facts

bitchkitty

(7,349 posts)
38. I used to say, why not just move
Thu Nov 15, 2012, 04:33 PM
Nov 2012

your grow indoors? Then I had an outdoor grow this summer...sunshine and fresh air add something that no HID light can ever match!

That said, bummer about the public lands. If they'd just legalize it, like sane people want, the problem would not be a problem any more. It would simply disappear, without effort, without the millions spent on this Operation Mountain High.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»"OPERATION MOUNTAIN ...