Fri Nov 9, 2012, 09:32 PM
DonViejo (4,590 posts)
War On Women Continues: Ohio Revives Extreme Anti-Abortion Bill
Source: ThinkProgress
By Tara Culp-Ressler on Nov 9, 2012 at 11:00 am Last year, anti-choice advocates in Ohio pushed extreme legislation to ban abortions after a fetal heartbeat is detected — which often occurs as early as six weeks, before many women may even know they’re pregnant. So-called “heartbeat” bills like HB 125 are so radical that they often divide the anti-abortion community, and this particular legislation has been stalled in the Ohio Senate since June 2011. But now, thanks to significant pressure from the anti-choice groups who were the biggest proponents of the heartbeat bill last year, HB 125 may be up again for consideration in Ohio’s Senate as early as next week: Mired in the Ohio Senate since June 2011, HB 125 is getting another look, Senate President Tom Niehaus, R-New Richmond, told The Enquirer Thursday. He said a substitute bill is being prepared. If passed, Ohio’s bill would be the most restrictive abortion ban in the nation — far surpassing a bill in Arizona that currently earns that unfortunate distinction by banning abortions after 20 weeks. HB 125 would criminalize all abortions after the fetal heartbeat is detected without even the narrowest exceptions in cases of rape, incest, or the mental health of the woman. Read more: http://thinkprogress.org/health/2012/11/09/1170671/ohio-revives-heartbeat-bill/
|
17 replies, 2814 views
| Author | Time | Post | |
| DonViejo | Nov 2012 | OP | |
| Angry Dragon | Nov 2012 | #1 | |
| Sekhmets Daughter | Nov 2012 | #2 | |
| Walk away | Nov 2012 | #3 | |
| Swede Atlanta | Nov 2012 | #4 | |
| kestrel91316 | Nov 2012 | #6 | |
| Stargazer09 | Nov 2012 | #8 | |
| Doremus | Nov 2012 | #5 | |
| rockbluff botanist | Nov 2012 | #7 | |
| noamnety | Nov 2012 | #14 | |
| DonViejo | Nov 2012 | #17 | |
| tomm2thumbs | Nov 2012 | #9 | |
| Archae | Nov 2012 | #10 | |
| daybranch | Nov 2012 | #11 | |
| cynzke | Nov 2012 | #12 | |
| EmeraldCityGrl | Nov 2012 | #13 | |
| sakabatou | Nov 2012 | #15 | |
| historylovr | Nov 2012 | #16 |
Response to DonViejo (Original post)
Fri Nov 9, 2012, 09:37 PM
Angry Dragon (24,073 posts)
1. They must really hate their mothers, wives, daughters, sisters
Response to Angry Dragon (Reply #1)
Fri Nov 9, 2012, 09:45 PM
Sekhmets Daughter (7,137 posts)
2. Nah...they fear them.
Response to Angry Dragon (Reply #1)
Fri Nov 9, 2012, 09:45 PM
Walk away (4,601 posts)
3. If every wife, mother, daughter and sister would go to the polls...
|
and vote these assholes back to hell this wouldn't be happening. Tuesday taught us many lessons. The most important is that women, voting together, can change the world.
|
Response to DonViejo (Original post)
Fri Nov 9, 2012, 09:48 PM
Swede Atlanta (2,247 posts)
4. That bill would run afoul of the current jurisprudence on Roe v. Wade
|
I know conservatives are trying to pass legislation that will result in a case that is ripe to take to the S.C. with a hope they will overturn Roe v. Wade. But this bill, impermissibly interferes with a woman's right to privacy that includes her right to terminate her pregnancy.
These folks are so worried about non-viable fetuses in the womb tut care less about ensuring people have access to healthcare, food, education, housing or retirement security. They are so focused on the womb. What's up with that? |
Response to Swede Atlanta (Reply #4)
Fri Nov 9, 2012, 10:21 PM
kestrel91316 (45,434 posts)
6. They see unwanted pregnancy as appropriate punishment for the sin of
|
having sex without wanting to procreate.
|
Response to Swede Atlanta (Reply #4)
Fri Nov 9, 2012, 10:49 PM
Stargazer09 (1,072 posts)
8. They hate women
|
This is simply their way of sending women back to the home.
It's also punishment for women who want to enjoy sex. If this was simply due to "protecting the unborn," they would be handing out birth control pills like they were candy and pushing for all women to take charge of their fertility. Instead, they are making it more and more difficult for women to get birth control. It's sickening. And it's all about controlling women. |
Response to DonViejo (Original post)
Fri Nov 9, 2012, 10:02 PM
Doremus (5,144 posts)
5. Hate to say it but if this gets fellow Ohioans to take their heads out of their ass
|
then bring it, Niehaus.
Repukes have had this state under their thumb for way too long. If they pull a blatantly misogynistic move like this, it may be enough to shake some folks awake for a change. |
Response to DonViejo (Original post)
Fri Nov 9, 2012, 10:44 PM
rockbluff botanist (13 posts)
7. Can a woman just go to another state that has reasonable abortion laws?
Response to rockbluff botanist (Reply #7)
Sat Nov 10, 2012, 06:30 PM
noamnety (18,379 posts)
14. Those with means can travel, yes.
|
And the rest of them ... not so much.
|
Response to rockbluff botanist (Reply #7)
Sat Nov 10, 2012, 10:56 PM
DonViejo (4,590 posts)
17. Depends on state law and whether the woman has
|
travelling funds.
|
Response to DonViejo (Original post)
Fri Nov 9, 2012, 11:05 PM
tomm2thumbs (9,190 posts)
9. They. Do. Not. Learn.
|
But they will. |
Response to DonViejo (Original post)
Sat Nov 10, 2012, 02:24 AM
Archae (26,396 posts)
10. This is simply revenge.
|
Revenge by the right-wingers against "dem lib'rul broads" for partly costing THEIR guy, (Romney and Ryan) the election.
We're going to see more of this, in the next 4 years. |
Response to DonViejo (Original post)
Sat Nov 10, 2012, 05:12 AM
daybranch (393 posts)
11. Gerrymandering result
|
This is exactly what happens when your congressional districts have been rigged to elect republicans and extremists grab the primaries. This is why we will soon start collecting signatures to prevent this gerrymandering which allows and encourages pandering to extreme views and big money donors rather than accountability tot he people. Our imperfect attempt to do this (Issue 2) failed but we will improve and move a new bill to get rid of the gerrymandering onto the ballot. We will not quit until citizens of Ohio are fairly represented.
We made mistakes for a number of reasons, letting this issue (Issue 2} fail. While there was lot of PAC money against us, we could have beaten it and won. We will do better. Anyone who wants to help protect the rights of Ohio citizens and prevent gerrymandering determining who has the majority of the members of the House of Representatives contact VotersFirst in Ohio to help. I guess this is a national issue and must be examined everywhere and then defeated if we really want to do what the framers of our constitution wanted. |
Response to DonViejo (Original post)
Sat Nov 10, 2012, 12:20 PM
cynzke (147 posts)
12. Timing!
|
Up to now, the SC has been reluctant to take up Roe vs Wade, willing to wait assuming that Obama would be a one term President. Now that he is re-elected and in the position to replace retiring Justices, any bet this time around the Roberts court will take up Roe vs Wade at the first opportunity before Obama has a chance to lock in a liberal court for decades.
|
Response to DonViejo (Original post)
Sat Nov 10, 2012, 01:09 PM
EmeraldCityGrl (4,308 posts)
13. They want women to be baby making machines.
|
They are so desperate to increase the white population there will be no end to
this until repukes are gone. Did women not speak loud and clear this election? There are so many things I want to say, but they would be so politically incorrect I'd be banned...these bastards are digging their own grave. |
Response to DonViejo (Original post)
Sat Nov 10, 2012, 07:14 PM
sakabatou (29,108 posts)
15. They sure hate women, don't they?
Response to DonViejo (Original post)
Sat Nov 10, 2012, 10:32 PM
historylovr (178 posts)

