HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » Latest Breaking News (Forum) » Russia enters the race fo...

Mon Sep 3, 2012, 10:19 PM

Russia enters the race for cosmic energy

Source: Russia & India Report

A new space race between Russia, the U.S., and Japan is in the cards. Russian scientists have announced their intention to develop a space-based solar power station, which could be used to transmit energy to Earth.

The United States and Japan are currently both working on projects to build solar power stations in space. Meanwhile, Russia has thrown down the gauntlet to both East and West, announcing plans to put the country’s best brains to work on its own cosmic energy venture.

Vitaly Melnikov is an official representative of the Central Research Institute of Machine Building (TSNIIMASH). “The plan is to arrange a kind of cosmic cluster around the project, which will include companies inside the industry, electronics firms, and universities,” Melnikov announced, speaking at the International Aerospace Congress.

<snip>

Melnikov says that a “working prototype of an SSPS with a capacity of 100 kW is already in development.” TSNIIMASH has not specified how the Russian space station will differ from its American or Japanese counterparts, but experts point out that all three projects are similar in concept. Special apparatuses in geostationary orbit will concentrate solar radiation and directly convert the energy into electricity. The energy will be transferred to Earth using a laser or microwave transmitter. The Russian team is likely to opt for the laser method: to begin with, it is safer; secondly, the technology is already being developed by Energia Rocket and Space Corporation and Lavochkin Research and Production Association.

<snip>

Read more: http://indrus.in/articles/2012/09/03/russia_enters_the_race_for_cosmic_energy_17369.html

28 replies, 3784 views

Thread informationRemove bookmarkTrash this thread

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 28 replies Author Time Post
Reply Russia enters the race for cosmic energy (Original post)
bananas Sep 2012 OP
Bernardo de La Paz Sep 2012 #1
freshwest Sep 2012 #2
Baclava Sep 2012 #4
backscatter712 Sep 2012 #5
LongTomH Sep 2012 #6
backscatter712 Sep 2012 #7
NickB79 Sep 2012 #23
backscatter712 Sep 2012 #9
Bernardo de La Paz Sep 2012 #17
awoke_in_2003 Sep 2012 #20
Posteritatis Sep 2012 #11
xtraxritical Sep 2012 #3
RC Sep 2012 #8
BlueStreak Sep 2012 #10
Selatius Sep 2012 #13
Bernardo de La Paz Sep 2012 #18
bemildred Sep 2012 #19
Bernardo de La Paz Sep 2012 #22
bemildred Sep 2012 #24
BlueStreak Sep 2012 #21
Posteritatis Sep 2012 #12
thelordofhell Sep 2012 #14
Tunkamerica Sep 2012 #16
thelordofhell Sep 2012 #25
krkaufman Sep 2012 #26
Tunkamerica Sep 2012 #28
oldsarge54 Sep 2012 #15
truthisfreedom Sep 2012 #27

Response to bananas (Original post)

Mon Sep 3, 2012, 10:25 PM

1. Beam weapons :(

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Bernardo de La Paz (Reply #1)

Mon Sep 3, 2012, 10:34 PM

2. ...


Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Bernardo de La Paz (Reply #1)

Mon Sep 3, 2012, 10:43 PM

4. ayep

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Bernardo de La Paz (Reply #1)

Mon Sep 3, 2012, 11:22 PM

5. My understanding is that microwave beams or laser beams made to transmit power...

from space power satellites to Earth receiver stations don't make very good weapons - this isn't the movies where such devices are easily made into death rays - the beam's too diffuse for that.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to backscatter712 (Reply #5)

Mon Sep 3, 2012, 11:37 PM

6. Correct! The microwave beam from an SPS is only about 1/5th the intensity of sunlight.

The advantage is that, it's in a form easily converted to electricity.

And, no, you can't convert an SPS transmitter into a death ray. The intensity is a function of the size of the transmitter array in space.

The sad thing is, this looks to be another "Invented here, Sold there" technology. The idea was invented by an American space scientist, Dr. Peter Glaser, in 1968.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to LongTomH (Reply #6)

Mon Sep 3, 2012, 11:52 PM

7. The hard part is getting a big enough power satellite into space to generate significant power.

If you're talking about many megawatts of power, the satellite's going to have to be huge. Granted, there are some technological things that can be done to improve efficiency - using mirrors to concentrate sunlight to heat liquid sodium to generate power instead of using photoelectric cells is a possibility, but in the end, you've got to send a large amount of hardware up there, and so far, nobody's been willing to spend the money to get it done.

Hopefully in the near future, enough of the technology will be developed to make it so deep-pocketed governments and investors will find it worthwhile to go for it.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to backscatter712 (Reply #7)

Tue Sep 4, 2012, 11:21 AM

23. The only way to do it is to assemble the satellites in orbit

Mined from captured asteroids or on the Moon.

At a lift price of thousands of dollars per pound to reach orbit, there is simply no feasible way to economically put up a multi-megawatt solar installation.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to LongTomH (Reply #6)

Tue Sep 4, 2012, 12:01 AM

9. I remember Gerard O'Neill proposed that power satellites be the industry that drove colonization.

He was the one that designed and proposed those big O'Neill colonies, and suggested that the industry that those big habitats would support would be power generation. There would be mines on the moon that extracted metals including iron and aluminum, as well as silicon and oxygen (and helium-3 for fusion power.) There would be big linear mass drivers used to shoot payloads of refined metals and materials from the moon to sites such as the L4 and L5 Lagrange points, where those materials were used to build enormous solar power satellites which would essentially solve Earth's energy problems, and O'Neill habitats would be built to create homes for the workers that built and maintained the power satellites, as well as their families.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to LongTomH (Reply #6)

Tue Sep 4, 2012, 06:38 AM

17. Thanks for the reassurance. Sincerely. Could be a big benefit, but very capital intensive. nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to LongTomH (Reply #6)

Tue Sep 4, 2012, 09:27 AM

20. Russia stealing technology?...

No way

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Bernardo de La Paz (Reply #1)

Tue Sep 4, 2012, 01:14 AM

11. No. (nt)

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to bananas (Original post)

Mon Sep 3, 2012, 10:36 PM

3. I guess because the Russians were finally able to get out of Afghanistan they can afford it.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to xtraxritical (Reply #3)

Mon Sep 3, 2012, 11:58 PM

8. Good guess.

But did they air condition the tents while they were there?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to xtraxritical (Reply #3)

Tue Sep 4, 2012, 12:38 AM

10. That article seems really bogus

1) It talks about exponentially greater efficiency in collecting solar power outside the atmosphere, but the losses are not exponential.

2) You will encounter much of that same loss due with the laser beam transmitting the energy. After all, the laser has to shoot through the atmosphere too.

3) The solar panels would have to be huge -- thousands of times larger than the Space Station.

I think cold fusion would be a better investment.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to BlueStreak (Reply #10)

Tue Sep 4, 2012, 03:21 AM

13. Cold fusion has proven to be a myth. Regular fusion power is far more promising.

We already have experimental fusion reactors that run. The only thing is that they are barely net positive in terms of electrical energy input vs. thermal energy output. Having said that, it is fairly realistic to say that at the current pace of progress, it could be several decades before a commercially viable fusion reactor design is found. Probably the most conservative estimates put that marker roughly a century away.

In the meantime, other renewable energy sources would have to be tapped until fusion is realized, and to buy more time, it is likely this strategy would be coupled with a program of energy conservation and pollution control.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to BlueStreak (Reply #10)

Tue Sep 4, 2012, 06:51 AM

18. The word exponential does not mean Big or that A is Bigger than B. It is about rates.

Folks, Please be careful about accidental misuse of the word exponential to avoid being confused with somebody who does not understand elementary mathematics.

The word exponential does not mean Large or Huge. It can't be used for a comparison of two numbers or two quantities, (not to say A is Bigger than B). It is about rates of change, growth, decay, increase, decrease.

A linear rate of growth is ct or constant c multiplied by variable t.

Example (10 points): c = 2, t = natural numbers: 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, ....

A geometric rate of growth is t^c or the variable t raised to power of c, like squared or cubed.

Example: 1, 4, 9, 16, 25, 36, 49, 64, 81, 100, ...

Exponential growth is c^t or the constant c raised to the power of t.

Example: c = 2, t = whole numbers (naturals and zero): 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64, 128, 256, 512, ...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Bernardo de La Paz (Reply #18)

Tue Sep 4, 2012, 09:14 AM

19. Good luck with that.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to bemildred (Reply #19)

Tue Sep 4, 2012, 10:56 AM

22. People are free to use language ignorantly. Language is as language does. nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Bernardo de La Paz (Reply #22)

Tue Sep 4, 2012, 11:54 AM

24. I know, you lose these distinctions, and pretty soon you can't think at all. nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Bernardo de La Paz (Reply #18)

Tue Sep 4, 2012, 10:41 AM

21. That may be true in a purely mathematical sense, but in this context

the clear intent of the word "exponential" was to suggest an overwhelming advantage.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to bananas (Original post)

Tue Sep 4, 2012, 01:14 AM

12. Just a reminder that anyone invoking Simcity doesn't know enough about this to talk. (nt)

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to bananas (Original post)

Tue Sep 4, 2012, 04:08 AM

14. American scientist Reed Richards has developed his own rocket to collect Cosmic Rays

He intends to fly it into space with his pilot Ben Grimm, his girlfriend Sue Storm and his girlfriend's kid brother Johnny Storm

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to thelordofhell (Reply #14)

Tue Sep 4, 2012, 06:31 AM

16. okay. i got it. who else?

watch out for gamma rays is the only advice I can give.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Tunkamerica (Reply #16)

Tue Sep 4, 2012, 01:25 PM

25. Now, now

We all know that Dr. Bruce Banner is the expert on Gamma Rays

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Tunkamerica (Reply #16)

Tue Sep 4, 2012, 02:23 PM

26. not much to hget

it wasn't fantastically subtle.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to krkaufman (Reply #26)

Wed Sep 5, 2012, 07:13 AM

28. oh.

ok.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to bananas (Original post)

Tue Sep 4, 2012, 06:00 AM

15. Robber Barons

America used to be a leader. Our companies led the world in innovation and exploration. However, when Presidents of companies were replaced by bean counting CEOs, the vision of the corporate world in the United States dropped to the next quarter's statement. That when the government started taking over the exploratory science, and now the bean counters want to cut that out as waste. We're going to lose this one, because the haves are just interested in creasing what they have, and the have nots are just into surviving.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to bananas (Original post)

Tue Sep 4, 2012, 07:23 PM

27. Proof of concept seems to be the objective.

What we should put money into is creating another Thorium reactor design that runs safely and reliably. Thorium reactors could provide us with clean power for hundreds, if not thousands of years, because there's so dang much Thorium on the planet. Our Air Force built one that operated successfully in the 60s. What's cool about it is that the "hot" waste products break down into safer, easier to store low-level waste in about 25 years, so the hot waste can be cycled in and out of underground (think Yucca) storage very often. The low-level waste is very manageable. The reactors can be designed so that if they loose power (think Fukushima) they simply shut themselves down quietly. They have a negative feedback mechanism that keeps them from overheating under any circumstances... their core is completely molten so it expands if it gets too hot, which causes it to loose reactions and cool back down. Thorium reactors will likely be man's ultimate power source. They can be quite small, too, and because of their inherent safety, can be located very close to the cities they'd supply.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread