Thu Aug 30, 2012, 03:00 PM
alp227 (20,430 posts)
Israeli attack on Iran 'would not stop nuclear programme'
Source: The Guardian
An Israeli attack on Iran would delay but probably not stop its nuclear programme, the most senior US military officer has claimed. General Martin Dempsey reinforced Washington's opposition to unilateral Israel military action as he made clear that US military chiefs were equally wary of getting ensnared in Syria. In common with Nato's supreme commander, US admiral James Stavridis, who wrote about Afghanistan for the Guardian on Thursday, Dempsey put a brave face on the situation there. The chairman of the joint chiefs of staff was speaking to journalists in London, where he attended the opening ceremony of the Paralympic Games as head of the US delegation. Distancing himself from any Israeli plan to bomb Iran, Dempsey said such an attack would "clearly delay but probably not destroy Iran's nuclear programme". Read more: http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/aug/30/israeli-attack-iran-not-stop-nuclear
|
7 replies, 1498 views
Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
| Author | Time | Post | |
| alp227 | Aug 2012 | OP | |
| liberallibral | Aug 2012 | #1 | |
| Scootaloo | Aug 2012 | #2 | |
| defacto7 | Aug 2012 | #3 | |
| Scootaloo | Aug 2012 | #5 | |
| Coyotl | Aug 2012 | #4 | |
| Junkdrawer | Aug 2012 | #6 | |
| roamer65 | Aug 2012 | #7 |
Response to alp227 (Original post)
Thu Aug 30, 2012, 03:31 PM
liberallibral (272 posts)
1. What it WOULD do...is start WW3 though.....
|
|
Response to alp227 (Original post)
Thu Aug 30, 2012, 03:42 PM
Scootaloo (5,864 posts)
2. Apparently, the attack on Osirak only made Saddam MORE adamant about gaining nukes
|
It wasn't the Israelis that stopped him in that regard; it was the '91 Gulf War.
Neither Israel nor iran is going to try anything; Israel lacks the firepower to actually do anything to Iran. iran doesn't want to end up squaring off against the US. Neither has any incentive to strike first, and every reason to let the other make the first move. |
Response to Scootaloo (Reply #2)
Thu Aug 30, 2012, 04:36 PM
defacto7 (3,257 posts)
3. the following is NOT a trick question....
|
With regard to your reply, do you think Iran actually having nukes would be a deterrent to nuclear confrontations?
|
Response to defacto7 (Reply #3)
Fri Aug 31, 2012, 01:39 AM
Scootaloo (5,864 posts)
5. I have no idea
|
I frankly don't think "nuclear confrontation" is even really an issue these days.
|
Response to alp227 (Original post)
Thu Aug 30, 2012, 05:27 PM
Coyotl (5,155 posts)
4. It would probably make Iran want to start a nuclear bomb program though!
Response to alp227 (Original post)
Fri Aug 31, 2012, 05:59 PM
Junkdrawer (26,007 posts)
6. This weekend could get real interesting....
|
If Israel was going to strike, my read of the political calculus would put the attack after the RNC and BEFORE the DNC.
|
Response to alp227 (Original post)
Fri Aug 31, 2012, 09:55 PM
roamer65 (6,380 posts)
7. My feeling is Feb-March 2013.
|
I suspect Israel does not have an American "green light" until that point.
|

