HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » Latest Breaking News (Forum) » Taiwanese boats off dispu...

Mon Sep 24, 2012, 10:47 PM

Taiwanese boats off disputed East China Sea islands

Source: BBC

Dozens of Taiwanese vessels, including coastguard ships, have entered waters around disputed East China Sea islands, Japanese officials say.

The uninhabited islands, called Senkaku in Japan and Diaoyu in China, are controlled by Japan, but also claimed by China and Taiwan.

Tension in the region has been high since Japan's purchase of the islands from their private Japanese owner.

A top Japanese envoy is in Beijing for talks aimed at easing the strains.

Read more: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-19709355

8 replies, 1465 views

Thread informationRemove bookmarkTrash this thread

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 8 replies Author Time Post
Reply Taiwanese boats off disputed East China Sea islands (Original post)
Bosonic Sep 2012 OP
dipsydoodle Sep 2012 #1
Lurks Often Sep 2012 #2
dipsydoodle Sep 2012 #3
glacierbay Sep 2012 #5
dipsydoodle Sep 2012 #6
glacierbay Sep 2012 #7
Archae Sep 2012 #4
Socal31 Sep 2012 #8

Response to Bosonic (Original post)

Tue Sep 25, 2012, 04:53 AM

1. China carrier a show of force as Japan tension festers

(Reuters) - China sent its first aircraft carrier into formal service on Tuesday amid a tense maritime dispute with Japan, a show of naval force that could worry its neighbours.

China's Ministry of Defence said the newly named Liaoning aircraft carrier would "raise the overall operational strength of the Chinese navy" and help Beijing to "effectively protect national sovereignty, security and development interests".

http://uk.reuters.com/article/2012/09/25/uk-china-japan-idUKBRE88O06W20120925

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to dipsydoodle (Reply #1)

Tue Sep 25, 2012, 10:01 AM

2. Mostly bluster on the part of the Chinese

the Liaoning only carries 26 fixed wing aircraft (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinese_aircraft_carrier_Liaoning),
roughly a third of what a US aircraft carrier has, so it would be hard pressed to defend itself under a major attack, much less carry out major offensive operations. Additionally, it is very probable that the Chinese will lose a significant number of pilots and aircraft during the next several years. Flying from an aircraft carrier is not easy and the Chinese navy lacks the 70+ years of experience and doctrine that the US Navy has developed.

I don't expect this to develop to where the various sides end up shooting at each other. Japan's Air Force and Navy are very well equipped with a long history of being very well trained, if this develops into a shooting war, the Chinese military is going to get hurt badly by the Japanese. That does not take into consideration the very high likelihood of the US and South Korea being dragged into the conflict. Japan, US & South Korea do not have the resources to invade China and China lacks the amphibious and logistical ships ships to invade Japan.

I think we'll see a lot of bluster and saber rattling and then somewhere down the road they'll come to an agreement that all parties can accept and profit from.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Lurks Often (Reply #2)

Tue Sep 25, 2012, 10:52 AM

3. Prestige not bluster

Showing their own people what they do with the huge reserves built up by the shopping habits of the west.

Meanwhile the US has expressed disapproval of the Chinese having a carrier despite the fact the US had eleven of them.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to dipsydoodle (Reply #1)

Tue Sep 25, 2012, 11:10 AM

5. What a joke of a carrier

 

Here's what a real Aircraft Carrier looks like:

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to glacierbay (Reply #5)

Tue Sep 25, 2012, 11:41 AM

6. Its symbolic

at least for time being. Its reckoned it will take them 10 years to put a full blown navy together. Carriers are a piece of cake to take out with missiles anyway regardless of how advanced or otherwise they may be.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to dipsydoodle (Reply #6)

Tue Sep 25, 2012, 11:43 AM

7. No they are not pieces of cake to take out

 

they are very well defended. Don't believe that they are easy to sink, that's just not true.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Bosonic (Original post)

Tue Sep 25, 2012, 11:02 AM

4. What's on these islands, anyway?

Or is this China just waving their dick around?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Archae (Reply #4)

Tue Sep 25, 2012, 11:46 AM

8. It's obvious, isn't it?

Last edited Tue Sep 25, 2012, 11:47 AM USA/ET - Edit history (2)

There are reports of large fossil fuel and natural gas stores. Same reason Russia/China want to plant flags in the Arctic.

Japan is under our "nuclear umbrella", so I doubt anything will become of that side of the mess. Taiwan, however, is a serious Chinese black-eye, and I really wish we would recuse ourselves from our current treaty with them.

I really don't want to die from a full nuclear exchange due to a civil war over some disputed islands.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread