Tue Sep 25, 2012, 04:03 PM
bananas (20,168 posts)
Clinton: Iran cannot be trusted with nuclear program
Source: CNN
Former President Bill Clinton weighed in one of the election's pressing international issues Tuesday saying Iran's President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad cannot be trusted regarding his country's nuclear ambitions. In an interview on CNN's "Piers Morgan Tonight" to air Tuesday at 9 pm E.T., Clinton also addressed ... <snip> Asked to respond to the Iranian president questioning why his country cannot have nuclear weapons if other countries can, Clinton, in turn, posed a rhetorical question: "Why isn't (Ahmandinejad) going for some bigger non-proliferation initiative instead of acting like what he really wants is a nuclear bomb because that will help to get everybody get rid of their nuclear weapons?" "No serious person believes that," Clinton answered in the interview. <snip> Read more: http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2012/09/25/clinton-iran-cannot-be-trusted-with-nuclear-program/
|
63 replies, 4730 views
| Author | Time | Post | |
| bananas | Sep 2012 | OP | |
| zellie | Sep 2012 | #1 | |
| ZombieHorde | Sep 2012 | #38 | |
| Pterodactyl | Sep 2012 | #39 | |
| ZombieHorde | Sep 2012 | #40 | |
| Canuckistanian | Sep 2012 | #2 | |
| harmonicon | Sep 2012 | #6 | |
| Missycim | Sep 2012 | #9 | |
| harmonicon | Sep 2012 | #11 | |
| Missycim | Sep 2012 | #15 | |
| harmonicon | Sep 2012 | #21 | |
| Missycim | Sep 2012 | #33 | |
| Comrade Grumpy | Sep 2012 | #50 | |
| DonCoquixote | Sep 2012 | #17 | |
| harmonicon | Sep 2012 | #23 | |
| 24601 | Sep 2012 | #42 | |
| harmonicon | Sep 2012 | #47 | |
| sabrina 1 | Sep 2012 | #43 | |
| history lover | Sep 2012 | #36 | |
| oberliner | Sep 2012 | #32 | |
| Canuckistanian | Sep 2012 | #37 | |
| leveymg | Sep 2012 | #3 | |
| harmonicon | Sep 2012 | #7 | |
| Missycim | Sep 2012 | #12 | |
| harmonicon | Sep 2012 | #14 | |
| Missycim | Sep 2012 | #16 | |
| harmonicon | Sep 2012 | #19 | |
| Missycim | Sep 2012 | #20 | |
| harmonicon | Sep 2012 | #24 | |
| history lover | Sep 2012 | #35 | |
| leveymg | Sep 2012 | #18 | |
| Missycim | Sep 2012 | #10 | |
| Ash_F | Sep 2012 | #22 | |
| Missycim | Sep 2012 | #31 | |
| Ash_F | Sep 2012 | #41 | |
| King_David | Sep 2012 | #46 | |
| Ash_F | Sep 2012 | #58 | |
| King_David | Sep 2012 | #59 | |
| Ash_F | Sep 2012 | #60 | |
| King_David | Sep 2012 | #61 | |
| Ash_F | Sep 2012 | #62 | |
| Beacool | Sep 2012 | #52 | |
| leftynyc | Sep 2012 | #55 | |
| sabrina 1 | Sep 2012 | #44 | |
| harun | Sep 2012 | #4 | |
| Ash_F | Sep 2012 | #5 | |
| TomClash | Sep 2012 | #8 | |
| Stewland | Sep 2012 | #13 | |
| Comrade_McKenzie | Sep 2012 | #25 | |
| Ash_F | Sep 2012 | #26 | |
| bananas | Sep 2012 | #27 | |
| Ash_F | Sep 2012 | #30 | |
| sabrina 1 | Sep 2012 | #45 | |
| leftynyc | Sep 2012 | #56 | |
| FrodosPet | Sep 2012 | #57 | |
| 24601 | Sep 2012 | #63 | |
| bananas | Sep 2012 | #28 | |
| Ash_F | Sep 2012 | #29 | |
| Beacool | Sep 2012 | #54 | |
| history lover | Sep 2012 | #34 | |
| Megahurtz | Sep 2012 | #48 | |
| Beacool | Sep 2012 | #53 | |
| DeSwiss | Sep 2012 | #49 | |
| olddad56 | Sep 2012 | #51 |
Response to bananas (Original post)
Tue Sep 25, 2012, 04:26 PM
zellie (437 posts)
1. Way to go my homey, Bill
|
Bubba nails it again.
"No serious person believes that"? Lol... I know some people who would give you an argument about that. |
Response to zellie (Reply #1)
Tue Sep 25, 2012, 09:31 PM
ZombieHorde (23,858 posts)
38. It is classic fallacious argumentation.
|
That type of argumentation has been recognized as fallacious for thousands of years.
|
Response to ZombieHorde (Reply #38)
Tue Sep 25, 2012, 10:31 PM
Pterodactyl (992 posts)
39. I see what you did there.
|
You snuck in a "fallacious" in a post about Clinton. Zing!
|
Response to Pterodactyl (Reply #39)
Wed Sep 26, 2012, 09:34 AM
ZombieHorde (23,858 posts)
40. Ha! nt
Response to bananas (Original post)
Tue Sep 25, 2012, 04:34 PM
Canuckistanian (42,204 posts)
2. Ahmandinejad is in charge of nothing
|
He's practically the spokesperson for the real leaders, the Guardian Council. And Ahmandinejad is on his way OUT.
I wish people would stop calling him the "Leader of Iran" |
Response to Canuckistanian (Reply #2)
Tue Sep 25, 2012, 04:51 PM
harmonicon (11,938 posts)
6. Telling the truth about Iran is a big no-no.
|
We must keep it shrouded in mystery as a dark and evil place, dontcha know!!
Heaven forbid that Americans learn that Iran is a first-world country with a highly educated population with a wide diversity of views on politics and religion - a heck of a lot like the US in many ways. If that happened, people might feel bad about bombing them. |
Response to harmonicon (Reply #6)
Tue Sep 25, 2012, 05:04 PM
Missycim (950 posts)
9. Please show me the views that accept gays,non muslims and
|
people who are critical of Islam.
|
Response to Missycim (Reply #9)
Tue Sep 25, 2012, 05:07 PM
harmonicon (11,938 posts)
11. Well, I guess you'd have to ask gay and non-muslim Iranians about that.
|
I assume they're ok with who they are, though they may not be 100% ok with their government. Of course, here in the US, gays have equal rights and no qualms with the government, right?
|
Response to harmonicon (Reply #11)
Tue Sep 25, 2012, 05:11 PM
Missycim (950 posts)
15. You said they have a diversity of views,
|
well I want proof of that. I am speaking of the people as a whole not sub groups.
|
Response to Missycim (Reply #15)
Tue Sep 25, 2012, 05:35 PM
harmonicon (11,938 posts)
21. Who are the "people as a whole" if you're leaving out large numbers of people?
|
I'm pretty sure it's statistically impossible for there to be no homosexuals in Iran.
As for a diversity of views, were you living in a monastery for the last ten years or something? Do you not remember wide-spread political protests happening in Iran? Do you think the Christians, Jews, Zoroastrians, etc. in Iran hate non-Muslims? I imagine that they take their own religions just as seriously as Muslims do and are not self-hating masochists. |
Response to harmonicon (Reply #21)
Tue Sep 25, 2012, 07:40 PM
Missycim (950 posts)
33. Ya what happened to those protesters?
|
nt
|
Response to Missycim (Reply #33)
Fri Sep 28, 2012, 01:15 AM
Comrade Grumpy (3,394 posts)
50. They got repressed.
|
Which doesn't disprove the point that Iran is a diverse country with a diversity of political and cultural views. It just proves that there is a pretty effective authoritarian regime in charge.
|
Response to harmonicon (Reply #11)
Tue Sep 25, 2012, 05:26 PM
DonCoquixote (5,630 posts)
17. has the US executed someone for being gay yet?
|
Untilthey do,yes, Iran does have a more bigoted LGBT policy than we do.
|
Response to DonCoquixote (Reply #17)
Tue Sep 25, 2012, 05:38 PM
harmonicon (11,938 posts)
23. Oh, yes, of course they do.
|
I didn't mean to suggest otherwise, but you bring up a good point here. Has the US executed someone recently? Yep. We're in a really small, disgusting club with that one.
Just as I would rather not be bombed because of the terrible actions of my government, I assume most Iranians would rather not be bombed because of the terrible actions of their government. That bit doesn't really matter though. I don't hear a lot of cries above the drums of war for bombing Iran for the purposes of bringing equal rights to gays or ending their death penalty. |
Response to harmonicon (Reply #23)
Thu Sep 27, 2012, 09:14 PM
24601 (2,494 posts)
42. The question wasn't whether the US had executed someone, but whether the offense was being
|
GLBT. And the US rarely executes anyone. The vast majority of executions are conducted by individual states for violation of state laws rather than federal cases.
I have no doubt that some GLBT people have been executed, but their orientation hasn't been the offense. |
Response to 24601 (Reply #42)
Thu Sep 27, 2012, 10:10 PM
harmonicon (11,938 posts)
47. Yeah, but that's a completely silly distinction to make.
|
Having a death penalty for any crime would be laughably absurd if it didn't involve the state killing people. That's some crazy backwards shit.
We also don't have equal rights in the US for all people. I don't think the pot should be calling (or bombing) the kettle black. |
Response to Missycim (Reply #9)
Thu Sep 27, 2012, 09:19 PM
sabrina 1 (34,089 posts)
43. Have you ever been to Iran?
Response to harmonicon (Reply #6)
Tue Sep 25, 2012, 08:45 PM
history lover (3 posts)
36. soundbite generation
|
these days we learn from headlines and soundbites... too easy for people to think they know the issues when its a really just a superficial and vague idea of what's going on.
|
Response to Canuckistanian (Reply #2)
Tue Sep 25, 2012, 07:39 PM
oberliner (22,147 posts)
32. The Supreme Leader is in charge of everything
|
I don't think anyone in this article called Ahmadinejad the "leader of Iran" - certainly not the Clintons.
He is the public face of Iran, however, and seems to enjoy giving interviews to Western news outlets. |
Response to oberliner (Reply #32)
Tue Sep 25, 2012, 09:18 PM
Canuckistanian (42,204 posts)
37. Yeah, I know
|
But when anger turns towards Iran, everyone blames the EVIL Ahmadinejad, dictator of Iran.
He's not. And even Bill Clinton seems to endow him with more power than he really has. |
Response to bananas (Original post)
Tue Sep 25, 2012, 04:44 PM
leveymg (26,365 posts)
3. Bill, why not "help to get everybody get rid of their nuclear weapons." Start with those who have
|
them - Israel and Pakistan. I haven't heard a word about those, and they really do have lots and lots of bombs.
|
Response to leveymg (Reply #3)
Tue Sep 25, 2012, 04:52 PM
harmonicon (11,938 posts)
7. Change starts at home.
|
Start with the good ol' USA. Until we disarm, we're hypocrites for asking anyone else to.
|
Response to harmonicon (Reply #7)
Tue Sep 25, 2012, 05:08 PM
Missycim (950 posts)
12. Ya lets disarm while they arm (not to mention china, russia etc)
|
thats the spirit!!!1
|
Response to Missycim (Reply #12)
Tue Sep 25, 2012, 05:11 PM
harmonicon (11,938 posts)
14. Yes, it is.
|
All we gain from having nuclear weapons is the spread of such weapons around the world and an increased likelihood of destroying this world. Do you think hypocrisy is a virtue, or do you think every country should be nuclear?
|
Response to harmonicon (Reply #14)
Tue Sep 25, 2012, 05:13 PM
Missycim (950 posts)
16. No I am quite alright being judgemental
|
I think some countries are mature and some others not so much. If you think Iran nuclear is the same as the US being nuclear, then there's a problem
|
Response to Missycim (Reply #16)
Tue Sep 25, 2012, 05:31 PM
harmonicon (11,938 posts)
19. No, I don't. The US is clearly far more dangerous. (nt)
Response to harmonicon (Reply #19)
Tue Sep 25, 2012, 05:32 PM
Missycim (950 posts)
20. Ok this is an agree to disagree moment and we shall move on,
|
take care
|
Response to Missycim (Reply #20)
Tue Sep 25, 2012, 05:39 PM
harmonicon (11,938 posts)
24. You too. (nt)
Response to harmonicon (Reply #14)
Tue Sep 25, 2012, 08:43 PM
history lover (3 posts)
35. i think you would appreciate this link
|
www.armageddonletters.com
taking lessons from the Cuban Missile Crisis to generate discussion about nonproliferation and disarmament... short films, graphic novels, and blogs... |
Response to Missycim (Reply #12)
leveymg This message was hidden by Jury decision.
Response to leveymg (Reply #3)
Tue Sep 25, 2012, 05:05 PM
Missycim (950 posts)
10. Neither one of them have threatened to wipe another country off the map
|
nt
|
Response to Missycim (Reply #10)
Tue Sep 25, 2012, 05:37 PM
Ash_F (1,744 posts)
22. Yet another right wing lie.
|
Thoroughly debunked but that doesn't stop some duers. No nation needs nuclear weapons either. As the other poster said, Freeperville is that way --->
|
Response to Ash_F (Reply #22)
Tue Sep 25, 2012, 07:37 PM
Missycim (950 posts)
31. lol you are cute
|
Last edited Tue Sep 25, 2012, 07:37 PM USA/ET - Edit history (1) its like watching grover dill on "a Christmas story", you don't have to try so hard building cred.
What do you think has kept the Jews safe for nearly 40+ years? |
Response to Missycim (Reply #31)
Thu Sep 27, 2012, 03:50 PM
Ash_F (1,744 posts)
41. Not right-wing talking points cribbed straight from Fox and Limbaugh, that's for sure. /nt
Response to Ash_F (Reply #22)
Thu Sep 27, 2012, 09:48 PM
King_David (4,636 posts)
46. Debunked? ha ha
|
it has become right wing to quote Ahmadinejad. ( the bigoted homophobic jerk ? )
Debunked my ass. And I am a lifelong democratic party supporter. And anyone claiming it has been debunked when the BIGOTED HOMOPHOBIC IDIOT JERK ,says it at least once or twice a week is delusional. |
Response to King_David (Reply #46)
Fri Sep 28, 2012, 01:39 PM
Ash_F (1,744 posts)
58. Do you speak Farsi?
|
Last edited Fri Sep 28, 2012, 01:44 PM USA/ET - Edit history (2) Maybe you should get educated on the subject before you go making personal attacks.
PS - Also, it is possible to support gay-rights, women's rights and democratic reform in Iran with out resorting to lies. Cheers. |
Response to Ash_F (Reply #58)
Sat Sep 29, 2012, 12:31 AM
King_David (4,636 posts)
59. No need to speak Farsi
|
His pet official 'pravda' press TV and official websites do a grand job of translation. He does not have the same embarrassment or reticence in sprouting his bigoted jerk idiotic imbecilic juvenile hate that some in the west do. It ain't even up for discussion. He says it weekly,clearly,and without shame. He is a fucking homophobic bigoted antisemitic holocaust denying asshole ! ( no need to translate that into Farsi) |
Response to King_David (Reply #59)
Sat Sep 29, 2012, 05:48 AM
Ash_F (1,744 posts)
60. No argument here
|
Last edited Sat Sep 29, 2012, 05:53 AM USA/ET - Edit history (2) "He is a fucking homophobic bigoted antisemitic holocaust denying asshole !" <- This is true
I never disputed that, in any post. His own words prove that. BUT he has never threatened to strike Israel. Ever. That is a flat out lie. A dangerous one because it can be a pre-text for instigating war. A lie that has been debunked by reputable press, but not before the right-wing noise machine passes it around. Just the other day, Reuters tried it again with some editorial shenanigans before CBS stepped in and put the kabosh on it. "But while Reuters quoted Ahmadinejad as calling for Israel to be “eliminated,” the official translation of his remarks indicated that he steered clear of the fiery rhetoric he is best known for." Even Obama carefully avoided claiming that in his UN speech. He chose his words wisely for a reason. It wasn't just semantics. Our president is not a propagandist nor a liar. It's not unlike the "you didn't build that" meme he had to deal with a while ago. Except this is more dangerous because we are talking about war. |
Response to Ash_F (Reply #60)
Sat Sep 29, 2012, 10:19 AM
King_David (4,636 posts)
61. You're too much,
|
Your 'mistranslation ' argument is as ridiculous as it was a few years ago.
You're the only one I have seen clinging to this nonsense. |
Response to King_David (Reply #61)
Sat Sep 29, 2012, 01:27 PM
Ash_F (1,744 posts)
62. And CBS?
|
Last edited Sat Sep 29, 2012, 01:37 PM USA/ET - Edit history (1) You conveniently disregard them too? Who's clinging?
|
Response to Ash_F (Reply #22)
Fri Sep 28, 2012, 11:10 AM
Beacool (19,095 posts)
52. Debunked????????
|
How many times has Ahmandinejad called for the destruction of Israel????
|
Response to Ash_F (Reply #22)
Fri Sep 28, 2012, 11:29 AM
leftynyc (10,330 posts)
55. NEVER DEBUNKED
|
And I'm shouting because it's a lie worth shouting about.
|
Response to leveymg (Reply #3)
Thu Sep 27, 2012, 09:24 PM
sabrina 1 (34,089 posts)
44. Good question, the US needs to lead the way in getting rid of Nukes. But instead
|
the focus on this one country which DOESN'T EVEN HAVE THEM, is more than suspicious. Bill must think we are all as naive as we used to be back before we realized he was such good friends with the Bush family, AFTER we spent years defending him from Bush supporters.. That was the beginning of a rude awakening for me regarding politicians in general.
Bill needs to remember what he himself said about nuclear armed nations when he was president. He stated that the Pakistan/India situation was the most dangerous in the world and that during his term of office, they came close to Nuclear War three different times. I guess he forgot that threat from actual nuclear armed countries, and someone has persuaded him to try to convince us that Iran, which has no nukes, is a worse threat then the countries he himself identified as the real threat to world peace. |
Response to bananas (Original post)
Tue Sep 25, 2012, 04:45 PM
Ash_F (1,744 posts)
5. Clinton was right on that question, but will he endorse such an initiative himself?
|
He carefully avoided going there. The US could lead from the front by drawing down it's own nuclear weapons program, instead of modernizing it to the tune of billions.
http://www.armscontrol.org/factsheets/USNuclearModernization |
Response to bananas (Original post)
Tue Sep 25, 2012, 04:58 PM
TomClash (10,948 posts)
8. No serious person believes the US and Israel are interested in nonproliferation
|
And neither is anyone else.
|
Response to bananas (Original post)
Tue Sep 25, 2012, 05:09 PM
Stewland (163 posts)
13. If Iran has the intent of using nuclear capacity for evil
|
Certainly there are better ways to deal with Iran than bombing and killing thousands of its citizens. I troubles me that Natanyaho is doing his darnedest to drag the United States into a war before our elections. Why can't our elected officials gather the strength to tell Zionists NO More War ,No more military aid and no more support of its militaristic aims.
|
Response to bananas (Original post)
Tue Sep 25, 2012, 05:41 PM
Comrade_McKenzie (2,526 posts)
25. I trust Obama to do the right thing. nt
Response to Comrade_McKenzie (Reply #25)
Tue Sep 25, 2012, 06:04 PM
Ash_F (1,744 posts)
26. +1
|
He definitely won't strike without a declaration of violation from the General Conference. Which also will not happen, because Iran is not in violation of the NPT.
He won't act outside of international law, like previous presidents. |
Response to Ash_F (Reply #26)
Tue Sep 25, 2012, 06:25 PM
bananas (20,168 posts)
27. Iran is in violation of the NPT.
|
And here's the transcript of Obama's remarks about Iran:
"Time and again, it has failed to take the opportunity to demonstrate that its nuclear program is peaceful, and to meet its obligations to the United Nations." http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2012/09/25/remarks-president-un-general-assembly
<snip> In Iran, we see where the path of a violent and unaccountable ideology leads. The Iranian people have a remarkable and ancient history, and many Iranians wish to enjoy peace and prosperity alongside their neighbors. But just as it restricts the rights of its own people, the Iranian government continues to prop up a dictator in Damascus and supports terrorist groups abroad. Time and again, it has failed to take the opportunity to demonstrate that its nuclear program is peaceful, and to meet its obligations to the United Nations. So let me be clear. America wants to resolve this issue through diplomacy, and we believe that there is still time and space to do so. But that time is not unlimited. We respect the right of nations to access peaceful nuclear power, but one of the purposes of the United Nations is to see that we harness that power for peace. And make no mistake, a nuclear-armed Iran is not a challenge that can be contained. It would threaten the elimination of Israel, the security of Gulf nations, and the stability of the global economy. It risks triggering a nuclear-arms race in the region, and the unraveling of the non-proliferation treaty. That’s why a coalition of countries is holding the Iranian government accountable. And that’s why the United States will do what we must to prevent Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon. <snip> |
Response to bananas (Reply #27)
Tue Sep 25, 2012, 06:55 PM
Ash_F (1,744 posts)
30. Nope
|
Last edited Tue Sep 25, 2012, 06:57 PM USA/ET - Edit history (1) We've been through this before. Only the nations who wrote and signed the treaty can find one in violation. That is not for you to dictate. Even Obama has not said Iran is in violation and that is on purpose.
|
Response to bananas (Reply #27)
Thu Sep 27, 2012, 09:25 PM
sabrina 1 (34,089 posts)
45. Israel is in violation of UN Resolutions. How come nothing has been done about that?
Response to sabrina 1 (Reply #45)
Fri Sep 28, 2012, 11:35 AM
leftynyc (10,330 posts)
56. Because the UN is a joke
|
Always resolutions about Israel but still haven't had anything but wringing of the hands on Syria and in fact FAILED to condemn them. I don't know any country that takes them seriously anymore.
|
Response to bananas (Reply #27)
Fri Sep 28, 2012, 11:46 AM
FrodosPet (1,027 posts)
57. Dear God NO!
|
For the love of all that is dear to our nation:
Our President is being lied to, or perhaps blackmailed, regarding Iran. Get the warmongers and neocons, feeding their lies, away from President Obama. He needs to be surrounded by peace loving advisers, not by the savage self interests that are steering us towards war. |
Response to FrodosPet (Reply #57)
Sat Sep 29, 2012, 03:10 PM
24601 (2,494 posts)
63. Golly gee, you forgot to blame the Jews. What good is a thinly-veiled attack on Israel without once
|
mentioning the Jews. "Neocons" just doesn't have quite the same resonance as "those warmongering Jews."
For the record, I want our nation to stand with Israel, even if it does live in a crappy neighborhood. And being unprepared for war is the one sure way to ensure you will have one. |
Response to Ash_F (Reply #26)
Tue Sep 25, 2012, 06:31 PM
bananas (20,168 posts)
28. LOL - "He won't act outside of international law"
|
Assassinating Iranian scientists, sabotaging Iranian industrial equipment - all perfectly legal! Remember, kids, it's not illegal if you don't get caught! |
Response to bananas (Reply #28)
Tue Sep 25, 2012, 06:52 PM
Ash_F (1,744 posts)
29. I don't believe Obama is responsible for any of that /nt
Response to Comrade_McKenzie (Reply #25)
Fri Sep 28, 2012, 11:14 AM
Beacool (19,095 posts)
54. Well, good for you.
|
I wouldn't be so trusting. For example, why was the administration peddling the story that the attack in Libya was a consequence of the anti Islamic video when it wasn't?
|
Response to bananas (Original post)
Tue Sep 25, 2012, 08:38 PM
history lover (3 posts)
34. lets take a look at history...
|
The 50th anniversary of the Cuban Missile Crisis is coming up in October and there is alot of analysis going on about how we came to the brink of a nuclear armageddon and what lessons we can learn from that situation and the leadership of Kennedy, Khrushchev, and Castro at that time... Take a look at www.armageddonletters.com/films. They have only added 4 films, but are making a series based on the communications between the leaders of the US, Russia, and Cuba to look at what that moment in time means for us now. Maybe its scary to disarm our weapons, but it's really scary to know that thousands of nuclear weapons exist and only 20 are needed to cause a nuclear winter.
|
Response to bananas (Original post)
Thu Sep 27, 2012, 11:59 PM
Megahurtz (6,913 posts)
48. Bill Needs to Stick to Signing Books
|
or something. He seems to have Foot In Mouth Disease.
|
Response to Megahurtz (Reply #48)
Fri Sep 28, 2012, 11:12 AM
Beacool (19,095 posts)
53. No, he doesn't.
|
He's smarter than most people and knows exactly what he is saying.
|
Response to bananas (Original post)
Fri Sep 28, 2012, 12:47 AM
DeSwiss (17,218 posts)
49. I don't trust anyone with nuclear weapons......
- Or any nuclear material of any kind. We haven't evolved sufficiently, in my view, to be trusted with such knowledge. And I especially don't trust US, since we have the most nuclear weapons and thus a greater probability of fucking something up with them -- by accident, or whatever. And we have the ''most accidents'' with them too. Absolute butter-fingers. We've got bombs that fell out of aircraft, or those that crashed or otherwise sunk into the drink with oodles of nuclear weapons in-tow. And there all still down there next to Davy Jones locker -- too deep or difficult, and/or risky to try and retrieve -- they say. Literal ticking time bombs.
Peruse through these when you have an hour or five to kill....... List of civilian radiation accidents http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_civilian_radiation_accidents List of civilian nuclear accidents http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_civilian_nuclear_accidents Criticality accidents http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticality_accident List of civilian nuclear incidents http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_civilian_nuclear_incidents List of military nuclear accidents http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_military_nuclear_accidents List of states with nuclear weapons http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_states_with_nuclear_weapons And here's a few more for the bonus round: Russia Announces Enormous Finds Of Radioactive Waste And Nuclear Reactors In Arctic Seas Radioactive material dumped in the cavern during the 1990s was 'likely entombed' at the bottom New flyover footage of giant sinkhole shows signs of further expansion (VIDEO) |
Response to bananas (Original post)
Fri Sep 28, 2012, 01:25 AM
olddad56 (2,836 posts)
51. but India, China, Israel, Pakistan, the US, etc can be trusted? ...
|
I wouldn't trust Robme with a fucking BB gun. He might put his eye out.
|


- Or any nuclear material of any kind. We haven't evolved sufficiently, in my view, to be trusted with such knowledge. And I especially don't trust US, since we have the most nuclear weapons and thus a greater probability of fucking something up with them -- by accident, or whatever. And we have the ''most accidents'' with them too. Absolute butter-fingers. We've got bombs that fell out of aircraft, or those that crashed or otherwise sunk into the drink with oodles of nuclear weapons in-tow. And there all still down there next to Davy Jones locker -- too deep or difficult, and/or risky to try and retrieve -- they say. Literal ticking time bombs.