Wed Sep 26, 2012, 03:59 PM
Eugene (15,542 posts)
US judge upholds Obama ban on lobbyists serving on boards
Source: Reuters
WASHINGTON | Wed Sep 26, 2012 11:56am EDT (Reuters) - A federal judge on Wednesday upheld an attempt by President Barack Obama to cut down the influence of lobbyists, ruling that Obama was within his authority when he barred them from serving on government boards. The ruling dismisses a lawsuit brought by six lobbyists who argued the ban unfairly penalizes them for exercising their right to petition the government. The lobbyists failed to show that they lost something by not serving on government boards, such as a committee that advises on trade issues, wrote U.S. District Judge Amy Berman Jackson. Even if they had shown a real benefit, they are not entitled to serve on the boards, the judge added. -snip- Read more: http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/09/26/us-usa-politics-lobbyists-idUSBRE88P18320120926
|
9 replies, 1734 views
| Author | Time | Post | |
| Eugene | Sep 2012 | OP | |
| donqpublic | Sep 2012 | #1 | |
| drm604 | Sep 2012 | #2 | |
| Lasher | Sep 2012 | #3 | |
| meow2u3 | Sep 2012 | #4 | |
| dipsydoodle | Sep 2012 | #5 | |
| Lasher | Sep 2012 | #8 | |
| benld74 | Sep 2012 | #6 | |
| madinmaryland | Sep 2012 | #7 | |
| alp227 | Sep 2012 | #9 |
Response to Eugene (Original post)
Wed Sep 26, 2012, 04:13 PM
donqpublic (155 posts)
1. That is a big win. Big! (n/t)
Response to Eugene (Original post)
Wed Sep 26, 2012, 04:16 PM
drm604 (13,962 posts)
2. This is very good. K&R
|
Last edited Wed Sep 26, 2012, 04:16 PM USA/ET - Edit history (1) |
Response to Eugene (Original post)
Wed Sep 26, 2012, 04:18 PM
Lasher (20,477 posts)
3. Huzzah!
|
This is what real entitlement reform looks like.
|
Response to Eugene (Original post)
Wed Sep 26, 2012, 04:41 PM
meow2u3 (13,889 posts)
4. A-freakin'-men!
|
|
Response to Eugene (Original post)
Wed Sep 26, 2012, 04:42 PM
dipsydoodle (32,674 posts)
5. In the words of the Profit
|
Fuck 'em.
|
Response to dipsydoodle (Reply #5)
Wed Sep 26, 2012, 08:19 PM
Lasher (20,477 posts)
8. Not in the name of the profit, pretty much the opposite.
|
Little slip of the homophone there, but I know what you meant.
|
Response to Eugene (Original post)
Wed Sep 26, 2012, 04:43 PM
benld74 (4,597 posts)
6. YEAH! Sanity final prevails!!!!
Response to Eugene (Original post)
Wed Sep 26, 2012, 06:45 PM
madinmaryland (52,935 posts)
7. Hmmm. So lobbyists want an entitlement!! nt
Response to Eugene (Original post)
Wed Sep 26, 2012, 11:32 PM
alp227 (20,488 posts)

