Tue Oct 16, 2012, 02:46 PM
kpete (39,116 posts)
Fox Botches Report On Decision To Uphold Early Voting In Ohio
Source: Media Matters
Just minutes after the Supreme Court ruled to allow early voting in Ohio the weekend before Election Day, Fox News host Jon Scott falsely claimed that the Obama campaign sought to stop military families from early voting in the state. Scott further botched the state's early voting history when he claimed that Democrats sought to limit early voting when in fact, it was Republicans. The real story is that Ohio expanded early voting in 2008 and 2010 in response to long wait times for thousands of voters during the 2004 election. But last year, the Republican-controlled legislature eliminated in-person voting during the three days before the election for everyone but military families and overseas voters. In response, the Obama campaign and other Democrats filed a lawsuit seeking to restore early voting for all Ohioans. Today, the Supreme Court let stand a ruling that sided with the Obama campaign. Scott's rendition of these events conflicts with reality and ignores the role Republicans played to limit early voting: SCOTT: Ohio's voting laws are going to be changing, it would appear. There was an early voting program voted in by the state of Ohio for military members and their families. They were to be allowed to vote early. The Democrats and the Obama campaign asked that that be blocked. They, for whatever reason, did not want military families and military members voting extra early. A couple of lower courts blocked the law -- again, at the request of the Obama campaign and state Democratic officials. Now it's gone to the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court is going along with that block. According to our Shannon Bream, who covers the Supreme Court for us, we believe that is what is going to result from all of this is that everybody in Ohio is going to be allowed extra-early voting. No special privileges for military members and their families. Read more: Link tohttp://mediamatters.org/blog/2012/10/16/fox-botches-report-on-decision-to-uphold-early/190663 source Video: http://mediamatters.org/blog/2012/10/16/fox-botches-report-on-decision-to-uphold-early/190663
|
45 replies, 5799 views
| Author | Time | Post | |
| kpete | Oct 2012 | OP | |
| KamaAina | Oct 2012 | #1 | |
| GoCubsGo | Oct 2012 | #6 | |
| KamaAina | Oct 2012 | #8 | |
| valerief | Oct 2012 | #34 | |
| kracer20 | Oct 2012 | #30 | |
| beac | Oct 2012 | #36 | |
| Coyotl | Oct 2012 | #14 | |
| Rosa Luxemburg | Oct 2012 | #26 | |
| Jackpine Radical | Oct 2012 | #2 | |
| Angry Dragon | Oct 2012 | #7 | |
| fleur-de-lisa | Oct 2012 | #3 | |
| AFD | Oct 2012 | #11 | |
| dipsydoodle | Oct 2012 | #4 | |
| goclark | Oct 2012 | #9 | |
| hrmjustin | Oct 2012 | #5 | |
| EC | Oct 2012 | #10 | |
| hue | Oct 2012 | #12 | |
| patricia92243 | Oct 2012 | #13 | |
| young_at_heart | Oct 2012 | #15 | |
| kpete | Oct 2012 | #16 | |
| DHelix | Oct 2012 | #17 | |
| ProfessionalLeftist | Oct 2012 | #18 | |
| Monk06 | Oct 2012 | #19 | |
| sinkingfeeling | Oct 2012 | #20 | |
| DHelix | Oct 2012 | #21 | |
| SCVDem | Oct 2012 | #22 | |
| BainsBane | Oct 2012 | #23 | |
| musiclawyer | Oct 2012 | #24 | |
| Raster | Oct 2012 | #25 | |
| sakabatou | Oct 2012 | #27 | |
| 99th_Monkey | Oct 2012 | #28 | |
| Uncle Joe | Oct 2012 | #29 | |
| Pakid | Oct 2012 | #31 | |
| Spitfire of ATJ | Oct 2012 | #32 | |
| lindysalsagal | Oct 2012 | #33 | |
| geckosfeet | Oct 2012 | #35 | |
| marble falls | Oct 2012 | #37 | |
| Spitfire of ATJ | Oct 2012 | #39 | |
| marble falls | Oct 2012 | #41 | |
| Spitfire of ATJ | Oct 2012 | #43 | |
| ladjf | Oct 2012 | #38 | |
| Ms. Toad | Oct 2012 | #40 | |
| LisaL | Oct 2012 | #42 | |
| Ms. Toad | Oct 2012 | #44 | |
| kelliekat44 | Oct 2012 | #45 |
Response to kpete (Original post)
Tue Oct 16, 2012, 02:47 PM
KamaAina (45,687 posts)
1. "Botched"?
|
Don't you mean "deliberately distorted"?
|
Response to KamaAina (Reply #1)
Tue Oct 16, 2012, 02:51 PM
GoCubsGo (13,176 posts)
6. Yes.
|
They've been pushing that bullshit for as long as the Dems have been fighting the whole thing. It's not "botched". It's "Same shit, different day."
|
Response to GoCubsGo (Reply #6)
Tue Oct 16, 2012, 02:53 PM
KamaAina (45,687 posts)
8. They should change their name to "The Malarkey Channel"
|
|
Response to KamaAina (Reply #8)
Tue Oct 16, 2012, 05:13 PM
valerief (35,729 posts)
34. Bwahahaha! DUzy!
|
|
Response to GoCubsGo (Reply #6)
Tue Oct 16, 2012, 04:41 PM
kracer20 (19 posts)
30. FCC Complaints?
|
Would it be a giant waste of my time to try and file a complaint with the FCC? Yeah, I already know the answer.
This wasn't an error, this was an outright lie to deceive their viewers. Why aren't they held to at least some journalistic standards? |
Response to kracer20 (Reply #30)
Tue Oct 16, 2012, 05:48 PM
beac (9,361 posts)
36. Because they went to court to win their "right to lie"
|
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2007/07/31/364678/-Fox-News-wins-in-court
I think they should have been forced to replace "News" in their name with "BS" but the judges in Florida didn't see it that way. |
Response to KamaAina (Reply #1)
Tue Oct 16, 2012, 03:00 PM
Coyotl (5,403 posts)
14. Indeed, they are not going to change their lies just because the story has a new chapter.
|
Don't you mean "deliberate propaganda lies"?
|
Response to KamaAina (Reply #1)
Tue Oct 16, 2012, 03:38 PM
Rosa Luxemburg (22,271 posts)
26. They should be fined for relaying incorrect Supreme Court information
Response to kpete (Original post)
Tue Oct 16, 2012, 02:48 PM
Jackpine Radical (36,687 posts)
2. Botched?
|
Last edited Tue Oct 16, 2012, 02:50 PM USA/ET - Edit history (1) Is that a synonym for lied their asses off?
Trying to deal with all Fox's lies one at a time is a little like trying to protect a wheatfield from a hailstorm by catching the falling hailstones in a teacup. |
Response to Jackpine Radical (Reply #2)
Tue Oct 16, 2012, 02:51 PM
Angry Dragon (24,073 posts)
7. +34,296 ........ HE LIED
|
LIES
|
Response to kpete (Original post)
Tue Oct 16, 2012, 02:49 PM
fleur-de-lisa (1,605 posts)
3. I guess we shouldn't be expecting a retraction?
|
Do those assholes ever apologize?
|
Response to fleur-de-lisa (Reply #3)
Tue Oct 16, 2012, 02:58 PM
AFD (9 posts)
11. I guess we shouldn't be expecting a retraction?
|
You made me laugh. I needed that. Thanks!
|
Response to kpete (Original post)
Tue Oct 16, 2012, 02:49 PM
dipsydoodle (33,180 posts)
4. Shortly afterwards Scott said
|
Last edited Tue Oct 16, 2012, 03:02 PM USA/ET - Edit history (1) ![]() |
Response to dipsydoodle (Reply #4)
Tue Oct 16, 2012, 02:55 PM
goclark (30,404 posts)
9. That is a Straight Jacket -right?
|
That is exactly what he needs |
Response to kpete (Original post)
Tue Oct 16, 2012, 02:50 PM
hrmjustin (10,690 posts)
5. Bet there will be no correction.
Response to kpete (Original post)
Tue Oct 16, 2012, 02:56 PM
EC (11,499 posts)
10. They didn't botch it.
|
That's how they wanted it reported.
|
Response to kpete (Original post)
Tue Oct 16, 2012, 02:59 PM
hue (2,612 posts)
12. There is rarely a correction or apology. They really don't care about accuracy & never have.
|
They are paid to feed their sheeple with kool-aide!
|
Response to kpete (Original post)
Tue Oct 16, 2012, 03:00 PM
patricia92243 (7,569 posts)
13. This was a hatchet job - not a mistake (botch).
Response to kpete (Original post)
Tue Oct 16, 2012, 03:02 PM
young_at_heart (3,313 posts)
15. They have no right to call themselves a news organization!
|
What they air is anything BUT the news.
|
Response to young_at_heart (Reply #15)
Tue Oct 16, 2012, 03:04 PM
kpete (39,116 posts)
16. but
|
this is what we are up against...
peace, kp |
Response to kpete (Original post)
Tue Oct 16, 2012, 03:05 PM
DHelix (89 posts)
17. This kind of crap is exactly how their lies spread
|
They've done this with the birther thing.
They've done this with GM making cars in China (It's an international company producing cars for the Chinese market). They've done this with the Bangazi story. There has to be some accountability here. It's no wonder so many Americans are up in arms... They're being force fed lies directly from a TV station so they take them as fact. |
Response to kpete (Original post)
Tue Oct 16, 2012, 03:07 PM
ProfessionalLeftist (4,982 posts)
18. That's putting it nicely.
|
They flat-out LIED. Not that this is any different than what they usually do.
|
Response to kpete (Original post)
Tue Oct 16, 2012, 03:15 PM
Monk06 (5,623 posts)
19. It's the same lie about early voting in Ohio that they have been repeating all along. In spite of
|
Last edited Tue Oct 16, 2012, 03:16 PM USA/ET - Edit history (1) multiple corrections. They'll keep repeating it until Nov. 5, even though the result is everyone in Ohio gets to vote early. Which is exactly what the RW did not want.
Notice no mention that this is Roberts, 'conservative' court that made the final decision. It's the same old fascist trick. Keep repeating the lie until it sticks. |
Response to kpete (Original post)
Tue Oct 16, 2012, 03:21 PM
sinkingfeeling (28,087 posts)
20. That's SOP for Fox.
Response to kpete (Original post)
Tue Oct 16, 2012, 03:26 PM
DHelix (89 posts)
21. What bothers me the most is that our "liberal" media overcompensates to the Right now
|
Last edited Tue Oct 16, 2012, 03:31 PM USA/ET - Edit history (2) What bothers me the most is that our supposed "liberal" media overcompensates to the Right now based on them constantly saying that they're so hard done by and that none of their voices are being heard while they're full allowed to operate as a full on Propaganda and lies network for the Republicans. For every Democratic voice there now has to be the Republican counterpoint on all of the big networks and CNN. Meanwhile, on FOX do they ever... honestly... have the liberal counterpoint? I honestly don't know because I can't even watch their roundtable discussions for more than 20 seconds before I feel like throwing my remote through my TV screen.
So, our politicians and positions have to stand up to "balanced' criticism on all of the big networks and CNN while being ripped apart on Fox while they get "balanced" criticism from the big networks on CNN while being completely supported 100% by Fox. It gives them a huge unfair advantage. And what's worse is that a lot of the stuff coming from the Right is pure hypocritical, hateful, selfish, flies in the face of science and reason nonsense and yet the networks still have to give them a chance to share it and spread it while our message gets completely shredded on their networks. It's a serious issue, IMO, and one that's given the rise to the Tea Party and conservatism in general. And now with Yahoo searches veering further and further to the right (Seriously, their results seem more conservative than Google's) I fear that search engines will soon start looking to be more and more niche to serve political interests. |
Response to kpete (Original post)
Tue Oct 16, 2012, 03:28 PM
SCVDem (1,023 posts)
22. When exactly are they called
|
Un-American Activities?
|
Response to kpete (Original post)
Tue Oct 16, 2012, 03:32 PM
BainsBane (11,123 posts)
23. That's been the right wing line for a while
|
That's how they spin this whole Ohio thing. They've been lying about it since the start. Fox doesn't see this as botching the story. This is party of their daily GOP propaganda that pretends to be news.
|
Response to kpete (Original post)
Tue Oct 16, 2012, 03:32 PM
musiclawyer (2,064 posts)
24. For the life of me. why do Dem elected officials and surrogates go on that channnel?
|
It should be boycotted. And reasons made clear. This is a great example.
The concept that we need to have the other side hear our side is ridiculous. They are there because they DON'T want to hear us. They are a lost and fading minority demographic that we don't need. We dont want to provide FOX with legitimacy. Quite the opposite. |
Response to kpete (Original post)
Tue Oct 16, 2012, 03:35 PM
Raster (12,623 posts)
25. In summation: Bullshit Mountain spews bullshit.
Response to kpete (Original post)
Tue Oct 16, 2012, 04:10 PM
sakabatou (29,256 posts)
27. Botches is too nice a word. How about, FLAT OUT LIED?!
Response to kpete (Original post)
Tue Oct 16, 2012, 04:12 PM
99th_Monkey (7,377 posts)
28. "Extra-early"? The subject is "early voting"
|
extra-early makes it sound like, excessively-early, or weirdly-early, or some such nonsense.
What a bunch of idiots. |
Response to kpete (Original post)
Tue Oct 16, 2012, 04:13 PM
Uncle Joe (25,065 posts)
29. Kicked and recommended.
|
Thanks for the thread, kpete.
|
Response to kpete (Original post)
Tue Oct 16, 2012, 04:50 PM
Pakid (205 posts)
31. That wasn't botched it was done on purpose
|
My wife got to listen to a right wing nut in a local store a few days ago who when on and on about how Obama was trying to stop the military from voting( Lucky for the nut I wasn't there or she would have gotten told off) I don't play nice with nuts what can I say. . So Fox lied in order to help perpetuate this BS!
|
Response to kpete (Original post)
Tue Oct 16, 2012, 04:53 PM
Spitfire of ATJ (7,899 posts)
32. Next up on FOX "News": How Democrats are stealing the election with electronic voting machines.
|
|
Response to kpete (Original post)
Tue Oct 16, 2012, 05:02 PM
lindysalsagal (1,892 posts)
33. I heard this crap on Dennis Miller today and wondered what the *&&%%$ it was about.
|
How do they get away with making crap up?
|
Response to kpete (Original post)
Tue Oct 16, 2012, 05:39 PM
geckosfeet (8,893 posts)
35. Clearly you meant "FOX lied" to distort the decision making process
Response to kpete (Original post)
Tue Oct 16, 2012, 05:51 PM
marble falls (2,103 posts)
37. What Fox says on thier site:
|
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/10/16/high-court-allows-early-voting-on-weekend-before-election-in-ohio/
They're schizophrenic over there. |
Response to marble falls (Reply #37)
Tue Oct 16, 2012, 06:07 PM
Spitfire of ATJ (7,899 posts)
39. Funny how they've dropped their whole comments section.....
|
Their fans used to be quite a read....
|
Response to Spitfire of ATJ (Reply #39)
Tue Oct 16, 2012, 06:48 PM
marble falls (2,103 posts)
41. Funny ha-ha or .....
|
funny running scared shitless?
|
Response to marble falls (Reply #41)
Tue Oct 16, 2012, 06:59 PM
Spitfire of ATJ (7,899 posts)
43. I miss it. It was Morans on parade.
Response to kpete (Original post)
Tue Oct 16, 2012, 05:52 PM
ladjf (13,235 posts)
38. The report was not "botched". It was altered on purpose. nt
Response to kpete (Original post)
Tue Oct 16, 2012, 06:10 PM
Ms. Toad (9,294 posts)
40. It isn't botched - that is essentially the argument
|
which was made to the court both by the Husted administration and by the amici briefs to the court by the military.
Uniform voting (legal argument that underpins the Obama case) can be achieved two ways: 1. By expanding voting the last three days to everyone 2. By denying the military the special option of voting those three days. Obama was, of course, really seeking the former - but achieving uniformity could just as easily have been accomplished by the latter (taking away the military's early voting right). It was a strange argument, but it is not botched reporting of the outcome. |
Response to Ms. Toad (Reply #40)
Tue Oct 16, 2012, 06:49 PM
LisaL (22,909 posts)
42. But Obama didn't ask to deny the military the special option of voting in the last three days.
Response to LisaL (Reply #42)
Wed Oct 17, 2012, 12:05 AM
Ms. Toad (9,294 posts)
44. The legal argument was for all individuals to have equal access to the polls
|
There are two ways to do that - one is to enforce the bar against voting those three days against everyone (i.e. taking the three days away from the militart). I know that solution isn't what he asked for to resolve the lack of parity, but it is one of two ways to address the parity he was seeking - and the Republicans have been consistent in presenting that argument to the court.
It was not botched reporting; it was the essence of their argument. |
Response to kpete (Original post)
Wed Oct 17, 2012, 08:00 AM
kelliekat44 (1,398 posts)


