Sun Sep 2, 2012, 04:58 PM
eppur_se_muova (20,863 posts)
Egypt retires 70 army generals
Source: BBC
Seventy generals in the Egyptian armed forces are to be retired, the government has announced. The move comes weeks after President Mohammed Mursi replaced the defence minister and the chief of staff. However, six of the generals will keep their positions on the Supreme Council of the Armed Forces (Scaf). Some analysts say Mr Mursi is asserting his authority over the army. There has so far been little adverse reaction from the military establishment. Read more: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-19456182 Gen Sisi ? SRSLY ?
|
28 replies, 3165 views
| Author | Time | Post | |
| eppur_se_muova | Sep 2012 | OP | |
| Posteritatis | Sep 2012 | #1 | |
| jody | Sep 2012 | #2 | |
| Posteritatis | Sep 2012 | #3 | |
| jody | Sep 2012 | #5 | |
| onwardsand upwards | Sep 2012 | #4 | |
| jody | Sep 2012 | #6 | |
| obliviously | Sep 2012 | #7 | |
| happyslug | Sep 2012 | #28 | |
| JDPriestly | Sep 2012 | #8 | |
| azurnoir | Sep 2012 | #9 | |
| JDPriestly | Sep 2012 | #22 | |
| bemildred | Sep 2012 | #25 | |
| eppur_se_muova | Sep 2012 | #27 | |
| jody | Sep 2012 | #10 | |
| joshcryer | Sep 2012 | #11 | |
| jody | Sep 2012 | #12 | |
| joshcryer | Sep 2012 | #13 | |
| tabasco | Sep 2012 | #14 | |
| bemildred | Sep 2012 | #15 | |
| Skittles | Sep 2012 | #17 | |
| Posteritatis | Sep 2012 | #19 | |
| sofa king | Sep 2012 | #21 | |
| Posteritatis | Sep 2012 | #24 | |
| Joey Liberal | Sep 2012 | #16 | |
| Posteritatis | Sep 2012 | #20 | |
| MagniPeter | Sep 2012 | #26 | |
| aquart | Sep 2012 | #18 | |
| bluedigger | Sep 2012 | #23 |
Response to eppur_se_muova (Original post)
Sun Sep 2, 2012, 05:47 PM
Posteritatis (17,453 posts)
1. That's a lot of stars
|
Last edited Sun Sep 2, 2012, 05:47 PM USA/ET - Edit history (1) One retired general for every 13,000 or so personnel if you include the reserves. I wonder how many are still around, and whether the result's top-heavy or not.
|
Response to eppur_se_muova (Original post)
Sun Sep 2, 2012, 05:55 PM
jody (26,624 posts)
2. The Muslim Brotherhood has tightened its control of Egypt and Libya. With US help they can add Syria
|
and Lebanon.
That would be a giant leap toward establishing Sharia law in the Middle East. |
Response to Posteritatis (Reply #3)
Sun Sep 2, 2012, 06:25 PM
jody (26,624 posts)
5. Amazing how a two letter word can contain so much truth. nt
Response to jody (Reply #2)
Sun Sep 2, 2012, 06:05 PM
onwardsand upwards (82 posts)
4. Their choice
|
It's their right if they vote this way.
|
Response to onwardsand upwards (Reply #4)
Sun Sep 2, 2012, 06:30 PM
jody (26,624 posts)
6. Agree "their right if they vote" iff all adults are allowed to vote their conscience and unalienable
|
rights of a minority are protected by the state including those specified in The Universal Declaration of Human Rights adopted in 1948.
|
Response to onwardsand upwards (Reply #4)
Sun Sep 2, 2012, 06:44 PM
obliviously (1,494 posts)
7. I don't think the woman
|
of the country are voting to have their right to drive stripped away, to be locked in their own homes and to be treated like property.
|
Response to obliviously (Reply #7)
Tue Sep 4, 2012, 09:51 PM
happyslug (10,882 posts)
28. Who is Egypt is stripping away the rights of women??? It is NOT the Moslem Brotherhood
|
Egypt is a Sunni Islam Nation. One of the chief sources of Sunni sources on Mohammad is Aisha, his youngest wife. The Marriage between Aisha and Mohammad appears to be Political, she was the daughter of one of Mohammad's followers and the marriage was done to strengthen the relationship between the two (In fact Aisha's Father would succeed Mohammad as leaders of Islam at the death of Mohammad).
During Aisha’s entire life she was a strong advocate for the education of Islamic women especially in areas such as law and the teachings of Islam. Aisha, the mother of the Muslims, was known for establishing the first madrasah for women in her home. Attending Aisha’s classes varied from family relatives to orphaned children. Men also attended Aisha's classes, and a curtain simply separated the male and female students. One of her most mentioned and outstanding students was her nephew, Urwah, who eventually became one of the greatest scholars of his generation. Umrah bint Abdur was also one of Aisha’s famous women pupils who was not only regarded as a trustworthy narrator of the Hadith, but became Aisha’s secretary. Aisha's scholarly intelligence and motherly figure allowed for important contributions in the emergence of Islam and an important dignitary to the Muslim women. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aisha On the other hand, the Shiite hate Aisha (for the simple reason she opposed Ali as the successor of Mohammad, Shiite is translated into English as "Party of Ali") but they hold Mohammad's only daughter, Fatima, in high esteem, for she was also the wife of Ali (and in turn hated by Aisha, which has been one of the points of division between Shiite and Sunni Islam, i.e. two women are the centers of both Sunni and Shiite Islam). The Shitte attitude to Fatima is tied in with her being the only child of Mohammad to actually bear children herself. While Mohammad was alive, Fatima tended to be in the background, but at his death, she demanded her inheritance, not just once, but at least twice, including interrupting the Successor of Mohammad as Caliph, while he was giving a speech in a Mosque. When her inheritance was refused, she refused to recognize Mohammad's successor as his successor. Her refusal to accept the new Caliph was her decision not her husband's. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fatima_bint_Muhammad http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shi%27a_view_of_Fatimah Mohammad's relations with women were complex, his first wife, Khadīja bint Khuwaylid, he married at age 25 and lived with till her death when he turned 50. Mohammad did not have any other wives till she was dead, and then only for the last 12 years of his life. More on Khadīja bint Khuwaylid: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Khadijah_bint_Khuwaylid Khadīja bint Khuwaylid was the only wife to bear Mohammand's children, his other wives seems to be more political marriages OR marriages to the widow of followers then anything else. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muhammad%27s_wives As to the Moslem Brotherhood, while they want women to wear the "Viel", i.e. traditional arabic dress for women, http://edition.cnn.com/2011/WORLD/meast/08/03/egypt.muslim.sisterhood/index.html?&hpt=hp_c2 The Moslem Brotherhood has even accepted the idea that women can serve in the cabinet, through NOT the Presidency of Egypt: http://www.ikhwanweb.com/article.php?id=28077 http://www.egyptindependent.com/news/brotherhood-sticks-ban-christians-and-women-presidency |
Response to jody (Reply #2)
Sun Sep 2, 2012, 06:56 PM
JDPriestly (38,342 posts)
8. It is sad, but we have not offered a believable alternative for Egyptians.
|
We sided with torturers and dictators in the view of the Egyptian people.
And our War on the people of Iraq did not give our benevolent language much credibility. Many people in Egypt are well educated and liberal, but who did we support for decades? Folks like Musharraf. I hope that the Egyptian people will take another look at their political leaders and support liberal ones. But we have only our own conservatives to blame for the horrible distrust that many Egyptians have for all that is American and Western. Because our conservatives, those among us who were obsessed with fighting socialism and Communism set in place our policy of supporting conservatives in Egypt. And ultimately, the real conservatives in Egypt are the Islamic extremists, so you may be right that shariah law is on its way. But what would you suggest we do about it? Fight another war? Insult them? Those are usually the conservative responses for every foreign policy issue. |
Response to JDPriestly (Reply #8)
Sun Sep 2, 2012, 07:06 PM
azurnoir (27,412 posts)
9. wasn't the military dictatorship kind of 'encouraged' by the US?
|
that was when it became obvious that Mubarak was going to have to step down and to keep Iran from becoming Egypt's new best friend
|
Response to azurnoir (Reply #9)
Mon Sep 3, 2012, 08:08 PM
JDPriestly (38,342 posts)
22. I had that impression too. And we still seem to be encouraging it.
Response to JDPriestly (Reply #22)
Tue Sep 4, 2012, 09:02 AM
bemildred (67,762 posts)
25. We like authoritarian governments, and aspire to be one ourselves.
|
Much easier to cut deals that way, no need to lead, you just give orders.
|
Response to bemildred (Reply #25)
Tue Sep 4, 2012, 09:57 AM
eppur_se_muova (20,863 posts)
27. Just listen to our expert statesman, Dubya:
|
"You don't get everything you want. A dictatorship would be a lot easier." Describing what it's like to be governor of Texas.
(Governing Magazine 7/98) -- From Paul Begala's "Is Our Children Learning?" "I told all four that there are going to be some times where we don't agree with each other, but that's OK. If this were a dictatorship, it would be a heck of a lot easier, just so long as I'm the dictator," Bush joked. -- CNN.com, December 18, 2000 "A dictatorship would be a heck of a lot easier, there's no question about it, " said. -- Business Week, July 30, 2001 |
Response to JDPriestly (Reply #8)
Sun Sep 2, 2012, 07:28 PM
jody (26,624 posts)
10. "what would you suggest" plagues me. IMO neither Obama nor Romney nor their advisers have a clue.
|
I've traveled like so many others and seen poverty and starvation. I've seen slavery and near slavery of woman and poor in other countries in the name of religion and enough dead and destruction to make me ask why do humans exist?
I love to tweak the ultra religious by quoting from the Torah that Christians translated into the King James version as "And it repented the LORD that he had made man on the earth, and it grieved him at his heart." Genesis 6:6 God may not make many mistakes but when she does it's monumental! |
Response to jody (Reply #2)
Sun Sep 2, 2012, 08:06 PM
joshcryer (39,855 posts)
11. This is patently false. The Muslim Brotherhood resoundingly lost in Libya.
|
Libya still has its problems but the Muslim Brotherhood is not it.
|
Response to joshcryer (Reply #11)
Sun Sep 2, 2012, 08:17 PM
jody (26,624 posts)
12. "Libya elections: Muslim Brotherhood set to lead government" see
|
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/africaandindianocean/libya/9379022/Libya-elections-Muslim-Brotherhood-set-to-lead-government.html
Perhaps you are right but IMO the Muslim Brotherhood will end up controlling Libya. |
Response to jody (Reply #12)
Sun Sep 2, 2012, 09:13 PM
joshcryer (39,855 posts)
13. "Muslim Brotherhood fell 'below expectations' in Libyan elections"
|
Last edited Sun Sep 2, 2012, 09:16 PM USA/ET - Edit history (1) http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/jul/10/muslim-brotherhood-expectations-libyan-election
You're posting pre-election spin based on Tunisia and Egypt. Libya did not follow their lead and the Muslim Brotherhood was heavily marginalized in Libya thanks to the women who voted in numbers never before seen in the Muslim world. edit: another link: National Forces Alliance wins more than double the seats of Muslim Brotherhood party, as final results confirmed: http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/jul/17/mahmoud-jibril-party-elections-libya http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Libyan_General_National_Congress_election,_2012 Total defeat in Libya for the Muslim Brotherhood. Libya had an entire year to set up revolutionary councils and spread the revolutionary spirit. Neither Tunisia or Egypt had that opportunity. |
Response to eppur_se_muova (Original post)
Sun Sep 2, 2012, 09:18 PM
tabasco (18,325 posts)
14. A country the size of Egypt should only have about 70 generals. n/t
Response to tabasco (Reply #14)
Sun Sep 2, 2012, 09:31 PM
bemildred (67,762 posts)
15. I have read that Egypt's military is considerably top-heavy, which may part of the motive here.
|
Last edited Sun Sep 2, 2012, 09:32 PM USA/ET - Edit history (1) And of course, it's also an opportunity to retire people whose loyalty to the new regime seems questionable.
This guy moves fast. Edit: politicians who move fast worry me. |
Response to tabasco (Reply #14)
Mon Sep 3, 2012, 01:31 AM
Skittles (87,061 posts)
17. let's guess how many of them are women!
Response to tabasco (Reply #14)
Mon Sep 3, 2012, 06:41 PM
Posteritatis (17,453 posts)
19. That'd be about right
|
In proportion to their population the Egyptian military's about as large as the American one, and could get away with being much smaller than it is. It's a half million now - a million if you include reservists - and seventy generals of different ranks would imply something in the quarter-million range instead.
Say what you will about the US military, but I do like the fact that there's limits on how many generals its armed forces can have actually written into the law. (The current limit's 498, three-quarters of whom can 'only' be one- or two-star officers, and only eighteen of which are full four-star generals.) I wonder if Egypt might see something similar in the next few years as people attempt to nail down civilian control of the armed forces. |
Response to Posteritatis (Reply #19)
Mon Sep 3, 2012, 08:02 PM
sofa king (8,767 posts)
21. More might still be reasonable.
|
A look at their Wikipedia page suggests they have around 60 standing combat brigades organized into three armies, but it isn't a perfectly triangular organization and I can't guess the total number of combat generals without counting, which I ain't gonna do. That also assumes that brigades are commanded by brigadiers, which may not be so.
So the combat command structure alone might require at least 70 generals. If that doesn't include reserves, then it could be twice that. And then there is the air force and the navy, and the logistics, engineering, and administrative wings.... ... It is amazing that they get anything done at all! |
Response to sofa king (Reply #21)
Mon Sep 3, 2012, 09:44 PM
Posteritatis (17,453 posts)
24. Yeah, that's true. I was ballparking it off a guess of the number of brigades.
|
And militaries that evolve out of Warsaw Pact doctrines tend to be quite top-heavy. (Of course, again, as a Canadian, I don't have much room to comment on top-heavy armies.)
Egypt's army being around a million overall suggests a few hundred generals at various levels anyway, especially if they don't nudge older ones out the door or into odd positions. Given the army's history there they could probably stand to put at least seventy out to pasture though. |
Response to eppur_se_muova (Original post)
Sun Sep 2, 2012, 10:18 PM
Joey Liberal (5,272 posts)
16. U.S. Army has a lot of generals too
|
We have way too many generals and colonels and not enough grunts. No wonder we can't win a war anymore.
|
Response to Joey Liberal (Reply #16)
Mon Sep 3, 2012, 06:43 PM
Posteritatis (17,453 posts)
20. And that despite the codified limits
|
I keep hearing the US has more colonels than machinegunners.
Of course, as a citizen of a country whose military has more generals than combat aircraft I can't snark too hard. And I do like that you guys have managed to put actual legal limits on the number of generals, even if the result is still top-heavy at the lower levels. |
Response to Joey Liberal (Reply #16)
Tue Sep 4, 2012, 09:53 AM
MagniPeter (3 posts)
26. Military Coup
|
Military coup could be accelerated if Israel were to bomb Iran, causing the Middle East to explode and a massive destabilization of the free world.
http://www.prisonplanet.com/former-white-house-speechwriter-suggests-military-coup-could-oust-obama.html |
Response to eppur_se_muova (Original post)
Mon Sep 3, 2012, 08:37 AM
aquart (67,682 posts)
18. I am impressed.
Response to eppur_se_muova (Original post)
Mon Sep 3, 2012, 09:00 PM
bluedigger (10,726 posts)
23. In unrelated news, 70 Egyptian Army Colonels opened Swiss banks accounts yesterday.
|
|

