HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » Latest Breaking News (Forum) » Fanning furor, Justice Sc...

Tue Sep 18, 2012, 12:22 AM

Fanning furor, Justice Scalia says appeals court judge lied

Source: Reuters

(Reuters) - U.S. Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia on Monday escalated a war of words with a prominent appeals court judge, saying the judge lied in a recent criticism of Scalia's judicial philosophy.

Scalia, 76, the longest-serving justice and a leading conservative on the court, said Judge Richard Posner, of the 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, lied in a review in August of a book co-authored by Scalia.

In the review, Posner accused Scalia of deviating from his own strict, text-based approach to interpreting law when he struck down a District of Columbia handgun ban in 2008 by considering the legislative history behind the law.

"To say that I used legislative history is simply, to put it bluntly, a lie," Scalia said in an interview with Reuters Editor-in-Chief Stephen Adler.

Read more: http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/09/18/us-usa-court-scalia-idUSBRE88H06X20120918

41 replies, 5975 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 41 replies Author Time Post
Reply Fanning furor, Justice Scalia says appeals court judge lied (Original post)
jsr Sep 2012 OP
JRLeft Sep 2012 #1
freshwest Sep 2012 #2
WinstonSmith4740 Sep 2012 #9
rsdsharp Sep 2012 #27
WinstonSmith4740 Sep 2012 #36
progressoid Sep 2012 #13
OnyxCollie Sep 2012 #3
1StrongBlackMan Sep 2012 #4
Skittles Sep 2012 #5
OnyxCollie Sep 2012 #6
elleng Sep 2012 #10
1StrongBlackMan Sep 2012 #22
JudyM Sep 2012 #41
lonestarnot Sep 2012 #7
Hassin Bin Sober Sep 2012 #21
lonestarnot Sep 2012 #40
elleng Sep 2012 #8
msanthrope Sep 2012 #16
defacto7 Sep 2012 #11
StrictlyRockers Sep 2012 #12
LarryNM Sep 2012 #14
oldsarge54 Sep 2012 #15
Volaris Sep 2012 #18
oldsarge54 Sep 2012 #26
Dustlawyer Sep 2012 #17
trailmonkee Sep 2012 #19
ChairmanAgnostic Sep 2012 #20
1StrongBlackMan Sep 2012 #23
ChairmanAgnostic Sep 2012 #32
1StrongBlackMan Sep 2012 #35
elleng Sep 2012 #37
elleng Sep 2012 #31
annabanana Sep 2012 #24
annabanana Sep 2012 #25
onenote Sep 2012 #33
Ian David Sep 2012 #28
silvershadow Sep 2012 #29
former9thward Sep 2012 #38
zorro1 Sep 2012 #30
librechik Sep 2012 #34
Panasonic Sep 2012 #39

Response to jsr (Original post)

Tue Sep 18, 2012, 12:24 AM

1. Just retire asshole.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to JRLeft (Reply #1)

Tue Sep 18, 2012, 12:30 AM

2. Yeah, the place needs some airing out, you stinking crook.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to JRLeft (Reply #1)

Tue Sep 18, 2012, 01:07 AM

9. Unfortunately...

As much as I'd like to see that, after Obama wins in November, he won't. He'll never retire as long as Obama gets to name his successor. As long as there's a Democrat in the White House, they're going to have to carry him out.

He came in under Reagan, and I remember my husband being really uneasy about it. He always considered him kind of a "stealth" candidate. He came in under the radar 'cause he took Warren Burger's place on the court when Burger was made Chief Justice. It was viewed at the time as just one conservative replacing another, but in listening to the hearing, Mike realized then just how scary this guy could be. He was certainly right.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to WinstonSmith4740 (Reply #9)

Tue Sep 18, 2012, 11:31 AM

27. Burger was appointed by Nixon as Chief Justice

When Burger retired, Associate Justice William Rehnquist was nominated to take his place, and Scalia took Rehnquist's.

On the DC Circuit Scalia voted to end the FCC's Fairness Doctrine. That decision led directly to the rise of right wing talk radio.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to rsdsharp (Reply #27)

Tue Sep 18, 2012, 08:41 PM

36. Oops!

Right you are! I though Nixon had just appointed him to the Supreme Court, but now that I think about it, didn't Reagan tempt Burger away with some big time job that made him retire so Rehnquist could step up? I just remember the whole thing being kind of creepy, especially the Fairness Doctrine being overturned. The Rethugs actually used the argument that demanding both sides of position be presented somehow gave people less information, or some such bullshit.

But then again, Oceania has always been at war with Eastasia.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to JRLeft (Reply #1)

Tue Sep 18, 2012, 02:48 AM

13. Yes please.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to jsr (Original post)

Tue Sep 18, 2012, 12:45 AM

3. Hey, Fat Nino!

Vaffanculo!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to jsr (Original post)

Tue Sep 18, 2012, 12:48 AM

4. When I was in law school ...

I remember reading Posner's Opinions and coming away thinking, "Okay, that makes sense" (whether I liked the outcome or not). More, his writings on Contracts, Torts and Federalism that helped me understand those areas of law ... I don't recall reading a single thing penned by Scalia.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to 1StrongBlackMan (Reply #4)

Tue Sep 18, 2012, 12:56 AM

5. you'd remember puking if you had read Scalia, 1StrongBlackMan

yes INDEED

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to 1StrongBlackMan (Reply #4)

Tue Sep 18, 2012, 12:59 AM

6. I remember reading Scalia's opinion on Walmart v Dukes

and thinking, "What a fucking dick head."

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to 1StrongBlackMan (Reply #4)

Tue Sep 18, 2012, 01:09 AM

10. AND, Posner's been 'conservative,' an economist/judge,

and VERY well respected, considered for Supremes over the years.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to elleng (Reply #10)

Tue Sep 18, 2012, 11:19 AM

22. Absolutely ...

I learned to respect Posner's legal reasoning on matters that I was/am, politically, diametrically opposed to.

Since posting my original remark, I pulled, at random, 7 Opinions covering various topic, written by Scalia (while on the SCOTUS and the Appellate Court). After reading them, I was left with a feeling that he started with a desired result, then gathered law to support that result; rather than, what is customary (and proper), i.e., use the existing law to inform one's opinion.

And from listening to him speak and reading other articles ... I get the distinction impression that he believes himself to be the smartest, most cunning, man in the universe.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to 1StrongBlackMan (Reply #22)

Tue Sep 18, 2012, 11:22 PM

41. that's how he rolls. try reading his bowers v hardwick opinion

so vitriolic and mean-spirited i'd never seen anything like it, seething with homophobic contempt, voting to uphold georgia's sodomy law using the bible for support!!! there's some strict construction for you.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to jsr (Original post)

Tue Sep 18, 2012, 01:03 AM

7. Can we get him more cholesterol for lunch?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to lonestarnot (Reply #7)

Tue Sep 18, 2012, 10:04 AM

21. We should send a case of Krispy Kremes every day to his office.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Hassin Bin Sober (Reply #21)

Tue Sep 18, 2012, 11:11 PM

40. LOL. mmmmmmmmmm

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to jsr (Original post)

Tue Sep 18, 2012, 01:07 AM

8. POSNER???

Sounds like tony's losing it!
"First Monday of October" coming up!!!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to elleng (Reply #8)

Tue Sep 18, 2012, 07:00 AM

16. Yep...attacking Posner is not a well-balanced move. nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to jsr (Original post)

Tue Sep 18, 2012, 01:58 AM

11. what we need is an Obama landslide, a senate majority

and a congressional majority... impeach a couple of these fascists for treason or bad lunch choices, and get on with getting this country free and sound.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to jsr (Original post)

Tue Sep 18, 2012, 02:20 AM

12. That guys is a royal prick.

He can't retire soon enough.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to jsr (Original post)

Tue Sep 18, 2012, 02:55 AM

14. Term Limits on SCOTUS Members Along with

strict controls on Senate Filibusters and abolition of the Electoral College. Perhaps if this nation does not do these things, then the nation that replaces it will.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to jsr (Original post)

Tue Sep 18, 2012, 05:47 AM

15. Mr Justice,

I've got a copy of your comments on District of Columbia vs Heller. You sir, are the one standing on an untruth.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to oldsarge54 (Reply #15)

Tue Sep 18, 2012, 08:41 AM

18. No shit. I read that opinion, (and actually thought it was a rare decent one by Fat Tony)

Last edited Tue Sep 18, 2012, 08:42 AM USA/ET - Edit history (1)

but to state that he did NOT in fact, cite legislative, common law history going back to pre-colonial Britain is just a straight-up LIE. (Maybe he's starting to go senile as he progresses in years?) To rip into a fellow Justice over this strikes me as juvenile and unprofessional. You'd think a Supreme Court Justice (OF ALL fucking people) would have developed a thicker hide...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Volaris (Reply #18)

Tue Sep 18, 2012, 11:30 AM

26. I'm Not a Lawyer

Just a retired GI and school teacher, but I wonder how he just deleted the first 13 words of the 27 words in the 2nd Amendment? That's 40% of the whole amendment struck out of the record. (40.9%) Then again, I'm no legal beagle, I didn't follow his logic.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to jsr (Original post)

Tue Sep 18, 2012, 08:31 AM

17. His ego is what makes him talk, give interviews. The man could not be more full of himself if he

tried! As far as him being a Koch sucker along with his own mini-me, Clarence Thomas, that's for the money and a suck up to POWER! He loves the affirmation he gets when he does a good job for those rich bastards.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to jsr (Original post)

Tue Sep 18, 2012, 09:54 AM

19. they should keep their comments to the court or formal papers, that would be the class move...

this war of words stuff is unbecoming

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to jsr (Original post)

Tue Sep 18, 2012, 09:54 AM

20. I've read three books by Posner. I've appeared before him in court. I've read his opinions.

In a battle of wits, or in this case, a wit and a halfwit, Scalia will be the clear loser.

Posner recently had a change of heart, especially in the battles between the little guy and big, bad corporations (including employers).

He will be shaping some new law, I suspect.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ChairmanAgnostic (Reply #20)

Tue Sep 18, 2012, 11:25 AM

23. I argued before Posner? ...

Wow! There are few individuals in this world whose mere presense would rattle me ... Posner would be one of them. It would be like being a cornerback trying to cover a receiver whose Football Card, one refused to trade.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to 1StrongBlackMan (Reply #23)

Tue Sep 18, 2012, 01:08 PM

32. actually, the panel just wanted me to sit down and shut up.

the facts and the law were so clearly on my client's side, that I probably said to much as it was. Nervous? ewe betcha.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ChairmanAgnostic (Reply #32)

Tue Sep 18, 2012, 01:48 PM

35. Oops ...

I meant to write "You" argued before Posner. But I guess you understood.

the facts and the law were so clearly on my client's side, that I probably said to much as it was.


I'm sure you've heard:

"If the law is on your side ... pound the law. If the facts are on your side ... pound the facts. If neither, the law nor the facts are on your side pound the table and talk real loud."

So now we can add:

"If both the law and the facts are on your side ... Shut the heck up; while the panel pounds your opponent!"

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ChairmanAgnostic (Reply #32)

Tue Sep 18, 2012, 09:36 PM

37. I recall arguing before 7th Circuit,

appointed case, not long after admission, and thought: If I can do THIS, I can do ANYTHING!!!
I did, Court thanked me for my 'service,' and client lost.
No idea WHO was on the panel. Was in mid-'70s.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ChairmanAgnostic (Reply #20)

Tue Sep 18, 2012, 12:45 PM

31. Will be very good to see,

as he's a fine jurist and very good writer.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to jsr (Original post)

Tue Sep 18, 2012, 11:27 AM

24. Scalia is a pig.

He desecrates the robes he wears.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to jsr (Original post)

Tue Sep 18, 2012, 11:30 AM

25. Posner... Obama's next appointee?

Suck it Tony.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to annabanana (Reply #25)

Tue Sep 18, 2012, 01:19 PM

33. Bad idea for several reasons

Not the least of which is that Posner is 73 years old. Also, despite the fawning over him by some on this thread, one should keep in mind that Posner was comrade in arms with none other than Robert Bork in developing a legal theory that effectively guts antitrust law. And he dissented from a decision that struck down on first amendment grounds a law that made it illegal to videotape public events, such as an arrest, without consent of those being taped.

We can do better.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to jsr (Original post)

Tue Sep 18, 2012, 11:33 AM

28. Didn't Scalia say that the line about "a well-regulated militia" is just a "rhetorical flourish?" nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to jsr (Original post)

Tue Sep 18, 2012, 11:55 AM

29. I'm no lawyer. Is that, by chance, an impeachable offense in some way? I keep waiting for

him to finally snap in some impeachable way.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to silvershadow (Reply #29)

Tue Sep 18, 2012, 10:15 PM

38. No criticism is not impeachable.

Nor is name calling or anything like that. No Supreme Court Justice has ever been impeached and convicted in the country's history. There have been many attempts but none have ever gotten anywhere.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to jsr (Original post)

Tue Sep 18, 2012, 12:38 PM

30. Scalias days are numbered

It won't be long before this sweaty, obese GOP insider falls over dead. Our country will be better off and hopefully his mid evil judicial philosophy will go with him.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to jsr (Original post)

Tue Sep 18, 2012, 01:40 PM

34. it says something when a clear conservative is at war with a nutbag conservative.

I await the conclusion with little hope and much amusement.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to jsr (Original post)

Tue Sep 18, 2012, 10:16 PM

39. I'm sure the esteemed jurist that Posner is, will hand a nice smackdown to Scalia

 

after a recent history of Bush v Gore.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread