HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » Latest Breaking News (Forum) » BLM declares Burning Man ...

Sat Sep 1, 2012, 12:06 AM

BLM declares Burning Man Second Amendment-free zone

Source: Examiner.com

The Bureau of Land Management has declared the Burning Man “radical self-expression/self-reliance" community “experiment” in northern Nevada’s Black Rock Desert a temporary weapons-free zone, GunLeaders Blog reported today. Citing a Department of the Interior “Notice of Temporary Closure and Temporary Restrictions of Specific Uses on Public Lands in Pershing County, NV” appearing in the Federal Register Volume 77, Number 157 (Tuesday, August 14, 2012), the edict mandates “temporary closures and temporary restrictions will be in effect from August 13, 2012 to September 17, 2012.

Proclaiming its authority under 43 CFR 8364.1., and issued by Gene Seidlitz, District Manager, Winnemucca District, the restriction notice declared “The possession of any weapon is prohibited except weapons within motor vehicles passing through the public closure area, without stopping, on the west or east playa roads.

“The prohibitions above shall not apply to county, state, tribal, and Federal law enforcement personnel, or any person authorized by Federal law to possess a weapon," the notice continued. "‘Art projects' that include weapons and are sanctioned by BRC LLC will be permitted after obtaining authorization from the BLM authorized officer.”

“Any person who violates the above rules and restrictions may be tried before a United States Magistrate and fined no more than $1,000, imprisoned for no more than 12 months, or both,” the notice warned, adding “Such violations may also be subject to the enhanced fines provided for at 18 U.S.C. 3571.”



Read more: http://www.examiner.com/article/blm-declares-burning-man-second-amendment-free-zone



[link:http://www.examiner.com/article/blm-declares-burning-man-second-amendment-free-zone|

36 replies, 4157 views

Thread informationRemove bookmarkTrash this thread

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 36 replies Author Time Post
Reply BLM declares Burning Man Second Amendment-free zone (Original post)
mia Sep 2012 OP
alp227 Sep 2012 #1
appal_jack Sep 2012 #6
jberryhill Sep 2012 #16
appal_jack Sep 2012 #25
jberryhill Sep 2012 #34
ZombieHorde Sep 2012 #30
boppers Sep 2012 #18
ZombieHorde Sep 2012 #29
petronius Sep 2012 #2
PavePusher Sep 2012 #9
petronius Sep 2012 #28
PavePusher Sep 2012 #35
DBoon Sep 2012 #3
Grassy Knoll Sep 2012 #4
alp227 Sep 2012 #7
aquart Sep 2012 #12
Posteritatis Sep 2012 #15
boppers Sep 2012 #19
Occulus Sep 2012 #11
The_Casual_Observer Sep 2012 #5
AtheistCrusader Sep 2012 #10
aquart Sep 2012 #13
AtheistCrusader Sep 2012 #14
PavePusher Sep 2012 #36
lunatica Sep 2012 #8
bemildred Sep 2012 #21
lunatica Sep 2012 #22
bemildred Sep 2012 #27
a geek named Bob Sep 2012 #31
bemildred Sep 2012 #32
a geek named Bob Sep 2012 #33
slackmaster Sep 2012 #24
leveymg Sep 2012 #17
bemildred Sep 2012 #20
Festivito Sep 2012 #23
slackmaster Sep 2012 #26

Response to mia (Original post)

Sat Sep 1, 2012, 12:08 AM

1. Shouldn't the Constitution be the supreme law of all the land?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to alp227 (Reply #1)

Sat Sep 1, 2012, 12:28 AM

6. Someone is mixing-up rights with privileges

Last edited Sat Sep 1, 2012, 10:28 AM USA/ET - Edit history (2)

Someone is mixing-up rights with priileges.

If it can be revoked, even temporarily, it is a privilege.

However, rights > privileges.

The Constitution has a Bill of RIGHTS, iirc.

I fully support arresting and fining (or imprisoning, if necessary), people who commit crimes with guns at Burning Man, particularly violent crimes. But making gun possession a crime is unwarranted. Why is the BLM free to reoke the Second Amendment at its whim?

_app

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to appal_jack (Reply #6)

Sat Sep 1, 2012, 02:47 AM

16. Because a privilege has been granted...

...in permitting, in an environmentally sensitive area, a large gathering of people, vehicles, and unusual behavior involving alcohol, drugs, fireworks, and a tremendous bonfire.

Any other time, you can go out there with your gun, and that is your right. However, in the context of an event which is not a right, but subject to exacting conditions on impact to the land, then we are operating under a different set of right/privilege conditions.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to jberryhill (Reply #16)

Sat Sep 1, 2012, 11:20 AM

25. I disagree.

Last edited Sat Sep 1, 2012, 11:21 AM USA/ET - Edit history (1)

The very nature of a codified right is that the government shold have no power to revoke it. This whole Hollywood police state notion of 'we are suspending the Constitution' is bullshit.

-app

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to appal_jack (Reply #25)

Sat Sep 1, 2012, 02:17 PM

34. You don't understand - the area has been essentially rented out


The playa is closed to the general public.

It's been permitted to the exclusive use of a private group.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to appal_jack (Reply #6)

Sat Sep 1, 2012, 01:02 PM

30. We don't allow prisoners to have guns.

We don't allow people taking White House tours to have guns. We don't allow people on airplanes to have guns.

By your definition (which isn't a bad one), guns are a privilege in the US.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to alp227 (Reply #1)

Sat Sep 1, 2012, 03:52 AM

18. So, allow guns at wild, drunken, parties, where people are not in their right minds?

Have you been to a burn?

Or do you just frequent parties like that, where guns aren't taboo?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to alp227 (Reply #1)

Sat Sep 1, 2012, 12:58 PM

29. We already ban guns for most people in some places, such as White House tours and airplanes.

Banning guns in certain areas seems pretty normal in the US.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to mia (Original post)

Sat Sep 1, 2012, 12:08 AM

2. Makes sense - what with recent reports about target shooting sparking fires and all...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to petronius (Reply #2)

Sat Sep 1, 2012, 12:59 AM

9. I thought it was the middle of a dry lake bed....?

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to PavePusher (Reply #9)

Sat Sep 1, 2012, 12:54 PM

28. It is, I was just trying to make a joke on the 'burning' aspect

Probably funnier before I typed it...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to petronius (Reply #28)

Sat Sep 1, 2012, 02:44 PM

35. Naw, that was my caffein-deficiency at work. Well played! n/t

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to mia (Original post)

Sat Sep 1, 2012, 12:23 AM

3. I doubt many burners would want to push this

even the ones who own.

Burning Man attracts a much different crowd than a typical gun show. Burners respect the culture and rule of the event, regardless of what they might do elsewhere.

You don't want to follow the rules, you can participate in a different event.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to mia (Original post)

Sat Sep 1, 2012, 12:24 AM

4. Why would you need a gun at a peaceful event ?

A gun free zone, Wow, Imagine.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Grassy Knoll (Reply #4)

Sat Sep 1, 2012, 12:30 AM

7. in case of an armed intruder?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to alp227 (Reply #7)

Sat Sep 1, 2012, 01:57 AM

12. That would be the genius with the gun.

Semi-automatic, I assume?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to alp227 (Reply #7)

Sat Sep 1, 2012, 02:45 AM

15. Such a recurring problem at Burning Man oh wait. (nt)

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to alp227 (Reply #7)

Sat Sep 1, 2012, 04:06 AM

19. Intruder?

It's not private land.

That being said, burners build massive flamethrowers, that they mount on desert capable tanks, for *fun*.

A handgun is just asking for a public beat down.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Grassy Knoll (Reply #4)

Sat Sep 1, 2012, 01:30 AM

11. It's not limited to that alone, though.

It seems to apply to out-of-state persons traveling through the area who stop to take a picture. Note the "without stopping" part. Effectively, they're saying "if you stop, your rights end here".


Nope.


Could anyone tell me if there would be a money award for a successful test of this? It seems like a slam dunk and I need the cash...

half

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to mia (Original post)

Sat Sep 1, 2012, 12:26 AM

5. There is no imaginable need for a gun at that place

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to The_Casual_Observer (Reply #5)

Sat Sep 1, 2012, 01:03 AM

10. When my son is old enough, I'm going to take him there.

To be honest, I normally carry, but all I need is for the organizers to say 'please, no guns', and I would respect their wishes.

That said, it's an event somewhat at risk from some right wing nutjob.

Two killed, 7 injured:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Knoxville_Unitarian_Universalist_church_shooting

Why any asshole came up with a reason to attack these peaceful, wonderful people, I cannot imagine, but there it is. It can happen.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2011_Norway_attacks
Unless you might have police there, to watch over it, there's always a chance some scumbag is going to show up and hurt good people. Having the tools to respond isn't necessarily a bad idea.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to AtheistCrusader (Reply #10)

Sat Sep 1, 2012, 02:01 AM

13. You want to take guns to church?

Be sure to sit next to curious children.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to aquart (Reply #13)

Sat Sep 1, 2012, 02:41 AM

14. Well no.

I don't 'do' church.

No curious child would ever be capable of obtaining my firearm though. I elect carry options that preclude such negligence.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to aquart (Reply #13)

Sat Sep 1, 2012, 02:48 PM

36. What's the problem?

 

Has no-one ever needed to defend themselves in a church? History says...?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to mia (Original post)

Sat Sep 1, 2012, 12:32 AM

8. A co-worker of mine goes every year and is very active in the SF Area Burning Man community

I can't imagine her thinking of it as a place for guns.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to lunatica (Reply #8)

Sat Sep 1, 2012, 10:12 AM

21. Yeah, I have a son that wants to take me.

I'm not sure I can handle it, but it sounds like fun to try.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to bemildred (Reply #21)

Sat Sep 1, 2012, 10:46 AM

22. If you like genuinely creative people you'll enjoy it

Everyone I know who has gone are interesting, creative and somewhat geeky people.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to lunatica (Reply #22)

Sat Sep 1, 2012, 11:30 AM

27. I like crazy people.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to bemildred (Reply #27)

Sat Sep 1, 2012, 01:29 PM

31. I'd love to put together a little theater

 

For Burning man...

Fly a solar powered blimp to Burning Man. On landing, use the blimp itself as a massive sun shade, and the propellers as wind generators...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to a geek named Bob (Reply #31)

Sat Sep 1, 2012, 01:30 PM

32. There you go, we don't do enough with blimps. nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to bemildred (Reply #32)

Sat Sep 1, 2012, 01:34 PM

33. Maybe...

 

a nice paint job, involving vivid purple and gold...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to lunatica (Reply #8)

Sat Sep 1, 2012, 11:08 AM

24. In the early days of Burning Man it was common to see participants carrying firearms

 

Dozens of people have been injured and even killed at Burning Man, but never by gunshot.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to mia (Original post)

Sat Sep 1, 2012, 03:03 AM

17. Not sure that guns and peyote buttons are such a great mix.

. . . Hunter Thompson is the exception that may prove the rule.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to mia (Original post)

Sat Sep 1, 2012, 10:10 AM

20. Good. nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to mia (Original post)

Sat Sep 1, 2012, 10:59 AM

23. This rule will help increase gun sales.

And, not even one reason why, just a non-discriptive comment from opponents to this government opposition to guns.

"Actions by a few participants at previous events have resulted in law enforcement and public safety incidents similar to those observed in urban areas of similar-size populations,”

My guess, this is done by a Republican plant. We won't get his/her name. Knee-jerks will knee-jerk blame lee-bruls and Obama while guns sales will go up.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to mia (Original post)

Sat Sep 1, 2012, 11:25 AM

26. This is redundant. The festival rules have prohibited firearms for many years.

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread