HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » Latest Breaking News (Forum) » Ryan: Specifics To Romney...

Mon Sep 17, 2012, 08:36 AM

Ryan: Specifics To Romney Tax Plan Will Be Sorted Out By Congress

Source: tpm

In an interview with the Christian Broadcasting Network's David Brody that will air in full on Friday, vice presidential candidate Paul Ryan said that specifics associated with the Republican ticket's tax plan will emerge when he and Mitt Romney work with Congress to iron out a deal.


David Brody: “There are some conservatives that have spoken out saying they want to see some more specifics from the Romney/Ryan team and one thing that comes up, at least from the liberals is tax loopholes. Is there a reason you guys aren’t naming specific tax loopholes?”

Paul Ryan: “Yes because we want to get it done. Look, I’ve been on the Ways and Means Committee for 12 years. I’m very familiar with how to make successful tax reforms take place. Ronald Reagan and Tip O’Neil did it in 1986 but we haven’t done it since 1986 for lots of reasons which is we don’t want to presume to say ‘here’s exactly our way or the highway take it or leave it Congress.’ We want to say this is our vision, lower tax rates across the board for families and small businesses and work on the loopholes that are enjoyed by the higher income earners, take away their tax shelters so more of their income is subject to taxation. That lowers everybody’s tax rates. And we have to be able to work with Congress on those details, on how to fill it in and more to the point we don’t want to cut some backroom deal that they did with Obamacare where we hatched some plan behind the scenes and they spring it on the country. We want to do this in front, in the public, through congressional hearings with Congress so that we can get to the best conclusion with a public participation. That’s the process that works the best to ultimate success gets this done. That’s why we’re doing it this way.”


Read more: http://livewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/entry/ryan-specifics-to-romney-tax-plan-will-be

46 replies, 4343 views

Thread informationRemove bookmarkTrash this thread

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 46 replies Author Time Post
Reply Ryan: Specifics To Romney Tax Plan Will Be Sorted Out By Congress (Original post)
trailmonkee Sep 2012 OP
eppur_se_muova Sep 2012 #1
rfranklin Sep 2012 #28
eppur_se_muova Sep 2012 #34
oldbanjo Sep 2012 #40
liberal N proud Sep 2012 #2
grattsl Sep 2012 #3
oldbanjo Sep 2012 #41
reflection Sep 2012 #4
Raven Sep 2012 #5
oldbanjo Sep 2012 #42
Cosmocat Sep 2012 #6
Amonester Sep 2012 #36
mojo2012 Sep 2012 #7
Roy Rolling Sep 2012 #8
valerief Sep 2012 #14
Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Sep 2012 #9
6000eliot Sep 2012 #10
Hissyspit Sep 2012 #22
onehandle Sep 2012 #11
Overseas Sep 2012 #12
oldbanjo Sep 2012 #43
Overseas Sep 2012 #46
jsr Sep 2012 #13
svip Sep 2012 #15
randome Sep 2012 #20
thecrow Sep 2012 #16
BootinUp Sep 2012 #17
truthisfreedom Sep 2012 #18
msanthrope Sep 2012 #19
Hissyspit Sep 2012 #21
evilhime Sep 2012 #23
FailureToCommunicate Sep 2012 #24
indypaul Sep 2012 #25
sherylkaye Sep 2012 #26
oldbanjo Sep 2012 #44
Fresh_Start Sep 2012 #27
subterranean Sep 2012 #29
DallasNE Sep 2012 #30
julian09 Sep 2012 #35
DallasNE Sep 2012 #37
triplepoint Sep 2012 #31
DallasNE Sep 2012 #38
bamacrat Sep 2012 #32
BumRushDaShow Sep 2012 #33
Zorro Sep 2012 #39
daybranch Sep 2012 #45

Response to trailmonkee (Original post)

Mon Sep 17, 2012, 08:37 AM

1. If Congress is going to do all the work, we don't need Ryan or Romney. nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to eppur_se_muova (Reply #1)

Mon Sep 17, 2012, 11:10 AM

28. Remember what Norquist said about the rubber stamp President?

 

In a speech he made at CPAC this year, Grover Nordquist articulated out loud a case for Mitt Romney that you usually hear only whispered by other conservative leaders. It appears Republicans have reconciled themselves to a Romney candidacy because they see Romney as an essentially weak and passive president who will concede leadership to congressional conservatives:

"All we have to do is replace Obama . . . . We are not auditioning for fearless leader. We don't need a president to tell us in what direction to go. We know what direction to go. We want the Ryan Budget. . . . We just need a president to sign this stuff. We don't need someone to think it up or design it. The leadership now for the modern conservative movement for the next 20 years will be coming out of the House and the Senate."
http://www.sodahead.com/united-states/grover-nordquist-romney-will-be-a-passive-president-who-will-do-as-hes-told-by-congressional-conse/question-2610261/

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to rfranklin (Reply #28)

Mon Sep 17, 2012, 12:04 PM

34. Well, sure, that's what the **R's** need -- but why should anyone else need R&R ?

Doesn't sound like an effective campaign strategy to me, to say that "it's not important who sits in the White House, please put us in the White House."

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to rfranklin (Reply #28)

Mon Sep 17, 2012, 04:07 PM

40. Your 100% correct.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to trailmonkee (Original post)

Mon Sep 17, 2012, 08:38 AM

2. In other words Romney and Ryan do not have a plan!

Romney and Ryan do not have a plan!

Romney and Ryan do not have a plan!

Romney and Ryan do not have a plan!

Romney and Ryan do not have a plan!

Romney and Ryan do not have a plan!

Romney and Ryan do not have a plan!

Romney and Ryan do not have a plan!

Romney and Ryan do not have a plan!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to trailmonkee (Original post)

Mon Sep 17, 2012, 08:46 AM

3. We will leave it to congress, because we don't actuall have a "Plan."

At least that's what it sounds like to my ears. If this is the reason why people should vote for a candidate , shouldn't that candidate at least work out enough of the numbers so that we are voting for more than "it might work"? In the least give a reason to believe a "do nothing" congress will do something. All in all it just sounds weak.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to grattsl (Reply #3)

Mon Sep 17, 2012, 04:15 PM

41. Mitt the mouse is

planing on letting the Republican party RAPE the Poor, the sick, the old and help the rich.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to trailmonkee (Original post)

Mon Sep 17, 2012, 08:46 AM

4. same thing this shitheel keeps saying

"we want to do this thing out in public where everyone can see it"

"ok, throw me a bone, give me just one specific thing so the public can hear it"

"oh HELL no, I can't do that" (snort)

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to trailmonkee (Original post)

Mon Sep 17, 2012, 08:46 AM

5. Sure Paul, leave it to a do-nothing Congress with

the lowest approval ratings in history. Brilliant!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Raven (Reply #5)

Mon Sep 17, 2012, 04:19 PM

42. Their are a do nothing Congress

to hurt Obama, they plan to do a lot to screw the poor, the old and the sick. They will work hard to f*** the 99%.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to trailmonkee (Original post)

Mon Sep 17, 2012, 08:54 AM

6. So ... NOW ... the upper income earners are going to pay MORE?

It is driving me MAD that the "liberal media" is not picking up on this ...

Their whole schtick, the WHOLE premise of the republican economic scam, is to sell the cut taxes for the wealthy so they create jobs boondoggle.

THAT is what Mitt Romney has run on, THAT IS WHAT HE HAS SAID REPEATEDLY for five years now.

Cut the taxes of the "job creators!"

What THIS fricken LIE they are spewing now is the DEMOCRATIC tax concept - a PROGRESSIVE taxation where they middle/lower class have a somewhat lesser tax burden so they have the money to actually buy stuff, while the upper income earners pay more in taxes to pay for things and not horde it.

What Romney and Ryan have been pitching for the last week now is a COMPLETE and TOTAL reversal of the republican position on taxes.

Why is this not questioned, and further, if they hold to it, outside of their deranged hatred for Obama, what reason is to elect them to enact the same tax paradigm this president is looking to enact?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Cosmocat (Reply #6)

Mon Sep 17, 2012, 12:07 PM

36. Yeah, rrright... like everyone sane should start believing anything pauLyan says!

flip
flop
flip
flop

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to trailmonkee (Original post)

Mon Sep 17, 2012, 08:56 AM

7. There They Go Again

Multiple Choice Romney & Lyin' Ryan cross wires again...didn't Romney just say he was coming out with more specifics? (supposedly)

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to trailmonkee (Original post)

Mon Sep 17, 2012, 09:03 AM

8. Lemmee get this straight

So they are gonna work a compromise in Congress the way they have fought against compromise in Congress for the last 6 years?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Roy Rolling (Reply #8)

Mon Sep 17, 2012, 09:37 AM

14. That's about it in a nutshell!!! nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to trailmonkee (Original post)

Mon Sep 17, 2012, 09:06 AM

9. Hey Ryan

Do your fucking job and provide some specifics.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to trailmonkee (Original post)

Mon Sep 17, 2012, 09:08 AM

10. Do they honestly expect people to buy this horseshit?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to 6000eliot (Reply #10)

Mon Sep 17, 2012, 10:53 AM

22. Yes.

They do.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to trailmonkee (Original post)

Mon Sep 17, 2012, 09:11 AM

11. 'Taxes are for the little people' nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to trailmonkee (Original post)

Mon Sep 17, 2012, 09:30 AM

12. Hey Lyan-- the people want to sort out Mitt Rmoney's tax returns for the past 10 years first.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Overseas (Reply #12)

Mon Sep 17, 2012, 04:25 PM

43. I think this is one of the most important items

the people in this Country should demand that the IRS check out his past taxes, he's hiding something.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to oldbanjo (Reply #43)

Tue Sep 18, 2012, 08:52 AM

46. We should keep demanding that he disclose like other candidates have. He should disclose.

Others disclosed by themselves. He should too.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to trailmonkee (Original post)

Mon Sep 17, 2012, 09:33 AM

13. Sounds like a plan to me

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to trailmonkee (Original post)

Mon Sep 17, 2012, 10:02 AM

15. Wait, what?

I’m very familiar with how to make successful tax reforms take place. Ronald Reagan and Tip O’Neil did it in 1986 but we haven’t done it since 1986 for lots of reasons which is we don’t want to presume to say ‘here’s exactly our way or the highway take it or leave it Congress.’

In one sentence he claims that since he has been on the Ways and Means committee for 12 years, he knows how to get successful tax reform done. Then in the very next sentence, he claims successful tax reform has not happened for 25+ years.

I guess since I played football from PeeWee football to High School for 11 years, I know what it takes to be a successful NFL player. Still waiting on my NFL call.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to svip (Reply #15)

Mon Sep 17, 2012, 10:36 AM

20. Good observation!

About the taxes, not your football chances! Welcome to DU!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to trailmonkee (Original post)

Mon Sep 17, 2012, 10:04 AM

16. "just trust us!"

mmmm hmmm

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to trailmonkee (Original post)

Mon Sep 17, 2012, 10:25 AM

17. The Romney/Ryan campaign is just a total joke at this point

Its getting really hard for me not to laugh out loud at each and every story about it.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to trailmonkee (Original post)

Mon Sep 17, 2012, 10:26 AM

18. Actually not. Congress will never be saddled with the Ryan/rMoney nonsense.

Buh-bye, Ryan!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to trailmonkee (Original post)

Mon Sep 17, 2012, 10:32 AM

19. That's a good plan, Ryan. Leave it to the political entity polling worse than you. nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to trailmonkee (Original post)

Mon Sep 17, 2012, 10:49 AM

21. "Paul D. Ryan, Suuupergeeenius."

Last edited Mon Sep 17, 2012, 10:52 AM USA/ET - Edit history (1)

He likes the way that rolls of the tongue. "Paul D. Ryan - Soooooooopergeeeeniiius."

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to trailmonkee (Original post)

Mon Sep 17, 2012, 10:56 AM

23. Wow

He's so full of shit I'm surprised his eyes aren't brown!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to trailmonkee (Original post)

Mon Sep 17, 2012, 10:59 AM

24. Sorry Ryan, It will be sorted out by the voters!

If they-we- all vote!

Hint, hint...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to trailmonkee (Original post)

Mon Sep 17, 2012, 11:04 AM

25. You mean the ones who have already

sold their hearts, souls and votes to Grover Norquist? No Thanks.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to trailmonkee (Original post)

Mon Sep 17, 2012, 11:09 AM

26. Sad

That Romney and Ryan think they "should" win an election without presenting any policies.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to sherylkaye (Reply #26)

Mon Sep 17, 2012, 04:30 PM

44. A true Republican and

a racist SOB will Vote for him.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to trailmonkee (Original post)

Mon Sep 17, 2012, 11:10 AM

27. So there is no Romney tax plan...its more of the same with the COngress tax plan

remind us again, why we need you Romney/Ryan?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to trailmonkee (Original post)

Mon Sep 17, 2012, 11:17 AM

29. The key here is the word "income."

Ryan says he will "work on" the loopholes enjoyed by the higher income earners "so more of their income is subject to taxation." The trick is, he does not consider capital gains to be income. Many of the richest people, like Romney, make most of their money from capital gains and dividends. Ryan wants to eliminate the already-low tax on those entirely. He also wants to eliminate the estate tax, which only affects the rich but which Republicans also do not consider to be "income." Of course, hedge fund managers will need to keep their carried-interest tax break, which would reduce their taxes to near zero under Ryan's plan. But I'm sure the same Congress that has a 10% approval rating will find some other minor loopholes to close (which will be quietly reinserted later when no one is paying attention).

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to trailmonkee (Original post)

Mon Sep 17, 2012, 11:26 AM

30. Ryan Must Be Stupid

If he thinks Congress will pass a bill that does away with, say, the mortgage interest deduction in order to give Romney another tax cut when he already pays at a lower rate than average Americans. Congress has to run the numbers past CBO for scoring and that is when we find out the numbers don't add up. That is why we need the details now -- to head off more grid lock Romney/Ryan Cannot lead from behind on this issue. Besides, if Ryan wants to talk about taxes, lets talk about Romney releasing more years of his tax returns -- after all, he demanded 10 years of tax returns for all of his VP candidates so what is good for the goose is good for the gander. Romney/Ryan need to come clean on taxes, whether is is Romney's tax returns or tax policy going forward. Transparency is a minimum requirement not some abstraction.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to DallasNE (Reply #30)

Mon Sep 17, 2012, 12:05 PM

35. He wants to decrease tax rate by 20% accross the board, after closing loopholes that 20% cut and

 

other cuts, there will still be deficit. Millionares will be paying less on larger amount, making it revenue neutral, no higher taxes paid by
millionares, making it comply with oath to Norquist. The savings will come from new deal cuts, medicare and poverty program cuts.
Don't forget he wants to increase defense spending, for red states on systems military doesn't want or need.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to julian09 (Reply #35)

Mon Sep 17, 2012, 01:56 PM

37. Getting Back To Taxes

By definition revenue neutral means some people will get cuts and other people will get increases. That is why we need details -- so we can learn who the winners and losers are. And that gets us to the next point, why change anything if it is revenue neutral? There is no clarity coming from Romney other than guidelines on rates where he is clear regarding a 20% cut in rates. For non-itemizers that would mean a 20% cut in personal exemptions and the standard deduction. For those that itemize it would mean the elimination of 20 percent of their current deductions. Over 90% of those deductions are 3 items; charitable contributions, State and local taxes and home interest so something would have to give there, but what? Keep in mind too that the personal exemption is going down and that complicates the formula. If Romney leaves the personal exemption alone then deeper cuts would have to be made in deductions making it necessary to move on charitable donations and home interest. No wonder Romney refuses to talk details.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to trailmonkee (Original post)

Mon Sep 17, 2012, 11:30 AM

31. Reminds me of nixon/noxon's secret plan to end the Vietnam War

 

--Without providing details, he asked people to elect him on that promise. SIX years and MANY lives later, noxon declared victory in Vietnam.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to triplepoint (Reply #31)

Mon Sep 17, 2012, 02:01 PM

38. That Is A Point I Make Often

The similarities don't end with the secrecy either. The lack of ability to connect with voters. The approach to governance. It is like Romney is a reincarnation of Nixon.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to trailmonkee (Original post)

Mon Sep 17, 2012, 11:47 AM

32. Their ideas, if posed to the American people who doom theirs and the GOPs hopes..

The loopholes they want to close mostly affect the middle class. Its not a tax increase for the poor its tax reform that favors the rich..

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to trailmonkee (Original post)

Mon Sep 17, 2012, 12:03 PM

33. "we don’t want to cut some backroom deal that they did with Obamacare"

He's full of shit because I actually watched the various healthcare summit meetings with the President and Ryan's ass was in there mostly talking gibberish and throwing out nonsensical numbers as fast as his lips could move. And he was even highlighted by the President as someone who wanted to provide input to to the process. I didn't even know who the hell he was at the time.

What an arrogant lying prick.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to trailmonkee (Original post)

Mon Sep 17, 2012, 03:03 PM

39. Now that's real presidential leadership!

You know, the kind of real leadership that leads!

Of course, it beggars the question: Why isn't Ryan exercising any Congressional leadership right now to work with the president to address the impending fiscal cliff?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to trailmonkee (Original post)

Mon Sep 17, 2012, 04:37 PM

45. no plan

even under perfect conditions of no Congressional interference Romney and Ryan cannot show a plan which would appeal to voters and at the same time to wealthy donors. Tough huh? and hidden away. If these scumbags are elected we can tell you who their hidden plan will appeal to.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread