Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

jsr

(7,712 posts)
Sat Oct 13, 2012, 10:44 PM Oct 2012

Damage but no injuries as U.S. Navy cruiser, submarine collide

Source: Reuters

(Reuters) - A U.S. Navy Aegis cruiser collided with a nuclear-powered submarine during exercises off the East Cost on Saturday, collapsing the sonar dome on the cruiser and possibly causing other damage, but no injuries, U.S. Navy officials said.

The collision between the USS San Jacinto and the nuclear-powered submarine USS Montpelier occurred about 3:30 p.m., the Navy said in a statement. The Navy declined to say where off the East Coast the accident occurred.

A Navy official said the watch team aboard the San Jacinto saw a periscope rise from the water about 100 to 200 yards (meters) ahead of the vessel during the exercise. The cruiser ordered "all back," but the San Jacinto still collided with the submarine.

The collision caused the collapse of the cruiser's sonar dome, a bulbous-shaped device on the bow of the ship beneath the water line, the Navy official said on condition of anonymity.

Read more: http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/10/14/us-usa-navy-collision-idUSBRE89D00X20121014

18 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

jtuck004

(15,882 posts)
1. Notice how private ships run into, say, Alaska, or Italy? Not our Navy. We
Sat Oct 13, 2012, 11:24 PM
Oct 2012

have the precision to hit a little ship in the middle of the ocean with another little ship. Your tax dollars at work.

(I put some effort into the Navy, so I know how difficult that is).

Submariner

(12,503 posts)
2. Well there goes 2 Navy command careers
Sat Oct 13, 2012, 11:30 PM
Oct 2012

The cruiser and/or the boat were obviously going too fast to detect each other over there own cavitations, or the sonar operators were not paying close enough attention to their displays.

This will be an encouraging signal to the new expanding Chinese submarine force that we still can't "see" each other all too well after about 70 years of sonar use and development, and that's not good for us.

defacto7

(13,485 posts)
5. Just playing chicken, a very expensive game of chicken.
Sun Oct 14, 2012, 01:50 AM
Oct 2012

But what does this actually mean in this case, "..Navy official said on condition of anonymity"?

Some Navy official just blurts out something that's a security issue for the hell of it?

Rhiannon12866

(205,161 posts)
17. Sorry, but I just pasted the actual headline
Sun Oct 14, 2012, 06:06 PM
Oct 2012

I wanted to credit where I got the pix. Excellent point...

 

Kindly Refrain

(423 posts)
8. we've got so many subs that little Montpelier, Vt gets one?
Sun Oct 14, 2012, 07:22 AM
Oct 2012

What's next the USS Dodge City? USS Mayberry? Time to defund the DoD

NutmegYankee

(16,199 posts)
16. Snark aside, they were being named after cities in each state during the cold war.
Sun Oct 14, 2012, 11:18 AM
Oct 2012

Prior to 688 Class we named them after fish.

unhappycamper

(60,364 posts)
10. One would think that a destroyer (whose job is to find submarines)
Sun Oct 14, 2012, 10:04 AM
Oct 2012

would light up their sonar to tell the sub "Hey man. I'm up here."

On the other hand the submarine should know everything (up, down, left, right. forward and backward) around it.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Damage but no injuries as...