HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » Latest Breaking News (Forum) » Fox Botches Report On Dec...

Tue Oct 16, 2012, 02:46 PM

Fox Botches Report On Decision To Uphold Early Voting In Ohio

Source: Media Matters

Just minutes after the Supreme Court ruled to allow early voting in Ohio the weekend before Election Day, Fox News host Jon Scott falsely claimed that the Obama campaign sought to stop military families from early voting in the state. Scott further botched the state's early voting history when he claimed that Democrats sought to limit early voting when in fact, it was Republicans.

The real story is that Ohio expanded early voting in 2008 and 2010 in response to long wait times for thousands of voters during the 2004 election. But last year, the Republican-controlled legislature eliminated in-person voting during the three days before the election for everyone but military families and overseas voters.

In response, the Obama campaign and other Democrats filed a lawsuit seeking to restore early voting for all Ohioans. Today, the Supreme Court let stand a ruling that sided with the Obama campaign.

Scott's rendition of these events conflicts with reality and ignores the role Republicans played to limit early voting:

SCOTT: Ohio's voting laws are going to be changing, it would appear. There was an early voting program voted in by the state of Ohio for military members and their families. They were to be allowed to vote early. The Democrats and the Obama campaign asked that that be blocked. They, for whatever reason, did not want military families and military members voting extra early. A couple of lower courts blocked the law -- again, at the request of the Obama campaign and state Democratic officials. Now it's gone to the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court is going along with that block. According to our Shannon Bream, who covers the Supreme Court for us, we believe that is what is going to result from all of this is that everybody in Ohio is going to be allowed extra-early voting. No special privileges for military members and their families.


Read more: Link tohttp://mediamatters.org/blog/2012/10/16/fox-botches-report-on-decision-to-uphold-early/190663 source



Video: http://mediamatters.org/blog/2012/10/16/fox-botches-report-on-decision-to-uphold-early/190663

45 replies, 5799 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 45 replies Author Time Post
Reply Fox Botches Report On Decision To Uphold Early Voting In Ohio (Original post)
kpete Oct 2012 OP
KamaAina Oct 2012 #1
GoCubsGo Oct 2012 #6
KamaAina Oct 2012 #8
valerief Oct 2012 #34
kracer20 Oct 2012 #30
beac Oct 2012 #36
Coyotl Oct 2012 #14
Rosa Luxemburg Oct 2012 #26
Jackpine Radical Oct 2012 #2
Angry Dragon Oct 2012 #7
fleur-de-lisa Oct 2012 #3
AFD Oct 2012 #11
dipsydoodle Oct 2012 #4
goclark Oct 2012 #9
hrmjustin Oct 2012 #5
EC Oct 2012 #10
hue Oct 2012 #12
patricia92243 Oct 2012 #13
young_at_heart Oct 2012 #15
kpete Oct 2012 #16
DHelix Oct 2012 #17
ProfessionalLeftist Oct 2012 #18
Monk06 Oct 2012 #19
sinkingfeeling Oct 2012 #20
DHelix Oct 2012 #21
SCVDem Oct 2012 #22
BainsBane Oct 2012 #23
musiclawyer Oct 2012 #24
Raster Oct 2012 #25
sakabatou Oct 2012 #27
99th_Monkey Oct 2012 #28
Uncle Joe Oct 2012 #29
Pakid Oct 2012 #31
Spitfire of ATJ Oct 2012 #32
lindysalsagal Oct 2012 #33
geckosfeet Oct 2012 #35
marble falls Oct 2012 #37
Spitfire of ATJ Oct 2012 #39
marble falls Oct 2012 #41
Spitfire of ATJ Oct 2012 #43
ladjf Oct 2012 #38
Ms. Toad Oct 2012 #40
LisaL Oct 2012 #42
Ms. Toad Oct 2012 #44
kelliekat44 Oct 2012 #45

Response to kpete (Original post)

Tue Oct 16, 2012, 02:47 PM

1. "Botched"?

Don't you mean "deliberately distorted"?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to KamaAina (Reply #1)

Tue Oct 16, 2012, 02:51 PM

6. Yes.

They've been pushing that bullshit for as long as the Dems have been fighting the whole thing. It's not "botched". It's "Same shit, different day."

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to GoCubsGo (Reply #6)

Tue Oct 16, 2012, 02:53 PM

8. They should change their name to "The Malarkey Channel"

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to KamaAina (Reply #8)

Tue Oct 16, 2012, 05:13 PM

34. Bwahahaha! DUzy!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to GoCubsGo (Reply #6)

Tue Oct 16, 2012, 04:41 PM

30. FCC Complaints?

Would it be a giant waste of my time to try and file a complaint with the FCC? Yeah, I already know the answer.

This wasn't an error, this was an outright lie to deceive their viewers. Why aren't they held to at least some journalistic standards?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kracer20 (Reply #30)

Tue Oct 16, 2012, 05:48 PM

36. Because they went to court to win their "right to lie"

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2007/07/31/364678/-Fox-News-wins-in-court

I think they should have been forced to replace "News" in their name with "BS" but the judges in Florida didn't see it that way.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to KamaAina (Reply #1)

Tue Oct 16, 2012, 03:00 PM

14. Indeed, they are not going to change their lies just because the story has a new chapter.

Don't you mean "deliberate propaganda lies"?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to KamaAina (Reply #1)

Tue Oct 16, 2012, 03:38 PM

26. They should be fined for relaying incorrect Supreme Court information

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kpete (Original post)

Tue Oct 16, 2012, 02:48 PM

2. Botched?

Last edited Tue Oct 16, 2012, 02:50 PM USA/ET - Edit history (1)

Is that a synonym for lied their asses off?

Trying to deal with all Fox's lies one at a time is a little like trying to protect a wheatfield from a hailstorm by catching the falling hailstones in a teacup.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Jackpine Radical (Reply #2)

Tue Oct 16, 2012, 02:51 PM

7. +34,296 ........ HE LIED

LIES

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kpete (Original post)

Tue Oct 16, 2012, 02:49 PM

3. I guess we shouldn't be expecting a retraction?

Do those assholes ever apologize?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to fleur-de-lisa (Reply #3)

Tue Oct 16, 2012, 02:58 PM

11. I guess we shouldn't be expecting a retraction?

You made me laugh. I needed that. Thanks!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kpete (Original post)

Tue Oct 16, 2012, 02:49 PM

4. Shortly afterwards Scott said

Last edited Tue Oct 16, 2012, 03:02 PM USA/ET - Edit history (1)

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to dipsydoodle (Reply #4)

Tue Oct 16, 2012, 02:55 PM

9. That is a Straight Jacket -right?


That is exactly what he needs

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kpete (Original post)

Tue Oct 16, 2012, 02:50 PM

5. Bet there will be no correction.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kpete (Original post)

Tue Oct 16, 2012, 02:56 PM

10. They didn't botch it.

That's how they wanted it reported.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kpete (Original post)

Tue Oct 16, 2012, 02:59 PM

12. There is rarely a correction or apology. They really don't care about accuracy & never have.

They are paid to feed their sheeple with kool-aide!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kpete (Original post)

Tue Oct 16, 2012, 03:00 PM

13. This was a hatchet job - not a mistake (botch).

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kpete (Original post)

Tue Oct 16, 2012, 03:02 PM

15. They have no right to call themselves a news organization!

What they air is anything BUT the news.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to young_at_heart (Reply #15)

Tue Oct 16, 2012, 03:04 PM

16. but

this is what we are up against...

peace, kp

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kpete (Original post)

Tue Oct 16, 2012, 03:05 PM

17. This kind of crap is exactly how their lies spread

They've done this with the birther thing.
They've done this with GM making cars in China (It's an international company producing cars for the Chinese market).
They've done this with the Bangazi story.

There has to be some accountability here. It's no wonder so many Americans are up in arms... They're being force fed lies directly from a TV station so they take them as fact.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kpete (Original post)

Tue Oct 16, 2012, 03:07 PM

18. That's putting it nicely.

They flat-out LIED. Not that this is any different than what they usually do.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kpete (Original post)

Tue Oct 16, 2012, 03:15 PM

19. It's the same lie about early voting in Ohio that they have been repeating all along. In spite of

Last edited Tue Oct 16, 2012, 03:16 PM USA/ET - Edit history (1)

multiple corrections. They'll keep repeating it until Nov. 5, even though the result is everyone in Ohio gets to vote early. Which is exactly what the RW did not want.

Notice no mention that this is Roberts, 'conservative' court that made the final decision.

It's the same old fascist trick. Keep repeating the lie until it sticks.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kpete (Original post)

Tue Oct 16, 2012, 03:21 PM

20. That's SOP for Fox.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kpete (Original post)

Tue Oct 16, 2012, 03:26 PM

21. What bothers me the most is that our "liberal" media overcompensates to the Right now

Last edited Tue Oct 16, 2012, 03:31 PM USA/ET - Edit history (2)

What bothers me the most is that our supposed "liberal" media overcompensates to the Right now based on them constantly saying that they're so hard done by and that none of their voices are being heard while they're full allowed to operate as a full on Propaganda and lies network for the Republicans. For every Democratic voice there now has to be the Republican counterpoint on all of the big networks and CNN. Meanwhile, on FOX do they ever... honestly... have the liberal counterpoint? I honestly don't know because I can't even watch their roundtable discussions for more than 20 seconds before I feel like throwing my remote through my TV screen.

So, our politicians and positions have to stand up to "balanced' criticism on all of the big networks and CNN while being ripped apart on Fox while they get "balanced" criticism from the big networks on CNN while being completely supported 100% by Fox. It gives them a huge unfair advantage.

And what's worse is that a lot of the stuff coming from the Right is pure hypocritical, hateful, selfish, flies in the face of science and reason nonsense and yet the networks still have to give them a chance to share it and spread it while our message gets completely shredded on their networks. It's a serious issue, IMO, and one that's given the rise to the Tea Party and conservatism in general.

And now with Yahoo searches veering further and further to the right (Seriously, their results seem more conservative than Google's) I fear that search engines will soon start looking to be more and more niche to serve political interests.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kpete (Original post)

Tue Oct 16, 2012, 03:28 PM

22. When exactly are they called

Un-American Activities?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kpete (Original post)

Tue Oct 16, 2012, 03:32 PM

23. That's been the right wing line for a while

That's how they spin this whole Ohio thing. They've been lying about it since the start. Fox doesn't see this as botching the story. This is party of their daily GOP propaganda that pretends to be news.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kpete (Original post)

Tue Oct 16, 2012, 03:32 PM

24. For the life of me. why do Dem elected officials and surrogates go on that channnel?

It should be boycotted. And reasons made clear. This is a great example.
The concept that we need to have the other side hear our side is ridiculous. They are there because they DON'T want to hear us. They are a lost and fading minority demographic that we don't need.

We dont want to provide FOX with legitimacy. Quite the opposite.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kpete (Original post)

Tue Oct 16, 2012, 03:35 PM

25. In summation: Bullshit Mountain spews bullshit.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kpete (Original post)

Tue Oct 16, 2012, 04:10 PM

27. Botches is too nice a word. How about, FLAT OUT LIED?!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kpete (Original post)

Tue Oct 16, 2012, 04:12 PM

28. "Extra-early"? The subject is "early voting"

extra-early makes it sound like, excessively-early, or weirdly-early, or some such nonsense.

What a bunch of idiots.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kpete (Original post)

Tue Oct 16, 2012, 04:13 PM

29. Kicked and recommended.

Thanks for the thread, kpete.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kpete (Original post)

Tue Oct 16, 2012, 04:50 PM

31. That wasn't botched it was done on purpose

My wife got to listen to a right wing nut in a local store a few days ago who when on and on about how Obama was trying to stop the military from voting( Lucky for the nut I wasn't there or she would have gotten told off) I don't play nice with nuts what can I say. . So Fox lied in order to help perpetuate this BS!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kpete (Original post)

Tue Oct 16, 2012, 04:53 PM

32. Next up on FOX "News": How Democrats are stealing the election with electronic voting machines.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kpete (Original post)

Tue Oct 16, 2012, 05:02 PM

33. I heard this crap on Dennis Miller today and wondered what the *&&%%$ it was about.

How do they get away with making crap up?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kpete (Original post)

Tue Oct 16, 2012, 05:39 PM

35. Clearly you meant "FOX lied" to distort the decision making process

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink



Response to marble falls (Reply #37)

Tue Oct 16, 2012, 06:07 PM

39. Funny how they've dropped their whole comments section.....

Their fans used to be quite a read....

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Spitfire of ATJ (Reply #39)

Tue Oct 16, 2012, 06:48 PM

41. Funny ha-ha or .....

funny running scared shitless?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to marble falls (Reply #41)

Tue Oct 16, 2012, 06:59 PM

43. I miss it. It was Morans on parade.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kpete (Original post)

Tue Oct 16, 2012, 05:52 PM

38. The report was not "botched". It was altered on purpose. nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kpete (Original post)

Tue Oct 16, 2012, 06:10 PM

40. It isn't botched - that is essentially the argument

which was made to the court both by the Husted administration and by the amici briefs to the court by the military.

Uniform voting (legal argument that underpins the Obama case) can be achieved two ways:
1. By expanding voting the last three days to everyone
2. By denying the military the special option of voting those three days.

Obama was, of course, really seeking the former - but achieving uniformity could just as easily have been accomplished by the latter (taking away the military's early voting right).

It was a strange argument, but it is not botched reporting of the outcome.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Ms. Toad (Reply #40)

Tue Oct 16, 2012, 06:49 PM

42. But Obama didn't ask to deny the military the special option of voting in the last three days.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to LisaL (Reply #42)

Wed Oct 17, 2012, 12:05 AM

44. The legal argument was for all individuals to have equal access to the polls

There are two ways to do that - one is to enforce the bar against voting those three days against everyone (i.e. taking the three days away from the militart). I know that solution isn't what he asked for to resolve the lack of parity, but it is one of two ways to address the parity he was seeking - and the Republicans have been consistent in presenting that argument to the court.

It was not botched reporting; it was the essence of their argument.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kpete (Original post)

Wed Oct 17, 2012, 08:00 AM

45. At some point in the next debate, Obama has to set this story straight.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread