Sat Oct 13, 2012, 10:44 PM
jsr (3,497 posts)
Damage but no injuries as U.S. Navy cruiser, submarine collide
Source: Reuters
(Reuters) - A U.S. Navy Aegis cruiser collided with a nuclear-powered submarine during exercises off the East Cost on Saturday, collapsing the sonar dome on the cruiser and possibly causing other damage, but no injuries, U.S. Navy officials said. The collision between the USS San Jacinto and the nuclear-powered submarine USS Montpelier occurred about 3:30 p.m., the Navy said in a statement. The Navy declined to say where off the East Coast the accident occurred. A Navy official said the watch team aboard the San Jacinto saw a periscope rise from the water about 100 to 200 yards (meters) ahead of the vessel during the exercise. The cruiser ordered "all back," but the San Jacinto still collided with the submarine. The collision caused the collapse of the cruiser's sonar dome, a bulbous-shaped device on the bow of the ship beneath the water line, the Navy official said on condition of anonymity. Read more: http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/10/14/us-usa-navy-collision-idUSBRE89D00X20121014
|
18 replies, 2524 views
| Author | Time | Post | |
| jsr | Oct 2012 | OP | |
| jtuck004 | Oct 2012 | #1 | |
| Submariner | Oct 2012 | #2 | |
| HooptieWagon | Oct 2012 | #12 | |
| SaveAmerica | Oct 2012 | #3 | |
| Kennah | Oct 2012 | #4 | |
| defacto7 | Oct 2012 | #5 | |
| Rhiannon12866 | Oct 2012 | #6 | |
| Arctic Dave | Oct 2012 | #11 | |
| Rhiannon12866 | Oct 2012 | #17 | |
| Arctic Dave | Oct 2012 | #18 | |
| davepc | Oct 2012 | #7 | |
| Kindly Refrain | Oct 2012 | #8 | |
| Berlum | Oct 2012 | #9 | |
| KansDem | Oct 2012 | #15 | |
| NutmegYankee | Oct 2012 | #16 | |
| unhappycamper | Oct 2012 | #10 | |
| Odin2005 | Oct 2012 | #13 | |
| Odin2005 | Oct 2012 | #14 |
Response to jsr (Original post)
Sat Oct 13, 2012, 11:24 PM
jtuck004 (5,095 posts)
1. Notice how private ships run into, say, Alaska, or Italy? Not our Navy. We
|
Last edited Sat Oct 13, 2012, 11:25 PM USA/ET - Edit history (1) have the precision to hit a little ship in the middle of the ocean with another little ship. Your tax dollars at work.
(I put some effort into the Navy, so I know how difficult that is). |
Response to jsr (Original post)
Sat Oct 13, 2012, 11:30 PM
Submariner (7,360 posts)
2. Well there goes 2 Navy command careers
|
The cruiser and/or the boat were obviously going too fast to detect each other over there own cavitations, or the sonar operators were not paying close enough attention to their displays.
This will be an encouraging signal to the new expanding Chinese submarine force that we still can't "see" each other all too well after about 70 years of sonar use and development, and that's not good for us. |
Response to jsr (Original post)
Sat Oct 13, 2012, 11:39 PM
SaveAmerica (4,982 posts)
3. Too much Champagne! Today is the Navy's birthday
Response to jsr (Original post)
Sat Oct 13, 2012, 11:58 PM
Kennah (6,739 posts)
4. "Fuck you! I'm not turning. You guys turn!"
Response to jsr (Original post)
Sun Oct 14, 2012, 01:50 AM
defacto7 (3,309 posts)
5. Just playing chicken, a very expensive game of chicken.
|
But what does this actually mean in this case, "..Navy official said on condition of anonymity"? Some Navy official just blurts out something that's a security issue for the hell of it? |
Response to jsr (Original post)
Sun Oct 14, 2012, 05:17 AM
Rhiannon12866 (54,902 posts)
6. Photos of the sub and the cruiser:
|
USS Montpelier
USS San Jacinto
Navy nuclear cruiser, submarine collide off East Coast; no injuries reported http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2012/10/13/14421340-navy-nuclear-cruiser-submarine-collide-off-east-coast-no-injuries-reported?lite |
Response to Rhiannon12866 (Reply #6)
Sun Oct 14, 2012, 10:25 AM
Arctic Dave (12,553 posts)
11. Worst headline editing ever.
|
Cruisers are not a nuclear driven ship.
|
Response to Arctic Dave (Reply #11)
Sun Oct 14, 2012, 06:06 PM
Rhiannon12866 (54,902 posts)
17. Sorry, but I just pasted the actual headline
|
I wanted to credit where I got the pix. Excellent point...
|
Response to Rhiannon12866 (Reply #17)
Sun Oct 14, 2012, 06:53 PM
Arctic Dave (12,553 posts)
18. Yeah. I wasn't balaming you.
|
|
Response to jsr (Original post)
Sun Oct 14, 2012, 05:21 AM
davepc (3,732 posts)
7. Well, there are a whole bunch of officer careers down the drain.
Response to jsr (Original post)
Sun Oct 14, 2012, 07:22 AM
Kindly Refrain (423 posts)
8. we've got so many subs that little Montpelier, Vt gets one?
|
What's next the USS Dodge City? USS Mayberry? Time to defund the DoD
|
Response to Kindly Refrain (Reply #8)
Sun Oct 14, 2012, 08:25 AM
Berlum (3,710 posts)
9. Keep talking trash about Vermont's sub, and they will sic Champ on your keester
![]() |
Response to Kindly Refrain (Reply #8)
Sun Oct 14, 2012, 11:13 AM
KansDem (24,348 posts)
15. "What's next the USS Dodge City?"
|
Hey, smile when you say that!
|
Response to Kindly Refrain (Reply #8)
Sun Oct 14, 2012, 11:18 AM
NutmegYankee (4,832 posts)
16. Snark aside, they were being named after cities in each state during the cold war.
|
Prior to 688 Class we named them after fish.
|
Response to jsr (Original post)
Sun Oct 14, 2012, 10:04 AM
unhappycamper (49,649 posts)
10. One would think that a destroyer (whose job is to find submarines)
|
would light up their sonar to tell the sub "Hey man. I'm up here."
On the other hand the submarine should know everything (up, down, left, right. forward and backward) around it. |
Response to unhappycamper (Reply #10)
Sun Oct 14, 2012, 11:01 AM
Odin2005 (48,255 posts)


