Chavez's socialist rule at risk as Venezuelans vote

I hope, although I'm not optimistic, that he will not declare the vote "invalid" and declare himself the winner.

It's happened before in South America.

Many times.

If Chavez lost, he'd step down.

Daniel Ortega did.

a non-reactionary message board shouldn't be endorsing the idea that leftists can't be trusted to be democratic.

That Chavez would ignore the people and become a dictator?

I hope it won't.

But if, and this is a big IF, it does, it wouldn't surprise me.

of himself, save for one station he has yet to shut down. And he sent his people to the home of that station owner, just to "remind" him that Chavez is in charge "or else."

Many have fled Chavez' Venezuela, some for their lives.

If you insist upon your claims, be good enough to link the sources to these stories.

Why not just round up the opposition and have them shot, Comrade?

And how fast he'd turn the clock back to the days of cholera epidemics.

supported by millions of Venezuelans who turn out for him in huge numbers whenever/wherever he speaks.

That isn't really an argument for him being the better candidate.

And it doesn't mean the majority of Venezuelan's will vote for him. Most opinion polls show a ~10 point lead for Chavez and even the few polls most generous to Capriles have him behind by 2 points.

I guess we will see shortly.

All the polls show Chavez with a healthy lead, as usual, over his creole elite opponent. It is only in the New York Times's dreams that he might lose. TP

And considering the segment the other day by All Things Considered couldn't have anyone left of the Brookings institute comment on it, you've probably nailed it.

I haven't heard this term before. it sounds like his opponent is a rich snob from Louisiana.

Not really a good argument to use against him. Not that I support Capriles anyway. Some of policies admittedly sound like they would benefit the masses, but others are clearly a feeding trough for rich foreigners(and the very few rich Venezuelans).


I guess that is what you would call "center-right" these days.

Wouldn't wanna channel em into good schools, green energy, healthy inner cities or anything radical like that.

Ahmadinejad, buying obsolete Russian armament, supporting beauty contests in Argentina, providing free oil to Cuba, guaranteeing sweetheart loans to Ecuador and Bolivia, etc. etc. The people must be really happy.

Billions missing from the Fonden fund. Hundreds of million openly taken through shell corporations.

Yeah.

That oil money is being squandered, wasted on rich boligarchs, and elites.

"wasted" now was all sucked up a kleptocratic elite before it was nationalized and did the people even less good (at least the aid to Cuba helps train Doctors who give poor people all over the world chance to see again, and the aid to the USA helps poor American Citizens afford heating oil each winter.)

The old guard kleptocrats from Ven were down right evil arrogant evil and entitled bastards. Their crimes paved the way for Chavez. The billions that the kleptocrats looted from Ven and hid overseas is to this day bankrolling the opposition. As a rule of thumb I give zero credibility to any news coming out of Ven from both Chavez and his opposition. However the opposition has a far more effective propaganda machine in the US so in the balance they push out a lot more disinformation.

I try to stick only to facts because manipulation is very strong with Venezuelan politics.

The deal with Cuba is highly disproportionate. No other country has such a deal with Venezuela.

The aid to the US and other countries via Chevron is not going anywhere. It's pennies compared to what Chavez gives to other states. Billion here, billion there. What's it matter, right?

finally pushed out the kleptocrats, why do you think they hate him so much. I know someone who lost $20 million US when it happened and his family all together lost a lot more then that. However they still have plenty of money the looted hidden in various offshore banks.

Obviously they are pissed off about that but contractors are not evil, even Chavez has hired dozens of Chinese contractors, and they all all throughout Venezuela. He has invested billions in China and Russia.

Certainly Venezuelans have benefited more in the bilateral socialist cooperation, as with help from Cuban know-how Venezuela achieved 100% literacy in very short time and created a national health care system for all the people? What is few barrels of oil compared to what no amount of dollars could have ever bought?

Half a billion in the Aben Pearl debacle is not pennies.

Billions from the Fonden fund is not pennies.

Note, the $2.5 million to Cuba is on top of the deal being made because Cuba reexports the oil. It's not paying for anything, it's free money.

Or for capitalistic greed of state capitalism?

That is not what Cuba's free money is.

It's graft.

I take that as 'yes'.

As usual.

what does socialist internationalism mean to you, generally and in the particular situation of Latin American revolutionary process.

Cronyism is the antithesis to socialism. It damages it.

You don't only help one state more than the other, you don't only have deals with one group more than the other.

Socialism is at its core egalitarianism.

Giving one country more than another country is cronyism. It's graft. It's corruption.

And it's not the kind of socialism I ascribe to.

I thought it was founded upon the principle "to everyone according to his needs". Cuba cannot participate freely in global trade because of US embargo, so it's needs are different from other countries.

...



Meanwhile Cubans still don't have internet even a year after the fiber optic line was laid.

but in your posts I never see any solidarity towards anything with even a whiff of socialism - or social libertarianism. Just anti-Cuba anti-Chavez anti-wikileaks propaganda. And I wonder why that is, as you insist being an socialist.

And the "socialist" regimes that are so often cheered here are hardly anti-authoritarian. They're cronyist.

It is not my fault you cannot differentiate between the nuances of these various regimes.

I don't like being misled and lied to as I so often am on these various issues.

The congress is still controlled by the PSUV as are many localities. I think that there would be a problem of "dual power," sort of the inverse of the situation from 1999 - 2002.

And Chavista governors are extremely unpopular right now.

But yeah, Capriles won't get to enjoy decree powers as Chavez has done for the majority of his tenure.

What a wild ride for those of us who actually followed the Venezuelan elections. A wild ride indeed.

looking for any Chavez Administration officials who might have taken sanctuary there. If he'd found them and helped apprehend them, they might well have been executed...for the horrible crime of serving in a democratically-elected government.

By me, that's NOT "centrism".

And trust me, nobody the New York Times is enthusiastic about in Latin American politics is ever going to to anything positive for the workers or the poor.

He wouldn't have been able to run if the courts didn't clear him.

(He went into the embassy to assure nothing would happen to the ambassadors; the ambassadors said as much on video.)

The Cubans didn't ask Capriles to enter their embassy grounds, and he had no right to do so.

Just ridiculous.

Capriles is a for the people, he's been running for office his whole life, that's all he lives for. He lives to solve problems and make people get along with one another. That's why he protected the ambassadors.

You realize that could also be said of THIS guy, don't you?

Typical.

No analog whatsoever between them.

How do you explain his pledge to reverse agrarian reform? To give land back to a British beef lord?

I'm not joking. He wants to help out this guy.



And I got that from a pro-Capriles article.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/9576153/Venezuelas-marathon-man-looks-to-run-down-Chavez.html

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samuel_Vestey,_3rd_Baron_Vestey

Looking at that, any lip-service he gives to Venezuela's working classes sounds like just that. Whatever legitimate criticism one may have of Chavez, I'm not sure Capriles is a better alternative.

Have to pay the piper.

I guess they have to have EVERYTHING.

If the campesinos won't develop it then they don't deserve to keep it, do they?

I mean, what Chavez basically did was take government lands and give it to campesinos who then went on to let the land fester. The Chavistas then dismiss it because, hey, they have billions of dollars from oil that they can use to import the food.

Cuba has a very similar "no use" you lose it policy.

Hell the US even has a similar policy (BLM lands can be leased but the BLM can revoke the lease if the lands aren't being used for the stated purpose).

I will say I am skeptical of the "land is being wasted" argument because I have seen it used nefariously here in the US before(usually by the rich and powerful who want it), but I will read up on it.

and claim vast land holdings with questionable legality, taking up important space which is needed for actual agriculture for the benefit of Venezuelan people.

So creepy.

The Vesteys have more than enough of this world's money. They deserve a good kick in their broad backsides.

What do you base this on? I did a quick search and found a list of 7 polling agencies in Venezuela. None of them show him ahead and most have Chavez ahead by a significant margin.

http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2012-09-27/news/sns-rt-venezuela-electionpolls-tablevepolls-20120401_1_henrique-capriles-main-pollsters-caracas-newsroom

No polling in the last week before election day. The two newest polls have him ahead.

Damn.

I never saw reuters call it "Bush's Rule" in one of their headlines.

Not all socialists support Chavez and his social fascism and this election isn't merely Chavez the Socialist vs the right wing, there are lot of leftists and socialists in Venezuela who know how crooked this man is and want him out.

But I would hardly call right-leaning social democrats who favor expanding the private sector "socialists." There are communists, radical ones, who support the opposition - Red Flag Party. They call Chavez a "social fascist." That's language the Maoists and pro-Albanian forces would use.

Who would have thought>?

I'll bother to object only to this: Chavez is not the least bit preaching an "anti-American" line (besides that Venezuelans are, of course, Americans). I consider it totally pro-US, because here in the US, we the people also pay the costs of our useless, destructive imperialism.

President Chavez just won re-election to another six year term, 55% to 45%, in a voting system which former U.S. President, Jimmie Carter, recently called the best in the world. President Cart has spent years monitoring international elections and evaluating voting systems. In comparison, he finds the U.S.'s voting system to be horrible.

President Chavez has brought real democracy to the neighborhood level in Venezuela and improved the lives of millions of people who now have universal health care, universal free education to the doctoral level, and government guaranteed nutrition and housing.
Americans desperately need similar programs since they have been driven into poverty by our inequitable economic system.

Our U.S state department and their corporate friends in the media call President Chavez a dictator, not because he is a dictator but because he is a world leader who will submit to their imperialist policies. They demonize President Chavez because they fear that Americans might demand the same socialist programs that are working so effectively here in Venezuela.

It is really shameful that that some would-be progressives in the U.S. believe the nonsense that is spouted about Chavez and his government by the U.S. media. Maybe they simply don't understand how distorted our news is. I'm an American who has been living and teaching in Venezuela for the past five years. I have observed that U.S. press reporting about Venezuela bears no relation whatever to the truth about life in Venezuela.

President Chavez just won re-election to another six year term, 55% to 45%, in a voting system which former U.S. President, Jimmie Carter, recently called the best in the world. President Carter has spent years monitoring international elections and evaluating voting systems. In comparison, he finds the U.S.'s voting system to be horrible.

President Chavez has brought real democracy to the neighborhood level in Venezuela and improved the lives of millions of people who now have universal health care, universal free education to the doctoral level, and government guaranteed nutrition and housing.
Americans desperately need similar programs since they have been driven into poverty by our inequitable economic system.

Our U.S State Department and their corporate friends in the media call President Chavez a dictator, not because he is a dictator but because he is a world leader who will not submit to their imperialist policies. They demonize President Chavez because they fear that Americans might demand the same socialist programs that are working so effectively here in Venezuela.

It is really shameful that that some would-be progressives in the U.S. believe the nonsense that is spouted about Chavez and his government by the U.S. media. Maybe they simply don't understand how distorted our news is. I'm an American who has been living and teaching in Venezuela for the past five years. I have observed that U.S. press reporting about Venezuela bears no relation whatever to the truth about life in Venezuela.

They ARE the ones who need it.

Hope you got a chance to see Chavez during campaign season.

Thanks for celebrating this election with D.U. progressives, Justina For Justice.