HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » Latest Breaking News (Forum) » Romney On Obama Recovery:...

Mon Sep 10, 2012, 01:40 PM

Romney On Obama Recovery: He Gets No Credit For Stopping Recession From Going Further

Source: Huffington Post

WASHINGTON -- In an interview with a local Virginia television station on Sunday, Mitt Romney went further than normal in criticizing the president's handling of the economy, saying that he doesn't deserve credit for stemming the bleeding he inherited from his predecessor.

"There has never been a recession that went on forever. There has never been a depression that went on forever," Romney told WVEC News. "A recession occurs, the economy goes down, and then comes after recession, the recovery. That's happened since the beginning of time. The president wants to say, well, he stopped the recession from going further. Well, frankly, the recession came to an end and we are waiting for the president to get us to where he said he'd get us, which is 5.4 percent unemployment. And he hasn't been able to do it because of the policies he's put in place."

This is a variation of the attack line that Romney's campaign traditionally deploys, in that it's more explicit than usual in its unwillingness to give the president any due for slowing the rate of job loss that he inherited upon taking office. The country was shedding between 700,000 and 800,000 jobs a month in the winter of 2008 and 2009. By early spring and summer of 2009 -- shortly after the stimulus passed -- that number was reduced to the 300,000 to 400,000 range; by the summer, it was in the 100,000 to 200,000 range; by the fall it was in the 0 to 100,000 range; and shortly after, the country started producing a net gain of jobs on a monthly basis.

"Mr. Romney is correct that recessions always do end, but their severity and duration vary," former Obama Office of Management and Budget director Peter Orszag said in an email to The Huffington Post. "The relevant question is therefore whether you can cushion the blow, and the evidence (including cross-state comparisons) strongly suggests that the Recovery Act did exactly that."

Read more: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/09/10/romney-obama-recession_n_1870936.html?utm_hp_ref=politics

23 replies, 2618 views

Thread informationRemove bookmarkTrash this thread

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 23 replies Author Time Post
Reply Romney On Obama Recovery: He Gets No Credit For Stopping Recession From Going Further (Original post)
Galraedia Sep 2012 OP
Rob H. Sep 2012 #1
Roland99 Sep 2012 #23
yellerpup Sep 2012 #2
1StrongBlackMan Sep 2012 #3
Roy Rolling Sep 2012 #8
cormac69 Sep 2012 #4
JudyM Sep 2012 #20
JudyM Sep 2012 #20
Bernardo de La Paz Sep 2012 #5
Roy Rolling Sep 2012 #9
SoapBox Sep 2012 #6
Bernardo de La Paz Sep 2012 #7
reflection Sep 2012 #10
Blue State Bandit Sep 2012 #11
fifthoffive Sep 2012 #12
magical thyme Sep 2012 #13
mac56 Sep 2012 #14
skeewee08 Sep 2012 #15
bupkus Sep 2012 #16
bamacrat Sep 2012 #17
olddad56 Sep 2012 #18
olddad56 Sep 2012 #19
JRLeft Sep 2012 #22

Response to Galraedia (Original post)

Mon Sep 10, 2012, 01:49 PM

1. "And he hasn't been able to do it because of the policies he's put in place."

One of the reasons we're not further along than we are is because of the stonewalling and filibustering BY THE GODDAMNED REPUBLICANS, MITT.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Rob H. (Reply #1)

Mon Sep 10, 2012, 04:18 PM

23. +60

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Galraedia (Original post)

Mon Sep 10, 2012, 01:53 PM

2. Oh, really?

If this is true: "A recession occurs, the economy goes down, and then comes after recession, the recovery. That's happened since the beginning of time," we could just set US Economy on autopilot and let it adjust itself as needed and everything would turn out fine every time. The sign of a stunted personality is refusing to give credit where credit is due and that is the LEAST of Rmoney's shortcomings.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Galraedia (Original post)

Mon Sep 10, 2012, 01:55 PM

3. First ...

I don't know where he got the 5.4% number?

But:

The president wants to say, well, he stopped the recession from going further. Well, frankly, the recession came to an end and we are waiting for the president to get us to where he said he'd get us, which is 5.4 percent unemployment. And he hasn't been able to do it because of the policies he's put in place."


To paraphrase Mr. Krugman:

"These aren't President Obama's economic policies ... remember, between criticizing the economy and criticizing the economy, there have been numerous votes where the gop is on record voting down President Obama's economic policies?"

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to 1StrongBlackMan (Reply #3)

Mon Sep 10, 2012, 02:01 PM

8. Thinking the same thing

Where did he pull that 5.4% number from? The same place he and Ryan get all of their "facts"?

The GOP has put a roadblock in front of every policy, legislation, and appointment that Obama proposed. The mediocre four years belongs to the GOP, and their entitlement mentality that they believe they can shut down the government's business for four years while they plot their revenge is as unpatriotic and treasonous as anything I've seen in politics.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Galraedia (Original post)

Mon Sep 10, 2012, 01:55 PM

4. Romney

Not to mention it was the last republican administration that put us in the hole to begin with.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to cormac69 (Reply #4)


Response to cormac69 (Reply #4)

Mon Sep 10, 2012, 03:46 PM

20. 'course he'd never mention *that*... to quote Bush-daddy, "It wouldn't be prudent."

Last edited Mon Sep 10, 2012, 03:47 PM USA/ET - Edit history (1)

Welcome to DU, cormac69!!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Galraedia (Original post)

Mon Sep 10, 2012, 01:56 PM

5. The Bush Recession not an ordinary recession (chart). Obama kept it from being Great Depression II.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Bernardo de La Paz (Reply #5)

Mon Sep 10, 2012, 02:02 PM

9. Great chart n/t

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Galraedia (Original post)

Mon Sep 10, 2012, 01:57 PM

6. STFU Flip-Flop'n Mittens!

Hell, your damned party created a lot of this mess, that, REMINDER, spread worldwide.

Oh ya...and it continues, worldwide.

So please, just STFU, LOSER.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Galraedia (Original post)

Mon Sep 10, 2012, 01:58 PM

7. Just like the Great Depression was a global crisis, so is the Great Recession. nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Galraedia (Original post)

Mon Sep 10, 2012, 02:05 PM

10. What a pissant.

Obama's right, the data does bear it out. One need look no further than CabCurious's post;

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10021180187

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Galraedia (Original post)

Mon Sep 10, 2012, 02:08 PM

11. Tell that to the Mayans, or the Roman Empire.

Putz.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Galraedia (Original post)

Mon Sep 10, 2012, 02:13 PM

12. So...

The President gets no credit for reversing the recession because there's nothing he can do - it's all up to the market and will happen regardless gov't. action.

But...

The President is entirely responsible for employment. The market has nothing to do with it, and can't fix employment without gov't. intervention.


How the heck are those two positions consistent?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Galraedia (Original post)

Mon Sep 10, 2012, 02:16 PM

13. ok. so recessions start and end irrespective of what the President does

Last edited Mon Sep 10, 2012, 02:17 PM USA/ET - Edit history (1)

in which case, why should we change horses midstream Mr. Romney?

What is it that Presidents *can* do and exactly what will *you* do that is different from Mr. Obama? And why?

Overturn Roe v Wade?
Reduce your tax burden to zero?
Replace Obamacare with what?
End the homeowner's mortgage interest deduction?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to magical thyme (Reply #13)

Mon Sep 10, 2012, 02:27 PM

14. this

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Galraedia (Original post)

Mon Sep 10, 2012, 02:28 PM

15. Whatever Multiple Choice!!!!!!!!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Galraedia (Original post)


Response to Galraedia (Original post)

Mon Sep 10, 2012, 02:37 PM

17. That makes sense given his view of how the recession started.

W gets no credit for starting it and Obama none for stopping it. Showing some consistency even if its stupid.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Galraedia (Original post)

Mon Sep 10, 2012, 02:57 PM

18. Maybe when the recession is caused by corruption, it takes longer to get over.

especially when the house of Reps is still full of corrupt people.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Galraedia (Original post)

Mon Sep 10, 2012, 02:58 PM

19. If Romney were elected (or selected), it would be like letting the fox back in the hen house.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Galraedia (Original post)

Mon Sep 10, 2012, 04:04 PM

22. In my opinion Romney made the case to keep Obama, because if economies recover on your own then we

do not need him.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread