Shell criticised for limited testing of Alaska drilling containment equipment

Source: The Guardian

Shell has been accused of "stock-car racing recklessness" after apparently undertaking only the most limited testing of a key piece of equipment aimed at preventing a Gulf of Mexico-style blowout during its controversial drilling in the Arctic.

Documents obtained under a Freedom of Information Act request suggest field-testing of a containment dome took place over two hours on 25 and 26 June. The dome, known as a "capping stack", would be dropped over any stricken wellhead.

Two officials from the bureau of safety and environmental enforcement (BSSE) – an arm of the US interior department – were present with Shell officials at the tests in Puget Sound, Alaska, but there was no independent verification of the tests.

Shell reportedly started work yesterday on the $4.5bn (£2.8bn) drilling programme in the Chukchi Sea, 70 miles off Alaska's north-west coast. It does not yet have permission to drill into oil reserves.

Read more: http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2012/sep/09/shell-criticised-limited-testing-alaska-drilling-containment

3 replies, 985 views

Reply to this thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum

Replies to this discussion thread

3 replies	Author	Time	Post
Shell criticised for limited testing of Alaska drilling containment equipment (Original post)	alp227	Sep 2012	OP
Either they dont care, dont learn, or KNOW they cannot be held acountable	benld74	Sep 2012	#1
It is astonishing that there has been so little discussin about this, or is it?	Samantha	Sep 2012	#2
Fairly normal...	rwsanders	Sep 2012	#3

Response to alp227 (Original post)

Sun Sep 9, 2012, 10:19 PM

benld74 (4,594 posts)

1. Either they dont care, dont learn, or KNOW they cannot be held acountable

Reply to this post

Response to alp227 (Original post)

Mon Sep 10, 2012, 12:38 AM

Samantha (5,997 posts)

2. It is astonishing that there has been so little discussin about this, or is it?

sometimes the wedge issue divides are cranked up just to obscure some controversial things in the background. And this could be one of those times.

Sam

Reply to this post

Response to Samantha (Reply #2)

Mon Sep 10, 2012, 09:22 AM

rwsanders (292 posts)

3. Fairly normal...

If you look at the regulations for oil spill response equipment for vessels and facilities it doesn't take much common sense to see the major flaws. They are allowed an hour for initial response even in areas where the current runs 3+ knots. By the time they can deploy the equipment a huge slug of oil is already gone (I've watched these exercises).

Reply to this post