HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » Latest Breaking News (Forum) » BREAKING NEWS: CIA Direct...
Introducing Discussionist: A new forum by the creators of DU

Fri Nov 9, 2012, 02:56 PM

BREAKING NEWS: CIA Director Petraeus submits resignation letter, citing extramarital affair

Source: MSNBC

BREAKING NEWS: Director of CIA, David Petraeus, submits letter of resignation

BREAKING NEWS: CIA Director Petraeus submits resignation letter, citing extramarital affair


Updated Link:
http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2012/11/09/15054517-cia-director-david-petraeus-resigns-cites-extramarital-affair

Gen. David Petraeus has resigned as director of the Central Intelligence Agency, MSNBC reports.

MSNBC host Andrea Mitchell broke the news Friday afternoon, reading Petraeus' resignation letter on air.

Petraeus wrote in the letter to the CIA staff on Friday that he had gone to the White House on Thursday and asked the president "for personal reasons" to resign.

"After being married for more than 37 years I showed extremely poor judgment by engaging in an extramarital affair," Petraeus wrote in his letter. "Such behavior is unacceptable, both as a husband and as a leader of an organization such as ours."

Petraeus said that the president accepted his resignation on Thursday.

This is a breaking news entry. More to come...

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/11/09/david-petraeus-resigns-cia-director-affair_n_2103094.html

Read more: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/default.aspx?id=11881780&q=patreaus&search=p&1=st&1




163 replies, 23624 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 163 replies Author Time Post
Reply BREAKING NEWS: CIA Director Petraeus submits resignation letter, citing extramarital affair (Original post)
kpete Nov 2012 OP
NRaleighLiberal Nov 2012 #1
demwing Nov 2012 #3
JohnnyRingo Nov 2012 #22
SoapBox Nov 2012 #45
erpowers Nov 2012 #65
muriel_volestrangler Nov 2012 #75
Mojorabbit Nov 2012 #90
JohnnyRingo Nov 2012 #106
crunch60 Nov 2012 #125
loudsue Nov 2012 #4
pasto76 Nov 2012 #27
Scuba Nov 2012 #31
Rosa Luxemburg Nov 2012 #138
Democrats_win Nov 2012 #2
xtraxritical Nov 2012 #66
DonViejo Nov 2012 #86
coalition_unwilling Nov 2012 #127
Suich Nov 2012 #5
coalition_unwilling Nov 2012 #128
Mme. Defarge Nov 2012 #6
JustABozoOnThisBus Nov 2012 #20
LanternWaste Nov 2012 #43
Mme. Defarge Nov 2012 #57
onenote Nov 2012 #61
dsc Nov 2012 #80
onenote Nov 2012 #84
jeff47 Nov 2012 #99
onenote Nov 2012 #100
jeff47 Nov 2012 #118
onenote Nov 2012 #120
jeff47 Nov 2012 #121
olddad56 Nov 2012 #108
jeff47 Nov 2012 #98
Javaman Nov 2012 #52
KeepItReal Nov 2012 #59
xtraxritical Nov 2012 #72
sarge43 Nov 2012 #103
Javaman Nov 2012 #148
sarge43 Nov 2012 #149
awoke_in_2003 Nov 2012 #130
grasswire Nov 2012 #7
struggle4progress Nov 2012 #8
GeorgeGist Nov 2012 #58
rosesaylavee Nov 2012 #79
struggle4progress Nov 2012 #89
ronnie624 Nov 2012 #153
NRaleighLiberal Nov 2012 #9
pinto Nov 2012 #18
skydive forever Nov 2012 #10
erpowers Nov 2012 #54
Rozlee Nov 2012 #81
sarge43 Nov 2012 #102
Thrill Nov 2012 #11
grahamhgreen Nov 2012 #12
coalition_unwilling Nov 2012 #129
grahamhgreen Nov 2012 #131
coalition_unwilling Nov 2012 #132
SharonRB Nov 2012 #162
grahamhgreen Nov 2012 #163
wicket Nov 2012 #13
valerief Nov 2012 #14
Scuba Nov 2012 #35
Zen Democrat Nov 2012 #40
valerief Nov 2012 #48
onenote Nov 2012 #70
rurallib Nov 2012 #15
Bernardo de La Paz Nov 2012 #16
JohnnyRingo Nov 2012 #17
BainsBane Nov 2012 #19
moobu2 Nov 2012 #23
mac56 Nov 2012 #25
randome Nov 2012 #39
lexw Nov 2012 #42
BainsBane Nov 2012 #44
Liberal Veteran Nov 2012 #62
wordpix Nov 2012 #111
Agnosticsherbet Nov 2012 #26
valerief Nov 2012 #49
Bernardo de La Paz Nov 2012 #73
BainsBane Nov 2012 #115
underpants Nov 2012 #113
Blue_Tires Nov 2012 #21
bayareamike Nov 2012 #24
Blue_Tires Nov 2012 #28
glinda Nov 2012 #38
ciking724 Nov 2012 #32
demhottie Nov 2012 #41
Maven Nov 2012 #82
struggle4progress Nov 2012 #29
are_you_serious_1234 Nov 2012 #122
struggle4progress Nov 2012 #124
are_you_serious_1234 Nov 2012 #135
Kolesar Nov 2012 #30
PCIntern Nov 2012 #33
Schema Thing Nov 2012 #34
windowpilot Nov 2012 #36
demwing Nov 2012 #50
windowpilot Nov 2012 #74
demwing Nov 2012 #114
windowpilot Nov 2012 #116
demwing Nov 2012 #134
windowpilot Nov 2012 #139
demwing Nov 2012 #143
windowpilot Nov 2012 #145
demwing Nov 2012 #147
windowpilot Nov 2012 #150
demwing Nov 2012 #154
Marrah_G Nov 2012 #157
MoonchildCA Nov 2012 #37
demwing Nov 2012 #46
Bernardo de La Paz Nov 2012 #78
olddad56 Nov 2012 #109
Bernardo de La Paz Nov 2012 #117
sarge43 Nov 2012 #151
blueclown Nov 2012 #47
struggle4progress Nov 2012 #51
barbtries Nov 2012 #53
MrYikes Nov 2012 #55
ciking724 Nov 2012 #56
randome Nov 2012 #60
Octafish Nov 2012 #63
olddad56 Nov 2012 #64
Indi Guy Nov 2012 #67
graham4anything Nov 2012 #68
ffr Nov 2012 #69
TwilightGardener Nov 2012 #71
grahamhgreen Nov 2012 #76
are_you_serious_1234 Nov 2012 #112
Gin Nov 2012 #77
Dash87 Nov 2012 #83
HereSince1628 Nov 2012 #85
Laurian Nov 2012 #87
reflection Nov 2012 #88
aletier_v Nov 2012 #123
SouthLouisianaWoman Nov 2012 #91
olddad56 Nov 2012 #107
vdogg Nov 2012 #92
TwilightGardener Nov 2012 #133
Caeser67 Nov 2012 #93
Solly Mack Nov 2012 #94
Panasonic Nov 2012 #95
bobthedrummer Nov 2012 #96
MrDiaz Nov 2012 #97
olddad56 Nov 2012 #101
csziggy Nov 2012 #110
watrwefitinfor Nov 2012 #104
nolabels Nov 2012 #158
Phlem Nov 2012 #105
Ter Nov 2012 #119
CRH Nov 2012 #126
cstanleytech Nov 2012 #136
adicortez Nov 2012 #137
cstanleytech Nov 2012 #140
David__77 Nov 2012 #141
pointsoflight Nov 2012 #142
David__77 Nov 2012 #144
Locut0s Nov 2012 #159
aandegoons Nov 2012 #146
ronnie624 Nov 2012 #152
glinda Nov 2012 #155
ronnie624 Nov 2012 #160
Tutonic Nov 2012 #156
glinda Nov 2012 #161

Response to kpete (Original post)

Fri Nov 9, 2012, 02:57 PM

1. Tweet from watchdog progressive

Watchdog Progressive ‏@Watchdogsniffer
BREAKING: Gen. David Petraeus resigns CIA due to personal reasons..... engaged in an extra-marital affair via #MSNBC #p2

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to NRaleighLiberal (Reply #1)

Fri Nov 9, 2012, 02:59 PM

3. holy cow!

You have to wonder if he was holding that letter till after the election

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to demwing (Reply #3)

Fri Nov 9, 2012, 03:12 PM

22. That's a good question

I hadn't considered that Petraeus may have been waiting so as not to affect the election. If so, I respect his patriotic decision not to steal the limelight from the CIC.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to JohnnyRingo (Reply #22)

Fri Nov 9, 2012, 03:25 PM

45. Ditto...had not considered that. nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to JohnnyRingo (Reply #22)

Fri Nov 9, 2012, 03:45 PM

65. Not Patriotic

I am not trying to be mean to you, but his decision to wait until after the election, if that is what he did, was not patriotic. It was a good thing, but not patriotic.

There was no reason for General Petraeus' affair to be a part of the election. President Obama did not have anything to do with the affair. It was not and is not in the President's job description to prevent people from cheating on their spouses.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to erpowers (Reply #65)

Fri Nov 9, 2012, 03:53 PM

75. But some would have claimed it was Obama forcing him out

and they would have tried it to Benghazi (eg Fox News). Petraeus is generally seen as Republican-leaning. No, it'd wouldn't make any sense, but then they gave up doing that some time ago. It would have been a mess, and I think it's good that it didn't happen right before the election; if he did delay until after, that reflects well on him (he's not a crazy Republican).

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to muriel_volestrangler (Reply #75)

Fri Nov 9, 2012, 04:21 PM

90. I am wondering if he had any role in furthering the

rumors re the Benghazi mess.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to erpowers (Reply #65)

Fri Nov 9, 2012, 06:21 PM

106. Whether you consider it patriotic or not...

...and whether or not you like him, he's a lifer in the military, and as such I'm sure he respects the chain of command.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to erpowers (Reply #65)

Fri Nov 9, 2012, 08:53 PM

125. I don't believe anyone knows about his decision regarding "when" to turn

 

in his resignation, so let's stop all the guessing and innuendos. Serves no purpose because we'll never know.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to NRaleighLiberal (Reply #1)

Fri Nov 9, 2012, 02:59 PM

4. Wow! CIA director having an affair? Pillow talk could be dangerous

to our national security.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to loudsue (Reply #4)

Fri Nov 9, 2012, 03:16 PM

27. yes. Being blackmailed, even moresoe

which is the real concern.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to pasto76 (Reply #27)

Fri Nov 9, 2012, 03:19 PM

31. Blackmail? All you have to say is "OK, go public", which he did.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to loudsue (Reply #4)

Fri Nov 9, 2012, 11:25 PM

138. Especially those from the Soviet Union!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kpete (Original post)

Fri Nov 9, 2012, 02:59 PM

2. Turn out the lights the Petraeus is over.

Part of me wouldn't mind seeing the CIA closed. Although they did help get OBL, they didn't stop 9/11. They're pretty expensive for doing such a poor job.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Democrats_win (Reply #2)

Fri Nov 9, 2012, 03:45 PM

66. Bush did not bother to read the Presidential Daily Breifing that the CIA presented to him

 

regarding possible Al Qaeda attacks on US soil. I think his stated reason for resigning is probably cover and he was asked to leave by the President for his handling of the Benghazi attacks.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to xtraxritical (Reply #66)

Fri Nov 9, 2012, 04:09 PM

86. Nonsense. nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Democrats_win (Reply #2)

Fri Nov 9, 2012, 09:19 PM

127. They completely missed the impending breakup of the USSR. What a bunch of fuckwads - n/t

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kpete (Original post)

Fri Nov 9, 2012, 02:59 PM

5. Petraeus needs to answer some questions about Benghazi!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Suich (Reply #5)

Fri Nov 9, 2012, 09:20 PM

128. He deserves the same treatment as Bradley Manning received and is receiving. Full

 

Court Martial. Solitary confinement and forced to stand naked.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kpete (Original post)

Fri Nov 9, 2012, 03:00 PM

6. Extra-Marital Affair???

Enough of a reason to resign? Vulnerable to blackmail?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Mme. Defarge (Reply #6)

Fri Nov 9, 2012, 03:11 PM

20. No. Once you admit to whatever you've done ...

... blackmailers got nothing.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to JustABozoOnThisBus (Reply #20)

Fri Nov 9, 2012, 03:23 PM

43. He admitted post hoc due to the affair., not despite it.

He admitted post hoc due to the affair., not despite it.

Had he kept silent, the potential for blackmail would indeed have been present.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to LanternWaste (Reply #43)

Fri Nov 9, 2012, 03:39 PM

57. What about the potential

BEFORE he publicly confessed and resigned?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Mme. Defarge (Reply #57)

Fri Nov 9, 2012, 03:44 PM

61. Do you think President Clinton should have resigned?

I don't. What makes Petraeus' infidelity more troubling. Do you think the President has a lower security clearance than the CIA director?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to onenote (Reply #61)

Fri Nov 9, 2012, 03:58 PM

80. One difference is that CIA agents who have affairs

are often forced to resign.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to dsc (Reply #80)

Fri Nov 9, 2012, 04:05 PM

84. Why should they be?

If its because of the risk of them disclosing secrets or being blackmailed, what differentiates them from any other official with a top secret security clearance, including the President?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to onenote (Reply #84)

Fri Nov 9, 2012, 05:53 PM

99. Because they can't hold a security clearance.

By having an affair, they've demonstrated they will lie to someone who is supposed to be extremely important to them.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to jeff47 (Reply #99)

Fri Nov 9, 2012, 05:59 PM

100. Isn't that true of anyone that has a security clearance, including the president

I'm playing devil's advocate a bit here, but seeing as I didn't think President Clinton's infidelity while in office justified calls for his resignation, I'm wondering why it seems so self-evident that Petraeus, or others who have security clearances, are held to a different standard.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to onenote (Reply #100)

Fri Nov 9, 2012, 07:53 PM

118. The President doesn't have a security clearance

He is the security clearance.

Congress delegated the entire security clearance process to the Executive branch. The process flows from executive orders, many of which delegate the process further.

What that means is the President has access to all classified information no matter what. Even if he has been convicted of espionage. There's no one who has the authority to cut off his access as long as he's in office.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to jeff47 (Reply #118)

Fri Nov 9, 2012, 08:02 PM

120. doesn't that just make my point?

If the reason for demanding the resignation of someone with access to secret information who has an affair is that they might compromise security by letting slip some information or might be susceptible to blackmail, why wouldn't the same standard apply to the president, who has the greatest access to secret information of anyone?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to onenote (Reply #120)

Fri Nov 9, 2012, 08:22 PM

121. Patraus's resignation isn't to take away his clearance

The resignation is because he can't do the job because his clearance is gone.

There's no mechanism to take away a President's clearance.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to onenote (Reply #61)

Fri Nov 9, 2012, 06:27 PM

108. He did not have sex with that woman, said so himself.

should Bush have resigned for banging Condi?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to JustABozoOnThisBus (Reply #20)


Response to Mme. Defarge (Reply #6)

Fri Nov 9, 2012, 03:34 PM

52. It's against military regs, believe it or not. nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Javaman (Reply #52)

Fri Nov 9, 2012, 03:41 PM

59. He's not in the Army any more

Retired in 2011.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Javaman (Reply #52)

Fri Nov 9, 2012, 03:51 PM

72. Just yesterday General Sinclare got caught up in a similar scandal.

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Javaman (Reply #52)

Fri Nov 9, 2012, 06:09 PM

103. He's retired. The UCMJ doesn't apply. n/t

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to sarge43 (Reply #103)

Sat Nov 10, 2012, 10:14 AM

148. Duh, you're right. My bad. nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Javaman (Reply #148)

Sat Nov 10, 2012, 10:37 AM

149. It doesn't apply that often to active duty types.

An army corps, a major air command or fleet could be formed up with all the military who violate that article. Looking at you, John McCain.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Mme. Defarge (Reply #6)

Fri Nov 9, 2012, 09:55 PM

130. Affairs are a court martial offense...

under the UCMJ

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kpete (Original post)

Fri Nov 9, 2012, 03:01 PM

7. he was blackmailable ----- holy crap

So, so against national security.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kpete (Original post)

Fri Nov 9, 2012, 03:01 PM

8. NBC: David Petraeus resigns from CIA

3:00PM EST November 9. 2012 - NBC reported Friday that CIA director David Petraeus has resigned from the CIA, citing an extramarital affair.

NBC's Andrea Mitchell said the resignation was submitted in a letter dated Friday and was accepted by the White House.

In a letter, Petraeus noted that he had been married for 37 years and had exercised "extremely poor judgment' in conducting an extramarital affair ...

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2012/11/09/david-petraeus-cia-resign-nbc/1695271/

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to struggle4progress (Reply #8)

Fri Nov 9, 2012, 03:41 PM

58. Why do people parrot ...

what the OP has already made clear?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to GeorgeGist (Reply #58)

Fri Nov 9, 2012, 03:55 PM

79. no doubt the admins have combined multiple related threads into one. nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to GeorgeGist (Reply #58)

Fri Nov 9, 2012, 04:15 PM

89. IIRC OP when I first posted had no link

Red edit message is currently suppressed due to high traffic

I looked for, and posted, material I thought provided more info

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to GeorgeGist (Reply #58)

Sat Nov 10, 2012, 11:22 AM

153. To look smart, informed and snappy;

an opportunity to post a link and drive up your post count.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink



Response to NRaleighLiberal (Reply #9)

Fri Nov 9, 2012, 03:10 PM

18. The MSNBC video clip - Mitchell reads the letter. Apparently the President has accepted resignation.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kpete (Original post)

Fri Nov 9, 2012, 03:03 PM

10. This is surprising because to be a general

you have to be very disciplined. This shows even someone like him is human deep down.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to skydive forever (Reply #10)

Fri Nov 9, 2012, 03:36 PM

54. Not Really

It seems that you really do not have to be very disciplined to be a general. A number of generals, admirals, and high ranking officers get into trouble concerning sex and other things. Generals and high ranking officers can be a wild bunch. It seems you just do not hear about it all the time.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to skydive forever (Reply #10)

Fri Nov 9, 2012, 04:04 PM

81. It happened to Dwight D. Eisenhower.

The scuttlebutt claims he even wanted to leave Mamie for Kay Summersby but got such a dressing down from the brass back home, that he backed down. I was reading once that men in high offices and positions of power have more testosterone than men in everyday life. That usually translates to higher sex drives according to the article. Individual morals and conscience take over from there.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to skydive forever (Reply #10)

Fri Nov 9, 2012, 06:08 PM

102. Not really

Eisenhower and Kay Summersby immediately come to mind.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kpete (Original post)

Fri Nov 9, 2012, 03:04 PM

11. He must be fucking a high profile person in Washington

Or he wouldn't be resigning

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kpete (Original post)

Fri Nov 9, 2012, 03:05 PM

12. Awesome! Now can we appoint someone who understands that blowback from these idiotic CIA exploits

(such as hiring bin Laden) is more costly than doing nothing?

I suggest Kucinich.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to grahamhgreen (Reply #12)

Fri Nov 9, 2012, 09:32 PM

129. Would it be utter heresy to suggest Ralph Nader or Noam Chomsky? - n/t

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to coalition_unwilling (Reply #129)

Fri Nov 9, 2012, 09:59 PM

131. How bout Valerie Plame?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to grahamhgreen (Reply #131)

Fri Nov 9, 2012, 10:00 PM

132. I'd settle for her or her husband. One thing's for sure. Neither would have

 

missed the impending break-up of the USSR.

Jay-sus, you can't make this shit up.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to grahamhgreen (Reply #131)

Mon Nov 12, 2012, 09:24 PM

162. I said this to my husband the other night

I was only half joking. I'd love to see Republican heads explode by having her or Joe Wilson named as head of the CIA. Talk about karma!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to SharonRB (Reply #162)

Mon Nov 12, 2012, 09:33 PM

163. You know, they should just float the names to drive the R's crazy!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kpete (Original post)

Fri Nov 9, 2012, 03:06 PM

13. Cheated on his wife!

WOW!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kpete (Original post)

Fri Nov 9, 2012, 03:07 PM

14. Jeez, more sex nonsense wallpapering the news. What a moronic country. Avoid real problems

to deal with consensual sex nonsense.

Unless, of course, the sex nonsense is a cover for something real.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to valerief (Reply #14)

Fri Nov 9, 2012, 03:20 PM

35. Bingo. There is no blackmail if he just says "yes, I did that".

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to valerief (Reply #14)

Fri Nov 9, 2012, 03:22 PM

40. If it's the CIA Director it's inexcusable because he's open to blackmail.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Zen Democrat (Reply #40)

Fri Nov 9, 2012, 03:31 PM

48. All of our elected officials are open to blackmail. nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Zen Democrat (Reply #40)

Fri Nov 9, 2012, 03:49 PM

70. Why is it less excusable than the president himself being unfaithful

I didn't think President Clinton's infidelity disqualified him from serving as president and he obviously has as high a security clearance as anyone in government.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kpete (Original post)

Fri Nov 9, 2012, 03:07 PM

15. so much for that run at the presidency.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kpete (Original post)

Fri Nov 9, 2012, 03:08 PM

16. My, my, how the darlings of the moralizing right turn out . . . nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kpete (Original post)

Fri Nov 9, 2012, 03:09 PM

17. He must have known it was coming out soon

That's the reason he has to go. If the CIA director puts himself in a position where he can be blackmailed, it puts US security at risk.

Surprising conduct from a man who is known for his professionalism.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kpete (Original post)

Fri Nov 9, 2012, 03:10 PM

19. This is about Benghazi

The CIA screwed up the intel and made the White House look bad.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to BainsBane (Reply #19)

Fri Nov 9, 2012, 03:13 PM

23. He may have been flushed out by the investigation

or was scared he would have been found out. There's no way he could have hidden anything like this.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to BainsBane (Reply #19)

Fri Nov 9, 2012, 03:14 PM

25. Or maybe... and I know this suggestion is just plain nuts...

but maybe it is just what it appears to be.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to mac56 (Reply #25)

Fri Nov 9, 2012, 03:21 PM

39. That's the nuttiest suggestion so far!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to mac56 (Reply #25)

Fri Nov 9, 2012, 03:23 PM

42. :)

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to mac56 (Reply #25)

Fri Nov 9, 2012, 03:24 PM

44. MSNBC reported that Obama was about to dump Petraeus

over Benghazi. That was before the affair story become public. Evidently he has never been a good fit with the CIA since he comes from a military background.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to mac56 (Reply #25)

Fri Nov 9, 2012, 03:44 PM

62. Worst Conspiracy Theory Ever!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to mac56 (Reply #25)

Fri Nov 9, 2012, 06:39 PM

111. if so, it's a wacky reason to leave service

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to BainsBane (Reply #19)

Fri Nov 9, 2012, 03:15 PM

26. According to Petreus, there was screwing going on...

But to be unfaithful with an entire city? I can't see it.

I don't see any evidence this is about Benghazi, and if he was being fired, convincing him to trash his own life is the wrong way to do it.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to BainsBane (Reply #19)

Fri Nov 9, 2012, 03:32 PM

49. That makes the most sense to me. nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to BainsBane (Reply #19)

Fri Nov 9, 2012, 03:52 PM

73. Utter nonsense. Right is spinnging that shite. Petraeus fell of own moral failing. He wasn't pushed.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Bernardo de La Paz (Reply #73)

Fri Nov 9, 2012, 07:08 PM

115. This is what I heard

Before the affair story broke. On MSNBC they said that Obama wanted to get rid of Petraeus. They thought it was a result of Benghazi. Now they could have been wrong. Then a couple of hours later this story breaks. I did NOT base my post on a right wing source.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to BainsBane (Reply #19)

Fri Nov 9, 2012, 06:55 PM

113. I heard that on tape delay of Hannity's show (sit hosts)

of course when all you have is a hammer everything looks like a nail

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kpete (Original post)

Fri Nov 9, 2012, 03:12 PM

21. I'm wondering if the "affair" is a smokescreen for a much worse reason...

Something the general public couldn't easily digest and dismiss...Something that isn't as media-friendly as a sex sandal between consenting adults...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Blue_Tires (Reply #21)

Fri Nov 9, 2012, 03:14 PM

24. Any hypotheses? nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to bayareamike (Reply #24)

Fri Nov 9, 2012, 03:16 PM

28. Some people are already saying Benghazi

And it could be, but he was CIA so it could be damn near anything...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to bayareamike (Reply #24)

Fri Nov 9, 2012, 03:21 PM

38. He had an affair. It was going to be outed and used against the current Government? He decided

to step down to avoid more tension in this Country?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Blue_Tires (Reply #21)

Fri Nov 9, 2012, 03:19 PM

32. Maybe like a non-heterosexual affair? That was my first thought.

My next thought is that Rove and his cohorts tried to get him to play along with that Benghazi thing and he wouldn't, so they were going to expose him. This sounds more believable to me.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ciking724 (Reply #32)

Fri Nov 9, 2012, 03:23 PM

41. sounds plausible

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ciking724 (Reply #32)

Fri Nov 9, 2012, 04:04 PM

82. Holy crap - I bet you're absolutely right about Rove blackmailing him

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kpete (Original post)

Fri Nov 9, 2012, 03:17 PM

29. CIA Director Petraeus Resigns, Cites Extramarital Affair

... "Yesterday afternoon, I went to the White House and asked the President to be allowed, for personal reasons, to resign from my position," Petraeus said in his resignation letter. "After being married for over 37 years, I showed extremely poor judgment by engaging in an extramarital affair. Such behavior is unacceptable, both as a husband and as the leader of an organization such as ours."

"This afternoon, the President graciously accepted my resignation," Petraeus said in the letter ...

http://www.nbcbayarea.com/news/national-international/NATL-CIA-Director-Petraeus-Resigns-Cites-Extra-Marital-Affair-178159541.html

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to struggle4progress (Reply #29)

Fri Nov 9, 2012, 08:25 PM

122. The story goes that the FBI was investigating something broader when they ran into this affair.

Anyone have any theories of what that investigation may have been about?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to are_you_serious_1234 (Reply #122)

Fri Nov 9, 2012, 08:39 PM

124. they were investigating her as a source of leaks, according to rumor

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to struggle4progress (Reply #124)

Fri Nov 9, 2012, 10:46 PM

135. Ok. Hadn't heard that rumor. Thanks for the update.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kpete (Original post)

Fri Nov 9, 2012, 03:17 PM

30. Petraeus, betrayus,

but whatever you do, don't lay us!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kpete (Original post)

Fri Nov 9, 2012, 03:19 PM

33. Honest to God, I thought this was an Onion headline...

wow.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kpete (Original post)

Fri Nov 9, 2012, 03:20 PM

34. geez, James Bond does not approve this message!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kpete (Original post)

Fri Nov 9, 2012, 03:20 PM

36. Motherfucker betrayed us, and his ol lady.

 

n/t

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to windowpilot (Reply #36)

Fri Nov 9, 2012, 03:32 PM

50. I dont FEEL betrayed

how did he betray us?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to demwing (Reply #50)

Fri Nov 9, 2012, 03:52 PM

74. He betray the American people with his assessment of Iraq...

 

Welcome to DU...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to windowpilot (Reply #74)

Fri Nov 9, 2012, 06:58 PM

114. welcome?

Thanks, I guess? I've been here for years...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to demwing (Reply #114)


Response to windowpilot (Reply #116)

Fri Nov 9, 2012, 10:11 PM

134. oh you're being "clever"

Sorry, I didn't notice

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to demwing (Reply #134)

Fri Nov 9, 2012, 11:44 PM

139. My apologies if I offend.

 

I try to ignore all the 180's on this site, but sometimes it's hard when they ask stupid questions...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to windowpilot (Reply #139)

Sat Nov 10, 2012, 12:32 AM

143. You know there are no "stupid questions" :)

but I have heard some very ridiculous answers.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to demwing (Reply #143)


Response to windowpilot (Reply #145)

Sat Nov 10, 2012, 09:42 AM

147. Yep, I'm sure.

what else ya got?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to demwing (Reply #147)

Sat Nov 10, 2012, 10:44 AM

150. I've got nothing for you.

 

Some people live and learn, others just post...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to windowpilot (Reply #150)

Sat Nov 10, 2012, 12:25 PM

154. And in the end, we agree

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to windowpilot (Reply #145)

Sat Nov 10, 2012, 06:08 PM

157. If you have been here for so long you should realize that your behavior is against the rules

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kpete (Original post)

Fri Nov 9, 2012, 03:21 PM

37. I agree with others...

...you have to question whether this is about an affair. Though embarrassing and a bit scandalous, it's not necessarily a career killer. Resignation is.

Whatever his reasons were, I respect him for holding off until after the election.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kpete (Original post)

Fri Nov 9, 2012, 03:30 PM

46. So...Big Dog to run the CIA?

I can't imagine a smarter, more connected person, with the ability to see all angles on a situation.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to demwing (Reply #46)

Fri Nov 9, 2012, 03:54 PM

78. I can't see Bill being interested. Hillary, though, after Sec of State, hmmm? nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Bernardo de La Paz (Reply #78)

Fri Nov 9, 2012, 06:30 PM

109. Let Bill take Hillary's job.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to olddad56 (Reply #109)

Fri Nov 9, 2012, 07:47 PM

117. Bill might like that. But it would drive the right wing crazy. Oh, wait, they already are crazy. nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Bernardo de La Paz (Reply #117)

Sat Nov 10, 2012, 10:48 AM

151. Nope. Can't wet that water. n/t

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kpete (Original post)

Fri Nov 9, 2012, 03:30 PM

47. Petraeus/Gingrich 2016

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kpete (Original post)

Fri Nov 9, 2012, 03:33 PM

51. David Petraeus resigns as CIA director

By Greg Miller, Friday, November 9, 3:18 PM

... In a statement, Obama said that Petraeus has “provided extraordinary service to the United States for decades,” saying that “through his lifetime of service David Petraeus has made our country safer and stronger.”

Although the statement did not directly address Petraeus’s reason for resigning, the president said his “thoughts and prayers are with Dave and Holly Petraeus, who has done so much to help military families through her own work. I wish them the very best at this difficult time.”

Over the past week, Petraeus had traveled to Libya and Jordan, and directed the agency’s response to the controversy surrounding the attack on the U.S. mission in Benghazi. Officials said Petraeus insisted the controversy had nothing to do with his decision to resign.

He came into the CIA job after a distinguished U.S. Army career that carried him from West Point to leadership positions in which he was tapped to lead the war efforts in Afghanistan and Iraq ...

http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/david-petraeus-resigns-as-cia-director/2012/11/09/636d204e-2aa8-11e2-bab2-eda299503684_story.html

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kpete (Original post)

Fri Nov 9, 2012, 03:34 PM

53. he should apologize to his wife,

or get a divorce, but why does he have to resign his job? republicans in congress never do.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kpete (Original post)

Fri Nov 9, 2012, 03:38 PM

55. He must now lose his retirement account. To accept it would be dishonorable.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kpete (Original post)

Fri Nov 9, 2012, 03:39 PM

56. Didn't that clown Bob Woodward make reference to another story

that the Romney people were peddling, but tried to hook him with inside information on Benghazi? I remember reading something that Woodward said a few days ago, when he said they showed up at his house.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ciking724 (Reply #56)

Fri Nov 9, 2012, 03:44 PM

60. Yeah, but they gave him nothing but delays and obfuscation.

To the point where even Woodward was disgusted with them.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kpete (Original post)

Fri Nov 9, 2012, 03:45 PM

63. So. Another general gets caught with his pants down?

What was it Gen. Patton said about soldiers who won't fornicate?

Whatever it was, he wasn't talking about the head of the CIA.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kpete (Original post)

Fri Nov 9, 2012, 03:45 PM

64. would ypu expect more from him? Not me.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kpete (Original post)

Fri Nov 9, 2012, 03:45 PM

67. Little doubt that the CIA itself wanted him out - so he was nuetralized. n/t

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kpete (Original post)

Fri Nov 9, 2012, 03:48 PM

68. Good riddance, tata farewell, auf weidershein goodbye

 

this is good news indeed.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kpete (Original post)

Fri Nov 9, 2012, 03:49 PM

69. Friday news dump. I'm resigning & after the election

It's what is best for the country. He did right in his timing.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kpete (Original post)

Fri Nov 9, 2012, 03:50 PM

71. Whoa. That's a disappointment.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kpete (Original post)

Fri Nov 9, 2012, 03:54 PM

76. Pictures!!!! Can we see the pics, please?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to grahamhgreen (Reply #76)

Fri Nov 9, 2012, 06:44 PM

112. I don't really want to see any pictures.

Thanks.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kpete (Original post)

Fri Nov 9, 2012, 03:54 PM

77. Maybe baby on the way

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kpete (Original post)

Fri Nov 9, 2012, 04:04 PM

83. Did the Republicans try to blackmail him to attack Obama on Benghazi?

Totally baseless theory. Just speculating.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kpete (Original post)

Fri Nov 9, 2012, 04:07 PM

85. IDIOT!!!! Penis' little head thinking rather than his BIG head

String the ass up on his petard and be DONE with him.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kpete (Original post)

Fri Nov 9, 2012, 04:09 PM

87. I've never been a fan of Petraeus, so I'm not distressed by this. But

I will be interested to see if there is more to this story.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kpete (Original post)

Fri Nov 9, 2012, 04:09 PM

88. Man, the wingnuts are going to be howling at the moon

for the next few weeks. Even the hamster that spins the wheel of the Free Republic server will be screaming "CONSPIRACY"

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to reflection (Reply #88)

Fri Nov 9, 2012, 08:28 PM

123. freepers ARE screaming conspiracy but I'm fascinated by

how they hate Patraeus, too.

Both sites hate Boehner, too.

It's quite interesting.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kpete (Original post)

Fri Nov 9, 2012, 04:27 PM

91. Tom Ricks on CNN just said...

...that this may be a result of the Army officer on trial for sexual offenses. Ricks said that the officer--Sinclair--has supposedly said that if he's going to do time then he's going to take others with him. And maybe Petraeus is one of them.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to SouthLouisianaWoman (Reply #91)

Fri Nov 9, 2012, 06:25 PM

107. Cool, bring them all down.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kpete (Original post)

Fri Nov 9, 2012, 04:29 PM

92. This must be

The sex scandal bombshell that drudge was talking about. Honestly thought they were just trying to stir up bullshit before the election. Guess even a stopped clock is right twice a day.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to vdogg (Reply #92)

Fri Nov 9, 2012, 10:04 PM

133. No--the Drudge story was Bob Menendez and hookers.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kpete (Original post)

Fri Nov 9, 2012, 04:46 PM

93. John McCain

Just lost his favorite General. Goes the hope of Republicans, EVERYWHERE.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kpete (Original post)

Fri Nov 9, 2012, 04:48 PM

94. lolololololol

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kpete (Original post)

Fri Nov 9, 2012, 04:50 PM

95. Bye Betrayus.

 

Put in a real bulldog that'll help start cutting off black ops and redirect the slush funds back to the U.S. Treasury.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kpete (Original post)

Fri Nov 9, 2012, 05:34 PM

96. US COIN man...SOF...

kick


Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kpete (Original post)

Fri Nov 9, 2012, 05:46 PM

97. SINCE WHEN DOES

 

having an affair make you not qualified to direct the CIA? Is he still gonna testify for Obama on the Benghazi BS?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kpete (Original post)

Fri Nov 9, 2012, 06:02 PM

101. Could it have been Paula Broadwell?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to olddad56 (Reply #101)

Fri Nov 9, 2012, 06:38 PM

110. That's what they are saying on MSNBC Hardball

And that she may have seen information she should not have. I was working on a project and not paying complete attention so I didn't catch all the details.

It was discussed on Hardball - watch the re-run coming up in at 7 ET.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kpete (Original post)

Fri Nov 9, 2012, 06:18 PM

104. I'm still trying to figure out why he was made head of CIA to start with! n/t

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to watrwefitinfor (Reply #104)

Sat Nov 10, 2012, 07:55 PM

158. Probably because he hadn't been in working for the C.I.A. yet

or a least had a W-2 with their name on it. These military brass guys are all about the resumes

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kpete (Original post)

Fri Nov 9, 2012, 06:19 PM

105. Is that all

or is he covering up something much worse?

-p

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kpete (Original post)

Fri Nov 9, 2012, 08:00 PM

119. Let me get this stright

 

The CIA covers up the JFK assassination and untold other secrets. Yet the head of it can't hide something as simple as his own affair? Wow, anyone that incompetent should resign.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kpete (Original post)

Fri Nov 9, 2012, 09:03 PM

126. lol, what a joke, ...

All the sleasy shit the CIA has done over the years in the name of country and Wall St., and he is going to fall on an infidelity sword? I smell something much more rotten than is being said.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kpete (Original post)

Fri Nov 9, 2012, 10:48 PM

136. You all remember when Cheney back in 2007 said

"Like most Americans I admire the integrity and the candor that General Petraeus showed in his hearings before Congress." ? I wonder if he regrets those words now?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kpete (Original post)

Fri Nov 9, 2012, 11:17 PM

137. He was a great General.

If Gingrich can come back (for a short-lived run at POTUS) so can he. I hope he doesn't. Obama had nothing but good things to say about the man so I'll trust his judgement.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to adicortez (Reply #137)

Sat Nov 10, 2012, 12:05 AM

140. Great? Thats more of a matter of opinion really but lets assume he was one

he is still a piece of shit for cheating on his wife just like Clinton while being a great president (in my opinion atleast) is a piece of shit for cheating on Hillary and Gingrich is a piece of shit for cheating on his varies wives.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kpete (Original post)

Sat Nov 10, 2012, 12:07 AM

141. That's a ludicrous reason to resign.

In fact, if he is otherwise the best person for the job, it is entirely irresponsible and the resignation should be rejected.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to David__77 (Reply #141)

Sat Nov 10, 2012, 12:28 AM

142. The person he had an affair with breeched security and accessed his e-mails.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to pointsoflight (Reply #142)

Sat Nov 10, 2012, 01:00 AM

144. Ah, a different story.

And I would hope the media are framing it as such.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to David__77 (Reply #144)

Sat Nov 10, 2012, 11:43 PM

159. It's the media what do you expect. If there's sex involved NOTHING else matters.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kpete (Original post)

Sat Nov 10, 2012, 07:13 AM

146. Looks like betrayal runs deep in this scum.

Who would have ever guessed.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kpete (Original post)

Sat Nov 10, 2012, 11:05 AM

152. As for who will replace Petraeus in the longterm,

a former senior intelligence official told AOL Defense that Mike Vickers is a leading candidate.

"The prevailing wisdom is that Mike Vickers wants this with all his heart and soul," the official told AOL Defense. Vickers, now the Undersecretary of Defense for Intelligence, is the legendary former CIA operative who led the war against the Soviets in Afghanistan chronicled in the book, Charlie Wilson's War. Another candidate is Stephanie O'Sullivan, the principal Deputy Director of National Intelligence.


I guess we can look forward to more of the same old shit from the CIA.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ronnie624 (Reply #152)

Sat Nov 10, 2012, 03:27 PM

155. This would be a great time to clean house over there.

If even possible....

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to glinda (Reply #155)

Sun Nov 11, 2012, 01:20 AM

160. RIP anyone who makes an earnest attempt.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kpete (Original post)

Sat Nov 10, 2012, 06:04 PM

156. Hearing that she made threats to "two non-family women"

Could the General be a Playa?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Tutonic (Reply #156)

Sun Nov 11, 2012, 09:31 PM

161. I thought it was one? Who is the second one?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread