Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Hissyspit

(45,788 posts)
Mon Oct 1, 2012, 11:24 PM Oct 2012

Irreversible Warming Will Cause Sea Levels to Rise for Thousands of Years to Come, New Research Show

Last edited Tue Oct 2, 2012, 02:24 AM - Edit history (1)

Source: Science Daily

Irreversible Warming Will Cause Sea Levels to Rise for Thousands of Years to Come, New Research Shows

ScienceDaily (Oct. 2, 2012) — Greenhouse gas emissions up to now have triggered an irreversible warming of Earth that will cause sea levels to rise for thousands of years to come, new research has shown.

The results come from a study, published today (Oct. 2) in IOP Publishing's journal Environmental Research Letters, which sought to model sea-level changes over millennial timescales, taking into account all of Earth's land ice and the warming of the oceans -- something which has not been done before.

The research showed that we have already committed ourselves to a sea-level rise of 1.1 metres by the year 3000 as a result of our greenhouse gas emissions up to now. This irreversible damage could be worse, depending on the route we take to mitigating our emissions.

If we were to follow the high A2 emissions scenario adopted by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), a sea-level rise of 6.8 metres could be expected in the next thousand years. The two other IPCC scenarios analysed by the researchers, the B1 and A1B scenarios, yielded sea-level rises of 2.1 and 4.1 metres respectively.

Read more: http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/10/121001191531.htm

35 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Irreversible Warming Will Cause Sea Levels to Rise for Thousands of Years to Come, New Research Show (Original Post) Hissyspit Oct 2012 OP
Mr. President, I would not rule out the chance to preserve a nucleus of human specimens. slackmaster Oct 2012 #1
Gentlemen, we have a mine shaft gap!!! kooljerk666 Oct 2012 #10
Mein Führer... I CAN WALK! slackmaster Oct 2012 #11
We'll Meet again................ kooljerk666 Oct 2012 #29
THX 1138 aletier_v Oct 2012 #2
Drug Evasion was one of the highest crimes in THX 1138's dystopian future slackmaster Oct 2012 #3
In the future, people will beg for hallucinogens aletier_v Oct 2012 #6
Boy, Delphinus Oct 2012 #32
Kicked and recommended. Uncle Joe Oct 2012 #4
funny... nebenaube Oct 2012 #5
The wingnuts aren't worried. CheapShotArtist Oct 2012 #7
Proof!! lobodons Oct 2012 #8
California Has Mountains AndyTiedye Oct 2012 #18
oh, don't give me that global warming crap. olddad56 Oct 2012 #9
We might have done something 50 years ago. nt bemildred Oct 2012 #12
Fossil fuels will be consumed until they are fully consumed. closeupready Oct 2012 #13
No. Fossil fuels will be consumed until they are no longer economically viable compared to some... slackmaster Oct 2012 #15
I do hope you are correct on that, and I am wrong. closeupready Oct 2012 #17
I'm not so sure. Every time we estimate how fast things are happening, a year later we discover it truthisfreedom Oct 2012 #14
I'm predicting something on the order of anywhere from 25-50 feet by 2100. AverageJoe90 Oct 2012 #25
. XemaSab Oct 2012 #33
If our species survives until the year 3000... Silent3 Oct 2012 #16
Oh, we'll survive alright. AverageJoe90 Oct 2012 #22
Maybe the cost of living in Manhattan will drop... AntiFascist Oct 2012 #19
It is only going to get worse, China won't reverse its course and neither will corporations. In JRLeft Oct 2012 #20
China and India are going to do nothing but increase fossil fuel production for decades slackmaster Oct 2012 #21
Neither of these two countries can keep the current course, either. AverageJoe90 Oct 2012 #24
I seriously doubt China will still be here in another 2 decades. AverageJoe90 Oct 2012 #23
I just got done watching Carbon Nation Mnpaul Oct 2012 #26
The Elephant in the room. BlackGuero Oct 2012 #27
well put. Duppers Oct 2012 #28
Welcome to DU, BlackGuero. Great point. cbayer Oct 2012 #30
We can use the seas to our advantage in many ways. Sunlei Oct 2012 #31
Yes, a rising tide floods all coastal communities slackmaster Oct 2012 #34
of course and we won't be able to hold rising waters back Sunlei Oct 2012 #35
 

slackmaster

(60,567 posts)
1. Mr. President, I would not rule out the chance to preserve a nucleus of human specimens.
Mon Oct 1, 2012, 11:29 PM
Oct 2012

It would be quite easy at the bottom of some of our deeper mine shafts. The climate disaster would never penetrate a mine some thousands of feet deep. And in a matter of weeks, sufficient improvements in dwelling space could easily be provided.

It would not be difficult Mr. President. Nuclear reactors could provide power almost indefinitely. Greenhouses could maintain plant life. Animals could be bred and slaughtered. A quick survey would have to be made of all the available mine sites in the country. But I would guess that dwelling space for several hundred thousands of our people could easily be provided.

A computer could be set and programmed to accept factors from youth, health, sexual fertility, intelligence, and a cross section of necessary skills. Of course it would be absolutely vital that our top government and military men be included to foster and impart the required principles of leadership and tradition. Naturally, they would breed prodigiously. There would be much time, and little to do. But ah with the proper breeding techniques and a ratio of say, ten females to each male, I would guess that they could then work their way back to the present gross national product within say, twenty years.

 

kooljerk666

(776 posts)
29. We'll Meet again................
Wed Oct 3, 2012, 08:13 AM
Oct 2012

I thought about a reply for a day or so & this was the most appropriate....



aletier_v

(1,773 posts)
2. THX 1138
Mon Oct 1, 2012, 11:35 PM
Oct 2012
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0066434/

"The human race has been relocated to a underground city located beneath the Earth's surface. In the underground city, the population are entertained by holographic TV which broadcasts sex and violence and robotic police force enforces the law. In the underground city, society controls all life, all citizens are drugged to control their emotions and their behavior and sex is a crime."

aletier_v

(1,773 posts)
6. In the future, people will beg for hallucinogens
Mon Oct 1, 2012, 11:56 PM
Oct 2012

to block reality.

look at how much it happens today and we still have dry land.

CheapShotArtist

(333 posts)
7. The wingnuts aren't worried.
Tue Oct 2, 2012, 12:51 AM
Oct 2012

They're so rich that they can afford air conditioners. And they probably think if the weather gets too unbearable, they can either relocate to Mars or the Moon.

 

closeupready

(29,503 posts)
13. Fossil fuels will be consumed until they are fully consumed.
Tue Oct 2, 2012, 10:39 AM
Oct 2012

And global warming will accelerate exponentially.

That doesn't necessarily mean the end of the world, but does mean we are fucking up the planet.

 

slackmaster

(60,567 posts)
15. No. Fossil fuels will be consumed until they are no longer economically viable compared to some...
Tue Oct 2, 2012, 10:59 AM
Oct 2012

...other energy source.

I believe that will be a long, LONG time before they are fully consumed. There is a whole lot of coal in the ground.

truthisfreedom

(23,142 posts)
14. I'm not so sure. Every time we estimate how fast things are happening, a year later we discover it
Tue Oct 2, 2012, 10:45 AM
Oct 2012

is happening twice as fast as we thought. I think we'll be under 1.1 meters of new water by 2040 or sooner.

 

AverageJoe90

(10,745 posts)
25. I'm predicting something on the order of anywhere from 25-50 feet by 2100.
Wed Oct 3, 2012, 01:32 AM
Oct 2012

Though, A big part of the overall problem, I gotta say, has likely just been sheer shitty luck, probability wise.

Silent3

(15,190 posts)
16. If our species survives until the year 3000...
Tue Oct 2, 2012, 11:12 AM
Oct 2012

...without a massive die-off in the interim, by then we'll have the technology to regulate the planet's temperature with things like orbiting reflectors, or with technology we can't even imagine now.

 

AverageJoe90

(10,745 posts)
22. Oh, we'll survive alright.
Wed Oct 3, 2012, 01:26 AM
Oct 2012

Whether or not America's still around, as we know it, may be questionable, though.

 

JRLeft

(7,010 posts)
20. It is only going to get worse, China won't reverse its course and neither will corporations. In
Tue Oct 2, 2012, 05:16 PM
Oct 2012

other words we are fucked.

 

slackmaster

(60,567 posts)
21. China and India are going to do nothing but increase fossil fuel production for decades
Tue Oct 2, 2012, 05:18 PM
Oct 2012

The US is no longer the number one carbon liberator.

 

AverageJoe90

(10,745 posts)
24. Neither of these two countries can keep the current course, either.
Wed Oct 3, 2012, 01:30 AM
Oct 2012

China is likely to implode in a couple decades and India may very well face boycotts by much of the rest of the world if New Delhi decides to go full-bore with carbon production. And if that happens, India's economy would freefall and they'd be facing a revolution within weeks, maybe a few months if they're lucky.

 

AverageJoe90

(10,745 posts)
23. I seriously doubt China will still be here in another 2 decades.
Wed Oct 3, 2012, 01:28 AM
Oct 2012

I gotta be honest; that bubble is going to burst. And when it does, you can kiss China good-bye, and it will revert back to third-world status; only question is, "For how long"?

Mnpaul

(3,655 posts)
26. I just got done watching Carbon Nation
Wed Oct 3, 2012, 01:34 AM
Oct 2012

over at Snag Films and was surprised at the number of simple solutions there were. Interesting flick you can watch for free. What really surprised me was the output comparison o biofuels. Off one acre we can get 28 gallons of fuel from corn, 500-800 gallons from palm trees(palm oil) and 4000 gallons from algae(one acre pond).

http://www.snagfilms.com/films/title/carbon_nation

BlackGuero

(9 posts)
27. The Elephant in the room.
Wed Oct 3, 2012, 01:58 AM
Oct 2012

Irreversible is such a concrete word for a low information, rapture ready voter to wrap their head around. Hate to say it, but it will take a mega natural disaster for some people to start treating our natural world like we would treat our own family.

Sunlei

(22,651 posts)
35. of course and we won't be able to hold rising waters back
Wed Oct 3, 2012, 11:35 PM
Oct 2012

What I mean is we must build up all coastal areas above the flood zones. People have to build for hurricanes and floods. We can't just wall off part of a seawall as it moves the flooding to the sides of a seawall.

Places like the panhandle of Florida and the mississippi river should be wide open water transportation routes. The panhandle between the Gulf and the Atlantic ocean, Mississippi from the Gulf to the NW passage.

The panhandle is going to totally flood over anyway with a major hurricane. The Mississippi is going dry and wants to reverse anyway. Opening these water routes would midagate a lot of coastal storm surge, gives water a place to move.

I would LOVE to take a waterjet from Texas to Canada

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Irreversible Warming Will...