Fri Sep 7, 2012, 06:12 PM
highplainsdem (11,110 posts)
Larry Flynt Offers $1M Reward for Mitt Romney Tax Returns
Source: Adweek
It’s no secret that Larry Flynt, the often-controversial founder and publisher of Hustler magazine, is not a fan of Mitt Romney. (Maybe that’s because the Republican nominee has said that he supports federal obscenity laws—which aren't exactly good Flynt’s business.) It’s also no secret that Romney opponents have been dying to get their hands on his unreleased tax returns, which, they claim, could prove that the candidate hasn't been paying his fair share of taxes. Now, Flynt is joining their cause by offering a $1 million reward for Romney's tax information. Flynt is taking out full-page ads in this Sunday’s edition of The Washington Post and Tuesday’s USA Today that promises “up to $1 million” for the dirt on Romney’s “unreleased tax returns and/or details of his offshore assets, bank accounts and business partnerships.” (But before you go calling the Hustler hotline, be aware that Flynt will need “documented evidence of your claims.”) -snip- Read more: http://www.adweek.com/news/press/larry-flynt-offers-1m-reward-mitt-romney-tax-returns-143474
|
79 replies, 12912 views
| Author | Time | Post | |
| highplainsdem | Sep 2012 | OP | |
| Kingofalldems | Sep 2012 | #1 | |
| Cali_Democrat | Sep 2012 | #2 | |
| RKP5637 | Sep 2012 | #3 | |
| d_b | Sep 2012 | #4 | |
| NMDemDist2 | Sep 2012 | #5 | |
| 99th_Monkey | Sep 2012 | #36 | |
| former9thward | Sep 2012 | #43 | |
| lexw | Sep 2012 | #46 | |
| xocet | Sep 2012 | #67 | |
| FreakinDJ | Sep 2012 | #6 | |
| Cha | Sep 2012 | #11 | |
| notadmblnd | Sep 2012 | #17 | |
| Cha | Sep 2012 | #7 | |
| april | Sep 2012 | #8 | |
| truthisfreedom | Sep 2012 | #9 | |
| CitizenPatriot | Sep 2012 | #50 | |
| hlthe2b | Sep 2012 | #10 | |
| Major Nikon | Sep 2012 | #14 | |
| former9thward | Sep 2012 | #44 | |
| Major Nikon | Sep 2012 | #47 | |
| former9thward | Sep 2012 | #51 | |
| Major Nikon | Sep 2012 | #53 | |
| greyghost | Sep 2012 | #60 | |
| greyghost | Sep 2012 | #59 | |
| greyghost | Sep 2012 | #63 | |
| devilgrrl | Sep 2012 | #26 | |
| sabrina 1 | Sep 2012 | #12 | |
| Incitatus | Sep 2012 | #13 | |
| russspeakeasy | Sep 2012 | #15 | |
| tuvor | Sep 2012 | #16 | |
| defacto7 | Sep 2012 | #19 | |
| former9thward | Sep 2012 | #45 | |
| MjolnirTime | Sep 2012 | #70 | |
| former9thward | Sep 2012 | #71 | |
| Jackpine Radical | Sep 2012 | #20 | |
| Live and Learn | Sep 2012 | #39 | |
| cosmicone | Sep 2012 | #18 | |
| Jackpine Radical | Sep 2012 | #21 | |
| defacto7 | Sep 2012 | #22 | |
| cosmicone | Sep 2012 | #24 | |
| former9thward | Sep 2012 | #48 | |
| defacto7 | Sep 2012 | #52 | |
| Major Nikon | Sep 2012 | #55 | |
| former9thward | Sep 2012 | #74 | |
| greyghost | Sep 2012 | #62 | |
| former9thward | Sep 2012 | #72 | |
| Kurovski | Sep 2012 | #75 | |
| greyghost | Sep 2012 | #78 | |
| greyghost | Sep 2012 | #61 | |
| ruffburr | Sep 2012 | #23 | |
| cosmicone | Sep 2012 | #25 | |
| McCamy Taylor | Sep 2012 | #27 | |
| NBachers | Sep 2012 | #28 | |
| LadyHawkAZ | Sep 2012 | #29 | |
| tanyev | Sep 2012 | #30 | |
| windowpilot | Sep 2012 | #31 | |
| Dickeylee | Sep 2012 | #32 | |
| caveat_imperator | Sep 2012 | #38 | |
| condoleeza | Sep 2012 | #56 | |
| Politicalboi | Sep 2012 | #33 | |
| clydefrand | Sep 2012 | #34 | |
| olddad56 | Sep 2012 | #35 | |
| Ken Burch | Sep 2012 | #65 | |
| proud patriot | Sep 2012 | #37 | |
| valerief | Sep 2012 | #40 | |
| SleeplessinSoCal | Sep 2012 | #41 | |
| darkangel218 | Sep 2012 | #42 | |
| lexw | Sep 2012 | #49 | |
| Segami | Sep 2012 | #54 | |
| ArcticFox | Sep 2012 | #57 | |
| CoffeeCat | Sep 2012 | #58 | |
| Ken Burch | Sep 2012 | #64 | |
| NecklyTyler | Sep 2012 | #66 | |
| PearliePoo2 | Sep 2012 | #68 | |
| warrprayer | Sep 2012 | #69 | |
| Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin | Sep 2012 | #73 | |
| MrMickeysMom | Sep 2012 | #76 | |
| PossumSqueezins | Sep 2012 | #77 | |
| closeupready | Sep 2012 | #79 |
Response to highplainsdem (Original post)
Fri Sep 7, 2012, 06:12 PM
Kingofalldems (11,054 posts)
1. Yep
Response to highplainsdem (Original post)
Fri Sep 7, 2012, 06:16 PM
Cali_Democrat (14,657 posts)
2. Go Larry!!
|
|
Response to highplainsdem (Original post)
Fri Sep 7, 2012, 06:17 PM
RKP5637 (25,585 posts)
3. K&R !!! n/t
Response to highplainsdem (Original post)
Fri Sep 7, 2012, 06:17 PM
d_b (6,668 posts)
4. haha
|
love larry
|
Response to highplainsdem (Original post)
Fri Sep 7, 2012, 06:18 PM
NMDemDist2 (48,850 posts)
5. so maybe those guys in TN will collect?
|
we can only hope....
|
Response to NMDemDist2 (Reply #5)
Fri Sep 7, 2012, 07:59 PM
99th_Monkey (7,194 posts)
36. Thumb Drives meet Mr Flint. ~nt
Response to NMDemDist2 (Reply #5)
Fri Sep 7, 2012, 08:53 PM
former9thward (6,360 posts)
43. Fake story meets fake offer.
Response to former9thward (Reply #43)
Sat Sep 8, 2012, 10:16 AM
xocet (1,122 posts)
67. History seems to indicate that Flynt is willing to expend some monies though how much is unclear...
|
However, you may be right about the "fake story" part of things. That remains to be seen.
ROLLING STONE
Checking in With LARRY FLYNT On trial and under attack, the HUSTLER publisher is taking on his most ambitious project yet: making porn stars of the GOP February 18, 1999 By NEIL STRAUSS Photographs by MARY ELLEN MARK ... Flynt thrives on conflict, especially when he thinks he's right, and now leaning forward in his chair ‑ he delivers his knockout blow. "I may not decide who the next speaker of the House is going to be," he begins, raising his voice, "but I sure as hell decided who it was not going to be." Few argue this point. "But for Larry Flynt, Bob Livingston would be speaker ‑ that is a fact," echoes Democratic strategist James Carville in a separate interview. And all it took was money. In October, Flynt spent $85,000 for a full‑page ad in the Washington Post, offering up to $1 million to anyone able to provide evidence of "illicit sexual relations with a congressman, senator or other prominent officeholder." He received 2,000 responses. Within a week, the two private investigators he had hired narrowed the pool down to forty‑eight and then, a month later, to twelve lucky finalists, whose stories were well‑documented enough to pursue. But even before Flynt played his hand, one of his most formidable targets folded. On December 18th, Livingston, the Louisiana Republican who was about to become speaker of the House and second in line to the presidency, announced that he would resign his seat. Making a vague admission of "marital infidelity," Livingston complained about having been "Larry Flynted," but a full‑on Flynting promises to be a far more excruciating experience ‑ one supported by embarrassingly specific evidence for which Flynt is paying nicely. The week after the Falwell taping, Flynt held a press conference to charge that in 1983, Georgia Rep. Bob Barr ‑ a Republican who is an avid abortion opponent and a member of the pro‑life caucus ‑ drove his then‑wife to and from an abortion clinic and paid the doctor's bill. To support the claim, Flynt produced a signed affidavit from Barr's ex‑wife, Gail Vogel Barr, and a clinic receipt. Immediately after Flynt's announcement, Barr released a statement saying that he "never suggested, urged, forced or encouraged anyone, including my ex‑wife, to have an abortion." But Barr, a member of the House Judiciary Committee and the first House member to call for Clinton's impeachment, would not address specific questions as to whether he'd paid the bill. Though Flynt is in the midst of assembling cases against more Republicans, he says Livingston will be spared. (So will Newt Gingrich, who was under Flynt's microscope before stepping down as speaker.) "I spoke with Livingston's wife last week," Flynt says. "She was a very nice lady. She said she didn't want the details of the investigation published. The suffering was already done. The guy retired, so what's the point?" ... http://www.maryellenmark.com/text/magazines/rolling%20stone/920S-000-018.html Publisher Larry Flynt levels accusations at Rep. Bob Barr
January 12, 1999 ... Flynt is offering up to 1 million for information about sexual indiscretions by members of Congress. He wouldnt (sic) say how much he paid Gail Barr for her affidavit, but said he found her destitute and made a generous financial offer. Gail Barr declined comment. ... http://articles.cnn.com/1999-01-12/politics/flynt.01_1_hustler-magazine-publisher-gail-barr-bob-barr?_s=PM:ALLPOLITICS |
Response to highplainsdem (Original post)
Fri Sep 7, 2012, 06:20 PM
FreakinDJ (13,058 posts)
6. Think what you want about his smutt but he has defended 1st amendment
|
more then most
|
Response to FreakinDJ (Reply #6)
Fri Sep 7, 2012, 06:24 PM
Cha (124,391 posts)
11. I don't thnk at all about
|
Last edited Fri Sep 7, 2012, 06:24 PM USA/ET - Edit history (1) his line of work.. but, I do think about how he offers a Million Buck$ to out Hypocritical A$$holes and now the big Liar Hider, mittbot. Yeah!
|
Response to FreakinDJ (Reply #6)
Fri Sep 7, 2012, 06:37 PM
notadmblnd (17,097 posts)
17. And paid a very high price too
Response to highplainsdem (Original post)
Fri Sep 7, 2012, 06:21 PM
Cha (124,391 posts)
7. Brwawawawawawaaaa!
|
Larry Fooking Flynt!
|
Response to highplainsdem (Original post)
Fri Sep 7, 2012, 06:22 PM
april (1,148 posts)
8. So Good !
Response to highplainsdem (Original post)
Fri Sep 7, 2012, 06:22 PM
truthisfreedom (17,674 posts)
9. "...which aren't exactly good Flynt’s business." Edit, edit, edit, adweek. What has happened to
|
news reporting? Are writers in such a hurry they leave words out and nobody catches it?
|
Response to truthisfreedom (Reply #9)
Fri Sep 7, 2012, 09:25 PM
CitizenPatriot (3,773 posts)
50. It's not that they are in a hurry
|
it's that online publishing doesn't pay, and so copy editors are gone.
Newsweek just admitted they have no fact-checkers on staff now. Internet content is free to us for the most part. Advertising does not pay the bills. Print journalists are being laid off. Top outlets are having to go pay walls in order to try to pay the bills. Without funding from some source other than ads, there is no money to pay for the sort of perfection we are used to. Irony? Guess who's stepping in to fill the gaps? That's right-- "Free" content is being provided by well funded right wing organizations that write news and shoot packages provided for free to local tv stations and papers. It is not identified that this news is coming from a right wing funded agenda. But it is perfect. |
Response to highplainsdem (Original post)
Fri Sep 7, 2012, 06:23 PM
hlthe2b (47,248 posts)
10. As much as I love the thought, I can't help but think Flynnt would get in big time legal problems
|
if he published these. I'm not sure what he could do with them without opening himself to legal criminal action.
|
Response to hlthe2b (Reply #10)
Fri Sep 7, 2012, 06:30 PM
Major Nikon (9,633 posts)
14. He can publish them all he wants and it wouldn't be illegal
|
The Privacy Act only applies to the government.
|
Response to Major Nikon (Reply #14)
Fri Sep 7, 2012, 08:56 PM
former9thward (6,360 posts)
44. Ahh, no.
|
How many of your clients are in prison? I bet a lot. It is a felony to distribute the contents of anyone's tax returns to anyone not authorized to see them.
|
Response to former9thward (Reply #44)
Fri Sep 7, 2012, 09:09 PM
Major Nikon (9,633 posts)
47. Cite?
|
Be sure and list the exact statute, if you can, and please don't say 26 USC 6103 as that would not apply to Flynt.
|
Response to Major Nikon (Reply #47)
Fri Sep 7, 2012, 09:29 PM
former9thward (6,360 posts)
51. 26 USC 6103(a)(3)
|
covers anyone who has a legal right to look at return information. Anyone else would have to have gotten it illegally. Flynt is soliciting for someone to commit a felony because that is the only way someone could either get the information or pass along the information.
|
Response to former9thward (Reply #51)
Fri Sep 7, 2012, 10:06 PM
Major Nikon (9,633 posts)
53. I'm not sure how you figure that
|
Rmoney disclosed his returns to the McCain campaign during his VP vetting. As such, lots of people would have had very legal access to them, and since they aren't listed by 6103 as anyone who is forbidden from disclosure, they can do with them whatever they want. Rmoney might have some type of nondisclosure agreement (doubtful), but even then the best he would ever have is a civil suit and that's if he could ever find out who disclosed them, which is also doubtful.
|
Response to Major Nikon (Reply #53)
Sat Sep 8, 2012, 03:12 AM
greyghost (1,674 posts)
60. Exactly eom
Response to former9thward (Reply #44)
Sat Sep 8, 2012, 03:09 AM
greyghost (1,674 posts)
59. It's only a felony if you work for the IRS. eom
Response to Major Nikon (Reply #14)
Sat Sep 8, 2012, 03:45 AM
greyghost (1,674 posts)
63. Spot on eom
Response to hlthe2b (Reply #10)
Fri Sep 7, 2012, 07:05 PM
devilgrrl (21,023 posts)
26. I'd doubt he'd offer such a reward if that were the case.
|
eom
|
Response to highplainsdem (Original post)
Fri Sep 7, 2012, 06:27 PM
sabrina 1 (34,031 posts)
12. He missed his calling, well I guess that's debatable, but he would have been a great
|
political strategist to combat the ruthless, lying, cheating Rovian tactics that have destroyed this country's politics.
He's pretty fearless and doesn't worry too much what the 'right' thinks of his tactics. And the difference between him and Rove is that he doesn't rely on lies and smear campaigns, he gets the facts. |
Response to highplainsdem (Original post)
Fri Sep 7, 2012, 06:29 PM
Incitatus (4,184 posts)
13. Back in the news again!
|
|
Response to highplainsdem (Original post)
Fri Sep 7, 2012, 06:31 PM
russspeakeasy (5,720 posts)
15. If it weren't for that pesky "documented evidence"
|
wording, I could have provided them weeks ago.
|
Response to highplainsdem (Original post)
Fri Sep 7, 2012, 06:36 PM
tuvor (15,644 posts)
16. What happened to the group who claimed to have the returns and wanted a million dollars ransom? n/t
Response to tuvor (Reply #16)
Fri Sep 7, 2012, 06:40 PM
defacto7 (3,210 posts)
19. ongoing investigation....
|
but now it's much quieter... wonder why?
|
Response to defacto7 (Reply #19)
Fri Sep 7, 2012, 08:59 PM
former9thward (6,360 posts)
45. Its what happens when you pull off a hoax
|
and the FBI begins to investigate.
|
Response to former9thward (Reply #45)
Sat Sep 8, 2012, 01:29 PM
MjolnirTime (1,323 posts)
70. awww, you don't like this story, do you? I wonder why.
Response to MjolnirTime (Reply #70)
Sat Sep 8, 2012, 08:56 PM
former9thward (6,360 posts)
71. I guess you get your rocks off when people get excited
|
by fake stories on the internet. You are not alone. You have plenty of company which is why there are so many fake stories making the rounds.
|
Response to tuvor (Reply #16)
Fri Sep 7, 2012, 06:41 PM
Jackpine Radical (36,565 posts)
20. Larry's calling their bluff.
|
If they got the goods, he's got the million.
I think his offer & the price were in response to that earlier story. In fact, I recall a call for someone on DU to do exactly what he did. |
Response to Jackpine Radical (Reply #20)
Fri Sep 7, 2012, 08:10 PM
Live and Learn (1,455 posts)
39. +1 That is his style. nt
Response to highplainsdem (Original post)
Fri Sep 7, 2012, 06:38 PM
cosmicone (3,367 posts)
18. Larry did bring down
|
soon to be anointed speaker of the house Livingston which made the repukes elect Dennis Hastert.
I don't know if there will be any takers at $1 million but at $5 million, any junior accountant in PriceWaterhouseCoopers may take the bait. Anyone who releases the returns will never work again and will have huge legal bills. |
Response to cosmicone (Reply #18)
Fri Sep 7, 2012, 06:42 PM
Jackpine Radical (36,565 posts)
21. I understand Paraguay is nice this time of year
|
and a mil goes a long way down there.
|
Response to cosmicone (Reply #18)
Fri Sep 7, 2012, 06:42 PM
defacto7 (3,210 posts)
22. if money actually changed hands..
|
he would be some kind of accessory to a crime. It would be a criminal act.
My opinion... I'm no lawyer. |
Response to defacto7 (Reply #22)
Fri Sep 7, 2012, 06:54 PM
cosmicone (3,367 posts)
24. No. Larry is a journalist
|
and Romney is a public figure. People's right to know trumps privacy -- ask any paparazzi.
The person in trouble would be the one who obtains the info and sells to Larry Flynt. |
Response to cosmicone (Reply #24)
Fri Sep 7, 2012, 09:11 PM
former9thward (6,360 posts)
48. People love to practice law on DU.
|
And they are almost always wrong as are you. Federal law makes it a felony to access anyone's tax return information. It is a felony to give that information to anyone else. If Flynt printed anything it would be a felony. He is also soliciting for someone to commit a felony which is another felony. If matters not a whit that Romney is a public figure. Go back to law school if you even went to one.
|
Response to former9thward (Reply #48)
Fri Sep 7, 2012, 09:32 PM
defacto7 (3,210 posts)
52. that was my "guess"
|
Thanks for the free legal info!
|
Response to former9thward (Reply #48)
Fri Sep 7, 2012, 10:38 PM
Major Nikon (9,633 posts)
55. Posting anonymously and then trying to claim educational superiority is a hoot
|
Making educational/career claims on the internet which are completely unverifyable in an attempt to claim the intellectual high ground is a pretty commonly used tactic. Believe it or not, you're not the first to try this and you won't be the last.
If you are what you say you are, your posts should speak for themselves and you would have no need to make such claims. Just sayin' |
Response to Major Nikon (Reply #55)
Sat Sep 8, 2012, 09:05 PM
former9thward (6,360 posts)
74. "Posting anonomously"?
|
You say that as an accusation. Pretty much everyone here does that if you hadn't noticed. Please show where I said I had "educational superiority". If I post something and someone disagrees then they will challenge it if they want to bother. I do the same thing. That is why it is called a discussion board although many don't like the discussion aspect of it.
|
Response to former9thward (Reply #48)
Sat Sep 8, 2012, 03:19 AM
greyghost (1,674 posts)
62. Guess what? YOU ARE WRONG. It is a felony for IRS employees to reveal tax info.
|
It is not a felony to print any info he obtains there is NO LAW to prevent it.
|
Response to greyghost (Reply #62)
Sat Sep 8, 2012, 09:00 PM
former9thward (6,360 posts)
72. It is not just the IRS.
|
Federal law covers both public and private individuals who access tax returns. Anyone else would be doing it illegally. So to solicit anyone to give him tax return information is to solicit a felony. Try to defend the world's #1 misogynist again. You will come up with something.
|
Response to former9thward (Reply #72)
Sat Sep 8, 2012, 10:08 PM
Kurovski (33,249 posts)
75. Why...
|
why are we suddenly talking about the Pope?
|
Response to former9thward (Reply #72)
Sun Sep 9, 2012, 06:31 AM
greyghost (1,674 posts)
78. No, it doesn't. Why let reality interfere with your dislike of Mr Flynt?
|
Last edited Sun Sep 9, 2012, 10:18 PM USA/ET - Edit history (2) |
Response to defacto7 (Reply #22)
Sat Sep 8, 2012, 03:16 AM
greyghost (1,674 posts)
61. Your opinion is wrong. Only members of the IRS can be charged for revealing tax info.
|
Last edited Sat Sep 8, 2012, 03:20 AM USA/ET - Edit history (1) Paying people for information happens everyday.
|
Response to highplainsdem (Original post)
Fri Sep 7, 2012, 06:46 PM
ruffburr (302 posts)
23. Hustle that Mitt
|
I hope the info is really out there and it's bona fide So larry can publish it for all too see, The look on mitts face would be worth a million
|
Response to ruffburr (Reply #23)
Fri Sep 7, 2012, 06:55 PM
cosmicone (3,367 posts)
25. What is great is that
|
Mitt won't be able to silence Larry by offering some of his millions.
|
Response to highplainsdem (Original post)
Fri Sep 7, 2012, 07:05 PM
McCamy Taylor (13,710 posts)
27. K&R
Response to highplainsdem (Original post)
Fri Sep 7, 2012, 07:09 PM
NBachers (3,687 posts)
28. I was hoping Larry would unleash his millions when Rush had that viagra / Dominican Republic thing
|
I'm sure there was plenty of dirt to be dug, if the Dominican victims weren't murdered to tie up loose ends.
|
Response to highplainsdem (Original post)
Fri Sep 7, 2012, 07:19 PM
LadyHawkAZ (3,878 posts)
29. Larry, I loathe your publication
|
but you are awesome sometimes.
|
Response to highplainsdem (Original post)
Fri Sep 7, 2012, 07:27 PM
tanyev (22,076 posts)
30. How do you like that free market, Mittwitt?
Response to highplainsdem (Original post)
Fri Sep 7, 2012, 07:30 PM
windowpilot (115 posts)
31. Drip, Drip
|
N/T
|
Response to highplainsdem (Original post)
Fri Sep 7, 2012, 07:33 PM
Dickeylee (3 posts)
32. Good ol Larry...
|
Larry has made his living coming up with 4,307 different ways to photograph lady parts of all sizes. Whooda thunk that you could make a living doing that? Not Jerry Springer!
|
Response to Dickeylee (Reply #32)
Fri Sep 7, 2012, 08:07 PM
caveat_imperator (193 posts)
38. It's a more honest living than being a teabagger/rethuglican, at least.
|
|
Response to caveat_imperator (Reply #38)
Sat Sep 8, 2012, 12:04 AM
condoleeza (751 posts)
56. Really? becoming a millionaire by objectifying women is a more honest living?
|
apples/oranges, neither of them give a rats ass about how women are portrayed as anything other than property.
|
Response to highplainsdem (Original post)
Fri Sep 7, 2012, 07:39 PM
Politicalboi (9,439 posts)
33. Looks like the Cock brothers
|
Need to up the ante. 2 Million, do I hear 2 million?
|
Response to highplainsdem (Original post)
Fri Sep 7, 2012, 07:44 PM
clydefrand (3,836 posts)
34. Larry, give that person
|
that million soon...oh, I so hope this happens.
Now to the person who gets the million, be sure you have a safe haven. Will your really let this info out? Come on, do it NOW! |
Response to highplainsdem (Original post)
Fri Sep 7, 2012, 07:45 PM
olddad56 (2,825 posts)
35. If Larry can't find any takers for his million, maybe he can donate it to a Demo PAC
Response to olddad56 (Reply #35)
Sat Sep 8, 2012, 04:24 AM
Ken Burch (31,224 posts)
65. If Larry REALLY wants to screw Mitt over...
|
He should endorse him on the cover of his magazine...
|
Response to highplainsdem (Original post)
Fri Sep 7, 2012, 08:07 PM
proud patriot (99,659 posts)
37. woo hoo for Larry
Response to highplainsdem (Original post)
Fri Sep 7, 2012, 08:28 PM
valerief (35,667 posts)
40. We love our Larry! nt
Response to highplainsdem (Original post)
Fri Sep 7, 2012, 08:41 PM
SleeplessinSoCal (1,630 posts)
41. Looking forward to Romney offering $2 million to not give them to Flynt.
Response to highplainsdem (Original post)
Fri Sep 7, 2012, 08:51 PM
darkangel218 (4,325 posts)
42. wgat happend to the guys who said they had the taxes
Response to darkangel218 (Reply #42)
Fri Sep 7, 2012, 09:23 PM
lexw (804 posts)
49. Good question...
|
where is Karl Rove?
|
Response to highplainsdem (Original post)
Fri Sep 7, 2012, 10:11 PM
Segami (5,735 posts)
54. LOL! ..Go Larry Go!!
![]() |
Response to highplainsdem (Original post)
Sat Sep 8, 2012, 12:12 AM
ArcticFox (854 posts)
57. Capitalism at work!
|
Now, the invisible hand will deliver those returns to the highest bidder.
|
Response to highplainsdem (Original post)
Sat Sep 8, 2012, 12:28 AM
CoffeeCat (19,419 posts)
58. The Mittster must...
|
Last edited Sat Sep 8, 2012, 12:28 AM USA/ET - Edit history (1) ...have to call over Marlin Perkins with his elephant tranquilizer gun, in order to knock out his anxiety so he can sleep.
Seriously, it is highly possible that we will see his returns, if indeed those hackers are legit. I still wonder if that hacker/ransom story isn't a Rove-generated farce. I guess time will tell. Regardless, Rombey must be scared shitless. |
Response to highplainsdem (Original post)
Sat Sep 8, 2012, 04:23 AM
Ken Burch (31,224 posts)
64. Of course, if Larry Flynt handed you a check...you'd want to wear gloves when you grabbed it.
|
God knows where that piece of paper...and his hands...have been.
|
Response to highplainsdem (Original post)
Sat Sep 8, 2012, 06:14 AM
NecklyTyler (1,106 posts)
66. Larry better move fast, or he will miss out
Response to highplainsdem (Original post)
Sat Sep 8, 2012, 01:03 PM
PearliePoo2 (2,892 posts)
68. Oh my, this is funny as hell!
|
Hope little Mittens doesn't soil his "magic undies" over this.
|
Response to highplainsdem (Original post)
Sat Sep 8, 2012, 01:11 PM
warrprayer (1,253 posts)
69. Many will disagree
|
... but Larry is kind of the modern Ben Franklin.
|
Response to highplainsdem (Original post)
Sat Sep 8, 2012, 09:03 PM
Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin (6,600 posts)
73. Not a man to piss off
|
Just ask the Republican Congress during Monicagate.
|
Response to highplainsdem (Original post)
Sat Sep 8, 2012, 10:48 PM
MrMickeysMom (10,678 posts)
76. Larry Flint...
|
... for the rest of the world...
|
Response to highplainsdem (Original post)
Sun Sep 9, 2012, 05:44 AM
PossumSqueezins (184 posts)
77. He should offer $500K to anyone seeing Mittens drink Caffeine
|
or strap his 5 wives to the roof of the car.
|
Response to highplainsdem (Original post)
Mon Sep 10, 2012, 10:25 PM
closeupready (19,438 posts)
79. Oops sorry for double posting.
|
K&R
|


