HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » Latest Breaking News (Forum) » GOP elector resigns, says...

Fri Sep 14, 2012, 02:02 AM

GOP elector resigns, says she can't support Romney

Source: AP

One of the Republican appointees to the Electoral College abruptly resigned from her post Thursday after publicly questioning whether she would support the party's presidential ticket when casting official votes after the November election.

Melinda Wadsley of Ames, Iowa, told The Associated Press that she could not in good conscience vote for party nominee Mitt Romney. Wadsley was among three electors who had told the AP for a story published Thursday that they were exploring alternatives should Romney win their states.

"I have always been a straight ticket Republican, and for the first time in my life I am an undecided voter, therefore, I need to resign my position as a Republican presidential elector," Wadsley said in an email exchange.

Iowa GOP Chairman A.J. Spiker said in a statement that the state party's central committee would begin the process of selecting a replacement, essentially allowing the party to confirm a die-hard Romney supporter.

Wadsley and others had expressed frustration at how Republican leaders have worked to suppress Paul's conservative movement and his legion of loyal supporters.

"They've never given Ron Paul a fair shot, and I'm disgusted with that. I'd like to show them how disgusted I am," Wadsley had told the AP earlier, saying she was considering withholding her electoral vote from Romney. She is an Iowa mother of three who was selected as a Republican elector earlier this year and said Paul was the better choice.


Read more: http://www.nctimes.com/news/national/govt-and-politics/electoral-college-members-may-pass-on-romney/article_9e86efc1-9b67-5275-a398-b19f0ddc36f5.html



not looking good on all sides for these guys

42 replies, 7280 views

Thread informationRemove bookmarkTrash this thread

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 42 replies Author Time Post
Reply GOP elector resigns, says she can't support Romney (Original post)
trailmonkee Sep 2012 OP
left on green only Sep 2012 #1
humblebum Sep 2012 #9
xxqqqzme Sep 2012 #10
humblebum Sep 2012 #23
xxqqqzme Sep 2012 #28
sofa king Sep 2012 #30
Sirveri Sep 2012 #16
marions ghost Sep 2012 #20
24601 Sep 2012 #26
humblebum Sep 2012 #27
24601 Sep 2012 #29
humblebum Sep 2012 #33
DeSwiss Sep 2012 #34
humblebum Sep 2012 #37
DeSwiss Sep 2012 #38
humblebum Sep 2012 #39
DeSwiss Sep 2012 #40
DeSwiss Sep 2012 #41
humblebum Sep 2012 #42
CreekDog Sep 2012 #32
CreekDog Sep 2012 #31
JohnnyRingo Sep 2012 #2
JDPriestly Sep 2012 #11
goclark Sep 2012 #15
aint_no_life_nowhere Sep 2012 #17
mikeytherat Sep 2012 #19
freshwest Sep 2012 #36
progressoid Sep 2012 #3
xfundy Sep 2012 #4
Cha Sep 2012 #5
trailmonkee Sep 2012 #7
mountain grammy Sep 2012 #6
Jamaal510 Sep 2012 #8
Iris Sep 2012 #12
trailmonkee Sep 2012 #14
Posteritatis Sep 2012 #24
cbrer Sep 2012 #13
caseymoz Sep 2012 #18
donqpublic Sep 2012 #21
KANTANA Sep 2012 #22
Zambero Sep 2012 #25
craigmatic Sep 2012 #35

Response to trailmonkee (Original post)

Fri Sep 14, 2012, 02:07 AM

1. So now the rats are one by one jumping ship?

Keep bailing mittens.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to left on green only (Reply #1)

Fri Sep 14, 2012, 03:54 AM

9. There shouldn't even be a person called an "elector." Very undemocratic

 

in this day and age.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to humblebum (Reply #9)

Fri Sep 14, 2012, 04:13 AM

10. I know one of California's

55 electoral college 'electors'. Solid democrat, loves Obama.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to xxqqqzme (Reply #10)

Fri Sep 14, 2012, 01:47 PM

23. I certainly didn't make any comment on the personal character of electors. I am

 

Last edited Fri Sep 14, 2012, 01:47 PM USA/ET - Edit history (1)

sure that most of them are upstanding citizens. Nonetheless, the Electoral College in this era of mass media is a disgrace to the idea of "one person, one vote" as well as "a well-informed electorate."

With the existence of the Electoral College your vote is only a suggestion. Dump it.

We strive for democracy around the globe but are denied it here.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to humblebum (Reply #23)

Sat Sep 15, 2012, 05:17 AM

28. I agree. I am

pissed the millions of votes Obama will receive in California only count as 55 electoral votes. While that is the largest block, it reduces my vote to next to nothing. There will be more people voting for Obama here than the total population of some states!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to xxqqqzme (Reply #28)

Sat Sep 15, 2012, 12:08 PM

30. Think of it as AL, MS, LA, AR, OK, KS, NE, WY, UT, and ID

Plus one electoral vote. California cancels out every single one of the unfortunate states above which are sure to go in favor of Romney. All of them.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to humblebum (Reply #9)

Fri Sep 14, 2012, 06:56 AM

16. That is the group of people you vote for in the Presidential elections.

You don't actually vote for President, you vote for electors who are 'pledged' to vote for the president in the electoral college. It's just a quirk of our system.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Sirveri (Reply #16)

Fri Sep 14, 2012, 09:13 AM

20. A quirk that needs to go the way of the dodo

--------

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to humblebum (Reply #9)

Fri Sep 14, 2012, 08:16 PM

26. A Constitutional Republic isn't a Democracy. The degree that it resembles a Democracy would

not affect it's Constitutional standing.

To change it, there's an amendment process.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to 24601 (Reply #26)

Fri Sep 14, 2012, 10:17 PM

27. This constitutional republic came about and is maintained by the process of a democracy,

 

Last edited Fri Sep 14, 2012, 10:18 PM USA/ET - Edit history (1)

with the exception of the Electoral College. Your vote for President is still nothing more than a suggestion as long as it exists. Let's begin the process.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to humblebum (Reply #27)

Sat Sep 15, 2012, 11:50 AM

29. I would have to disagree strongly. Neither in the Declaration of Independence nor in the

drafting and ratification of the Constitution was any of it put to a democratic vote of the people. It was always by a republic-style methodology where a smaller number represented others.

The US was never a democracy and it's founding documents do not reflect that intent either in words or process.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to 24601 (Reply #29)

Sat Sep 15, 2012, 04:08 PM

33. So, you do not think that the US is a representative democracy? You might want to consult

 

Last edited Sat Sep 15, 2012, 04:13 PM USA/ET - Edit history (1)

the Federalist Papers. The Electoral College made much sense in the 18th and 19th centuries when few ever had any real access to the presidential candidates. But, today when the media allows us to know what color underwear they have on, individuals are more than able to make rational choices based upon what they see and hear.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to humblebum (Reply #33)

Sat Sep 15, 2012, 04:23 PM

34. Strictly speaking, that would be a big 'ol fat: NOPE.

- I might have been -- had there been universal suffrage from the start. But slaves, women, and renters would likely think otherwise......

"It's the old American double-standard -- you know: 'say one thing, do something different.' And of course the country is founded on the double standard, that's our history. We were founded on a very basic double-standard. This country was founded by slave-owners who wanted to be free." ~George Carlin

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to DeSwiss (Reply #34)

Sun Sep 16, 2012, 12:22 PM

37. Over time the enfranchisement of these various groups has led to a much more inclusive system

 

and a much more representative democracy.

And nothing in the Constitution suggesting a representative democracy? Just how then was the Constitution ratified by majority of the original 13 states?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to humblebum (Reply #37)

Sun Sep 16, 2012, 04:19 PM

38. How can it be representative now.....

...if it didn't start that way? Sure it's called representative NOW, but representative of what? Of whom? It didn't represent the original people here, did it? No slaves were presented, were they? No women? No renters? What about them? Don't they count?

- I don't require an answer, I just want you to think about what you say before you say it.

You might want to start here: The Lies My Teacher Told Me


Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to DeSwiss (Reply #38)

Sun Sep 16, 2012, 05:33 PM

39. You seem to trying to apply today's standards to 18th century society.

 

This is not the 18th century, and every citizen over the the age of 18 has a vote. There are some serious flaws in your reasoning.

Yes, votes are counted in this country one person-one vote, except for the presidency. If you want to stay in the past, be my guess. But the world is moving on.

Yes, we are both a representative democracy and a republic.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to humblebum (Reply #39)


Response to humblebum (Reply #39)

Sun Sep 16, 2012, 07:03 PM

41. I know where the flaws are.

And they aren't with my reasoning.

Good day.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to DeSwiss (Reply #41)

Sun Sep 16, 2012, 07:21 PM

42. Your reasoning hardly conforms to that of the founders, nor to those who

 

precipitated changes in society's changing attitudes toward human and civil rights. Your reasoning is very flawed.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to 24601 (Reply #26)

Sat Sep 15, 2012, 12:56 PM

32. Republic or Democracy doesn't make it right or fair

and doesn't make it as democratic as other representative democracies (small "d") in the Europe.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to humblebum (Reply #9)

Sat Sep 15, 2012, 12:55 PM

31. The electoral college is undemocratic, period.

I agree with you.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to trailmonkee (Original post)

Fri Sep 14, 2012, 02:11 AM

2. "...confirm a die-hard Romney supporter"

Scouring the asylums and mental wards as we speak.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to JohnnyRingo (Reply #2)

Fri Sep 14, 2012, 04:20 AM

11. Look in the ward for the severely depressed. I think that some of the very angry,

depressed voters I meet are actually Republicans who don't want to admit it to me. In the past, Republicans have been rather aggressive about their candidates and views, but this year, they are being unusually quiet so far. Just not wanting to talk. If somebody hangs their head when I ask them if they want to register, I figure that they are Republican.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to JohnnyRingo (Reply #2)

Fri Sep 14, 2012, 05:58 AM

15. I almost spilled my water bottle

I was laughing so hard...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to JohnnyRingo (Reply #2)

Fri Sep 14, 2012, 07:09 AM

17. I don't think I've seen a single enthusiastic Romney supporter on my TV

who wasn't being paid to be one. And even the paid campaign surrogates don't look that enthusiastic lately.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to JohnnyRingo (Reply #2)

Fri Sep 14, 2012, 08:44 AM

19. Place an empty chair on a stage and wait. First one to start arguing with the chair wins!

mikey_the_rat

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to JohnnyRingo (Reply #2)

Sun Sep 16, 2012, 03:12 AM

36. Her commitment to getting a vote for R$R is the story. She had her 15 minutes of fame and left.

This means nothing for Democrats. A no-vote, one for Obama or the other guy, would have been helpful. Another brain dead Republican stays brain dead. Thanks for nothing, toots.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to trailmonkee (Original post)

Fri Sep 14, 2012, 02:25 AM

3. Ron Paul 2012!!11!









Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to trailmonkee (Original post)

Fri Sep 14, 2012, 02:27 AM

4. Is that a great bumper sticker idea or what?

(The image on the bottom of your post.)

I love that!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to xfundy (Reply #4)

Fri Sep 14, 2012, 02:32 AM

5. I love it too!

It's my sig line.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to xfundy (Reply #4)

Fri Sep 14, 2012, 03:02 AM

7. here's a thread with the idea...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to trailmonkee (Original post)

Fri Sep 14, 2012, 02:36 AM

6. and sanity makes a slow but steady return.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to trailmonkee (Original post)

Fri Sep 14, 2012, 03:46 AM

8. Well if they want to sit it out since their Cult Leader wasn't nominated,

then by all means go ahead. It'll be less votes for Obama's main opposition, so I'm not complaining!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to trailmonkee (Original post)

Fri Sep 14, 2012, 04:47 AM

12. Because of Ron Paul?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Iris (Reply #12)

Fri Sep 14, 2012, 04:49 AM

14. so they say?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to trailmonkee (Reply #14)

Fri Sep 14, 2012, 02:03 PM

24. I can see it. I dislike him, but what they did to him at the RNC was total bull. (nt)

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to trailmonkee (Original post)

Fri Sep 14, 2012, 04:48 AM

13. I'm sure she could support his Ego...

 

With a 10 ton crane!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to trailmonkee (Original post)

Fri Sep 14, 2012, 08:40 AM

18. lol. "could not, in good conscience"?!!

Last edited Fri Sep 14, 2012, 08:41 AM USA/ET - Edit history (1)

He's done it! Romney has made vacuous mediocrity shocking to the conscience! Not Reagan, not Quayle, not George H. W., not even George W. Bush accomplished that with Republicans!



I think this is a definite turning point in US politics.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to trailmonkee (Original post)

Fri Sep 14, 2012, 10:29 AM

21. Willard

If you remember, after Willard killed Socrates (Ron Paul), the other rats didn't jump ship...they killed him.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to trailmonkee (Original post)

Fri Sep 14, 2012, 12:28 PM

22. I sympathise with this elector.

It takes a brain dead, thoughtless, hateful and totally uneducated person to vote for Romney. A total ROBOT!!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to trailmonkee (Original post)

Fri Sep 14, 2012, 03:59 PM

25. She was OK with Palin being a heartbeat way from POTUS...

but draws the line at the current head of the GOP ticket. Ouch for you, Mittens!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to trailmonkee (Original post)

Sat Sep 15, 2012, 05:16 PM

35. These guys are Paulbots not independents or undecided. I guess they're really sore losers.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread